5 Reasons Women Are As Shallow As Men (According to Science)
Thanks to romantic comedies and crappy comedians, we know that men are crude, shallow boors that only care about sex, and women are weepy sensitive hippies that only care about poetry and what's on the inside.

Like everything else in romantic comedies, this is bullshit. Some men are shallow and so are some women.
The stereotype persists because women usually aren't shallow in the same way. When you think of a superficial man, you think of a guy who stares at boobs or butts and has rules about no fat chicks. So you'd assume the equivalent woman would be all about ogling men's packages. So if they don't, then it must all be about personality, right?

We don't usually get as drooly over pecs as this Diet Coke commercial implies.
No, women are shallow in completely different ways, and it involves things like...

Chauvinists have been pointing out for YEARS that women are attracted to power. We shouldn't be surprised that science backs up the stereotype somewhat. But what's interesting is that our theoretical hussy here can't go around getting resumes from every man she meets, so she's got to size most of them up at a glance. So what makes a man look powerful?

Other than a radioactive glow?
Obvious things, like wearing red. I mean, that's so logical I hardly need to explain it, but basically what they did there in that study was show pictures of men to 288 women, Photoshopping some of the men's outfits to red. When women saw the guys in red, they rated them higher in terms of power and sexiness, but not in likability, kindness, or social skills, because who cares about that. Tying red to power and success even crosses cultures, having that meaning in places as diverse as China, Japan, Africa, and ancient Rome.
How is that any different from men, you might ask, since we all know that men are also attracted to women in red? Well, in that study, seeing a woman in red caused men to ask the women sexier questions (or plan to ask them -- the researchers made sure to keep the test subjects well away from the women), which implies they find her more attractive, or more receptive, or both. But not more powerful.

"Powerful" isn't the word I would use here.
One popular study that might be confusing here is one that showed that while women say they value earning power and ambition over looks, their actions indicate all those factors are about equally important, with a slight edge to looks (but more on that in a moment). So one set of scientists has to be a pack of liars, right?

"Wh-why would you say that?"
Not necessarily.
As the red study shows, there's obviously at least one subconscious visual clue that makes a woman think a man is more powerful, and there's surely more (distinguished salt-and-pepper hair perhaps?). So when a woman is evaluating a man on "looks," she's partially evaluating him for other traits like power and wealth (and personality sometimes, we're not all shallow strumpets), even if she doesn't know it.
As an example, think of male strippers.

Just try not to, now.
Male strippers are nowhere near as popular with girls as female strippers are with the dudes. Women will go there for their bachelorette parties and whenever they want to embarrass a friend, but you'll hardly ever find women making regular trips to the sausage show the way many men visit the titty bar.

Annually, more women go to literal sausage shows than metaphorical ones.
And it's not because all women are deep and only want a guy they can talk about feelings with. It's that a lot of women just don't find male strippers sexy, because they're men in a subservient role, which is basically negative power, and makes the woman feel unsexy herself. Cougars with boytoys are the butts of jokes. Old dudes with bikini models get high fives.

A lot of the reason people think ladies don't care as much about looks is based on a big misunderstanding:
Women want a hot guy, but simply do not agree on what "hot" means.
You often see a woman in love with what appears to be a horrible-looking creature and assume they looked past his appearance, when it's very likely she thinks that monstrosity is sexy incarnate.
For example, many of you men might have asked why girls you know are swooning over Edward from Twilight when he looks like a prancing homosexual. Well, many women find an aura of prancing homosexuality extremely hot. Others find musclebound jocks hot. Others like waifish nerds.

And Kristen Bell likes this.
Sure, men also differ in their tastes, but not as broadly as women, who are apparently all over the god damn place. Scientists guess it might have something to do with helping women avoid fighting over men too much. If I like nerds and my friend likes jocks, we get to stay friends. (Until her boyfriend stuffs mine in a locker I guess.)

Or worse.
Another interesting idea from the study is that this might be a reason why women have to worry so much more about body image - because there actually is a "right" set of characteristics that the majority of guys agree on. Conversely, because women are so scattered in what they like physically, there isn't one "right" way for men to look. This is why People Magazine always gets confused and puts people like Vince Vaughn and Ian McShane on its Sexiest Men Alive lists.
There is one exception though...

