The 7 Most Condescending Sports Euphemisms
There's sort of a weird dynamic in the world of sports commentary where red-blooded sports-watching men have to tiptoe around certain subjects as delicately as Victorian gentlemen. You can't bring up race, you can't call someone a jerk and unless you're a pundit or columnist, you can't straight out say someone sucks, even if his suckage is so blatant that pre-verbal children are pointing it out.
Instead, you end up using these euphemistic code words that are in some ways almost worse than just dissing people straight out. Like:

Real meaning: A mediocre player who will never be asked for his autograph.
Sometimes a player will get subbed into a game and the commentator's first thought is, Wow, what a complete non-entity. But because it's unprofessional for some reason to call a spade a spade, they'll instead point out that he's a "role-player" or perhaps a "hard worker," which is as condescending as someone telling you that your handwriting is very good when you ask them what they thought of your story.
Via Keith Allison
Nazr Mohammed, literal live action role-player.
In basketball, you might call someone a "banger" if they are willing to get under the basket and take a lot of tough physical contact from other players. Which seems like a compliment until you notice that nobody who can actually, you know, shoot, ever gets called a "banger" no matter how much pushing they do in the paint.
Via Keith Allison
Dirk Nowitzki -- proof that Neanderthals mated with modern humans? Perhaps. Banger? No.
Basically they're evading the implied question of, "Is he a good player?" by answering, "Well, uh, he works really hard and is OK with getting hit a lot."
Occasionally, you get someone trying to throw role-players a bone by saying they "can be stars in their own way" or are an Important Part of the Team, really! Which I would think is worse than being ignored.

Other uses:
When an announcer says: "With a seventh-round pick, they'll probably be picking up a role-player."
He means: "Apparently all that's left in the seventh round this year is a bunch of useless players nobody cares about."
When an announcer says: "A journeyman center acquired last year in the [star's name] trade."
He means: "I guess this guy must have been attached to that package in that big trade last year along with the players I've actually heard of."

Real meaning: Small, probably white.
Sports are full of unusually large specimens of humanity, so it's only natural to do a double-take when you see a player much shorter than his teammates, and only natural to want to point it out. The problem is that you usually want to point it out after he's done something impressive, effectively saying, "Even though Wes Welker is so tiny you can fit him in a teacup, he was somehow able to jump up and catch the ball. Oh, good for him!"
Via Official Star Wars Blog
Sometimes news outlets will mistakenly run a photo of Warwick Davis alongside a Wes Welker story.
So you have to go about it in a roundabout way. You use words like "scrappy"or "feisty" or say he's "a real sparkplug" -- words that are ostensibly about someone's energy and enthusiasm, but would clearly never be used for a large or average-sized person. So you can pretend you're talking about how he caught the ball because he's got so much energy and enthusiasm, and not saying he caught it despite the fact that he is an adorable munchkin.
But it's kind of depressing to compare someone like Wes Welker, who is actually an average American male at 5'9", to this:
Via GeekCast Radio
To be fair, size is pretty important in a lot of sports and affects a lot of what a player can do. But why do you need to mention that a hockey player is 5'8" (and "feisty") in order to point out that he's good at avoiding penalties? He doesn't do it by ducking under them.
And is being 5'7" really some kind of Lifetime Channel handicap you have to overcome to succeed in baseball? Really?
Would you really want your MVP celebration to be commemorated with phrases like, "the little shortstop stood tall?" Did you just win the championship of Major League Baseball or the Little League World Series?

