
|
If history teaches us anything, it's that it's way harder to pick out the good guys from the bad guys than the movies would lead us to believe. In fact, some of history's most face-blastingly savage regimes came up with some shockingly progressive innovations in health, human rights and, well, everything else. #6.
The Nazis Get the Anti-Tobacco Ball Rolling
We put this on the list at great risk to our future political careers. You really can't say anything good about the Nazis without it getting taken out of context in a campaign ad, and obviously pointing out that, say, Hitler's soldiers were well-groomed doesn't excuse their many, many, many atrocities. So nothing we're about to say about the Nazis makes us feel even the slightest bit bad about slaughtering them in one video game after another.
And Yet... They were the first to point out that, hey, tobacco kills people. Although Adolf Hitler had a 25-cigarettes-a-day habit early in life, he eventually came to find the addiction disgusting. Especially once German scientists discovered the link between tobacco and lung cancer, at which point the Fuhrer initiated the first anti-smoking campaign in modern history, and the most successful one throughout WWII.
And yeah, of course the motivation for the campaign was bizarrely linked to racial purity, because they were, after all, the Nazis. But what really mattered was that they were the first to link smoking during pregnancy with stillbirths and miscarriages, and went so far as to ban tobacco ration cards for pregnant women and Nazi ladies under the age of 25, just in case they got knocked up with Aryan spawn. The Nazis were also the ones who coined the phrase "passive smoking" and outlawed smoking in Nazi offices, schools, buses and trains. And they actually restricted tobacco advertisements in 1941, almost 30 whole years before America bothered to do the same.
#5.
The Aztecs: Eaters and Educators of Children
Before Cortes and his poxified Spanish troops infested the Americas, the Aztecs were the reigning lords of central Mexico. With an empire spanning the Gulf of Mexico to the Pacific Ocean, and a capital city supporting at least 200,000 inhabitants, no can argue that the Aztecs didn't have their business together.
Unfortunately, a big part of their "business" involved their religion, which had a few snags in it for junior Aztecs. Snags like worshiping gods who drank baby blood like water, and required ritualistic child sacrifices for every little heavenly favor, like rain, successful harvests or their continuing existence. So, yeah, the Aztecs rolled like that.
And Yet... The Aztecs' non-sacrificed kids were beneficiaries of the world's first mandatory education. The same guys who ate their babies in exchange for rain also went to great lengths to educate the undigested kids. And unlike most civilizations of the time, they weren't just interested in smartening up the rich boys. In fact, the Aztecs were arguably the first in the world to require all of their living children to go to school.
Aztec kids were homeschooled until their teens under the close supervision of their local Principal Skinner. While at home they were required to memorize nuggets of Aztec wisdom, presumably little proverbs that didn't apologize for the slaying of childhood playmates. From there, they could either attend a school to study the liberal arts and agriculture, or another to study government, medicine and the fine arts. Also, just to be on the safe side, they were taught how to kill people. And probably how to eat their still beating hearts.
#4.
The Mongol Hordes Were Big on Feminism
The Mongolian empire was so hardcore that the entire 13th and 14th centuries are actually referred to as "The Age of the Mongols." Yes, TWO WHOLE CENTURIES claimed by the mofos who took over Eurasia like a swarm of people-killing locusts. Experts estimate that the Mongols were singularly responsible for the deaths of between 30,000,000 and 100,000,000 people across Asia, Europe and the Middle East, a feat that is only rivaled by the deaths resulting from the entire second World War.
And if Ghengis' alcoholic son hadn't died an early gin-soaked death, the entire continent of Europe might have gotten the "Mongol Special" as well. And Yet... Women were the ones pulling the strings at home. You know the idea that if women ruled the world, there would be no wars? Bullshit. One of the most violent civilizations in the history of the universe gave extraordinary privileges to its women, and look at where it got them.
