The 5 Most Terrifying Civilizations In The History of the World
They say that those who ignore history are doomed to repeat it, so pay attention for Christ's sake. It turns out that many of our ancestors achieved levels of violence that take them right out of the realm of "badass" and into the less cool area of ball-shriveling atrocity.
These are the civilizations you don't want to face during, say, your next time travel adventure. And yes, the Spartans are down there.

History is kind of spotty on the Celts (they never wrote anything down, and many of the witnesses died brutally) but what facts survived confirm one thing: They had gigantic Celtic balls.
First of all, they had a thing for severed heads. After a long and trying battle they'd all unwind at the end of the day by collecting a few souvenir heads. Then they'd bring them home and decorate the house with them. So the average Celt home probably looked like a hunter's trophy room, crossed with the scene at the end of Halloween when all the mutilated bodies start popping up around every corner. Sweet dreams kids!

If they felt that yours was a head of particular importance, they'd embalm it and whip it out at parties to brag about how awesome they were. When they were alone they'd probably wiggle your jaw around and pretend you were complimenting them.
The reason for all of these head-chopping-good-times was that the Celts believed that the head held the soul, and so if you cut a dead guy's head off before all of that juicy soul leaked out of it, it was yours. A finders-keepers sort of deal, you might say.

A modern Celt.
So, Were They Really So Bad?
Hey, remember Braveheart? And how batshit insane Wallace's army looked with their faces painted blue?

Well, the Celts would sometimes paint themselves blue and fight completely naked. Just because. One would assume that fighting in the nude would present some rather sensitive targets to one's enemies (we're talking about their nuts), but it seems that the Celts were so frigging manly that they just didn't care. It was the ultimate insult: "I am not afraid of you, and to prove it, I have just laid my dong on your sword."

You remember Temple of Doom, and how that unfortunate gentleman had his heart ripped out right before they dropped him down the lava hole? Well, picture lots of that, only this time mom isn't around to turn off the VCR and stop your crying. That's the Aztecs.
The Aztecs believed that for every 52 years that passed, the world would end unless the gods were strong enough. And, as is common knowledge, the best way to toughen up a god is with a steady stream of constant human sacrifice (along with a dash of cannibalism, just for good measure).

Most of the sacrificing went towards keeping their Sun god happy, and it took place on top of giant pyramid, so at least the view was probably pretty good. Then they'd hold you down, saw through your ribs and take out your heart (which was likely still beating). Then, as if things couldn't get any worse, they'd throw you down the staircase.
So, Were They Really So Bad?
Yes. Yes they were. Did we mention the cannibalism? After they removed your heart and threw you down the stairs, they'd eat your arms and thighs, and whatever other bits looked tasty (the nuts? We do not know).
Some historians think that nourishment was the main reason behind all of this willy-nilly human sacrifice, as the Aztecs had no domesticated animals to slaughter, and as such their diet was low in fat and animal-stuff. You know how it is if you've ever had a roommate try a vegetarian diet. It's just a matter of time until you start waking up with teeth marks on your extremities.
And that's not even the bad part. The Aztecs held themselves to a high standard and for every situation they asked, "Could we make this more gut-wrenchingly gruesome?" So, for instance, during the sacrifice to the fire god, a newly-wed couple would be tossed into, you guessed it, a fire. Then, right before they finally died (from their horrendous burns), they'd drag them out, flesh still smoking, and dig out their hearts.

Wait, it gets better! There was the offering to the earth goddess, which involved a young woman's skin being removed and worn around like a Silence of the Lambs-style serial killer flesh suit.
On one hand you might ask why none of the Aztecs thought this was odd. On the other hand, if somebody had an objection to the ceremonies we're guessing they kept that shit to themselves.

The thing about the Assyrians is that they were basically the ancient Mesopotamian equivalent to that loveable team of underdogs in every sports movie. They had a lot of spunk and a can-do attitude, but, try as they might, they just couldn't seem to make it into the big leagues.
Luckily for them (and unluckily for everyone else), just as that loveable sports team will sooner or later stumble upon secret weapon, a magic dog with an unusual aptitude for kicking field goals perhaps, after a couple of hundred years of being constantly harassed by more powerful nations, the Assyrians came across their own secret weapon. No, it wasn't Emilio Estevez, but it was nearly as powerful.