Real meaning: Asshole
I've gone over this before regarding Chargers QB Philip Rivers. When the game is going terribly for him, he steps up by yelling at his teammates a lot. Of course, when he's winning, it's a totally different story. He instead yells at the other team a lot. Or their fans.
Via The Baltimore Sun
And don't get me wrong, some of them totally deserve it.
And as a commentator, you can't avoid saying something about it when he's doing it right in front of the viewers. So you go, "What a ... competitor! Yeah. Let's go with that. Rivers has got a real ... competitive spirit." Or maybe he's just really "passionate."
Via NeonTommy
Passion!
The fans, the bloggers and the columnists can feel free to use words like "jerk," "punk," "dick" and "asshole," but commentators have to pretend they're angels with no negative thoughts about anyone.
So they have to play it like the only reason he's yelling at his own teammates is because he really, really cares about winning the game. The problem is that this implies that the other players who aren't yelling at their own teammates don't care as much about winning the game. That they're driven by a sort of laissez-faire attitude where it's OK to win or lose, as opposed to grownup self-control in the face of massive frustration.
Via michael248
Like Tim Duncan, four-time NBA champion, who clearly doesn't care very strongly about winning.
Of course it's not just Philip Rivers, whom I tend to pick on because I don't like his smug, frat boy face. Athletes in any sport are always making dick moves, and no matter how awful they are, there will always be some people somewhere excusing them as merely being "really competitive."
Via NFL.com
Andrew Bynum being competitive.

Real meaning: Hitting people hard and probably dirty.
Even if you don't know sports, you can already tell "physical" is a euphemism because how the hell is a player or team going to not be physical? While a phase shift to the noncorporeal realm would be awesome for passing through defenders, I don't think I've seen a single professional player in any sport capable of pulling that move.

But it sounds distasteful and barbaric to say, "The Lakers really need to start hitting the other team harder when the referee isn't looking," so they go with, "The Lakers really need to bring a more physical game here in the third quarter to keep pressure on the Celtics."
Via CBCSports
Your average hockey headline.
There's a lot of nuance to the term, though, so while one fan might really be asking his team to push opponents around and stand their ground in a legal and honorable way, another fan might be asking for nut shots.