Men spend a lot of time trying to build muscles - probably exactly because the one physical trait most ladies agree on is that a guy should have some muscles and not be fat.

I wouldn't depend on that alone, though.
But wait, before you hit the steroids, they don't want too many muscles either. This study showed women six body types and ask them to rate them in four personality traits.
First, they probably all got lower ratings because most girls are turned off by guys with giant black dots for heads.

But setting that aside, girls considered the "toned" and "built" men attractive and thought the "brawny" man was getting to be a bit too much.

Bad news for Launchpad McQuack.
If you're a sticklike wimp or a flabby Santa, don't worry about never meeting the girl of your dreams though. The ripped guys were rated worst in the "commitment" category, so the ladies only think they're hot for one-night-stand purposes. When they want to really date a guy, you've got just as good a chance as those sandcastle kickers. Try wearing more red though.
You know what else helps?








Edward is a little too many for my taste. Can I have Prince instead?
Reply"You often see a woman in love with what appears to be a horrible-looking creature and assume they looked past his appearance, when it's very likely she thinks that monstrosity is sexy incarnate."
ReplyThis is possible, I suppose, but my personal experience actually is looking past his appearance. My current significant other had to win me over with things like intelligence and being nice to me because he's not the best looking guy in the world. Not to say I found him repulsive, but I never thought he was sexy incarnate. Thing about guys like that, though, is that they're more appealing to actually spend time with because they have a personality. Super attractive guys are generally jerks who know how to make a few charming comments to reel you in, but then they feel free to talk about their weight lifting or grooming habits. They don't put any effort into conversation (or sex) because they seem to think the relationship will coast along on their hotness. It gets old pretty fast.
I guess what I'm saying is that physical attraction based on looks is not what initially drew us together. In many ways, my semi-unattractive man *is* sexy incarnate to me, but he doesn't *look* it.
still think all women are self-centered bratty wannabe victims, but that author was hilarious
Replythe title of this article alone is ridiculously sexist. we all already knew that women were just as shallow as men, no one was arguing that.
ReplyI'm pretty shallow. For me, I like guys that are skinny or toned -- but not really muscly (maybe I don't want it to be so obvious that he can beat me up or something). I also like particular skin types -- that's TYPES, not colours. I'm not that much of an arsehole. A good cook is preferable, someone who can actually hold down a job, and most of all, BE A NICE GUY. I have never understood what women see in dickheads, and I wouldn't be caught dead with a man who treated me wrong. Oh, and if you're all of these things but you say racist stuff all the time like most of my family who I love but can't stand to converse with, don't even bother.
ReplyAnd yes, I'm accepting resumes by way of personal message. Looking forward to hearing from Mr Right!
I'm going to go ahead and add something I've said before but bears repeating; Japanese dicks are f*cking works of art.
I never fit in with the things women are "supposed" to be. I know she said "not all women", but still... I don't care about how much money a guy makes, and I don't know any other women that do either. I'm sure there are women out there like that, but I don't know why people always talk about that. The women I know are in college or went to college and make their own money. Most of the guys I know never did and are still working the same jobs they had in high school. As for what I find attractive, I like nice guys with morals that are fun and intelligent. There are certain types that I'm not attracted to physically, but I think a good personality outweighs looks. As for not wanting to look at male strippers, I don't think of them as being submissive. I think it's because a lot (most?) women have "sex is bad, sex is evil, if you have sex, your self-worth goes down, only whores have sex" drilled into them, so I think they just don't THINK about things like, "Oh, I want to see that guy's penis so bad!" because they are brought up to be ashamed of sexual urges. Also, with so many desperate guys getting their penises out with no provocation or constantly talking about them and begging for sex and things like that, it's just at turn-off. Desperation isn't attractive, and when there is no mystery element at all, that kind of behavior just makes the thought of sex or seeing a guy naked annoying, instead of sexy. I also don't get the power thing. I want an equal. Not somebody that is submissive and not somebody that is going to try to dominate me.
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesToo many words!