Ghengis Khan's mother was one of his main advisers, and he let his wives help him choose his successor. And the only reason why the Mongolian army was so ferocious in the first place was that women were allowed to run the show back home so the men could make fighting their full time jobs. Mongolettes could own property, divorce and even remarry. And while their female Persian neighbors were wrapped up in burqas and their Chinese subjects were deforming their feet as signs of subjugation, Mongol women were free to train for the military if so inclined. Which means that there were probably Lady Mongols out there killing men, children and the unborn as well.
Speaking of which... |
6 Companies That Make Money Solving Problems (They Made Up)
The 6 Most Psychotic Rip-Offs of Famous Animated Films
7 Lost Bodies of Work (That Would Have Changed Everything)
The 10 Most Important Things They Didn't Teach You In School
Jul 31st: A Day In Cracked History
6 Things From History Everyone Pictures Incorrectly
8 Historic Symbols That Mean The Opposite of What You Think
The 7 Most Disastrous Typos Of All Time
The 6 Worst Jobs Ever (Were Done by Children)
wow just goes to show its all about perspective
Go Mongols and Russians!!! I'm a tomboy myself, so I would love to live in those eras. But a I wouldn't be able to read Cracked...
I feel compelled to point out that the Russians were, historically speaking, a very pragmatic people. There is nothing wrong with this, per se; but the women battalions in World War II had less to do with equal rights and more to do with the fact that they lost just under 15% of their /entire goddamn population/ in WWII. Russia's a big country, that's a lot of people. They let women fight because there were /no more men/ to do it for them.
Exactly. Also, uh, some of the links for #3 explicitly refutes the article's implication that the Soviets were big on feminism. C'mon! That's just lazy.
Well, anarchists and tea partiers, you now have someone to blame: Persia.
Golden Dildo? XD
What about egyptians who were among the first people to brew beer?
The Egyptians were among the first people to do everything. Beer isn't an enlightened idea, but I guess sanitation is.
lol feminism and women army men?
"feminist army women men"..... I don't know about the Soviet Army, but when I served, I was called a SOLDIER.
Russia only allowed women into combat simply because at that point they really had no choice. And some of their top generals were still set against the idea all the way to the end.
U.S. female helicopter pilots in the Army flew combat missions in Operation Just Cause, the invasion of Panama, in 1989. We even had a pregnant door gunner. More than 700 women, including me, were awarded combat patches and expeditionary medals for that campaign.
That's badass.
So you are to be blamed for killing half my family? Congratulations on your patches.
LOLZ I agree with yaya. I mean, I´m all for women and feminism and women doing things they were told they couldn´t, but that´s a medal I´d rather not get.
But maybe I´m just too not-North-American for that.
Yaya, deal with it. It's called War. Suck it up.
A: Act like a bunch of Fonzies and be cool, people.
B: Uriel, you would be pretty pissed too if your family got crushed under a giant metal rock. It's not a nice way to die, and "crushed under a giant metal rock" is really emabarassing on your tombstone.
ooh unfortunate implications due to adds.
"Which means that there were probably Lady Mongols out there killing men, children and the unborn as well.
Speaking of which..." and then an add for a muslim matrimonial site...
I saw it too, and on second look I noticed the implications made by using the word "matrimonial" instead of "dating"
Rod Blagojevich is awesome.
That's not Rod..that's just his hair that is awesome.
The biggest empire ever was the British Empire on the twentieth century
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Empire
Huzzah for British winningness. Our ideas were not so much as "enlightening" as inspiring if you will, for example we invented the concentration camp in the Boer war. We also liked to steal tea from India, speaking of tea I must go and drink some then I will have a scone and comply to ay other racial sterotypes that people may have of British people.Whilst b***hing about other racial stereotypes, America I say.... GO LOSE SOME WEIGHT FATTY, also well done on passing the Health care reform bill. BUT FOR GOD SAKE STOP BITICHING ABOUT IT "Oh boo hoo now poor people can be treated in a hospital too without having to pay so much money that they are in crippling debt." It's not the outbreak of communism or any crap like that, It's common sense.
Oh my tea is ready.
I don't get it, randomorific. Are you trying to take the piss out of Brits, or out of yanks? Are you perhaps lost in a void, adrift in a sea, devoid of meaning, and are spitting spite out randomly as a means to try to feel something/ anything?
