
|
For a person, "going green" is as simple as recycling more, wasting less and always, always, always behaving like an insufferable prick in social situations. But for a corporation, "going green" can be a much harder task that costs million of dollars, thousands of hours of manpower and often painful company-wide cutbacks. Or, they can opt to do jack shit and just spend all of their money and effort convincing the public otherwise. This is what is referred to as "greenwashing," and it works like this: #6.
Who Needs Water When You Have Coca-Cola?
Listen: India is a beautiful, ancient place with a rich and storied culture and we don't mean to knock it, but it's pretty damned overcrowded. They're practically breathing other people right now, and as a result their resources are stretched taut. Water actually still means life over there--as opposed to the Western world where it's just something that needs to be enhanced with electrolytes or thrown on the t-shirts of girls who hate their fathers.
So when Coca-Cola came to India and started sucking up thousands of gallons of the nation's precious life-sustaining water each day to make their bottled acid-baths, it kind of rubbed a few (billion) people the wrong way. So to balance out this horrible misappropriation of resources, Coke tried to prove they were environmentally conscious by setting up a donation scheme to help save polar bears... which, of course, aren't native to India.
Then at a San Francisco business conference, Coke also pledged to go water neutral. Well, actually they said they "aspire to put back" what they "take out." Aspire. You can aspire to anything; take a poll of a first grade classroom and you'll get 18 kids aspiring to be astronauts, four aspiring to be policemen, two aspiring to be president and one special child aspiring to be a motorcycle. Wait, it gets better! Part of the their plan is that if they take all of the water out of one village's wells, they can become "neutral" by putting the water back... into a different village. You know, like how instead of paying back your loan to your bank, they'll allow you to just give the money to some random person instead. As long as you're paying somebody, right? #5.
Wait, isn't "Green" Also a Color?
In a thousand management meetings across the globe, the same idea takes shape: "Hmm. Environmentalism = Green. Green is a color. Let's color our products green. Holy shit! Done! That's lunch, motherfuckers. Cocaine bisque and vodka sandwiches on me!" For sheer, clanking brass-balled initiative, we have to admire GM the most for this kind of thing. Producer of the "gets-one-mile-per-Middle-Eastern-skirmish" Hummer, GM desperately needed a way to clean up its name and get some green cred. So, did they go for fuel-efficiency? A desperately needed push to hydrogen power? At least recycled paper in their sales flyers? Nope, they just changed their logo from blue to green. That's it!
Insiders said the new color was intended "in an effort to show consumers that [GM] is leaner, greener, more focused on fuel efficiency and better able to make quick decisions." ...wait, by drawing something you can make it reality?! We had no idea this Harold and the Purple Crayon-like power existed! Hold on one second!
#4.
Green Tongued
But it doesn't stop with just a color change on the log. Since there are no laws against outright lying about new-age bullshit buzz words, it was only a matter of time before somebody got the brilliant idea to advertise their products as "green" without having a single green feature. For instance, it's generally agreed that cloth diapers are more eco-friendly than the disposables. So how do you make people buy the landfill crowding, disposable kind? Use fewer trees? Minimize packaging? Nah. Just color the package green and print some meaningless eco-phrases on it.
Organic cotton? Yep, it's mentioned - but how much? Is it certified? A deafening silence on that. Recycled packaging? Why yes, a full 20 percent of the packaging is from recycled materials! 20 percent! How green! A full fifth of all of their diapers are- wait, you mean just the thin packaging is 20 percent recycled? Umm, how about the actual diapers inside? Made from pulverized bald eagle genitals? That's... less friendly. That seems downright unnecessary actually.
And then there are "Earth-loving" materials companies can say they've converted to, like bamboo. Super fast growing, requiring no cultivation and can grow anywhere... hell, bamboo is the sustainable material of the future, if you believe the ads for products like bamboo clothing. And, making clothing from bamboo would be pretty damn eco-friendly, except that most mass-market bamboo materials first have to be crushed, ground, dissolved in lye, mixed with carbon disulphide (which is a neurotoxin), then washed in battery acid and spun into fibers. So, on the downside that "natural" bamboo material you're wearing basically took a trip through the toxic waste dump. |
The 6 Most Misguided Causes Ever Made Famous by Celebrities
5 Guilty Pleasures The Web Killed While You Weren't Looking
7 Terrifying Prehistoric Creatures (That Are Still Around)
6 Slacker Behaviors That Science Says Are Good For You
Jul 31st: A Day In Cracked History
6 Objective Reasons The US Army Should Invade BP
The 5 Most Statistically Full of Shit National Stereotypes
BP: Still Working On It, Promise
The 6 Most Half Assed Attempts at Corporate Green Washing
Heroes
Just
Got
Owned.