for someone who tries hard to look smart you really just made assumptions about large groups of people claiming they think like you. and to say you don't know any women who care about what a man makes even a little is just asinine. you had like two good points in that giant steaming shitpile
You missed the entire point of this article. When rationalizing was completely tossed out, where women can pretend they don't or do pick this or that, they aimed more for X, Y and Z. You can say "I don't care about money", but how many homeless guys are single? I like my man to be in control as a man. Call me old-fashioned but these studies explain the instinct inside women's heads - not comments, but literally studies designed to get PAST the tl;dr BS of explaining away WHY they make the choices they do.
LOL, i was listening to gold digger by Kanye west from Youtube when i read this, "I am in no way on board with those who say that all bitches be gold diggers."
Reply"it's like a woman being given a choice between going to a guy's basement and watching him play Xbox or going for a walk in the park. It's free either way, one is just really lame." i completely agree. who would want to walk in a park?
ReplyAnd yet women expect to be treated differently, however expect equal treatment.
Replythe only four people who thumbed this down were women. they dont like it when you bring this up
anyone with an active vagina should sense the difference between width and length
Replythough admittedly the worst sex i've had was with a 5 incher... so it was either that or the alcohol (or lack of in my case)
DAMN I shouldn't have thrown out my Spiderman costume.
ReplySeriously, what the f**k were you thinking?
i have red clothes but i dont see women going "wow he's powerful!", but to be fair, these clothes are mostly t shirts or boardshorts. perhaps i need to buy red business attire. i dont work in a office or a white collar job that requires me to wear suits and ties, but what the hell? it'll be an interesting experiment!
Reply Hide All See All 4 RepliesA red dress shirt is the best! (trust me I'm a girl)
Guys in suits just look like groany, old car salesmen to me.
Or you could go with the more casual, nice red shirt, rolled up sleeves, and a vest look.
cough *Red button down* cough. Just saying.
Women shouldn't be allowed to write for cracked.
Reply Hide All See All 3 Repliesread christi harrison's articles.
^ No.
TROLL!!!
AHH!! YES!! FINALLY, SOMEONE SPEAKS THE TRUTH!!
ReplyRED ties! Oh! SO HOT! Red or purple tie with a black shirt and black pants... Beautiful. *drools*
Whenever someone says anything about a 9 inch dick I shudder. Something that is nine inches long (which is nearly the size of my forearm) does NOT belong inside my vagina. NEVER! GROSS YIKES OUCH OMFG THAT'S SCARY!!
Big guys are NOT ATTRACTIVE I much prefer guys who are average sized.
Seriously, I can't even consider dating a guy if I'm not physically attracted to him. Basically, common interests + hotness = dating material. Common interests + no physical attraction = friend-zoned. If you have ever wondered why a girl friend-zoned you, that is why- she's just not attracted to you. I'm sure that doesn't apply to every woman, but I'm pretty sure it applies to most. Really, women are *almost* as shallow as guys, only we generally don't like dating guys we that we can't be friends with (notice I said "dating", not hooking up with- in regards to casual sex/one night stands/etc., is all about the looks). Whereas I've known plenty of guys who date women they have nothing in common with other than the fact that they enjoy f*****g each other. That's probably why the term "trophy wife" gets about three million more hits on Google than "trophy husband".
ReplyAnd it's kind of funny when guys wonder why girls aren't attracted to them. Because guys are generally attracted to the same "type" (as in large breasts and nice butts, which they are evolutionarily wired to like because of the whole healthy offspring/good mother thing or whatever), they often seem to think that same applies to women. True, in the past physical strength was important in a mate, because physical protection for survival was important, and that's probably why "muscles" is the one thing in common generally look for. However, many guys I've encountered seem to think that muscles are the *only* requirement for physical attraction (hence the over-confidence of douches like "The Situation" who is *such* a butterface in my book). This male perception of physical attractiveness is probably why the porn industry is rife with muscled male butterfaces. I've found that in porn produced/cast/directed/whatever by gay men and women tends to have men that are much more attractive in my opinion (seriously, I have such a ladyboner for James Deen).