It was iron. The Assyrians were the first people to start using iron weapons instead of bronze which, to put into a modern perspective, is sort of like showing up for a knife fight with the Death Star. Using iron made the Assyrians so near-invincible that, really, the other guys might as well have been swinging around bananas.
So, Were They Really So Bad?
Well, in a word, yes. Here's a cheery little quote from King Ashurnasirpal, who spent much of his spare time baking cherry pies for the homeless and teaching the neighborhood kids how to correctly adjust their bike helmets:
"I built a pillar over against his city gate, and I flayed all the chief men who had revolted, and I covered the pillar with their skins; some I walled up within the pillar, some I impaled upon the pillar on stakes, and others I bound to stakes round the about the pillar; many within the border of my own land I flayed, and I spread their skins upon the walls; and I cut off the limbs of the officers, of the royal officers who had rebelled."

"And then I was thinking about slap boxing with a lion, but only if there's time."
Ever have one of those days when you just wanted to get out of the house and flay somebody? Yep, you're probably a sociopath.
Sure, we understand that intimidation was how invading armies ended wars before they started, that this kind of psychological warfare was crucial for a conquering army. But reading that up there, we're pretty sure the Assyrians just enjoyed it.








being more scottish than anything else, and part irish too, I am proud to say that my ancestry lies with the Celts. If I were a mortal kombat character, I would decapitate my enemy and stomp foot-shaped holes in the corpse.
ReplyOur modern age of debt-slaves is more dreadful than those before, when there were many nations free of central banks. The relatively recent murder of Ukranians and Russians by the jewish communist movemtent alone is worse than any of the things recorded or linked to in this article.
Reply Hide All See All 5 Replies#4
The Aztecs were degenerate primitive savages. The Celts taking trophies from conquered enemies and the Assyrians punishing rebels doesn't compare to horrifically murdering people for no good reason.
Saying, "they needed to eat peopl b/c they didn't have cattle" is some all-cultures-are-equal liberal bullshit. An anthropologist is not an apologist.
The Aztecs aren't the scariest civilization on this list but they are the one most cruel for cruelty's sake.
#2
Messed up your links.
Yes, being in debt is much worse than being kept as human shields by the army that burned down your city and killed your family. f**k your Anti-Semitic ass, no one gives a f**k what you think.
Urm .. I don't think it was for "no good reason". They firmly believed the world would end if the gods weren't provided with regular sacrifices. Also, many historians claim that the "sacrifices" were in fact willing and not forcibly taken. Add to this the constant famines and people being clueless as to why their gods have forsaken them. I'm not defending them. It is indeed, incredibly stupid, I'm just pointing out it was not "torture for toruture's sake and they were enjoying it" thing. It is born out of pure desperation, kind of like when the black plague spread to Europe, peoplle did crazy things like flogging themselves to appease god, or even later on go on to burn witches at stake, which is in fact happening even now in African villages. So yeah, f**k superstition.
I don't know how people like you may express such stupidities without having read and learning with objectivity about the theme you are talking. Aztec people were cruel, in fact, but their legacy is in many aspects, still beyond that the one that european and "civilized" contemporany countries left. And Europe and the USA were as cruel as the worst civilizations in history, making the life of native american people a real hell
You call them "degenerate primitive savages" but the Aztecs built what was, by some estimates, perhaps the most populous city on earth at the time, complete with palaces, canals, temples, markets, schools and even refuse collection in the MIDDLE OF A LAKE. Of course,they are most famous for their human sacrifices and fecorcity towards their enemies in battle, traits shared with other mesoamerican cultures to varying degrees, the Aztecs being simply the dominant faction in the region at the time of their encounter with the West. In contemporary sources, they were usually stereotyped as either primative deranged savages, or innocent and simple minded sheep, but of course as always you need to take these views with a bucketful of salt. The 'civilized' Spanish, like pretty much all other conquerors of far flung lands in history, were quilty of their own acts of savagery, presumably because, like you, they barely thought of the 'natives' as human. That the Aztecs most likely existed in some kind of middle-ground is not some 'liberal bullshit' but analysis of the evidence at hand. I could call your line of thinking primitive and and naiive colonialist bullshit but I wouldn't be so petty.
Oh, wait you seem to have referred to something called "the jewish communist movemtent"...
I guess the world is controlled by these dastardly Commie-Jews using the international banking system and hollywood to steal all teh monies to line their nests, right?
Man...
You are the worst.