I hated NBC's Green Week. You just know that at some point in the future someone's going to watch reruns of some of those shows and wonder what's with all the eco-awkwardness. I liked the slap at Heroes, though!
The BAE "eco-friendly" weapons thing actually does make some sense. There's a huge problem in Iraq of the after effects from radioactive, "depleted-uranium" rounds we used during the Persian Gulf War. Almost 20 years after it was finished, the radioactive leftovers from those rounds have poisoned water supplies, caused mutation in new generations of children, and dramatically increased the amount of people getting cancer. Cleaning up the weapons we use now helps to insure future generations aren't being punished(more than necessary).
Yeah, but I think you and BAE are kind of missing the point here.
"Almost 20 years after it was finished, the radioactive leftovers from those rounds have poisoned water supplies, caused mutation in new generations of children, and dramatically increased the amount of people getting cancer."
You do realize those charges are all bulls**t cooked up by antiwar activists, don't you?
Think about it- there have never been figures for rates of cancer and birth defects in Iraq. So on what basis is this "increase" derived.
Being in the military, I have to agree with BAE's eco-friendly policy. At least they are actually doing something unlike the half-assed attempts of the other companies. Also, war isn't going away anytime soon. Anything we can do to minimize the after effects of war is a boon to humanity as far as I'm concerned.
Wowwwwwwwwwww!!!Recently, I came across a hot sugardaddy and sugarbabe dating site.
----**Sugar daddy hunt dot come**----
There are many sassy young ladies and rich successful personals seeking fun, friendship, love ,marriage and even more!!!!! Maybe you wanna check out or tell your friends.
OK It's good and makes a worthy point but the stuff about bamboo is BS. Oh no, battery acid (non-toxic), and lye! (non toxic), and alcohol which is a neurotoxin, oops i mean carbon disulphide. So they used a few chemicals which when appropriately processed don't do any environmental damage at all. Nothing wrong with chemicals, animals are crawling (and flying, walking) with loads of them.
ARGH TRIPLE-POST!
What do you mean triple [sic] post?
What did you mean "[sic]"? Did you think it was spelled wrong or were you trying to reiterate your point?
I don't understand what being green-tongued has to do with the bagger 288 (or was that the 293) honestly, i was expecting a rant on big-ass manly machines and stuff, not huggies. but alas.
The calendar... Oh my god... I headsploded.
Good stuff ... I love this site
Classic Cracked hilarity ensued. Reminds one of Malaysian car manufacturers, Proton, producing a 'greener' model by calling it Cares [as in Proton Cares]; and it comes in its own self appointed tone of 'caring' metallic green.
Oh- Ha- right underneath the one bashing the eco-friendly phrases for diapers, there was an ad for "chlorine free" diapers. In green. With a leaf on the advert. It was just brilliant.
Super funny article! But seriously, can´t Cracked do something about all these ads in the comments? They´re extremely aggravating...
I think its a little unfair to say GM has done nothing but slap green onto its logo. A lot of their cars surpass their Japanese competitors in fuel efficiency and they're about to (re)release an electric car. I'm sorry, but I am going to have to make the assumption that you are working for Toyota
i think you're working for GM
There's now officially more spambots than users on Cracked dot com.
It`s been like this for as long as I can remember *sob*
Should be a way to flag spam and there should be admins to delete their accounts.
That earth-raping Calendar is so f**king funny!!! I almost hilarified my ass off!
Thoroughly enjoyable. The Coldplay joke was sweet. Oh man, those goddamn airline surcharges... seriously, what jerks.
eh, nothing much to write home about here, but i will say i lolled at "but Heroes, at least, really committed to the effort: They recycled the same storyline for the last four years."
While reading a lot of these comments I notice people seem to be confusing "efficiency" with "sustainability". Just because a company finds a way to cut costs doesn't automatically mean it is environmentally sound. In fact thats often the last consideration. And people defending GM should really watch a docu-film called Who Killed the Electric Car
The electric car killed itself with s**tty range. It really didn't need anyone's help.
Even worse was Marks and Spencer's ridiculous answer to this 'Green' bulls**t: charging for plastic bags (a couple of years ago, when all this started, all major stores gave free plastic bags with purchases in the UK). The public lapped up M&S's greedy bulls**ttery as if they were the messiah cometh and the largely rich, pretentious yuppies that shop there lauded the their exceedingly poor pragmatism over everyone else, because, with this green nonsense, paying for something that used to be free is entirely logical and fair.
Yeah, Aldi do that - 15p for a plastic bag. A GOD DAMN PLASTIC BAG. 15p TO BUY THE RAPIST OF THE EARTH.
I will be quite glad when cycling is no longer "trendy" for hipsters. They make actual cyclists look bad.
Cyclist make themselves look bad.