Anyway, while women do tend to favor men with muscles, because physical protection is no longer a priority for survival in modern society (at least not to the extent is once was), muscles are increasingly becoming a less-important prerequisite for physical attraction, and since women tend to be much more complex than men, consequently our criteria for physical attraction are much more diverse and complex. I don't have a particular "type", per say, when it comes to what I find physically attractive. I like "Clark Kent-looking" guys, "boys next door", Asian studs (Harry Shum Jr., for example), and a variety of others. Even when I usually don't find a particular look attractive, other traits in a guy can make me feel attracted to that person anyway. For instance, I don't normally go for black guys, but I would tap Elijah Kelly in a heartbeat. In that case, his musical theatre prowess and general physical attraction (not deformed, fat, etc.) trumps what I usually look for in a guy. Really, I pretty flexible in what look I find attractive in a guy so long as he can dance. Swing dancing is an important hobby to me that trumps a specific physical "type", which why I mostly only look seriously at guys that I meet while dancing.
And while being physically attracted to a guy is a must in a relationship for me, he has to be more than that. He and I have to be able to have engaging conversations, shared hobbies, and common interests. I have to be able to be friends with him, which brings me back to my original point. Physical attraction + friendship = dating material.
/end essay (which I didn't intend to write -_-U)
"Common interests + no physical attraction = friend-zoned. If you have ever wondered why a girl friend-zoned you, that is why- she's just not attracted to you"
I, as do many men, already know/knew this. I wanted to thank you for being honest about it. Most everyone else I meet starts yelling at the guys for "Only complaining because you want to get in her pants, and she won't let you!" While that's part of it, it's not quite that simple. Sometimes I like a girl and want a committed relationship with her, and she friendzones me. While that hurts, I get over it. What I don't appreciate it is when someone says that it's only a problem because I'm a horndogging pig. It's not a problem because the man is a pig, it's because the woman doesn't find us attractive.
You're being honest, which is something I do appreciate.
I've friend-zoned attractive men who I liked because I had eyes for someone who I deemed MORE attractive. I tell my guy friends not to take it too personal. There are plenty of factors that go into bangable, friendable and relationship-zone.
Loving the discussion on porn here, calling the women involved "shallow whore" and praising the cocks and muscles of the men. Why are men praised for sleeping with lots of women when women are reprimanded for the exact same action? I think that this article really did was point out that men are 10 times more shallow than women.. why? because it uses comparisons between the two sexes, and I don't know if anyone's noticed, in every comparison, man takes the cake for more shallow.. Next time I read an article on this website where "bouncy tits" or any phrase of the sort is mentioned, I'm exing out and never coming back.
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesEvolutionarily speaking, women were given countless advantages when it comes to sexual reproduction (anyone who even THINKS of uttering the word "childbirth" gets a foot up the ASS!). Mitochondrial and cytoplasm DNA comes from the mother while equivalent male genetic material is a GROSS minority. Female genetic disorders are virtually nonexistent while men get the shaft with colorblindness, Hemophilia, and Turner Syndrome. Given that those disorders are X linked, if someone has the disorder, it's because the mother had a faulty X-chromosome. Most of the physical bulk that makes up the zygote at conception, is the mothers egg. Several gender differentiating mechanisms include the feminization, and killing of males (Look up "Wolbachia". In several species of animal, gender differences can include grossly disadvantaging phenotypes in males for the sake of sexual selection. The list goes on.
Women were given both a head start, and the benefit of the doubt from the universe. All men have to look forward to is not bleeding from our privates every month and childbirth.
Now if you'll excuse me, I have to go put my own foot up my ass for saying the word "childbirth" for the sake of my argument.
hmmm last time i checked downs syndrome was pretty common in girls, js
1) I shouldn't really take that as a relevant statistic since it's just as easy for me to say "it's pretty common in boys". There's no statistical significance reported in your comment, which is just poor form. Is it more common? Less common? Just as common? I realize you're trying to say "more common", but after channeling my Bio classes I feel like it's only fair you at least half ass an attempt at sounding like you've studied the subject.
2) One thing that you're "just saying" against 3 or 4 examples? Sure OK.
3) (The future sentence is not an insult) Were you born with down syndrome? No? Well s**t, OK. Down syndrome is a fairly uncommon thing in nature, at least compared to what I provided. The bit about cytoplasm DNA happens in 100% of births. X-linked genetic disorders, while not 100%, are fairly freaking common (given I encompassed them all). Besides, everything that I said is for the sake of evolutionary success, so not only are the forces working against us, well, working against us, but condoned by evolution. That's like getting robbed by the bank and the President saying that they're allowed to do so (oh s**t politics!)