It's funny how many of my favourite Cracked articles were written by people who've written almost nothing else. Come back, Neal!
ReplySpartans also kept relations with young boys, ideally there'd be friends of several generations like 12, 22, 32, mmmaybe surviving 42 + of gay men NAMBLA types...
ReplyAnd they were "Commies" by today's standards. Their king banned money. Well, he didn't technically, but he DID ban gross displays of wealth or petty cash. Their money was huge disks of iron. So you could keep a stack of 'em for big purchases on rare occasions, but no pocket full of coins for trifles and whores. That got rid of whore-mongers and sellers of "Bling" for the Spartans certainly might buy that (hey, grab fun while you can) but let 'em plop down a big iron disk? What're they buying, the whore? The women would kill her or if they didn't they'd indoctrinate her and she'd just be another spartan woman. A pile of small gold coins/trinkets? The king would then thank you and put it in a pile gathering dust in the royal house except for every few years he had to do outside trading.
But, don't forget, women could have tombstones; If they died in childbirth...
I like how you try to make the spartans seem even more bad just by saying they where "commies", like having a civilization that doesnt use money, can compare with anything else on the list.
I cant belive that so many people think communism is that bad :s
I'm pretty sure Spartans could stop fighting before the age of 60.
ReplySure, there was a way to do that. They called it death.
Wow. Human beings are terrible, and we have always been terrible, and we're terrible right now, and maybe it's a good thing we don't live so long.
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesAwareness of our atrocities is the first step to reforming ourselves. It doesn't have to be this way, we can do better. We just have to choose to do so.
I choose to be better at being terrible. Like a f*****g murderous life-stealing vampire, forever increasing my life-debt with the innocent. How much blood has passed these lips? How much more will pass? The more I drink, the more I thirst!
It really depends what you see as terrible.
Sacrificing people to save the world. seems fair to me.
Fighting to spread your own supremecy doesnt seem that bad either, when you think about it, the point of the spartans are just to improbe the human race, the way its done sounds bad, but there is nothing wrong with the idea. If you can have an abortion because your kid is gonna be spastic or something, killing weak babies thousand of years ago doesnt seem that extreame, atleast not to me.
Hmm... Asian Batman Villains on horseback, sounds scary enough.
ReplyRiddle me this, riddle me that... What time is it when heads fly over your fence?
Time to move.
You speak as though flaying someone is a bad thing :-\
ReplyNot sure how to respond to that.
This has probably been said but ill say it anyway.
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesIron weapons were no more effective at killing in battle....at all.
The advantages of iron were that it was cheap to manufacture and didnt wear out as quickly.
Take a piece of bronze and a piece of iron roughly the same size and shape and clang them together. Their is a huge difference in weight and durability.
It went through bronze armour better than bronze went through iron, also iron weapons could break bronze ones.
Iron is a lot stronger than bronze. Bronze is copper and tin. Tin strengthens the copper, but copper is as soft as melted ice cream. Iron, though, is very strong. (and is cheaper)
Someone probably already mentioned this below, but... the Spartans were homosexual. In fact, they encouraged it among their military (to create closer bonds, natch), so they probably wouldn't have called someone "gay" for not slaughtering slaves. They probably would have just beat the piss out of the guy instead.
Reply Hide All See All 5 RepliesMaybe they'd have called you a woman-lover? XD
@Gormenghast, that actually might have happened. If a man showed interest only in women, the Spartans considered him to be something like a woman himself, which is of course the exact opposite of the stereotype today.
"the Spartans were homosexual."
That's not entirely correct. The Spartans did encoruage homsexual behavior among their fighting forces to build a sense of unit cohesion. However, the modern notion of homosexuality, i.e. of a person attracted solely to members of the same sex and declining to engage in intercourse with the other gender, would have baffled and repulsed them as much as it does a modern fundamentalist. The Spartans believed that everyone would marry some one of the opposite sex and produce copious children. To not do this would be seen as dishonoring one's family and shirking one's duty to the state. Thus they were not homosexuals in the modern sense of the term.
You do realize that when people call each other gay nowadays it's only vaguely and remotely related to sexual orientation? And you do know that the sexual practices of Spartans can't be called homosexual because no such term existed, right?
Of course that term didn't exist, Radek, they all spoke Greek.
That blue paint that the Celts wore was an ink derived from a plant related to the indigo plant. It seemed into your skin and acted as a drug similar to speed. They would get super hyped up and were famous for feeling little to no pain. There were stories of men and women getting limbs hacked off and just continuing the battle a la The Black Knight. Except blue. And naked.
