But then reality sets in for me. And it's never a problem of battery life that dissuades me from sending the inventor every ounce of my PayPal account. Something that some dude just constructed on the internet is bound to have a few issues like a short battery life. That's the nature of the beast, as far as I'm concerned. No, what dissuades me is always the question that I ask myself: "Am I going to enjoy playing this on a four-inch screen as much as I enjoyed playing it on a 30-inch screen?" The Nintendo 3DS has done a decent job of porting old games like Ocarina Of Time and converting series like Super Smash Bros. into dual-screen nirvana, but I bet that Nintendo would do it way more if they could figure out a way to make it, well, work at all.

It seems really cool to revisit all of that former joy until you realize that most Nintendo 64 games, and other games that were made for bigger consoles, were never meant to be seen on something as long as your ring finger. They were meant to be seen in an enrapturing television experience as your father sobbed behind you, begging you to play catch. Nintendo does a lot of weird stuff, like creating consoles that our earthly human bodies aren't meant to fully cope with. But they're not holding back on turning all of your favorite games from 1997 into portable 2017 games because they hate your smiles. Outside of licensing issues, they probably hold back because they haven't yet figured out a way to both turn it into something you can play on the subway AND not burn your eyes out of your face in the process.

Evan-Amos/Wikipedia
"It's nice that they gave us GoldenEye, but I'd love it if my pupils weren't bleeding right now."

The same thing goes for when someone shows me a dodgy emulator that they've downloaded on their phones. It might work great (it rarely does), but there's something lost in translating the controls of Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas to a touchscreen. Sure, it's technically playable. It's a thing that, if you own thumbs, you can f**k with. But every time it functions in a way that's more underwhelming than you like, it's not because "THIS PIECE OF s**t PHONE CAN'T EVEN PLAY 2004'S BEST-SELLING PS2 TITLE." It's because, when Rockstar Games was crafting it, they never took the time to sit their employees down and say, "Congratulations on finishing this game. Now, we're going to make it so that in 13 years, people can enjoy it on a device that's mostly meant to receive text messages." And speaking of haphazard attempts to relive nostalgia ...

It was then that I discovered that Pokemon Red is a great game if you've never played any other Pokemon game before. The balancing of the types, compared to the polished system that they have now, is frustratingly broken. If you have a psychic Pokemon in Red, the world is your Cloyster, and you can rampage through it unbothered by little things like game mechanics and difficulty curves.

Nintendo
"Now I am become death."

Some game series don't have any steady progression of quality. I can't tell you overall if the Resident Evil series is any good, but I can tell you that I enjoyed 4 and 7, and that 5 and 6 are puckered buttholes. But in the case of a series like Pokemon, the new ones are absolutely more effortlessly playable than the old ones. So until Nintendo creates Pokemon Red: Redder Edition, or whatever, I will stick with my 802 monsters for now. And no amount of "Man, remember when we ALL knew what a Pikachu was? Am I right?" is going to change that.

Blaming the zombie aspect on the downfall of a bad game is easy. Zombies are like Jar Jar Binks. People didn't want to write an essay about a boring narrative or a lack of interesting character dynamics, so they said "Jar Jar Binks ruined the prequels" and called it a day. That's why we get so excited whenever we see something like Dead Island or The Last Of Us or the Walking Dead Telltale series or Red Dead Redemption: Undead Nightmare or anything Dead Rising. We're not sick of zombies; we're sick of bad games that happen to be full of f*****g zombies.

Zombies are popular because they fit everywhere. Vampires are zombies that you want to make out with. Frankenstein's monster is a zombie that just took a little elbow grease to get going. We can apply any metaphor that we want to them, and we can use them as quick cannon fodder or as the plodding thing that we have to painstakingly evade once we find ourselves trapped in a room with one. They're the Swiss army knives of entertainment. Need something that's full of decapitation? Zombies. Need something thoughtful about the darkness of the human condition? Zombies. They're the guy who's always willing to help you out at work, but the minute he tries to grab drinks with us after, we're like "Oh f**k off, Zombie. No one wants you around."

ayoubZineLaarab/Pixabay
"Oh my god, Zombie's here. We didn't invite him out, so be cool."