Theres a big penis industry? What does that mean?
ReplyWow, you must have a really good email spam blocker!
My best friend ,she just has announced her wedding with a ~millinaire~ manRonald who is the
Reply Hide All See All 5 RepliesCEO of a MNC~~ !they met vi a -----?S`u`c`c`e`s`s`f`u`l`m`i`n`g`l`e.C//o//m?------ ..it is
the largest and best club for weal`thy people and their admirers to chat online. …you don’
t have to be rich` there ,but you can meet one , It's worthy` a try. You do not have to be
rich or famous. !-------but you can mee one, the most important is you can find yourtrue l-
o-v-e! right?
Cool story bro, needs more backwards apostrophes!
"she just has announced her wedding with a ~millinaire~ manRonald who is the CEO of a MNC"
Anyone else find that funny given what we've just read? Anyone? Just me? Ok...
A millionaire named Ronald? Only millionaire named Ronald I can think of is McDonald. So no thank you. Although, he does wear some red and have big feet...
I betcha she's having boatloads of orgasms!
So I copied the url into my browser and it didn't take me to S`u`c`c`e`s`s`f`u`l`m`i`n`g`l`e.C//o//m. Could you please type it out right next time?
ugh, irritating spambots can't spell.
My friend just told me a nice place -- T' a'' ll m' i n 'g 'l' e. С'⊙'M '-- it's the most effective site in the world to connect with, date and marry tall, and big people.. It's worthy a try.
ReplyThe downvotes are from short and small men. Go away, Lovethis.
I actually have a theory about porn I'm going to share here because it's relevant. I've noticed that in most mainstream porn, the men look like pro wrestlers. If they don't, they are hung like actual horses. If they aren't one or the other, they are both. (Oriental porn does NOT count) I've always known woman do not find this particularly attractive, so why is it? Well, if porn is generally aimed at men, why would it matter if the guys are big huge muscular monsters with giant wangs? I think it's for the same reason woman are worried to DEATH how they look when they leave the house. They aren't worried about men judging them, and if they are they shouldn't be, because men do not care what designer you are wearing. We care about what it is (or isn't) covering up. Woman put on a show for other women, to say "back off, who ever he is, he's mine." It's a pissing contest. When a man watches porn, he generally wishes he was the one tapping that sweet, sweet, bacterial zoo ass. Now since men judge themselves buy our muscles, penis size, and general ability to plow the s**t out of some vag, we don't want to watch some skinny pasty 3 inch guy crawling all over the hottest b***h on the planet. No, if it's not going to be us tearing that s**t up, it might as well be the biggest strongest deep dickenest guy they can find. At least then we can look on with admiration and say "good job, ten bucks says that b***h can't walk for a WEEK! Imaginary high five!" Rather than feeling intimidated, I think it pleases us. If we had to watch an inferior male potentially impregnate a superior female, those old alpha male instincts want to kick in and have us say "You're doing it wrong, get the f**k out of my way and let me show you how to chop wood, faggot." And since we can't do that, I at least, would rather close the video and find something with a more suitable genetic donor. Fertility is hot. That's the entire reason watching other people have sex is exciting to begin with. It's not our brains being so dumb we think were the ones getting laid, it's our brains being happy that someone in the cave is. Deep inside all of us is a desire to see the best possible genes being passed on so that a more prosperous humanity can result. If we can't feel like we are the most plausible candidate, then we can at least take satisfaction in knowning that the big guy is banging for the good of the tribe. Put us in a situation where we feel like we are a more apt candidate, we get all pissed off and enter poop flinging mode. This is why a big strong tall endowed man like me gets pissed off every time I see a scrawny sideways baseball cap "steve" type riding b***h in his girl friends honda civic. He shouldn't be getting laid before me, It's simply bad for humanity.
Reply Hide All See All 6 RepliesYou watch porn with men in it? :S
Everybody is a little gay. Straight men watch heterosexual porn, and they don't want to see a small, flaccid penis. They want a massive, hard cock. In other words, I think you're making it too complicated.
i am a retarde teenager and i couldn't read all of that so i can't think of a sensible comment other than ??? which may not be appropriate
Because having less alpha-male-gym-dominating douchebags is bad thing. If I wanted to watch porn containing multiple cleavages, said cleavage should never come from a guy.
Well said. Come to think of it, when I watch porn (not that I often do...) it's important that the woman is attractive. Though that could just be me going gay ;].
P.S.
Reeny you dumb fuck.
I prefer lesbo.