Seems to me that Wings was just pointing out a fact that seemed to have escaped the writer of the article (one that really shouldn't have escaped him, btw). Doesn't seem to me that your comment was really called for. Every race, empire, civilization, etc.. has wrongs to account for, as well as triumphs and achievments. Why do you need to dwell on the negatives so?
nb: tea sounds like an awesome idea. brb...
@Randomorific, you've fallen pray to a propaganda coup by Goebbels in world war 2. The first concentration camps were set up decades before in Cuba by a Spanish official who was a German aristocrat. This just shows another fail of standardized education.
THE AZTECS DID NOT EAT CHILDREN! THE AZTECS DID NOT EAT CHILDREN! THE AZTECS DID NOT EAT CHILDREN! THE AZTECS DID NOT EAT CHILDREN! THE AZTECS DID NOT EAT CHILDREN! THE AZTECS DID NOT EAT CHILDREN! THE AZTECS DID NOT EAT CHILDREN! THE AZTECS DID NOT EAT CHILDREN! THE AZTECS DID NOT EAT CHILDREN! THE AZTECS DID NOT EAT CHILDREN! THE AZTECS DID NOT EAT CHILDREN! THE AZTECS DID NOT EAT CHILDREN! THE AZTECS DID NOT EAT CHILDREN! THE AZTECS DID NOT EAT CHILDREN! THE AZTECS DID NOT EAT CHILDREN! THE AZTECS DID NOT EAT CHILDREN! THE AZTECS DID NOT EAT CHILDREN! THE AZTECS DID NOT EAT CHILDREN! THE AZTECS DID NOT EAT CHILDREN! THE AZTECS DID NOT EAT CHILDREN! THE AZTECS DID NOT EAT CHILDREN! THE AZTECS DID NOT EAT CHILDREN! THE AZTECS DID NOT EAT CHILDREN! THE AZTECS DID NOT EAT CHILDREN! THE AZTECS DID NOT EAT CHILDREN! THE AZTECS DID NOT EAT CHILDREN!THE AZTECS DID NOT EAT CHILDREN! THE AZTECS DID NOT EAT CHILDREN! THE AZTECS DID NOT EAT CHILDREN! THE AZTECS DID NOT EAT CHILDREN! THE AZTECS DID NOT EAT CHILDREN! THE AZTECS DID NOT EAT CHILDREN! THE AZTECS DID NOT EAT CHILDREN! THE AZTECS DID NOT EAT CHILDREN! THE AZTECS DID NOT EAT CHILDREN! THE AZTECS DID NOT EAT CHILDREN! THE AZTECS DID NOT EAT CHILDREN! THE AZTECS DID NOT EAT CHILDREN! THE AZTECS DID NOT EAT CHILDREN! THE AZTECS DID NOT EAT CHILDREN! Jesus Christ, you guys, they said the same thing about Pagans, Indians, Muslims, the Chinese, Native Americans and Jews. It is not true. Stop falling for this dumbass trick again and again and again - it's a racist lie meant to perpetuate and rationalize oppression on the basis that they ATE BABIES! Learn actual history, not European history.
Wow, it doesn't even matter what your point is, the fact that you repeated the same sentence over and over again just makes you look like a f**king a*****e. It doesn't get your point across, it makes you look immature.
What about some arguments, jackass?
Sources, please? You can't just point and say, "You're wrong!" without giving evidence to back yourself up.
moonloon is right.
way to spam your own annoying little self-assertions
...douche
spamspamspam*
they sacrificed babies but didnt eat them they beleived that the babies tears would bring rain and aztecs weren't even cannibals the staple of their diet was maize (corn) meat was actually a luxury for common peoples and they ate it very infrequently and normally they only sacrificed their own people if they had no prisoners
Not trying to defend bluelemons (spamming is so douchebaggish), but yeah, the whole "they ate babies" thing is old, racist and stupid. I mean, do you guys still get that from history class? Jeez.