Zombies are an underappreciated part of pop culture. And when we get tired of them, it's usually not because we're tired of the undead; it's because we're tired of the fact that game companies will clumsily add zombies to things because it beats having to actually come up with a story.

So a demand for post-end content usually translates to "If your mediocre open-world game could give us some semblance of goals and progression, we wouldn't be pissed off when we beat the game and still feel like nothing has happened." It would probably take more attention being paid to tying in smaller quests to the main story, or giving players a clearer route to get to side missions that didn't require so much aimless forest wandering. But gamers would much rather have a fulfilling experience than one that ends too soon and is followed by a bunch of levels where you do the townspeople's chores.

Warner Bros. Interactive Entertainment
Another village, another chance to do someone's laundry.

[subtitle]"Famous Game Franchises, But As A [Insert Genre Here]"[/subtitle]

Compared to a lot of my friends, I still have a very, for lack of a better phrase, "finger guns" approach to video games. They'll tell me about how Bethesda has gone downhill, and how they've ruined the adventure or RPG genres, and all I can say is "You know what's pretty cool, cats? Fallout 4. Pew pew." However, I'm still skeptical when they tell me about what they'd do to improve the game industry or a certain series. And that's not just because I find myself constantly questioning my own happiness, slowly choking the life out of my passions and my relationships.

Daniel Dockery
"I'm dying inside! Pew pew."

Sometimes, when people discuss improving a game series, it involves dropping the franchise into another genre entirely. "How great would Legend Of Zelda be ... as a turn-based RPG?" "Wouldn't it be cool if we had a Mario survival horror game?" "Overwatch Puzzles. OVERWATCH PUZZLES." And while these all sound ... interesting, a bigger question than "How do we improve this franchise?" is "Is our method of improving this franchise going to give us anything different from what we already get from other franchises?"

A Legend Of Zelda turn-based RPG would be super cool ... for a little bit. But after the initial wave of "I'm playing an RPG with Zelda characters!" wears off, unless the game is presenting us with something extraordinary that I'm not receiving from the countless other titles that feature questionably clothed teenagers, it's just another RPG about killing monsters with swords. And if you haven't noticed, that corner of the market is pretty well-covered. If I ever die at GameStop, it will probably be under a collapsed shelf of games that all feature virile, valiant men in little elf boots. Just a pile of them, covering me, suffocating me, feeling me.

Nintendo
I don't know if "Zelda, but with a more complicated inventory system" is that much of a franchise fixer.

Game franchises don't stick with one tried and true formula because their developers are lazy. (Well, some do.) They do it because they've usually got that s**t locked down. While a Pokemon MMO sounds really great, is it giving us anything that's remarkable in comparison to the glut of MMOs already out there? Outside of recognizable monster names, will it be better than at least half of the other titles? Trust me, the Dead Space Dating Simulator is in the hearts and minds of all of us, but if it's coming after Silent Hill: Kisses In Fog Love Me Super, is it really worth it?

Daniel has a blog and a Twitter.

The proliferation of beer pong and craft beer may have you think that we're living in one of the peak times to get drunk, but humans have been getting famously hammered for millennia. Like a frat house's lawn after a kegger, history is littered with world changing events that were secretly powered by booze. The inaugural games of the Roman Coliseum, the drafting of the US Constitution and the Russian Revolution were all capped off by major parties that most attendees probably regretted in the morning.

Join Jack O'Brien and Cracked staffers Carmen Angelica, Alex Schmidt, Michael Swaim, plus comedian Blake Wexler for a retelling of history's biggest moments you didn't realize everyone was drunk for.

Get your tickets here:

For more check out 5 Reasons the Video Game Industry Is About to Crash and 5 Creepy Ways Video Games Are Trying to Get You Addicted.

Subscribe to our YouTube channel and check out 5 Ways Gamers Are Holding Back The Games They Love and watch other videos you won't see on the site!

Also follow us on Facebook. There's no reason not to.