This seems to be written by someone who observes sports from a distance and then tries to criticize the way they are publicly discussed and managed. If you aren't into sports, why would you write a sports article?
ReplyPerfect "sparkplug" example: Shawn Johnson, very short and very white.
ReplyAs a Chiefs fan I've seen a lot of Philip Rivers being a whiny bitch.
ReplyWhy is Dirk's picture on there? He is a superstar player and future Hall Of Famer.
ReplyIt was written by the cat lady.
Most of these are bunk, but particularly the stuff about role-players. They are the reason teams cans become more than the sum of thei parts. A team full of superstars doesn't often work. It is the role-players that aren't in the limelight and just turn out and do the job assigned to them that make things work properly.
ReplyWhat sports do you watch man ? Its not any of the popular ones for sure... For an example, no superstar QB means you get to fail for years on end (Last years Colts anyone ? Everything being equal, a team made up of good but not great guys loses to a team with a couple of failures and a superstar at a critical position. That doesn't mean that you can just buy every supersstar you can and assume that translates to winning, because excellent team work and preparation can beat better athletes. But when you have superstars that are as well prepared and work as well in the team, then it makes a huge difference.
Jetman's right. You need star players, but sometimes, if you have a whole team of those people who always go for the shot and stuff, they end up not working well together because they all want the glory.
SPORTS RAGE!
Reply*cough* Now that that's over, I really enjoyed this article.
Honestly, you exaggerated every one of these. A team that's rebuilding means that they're acquiring the players needed to move forward. A team can suck without being in rebuilding phase, such as when a team continually applies the same formula and loses (i.e this year's Charlotte Bobcats, though I don't suspect you know enough about sports to be familiarized with their season this year).
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesWhile I agree with you on the rebuilding teams stance, I'm pretty sure she knows her sports very well. Anyone who recognizes Phillip Rivers' asshattery is clearly paying attention in my book!
The thing with rebuilding phases is that, while they make sense behind the scenes, you end up placing a subpar product on the field AND trying to sell it to your fans at the same price while appealing to their loyalties.
Seriously, you picked the worst possible example: This year Charlotte Bobcats tanked from the start line for a SHOT at the Unibrow and in the process had the worst season in the history of the NBA. I'm not sure one single player, no matter how good he is, is enough to erase that from the memory of the 18 fans Charlotte has.
@chronosaurus, you misunderstand me. I'm not referring to the Charlotte Bobcats as a rebuilding team, I'm pointing them out as an exception to a rebuilding team.
Role players are ridiculously important to the game. They're integral to making sure the team works as a cohesive unit.
Replywithout role players any team is s**t, it's all about knowing your role in the team and working together.
ReplyAgreed. The Mavericks won an NBA title with arguably an entire team of role players! And it proved that that system can beat out superstar power.
This is one of Christina's best articles.
ReplyNot saying a lot, since although she is an interesting read, she's never been one of my favourite writers. Still, I'd say of all her articles I've read, this was the most entertaining.
Please. Stop writing for this website.
ReplyPlease. Stop commenting on this website.
'Wily veteran/s'
ReplyWhen an ageing team or athlete is able to hold their own against younger
opposition (against all expectation)
One more thing... The term "role-player" when used in MLB is in no way, shape or form a derogatory remark. Utility players in baseball are often highly coveted and, in most cases, crucial parts of their respective teams. I mean, come on...do you actually KNOW anything about sports, or were you just desperate for something to write about?
ReplyThat's true, but the main point of that section was that they don't really distinguish themselves in any way. Mostly because they are not necessarily everyday players, but also because they play most positions well, but not spectacularly. I'm a Royals fan, and just this morning I was reading an article about Utility man Chris Getz who has been playing very well this year getting injured in last nights game. There were about ten comments on it, and not one even mentioned poor Getz. They were about is replacement, and the holes in our lineup. You know you're invisible when your injury generates comments about whether Gordon or Hosmer should be in the two spot. (BTW, it's Gordon).
Most of the things mentioned in this article make me question whether or not the author has ever actually watched sports. Wes Welker is one of the most productive receivers in the NFL and has been his entire career, so I don't really see why you'd make an attempt to use him as an example. I've never heard anything derogatory about his play. Oh and just FYI, the "championship of Major League Baseball" is called the World Series. Know your facts before you go writing in the future.
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesDespite only involving teams from North America. It really is a small world.
We'd let Japan play too, but their team names are just too f*****g weird.
That thing that just went whizzing over your head was the point of the article. Christina wasn't saying that Welker was in any way a bad player; she was saying that any player that performed at his level without being smallish wouldn't be called "feisty" or "sparkplug".
Before you open your gob next time, try double-checking to be sure you aren't just being a complete moron.
#2. Coloreds, beaners, and Samoans. That's all you need.
ReplyAre the cartoon birds from How To Get Ahead in Advertising?
ReplyI like your writing Christina, but all you did for this article was elaborate on a scene in "The League". If anyone watches the 3rd episode of season 2 they'll see what I mean.
ReplyAnd if you ever see a living pus sy, write back.
i was thinking that the entire time. although i was hoping she would say something about class acts.
Isn't "condescending euphemism" redundant?
ReplyNo. Aren't you a ret ard?
You are a retard TeabagSmith
Ahh, idk. "Physical". Maybe not in basketball cuz it's a soft non-contact sport. And maybe not in football (for the most part) because it's nothing BUT a contact sport. But I've grown up playing soccer all my life and we use "physical" all the time. Mostly because its a degree of playing style - some guys push you off the ball, or push you away from them, or come up from behind and bang you when you're about to receive the ball. Coach will either tell you beforehand that the team "plays really physical", which means you need to get out there ready to stiff-arm every guy in the neck, or else the coach will yell at you to get more physical out there!!! which means to stop being a p***y and letting yourself get shoved all over the place like that one video of those ducklings being blown by the wind...
ReplyAnyways. Basketball? Football? Baseball? Nah. But soccer? definately yes.
In what nig ger free world do you live that you think basketball is a non-contact sport?
While you're absolutely right that basketball is not a non-contact sport and involves quite a lot of physicality (although obviously not on the same level as american football or rugby), wtf does that have to do with the presence or absence of people of african origin.
The injuries one really pisses me off. There's a lot of things to hate about the sports world, but that's near the top of the list. Chalk it up to my mother being a nurse or me just being a big baby (though I've HAD one, so I don't think I can quite be accused of having zero pain tolerance), but few things make me rage quite like minimizing injury. Especially head injury. One of my friends suffered head trauma falling down stairs onto a cement floor as a toddler and has frontal-lobe damage to this day. It's not a minor matter.
Reply