I'm sorry, camyskaze, but how is it rasict?
This was a great and funny article. The only problem is that you said that the Persian Empire was the largest the world had ever seen is incorrect. In fact it was the Mongols who conquered the world's biggest empire from the far East of Europe to the far West of Asia.
Aside from that good article.
"Fuck. Here's a bunny to lighten the mood a bit." Priceless! XD
Didn't Charlemagne pioneered mandatory education?
In the west, not in mesoamerica.
You should include the Medieval Church. Known for burning people yes, but they invented War codes to spare civillians (Peace of God and Truce of God) and invented the University system. And there's all those nice hospitals and schools.
Plus, know that the Inquisition forgives sinners who repent. A thief who would lose his arms in a federal medieval court will only have to climb the santa scala or go to Rome for a pilgrimage. Criminals in China were starved to death, while the Turks decided to tie their hands to one ship while tying their feet to another ship headed the other way.
We would be exploring the sideral space if it wasnt for the balls sucker christian church
there's no progress in here, only delay in human progress, thanks to your stupid church
religion and progress are self-excludent, d******k
It seems you missed the part where Vader said that the church created the University. That's right, they created the institution that would define progress and advancement for the next 500 years. Do not let your petty hatred against religion blind you from seeing facts as I'm pretty sure you usually blame religion of doing.
What I love about this comment is that Vader999 did not stop to consider that the article is listing enlightnend ideas brought to you by evil empires. Are you trying to say that the Medieval Church was an evil empire? If so, I'm concerned about your concept of empire... (I'm not going to argue about the evil part...)
The Church was an empire, since in medieval times popes subjugated monarchs to their rule through the threat of excommunication, not to mention that they had facilities all over europe. Like the Roman Empire before them, the Church was good or bad depending on who's in charge, but mostly, they were more good than bad since they popularized the concept of mercy towards criminals. Before the church, criminals were given no mercy, and a starving beggar stealing grain is bound to lose his hands. The Church would simply feed him and urge him to go on pilgrimage to Rome.
And as i said before, they ran schools and hospitals. If it weren't for the Church there would be no High Medieval culture. And no Rennaisance. And no Enlightenment. (Voltaire was Jesuit-educated)And no America, western culture, or anything. So yes, during the Dark ages, the Church laid the foundation for modern society, along with the Byzantines, who revolutionized law with the Codex Iustinianus, a long series of laws from Rome's entire history as a republic and an empire. So, since the Church is Christian, and the Byzantines were Christian, it means Christianity is the rock that western civilization was constructed upon.
Not to mention that the Church essentially saved literacy during the Dark Ages. It was monks who kept the art of writing (and thus reading) alive, and taught to everyone else later, once people decided that schools might be a good idea after all.
Also, don't forget that many of the first observatories, etc. were funded by the Church--and that many of the first scientists were priests. It was the Protestant Church, not the Roman Catholic Church, that was opposed to ideas such as the heliocentric universe. The Catholics were in full support until the Council of Trent, when they decided that they should shake their fists a bit to get the Protestants off their cases about it.
I was totally rooting for the persians in 300. The actual Xerxes had epic beardage more than likely & didn't look like f**king Dhalsim
In truth, he won. He burnt Athens to the ground and got away with it. And later when the Spartans fought the Athenians, the Spartans allied with PERSIA!!!!!!!
THIS! IS! PERSIA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Funny and entertaining. Thanks!
It's amazing to see comments from seemingly-intellectual readers who neglect the fact that this is a HUMOR site. There is a very specific design to this or any list on the website, and it is sad that you cant see it for what it is. The general rule is always that the gag comes first. Facts and figures only exist to build up the funny. Try to remember that.
wow. sounds like someone just went where no comments user has gone before, issuing a bold and radical statement that has never before been issued by any person with a keyboard
..you also attempted to acquire some sort of name-connoting credibility by naming yourself after the website and sticking a universal categorization like 'planet' to imply that you in some way represent the voice of the people. well done sir, it appears you are clever on two fronts
True, but CrackedPlanet still made a good point.