Reply Hide All See All 4 Replies*Seeped
Tis' but a scratch!
Berserkers!
I'll bite your legs off!
That thing about history being written by the victors? The equal and opposite is also true, if you got beat by someone you'd be more apt to describe them not as 'a better warrior' but as 'a f*****g monster'. Still, even with a lot of grains of salt, modern wannabe 'badasses' should stop modeling themselves after ancient badasses who would be more aptly described as bullying psychopaths.
ReplyI kind of wish there was more about the Celts here, like how their kings were expected to have sex with horses as their 'qualification' ritual, and then they bathed in a soup made from it's broth and drank it too. That their myths are filled with 'warp spasms' a body changing battle frenzy not unlike the N.D. Fighting Irish Logo, that their women were as sexual and robust and equally as large and feared in battle as the men, and that the men grew magnificent handle bar mustaches- oh and that they decimated most of the worlds high civilisations like Rome and Thrace before it was cool to do it with 'imperial' methods.
ReplyOr that they were the prize mercenaries of the ancient world. No 'insurgent' army was considered daunting or frightening to empires like Rome unless it had Celtic Mercenaries.
honestly if I really wanted to throw my enemy I'd show up naked to.. nobody is really expecting that, you know? I do have Celt blood. I was told this was more the Welsh side though
ReplyTotally off-topic, but your comment inspired a t-shirt design. Thank you.
Actually spartans wouldn't call You gay, because after 30 yers spent in army without right to leave(unless there was war)You WERE gay. And it was encouraged.
ReplyAnd funny fact about Mongols - contemporary european generals think them to be cowards because they weren't fighting on the front lines(because it's easier to manage your bloodthirsty hord of reaveing maniacs from behind). Oh, and they used flamethrowers during battles :)
The Mongols had who is commonly described as "the greatest general who had ever lived" working for them.One of his main advantages was that he didn't die riding into battle,and used flags to communicate with soldiers.
The Mongols pioneered the false retreat strategies, among many others. They may have been vicious and blood thirsty, but they were also brilliant, compassionate (to their own people, exclusively) democratic, and implacable. They totally could have taken Rome, if they hadn't had to stop at the European frontier and turn around.
Showing up to a knife fight with the death star huh. . . fine i will do both of these showing up to kendo practice with tensa zangetsu and showing up to a gundam battle in tengen toppa gurren laggan. top that mo fo.
Reply Hide All See All 5 RepliesLower.Your.Fucking.Powerlevel.
"I'm eleven years old!"
no not eleven just an imature 18.
"And that's somehow better?" asks another 18-year-old, holding her Pinkie Pie plush.
and i'll use my shinai to break your tensa zangestu with a suki directly into your adam's apple and then you'll, uh, commit hari kair. desu.
Goddamn otakus, either man up and go to Japan or shut up.
The Vikings were extremely barbaric. Perhaps they were too short-lived to be considered in this article. There is a story of one Viking who would make a game of tossing babies into the air and impaling them on his sword. Kinda like ball-in-a-cup.
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesJapanese soldiers in WWII would do that with their bayonets.
Reason they did things like that was because they were hoping to terrify people enough to just hand over anything valuable without a fight. Barbaric, but sensible!
But if you miss, it's okay, because the baby is on a string and attached to the sword!
The word " Celt " doesn't really represent a particular people or tribe. Rather, it's a general word invented by the Romans to refer to anyone who lived in northwestern Europe at the time. This could be any of hundreds of different tribes or peoples.
ReplyNaturally, these different people would join together to fight the Romans. The Romans just weren't very interested in asking them all what they called themselves and lumped them all together with one word.
It should be noted that Celtic women also fought alongside their men against the Romans, and naked too. Celtic women were famous as warriors and formed their own fighting groups.
Tacitus tells a story popular among Roman soldiers about Celtic women, " If you happen to come across a Celtic farmer be very careful of him, he'll be over 6 feet tall and can handle himself against 5 Romans. But, be more careful about his wife..... she beats him up. "
Most information on the Celt Society is nothing more then Roman lies.
ReplyDEATH TO ROME!
TRUTH VERSUS THE WORLD!
So you're saying the celts were pussies, then?
The Romans did more usefull stuff and beat the Celts.
Ffff, not only is Braveheart so badly inaccurate, chances are William Wallace would have been a descendant of the Picts.. oh and the "Celts" are non-existent. "Celtic" just refers to the common cultures & language of certain countries. "Celts" in the British Isles are mainly Gaels, Brythonic, Manx etc.
ReplyYeah sorry for "being that guy", but it had to be done.
Off with your head.
they are all celtic. just as both the english, the Scandinavian and the germans are germanic "races"