8 (Pointless) Laws All Comic Book Movies Follow
Hollywood is a land of money and cowardice. Every big film is basically a $150 million gamble, so they tend to play it safe and stick to a successful formula.
Nowhere is this more evident than in the genre of big-budget superhero franchises, where it's been decided that you must follow most if not all of the eight rules below:
For some unknown reason, tradition states that the first movie must consist largely of something no one in the audience paid to see: The superhero as he lived before he could do any cool superhero stuff.
Other genres don't feel the need to do this; Die Hard didn't spend the first half of the movie with John McClane taking target practice, Rambo didn't spend an hour showing Rambo in basic training. Why can't we just jump in?
Instead we have to watch Peter Parker struggling as a photographer, and Bruce Banner quietly working as a scientist, as if we must first appreciate the tedium of their regular lives before we get to see them jump off an exploding building.
And to double the problem, they usually throw in an origin story for one or more of the villains, too. Behold! Here is the awesome badass supervillain, back when he was just a disgruntled dude in a lab coat!
Often to save time they'll cram those two origin stories together, by having the main villain kill off the hero's parents (regardless of whether or not it happened in the comic book) simultaneously starting their respective careers in superheroism and supervillainy.
A young Joker kills Bruce Wayne's parents, Robin's are trapezed to death, Kingpin kills Daredevil's dad
Also ...
In Spider-Man 3, the previous origin story is changed so that the current villain (The Sandman, Marko Cain) is now the murderer of Uncle Ben, a plot point based entirely on the premise that none of the fans owned a DVD of the first film.
For the first film, the franchise always whips out the most prominent villain in the hero's rogue gallery. They don't have a choice, millions are at stake and if you go with a lesser villain there may not be any sequels at all. Unfortunately, this means that you're going with a decreasing grade of villain for the rest of the series.
He's made of sand
Thus introduces the Multiple B-List Villain Rule: Since the best villain has been used in the first film, all sequels must use a minimum of two less-popular villains. Quantity to make up for quality. Michael Keaton's Batman fought the Joker first, then found himself simultaneously taking on the combination of the Penguin and Christopher Walken. Superman fights Lex Luthor in the first film, in the second he's going up against Lex and three supervillains.
They do sometimes cheat this rule by trying to bring back the first villain as often as possible, regardless of whether the villain died in the first movie. They'll film flashbacks if necessary. Lex Luthor, Magneto, Dr. Doom and the Green Goblin have all appeared in nearly every single film in their respective franchises--two of them returning from on-screen deaths, proving that nothing is impossible in a world where big box office dollars are at stake.
Also ...
Interestingly (or bafflingly, depending on your point of view) the villains often turn up in a predictable pattern: the Brain, the Bod and the Bumbler.
Ms. Teschmacher (the Bod) Otis (the Bumbler) Lex (the Brains)
The Brain is the planner and nearly always creates the main conflict the heroes must resolve. However, since the plan is usually very simplistic and takes about two seconds of screen time to explain, the Brain spends most of their screen time heaping verbal or even physical abuse on the Bumbler.
Bod -> Brains -> Bumbler
The Bod is usually there to show cleavage, wear tight leather pants and show partial nudity. Some market research suggests this appeals to comic book fans.
The Bumbler began as just that, a character who shuffles around, usually screwing up the simplest of assignments. However, this role has evolved into a mute or retarded character with great physical strength but little in the way of brains. However, they are still the target of jokes and abuse by other characters. Plus, they often provide many of the film's comic relief which may or may not be gut-wrenchingly awful.
No one knows why this formula has been used so often. Perhaps it is some sort of primal urge in humanity where the three faces represent the three ages of man. Or, perhaps there's some deep psychological comfort in triangles or groups of three. Maybe it's a subconscious representation of the Holy Trinity or a subliminal image of the Masonic Pyramid.
Or, maybe Hollywood executives think we're fucking imbeciles.
You get the idea.
Look, Hollywood, the whole "secret identity" thing is there for a reason. In the comic, a hero's secret identity is the only way they prevent their enemies from sending wave after wave of henchmen after them and their families and friends. Yet, in the transition to film, secret identities are often the first casualty.
Secret identities are usually revealed in the second film in the franchise, to a girlfriend, family member or even the villain. For instance in Superman II, a Superman who is desperate to get into Margot Kidder's pants reveals his secret identity, undergoes possibly permanent genetic damage by using radiation to get rid of his powers, walks from the North Pole to Alaska, and gets a good beating along the way. Hope she was worth it, dude.
Michael Keaton, also in an effort to get into somebody's pants, reveals his secret identity in Batman Returns to his girlfriend and the Penguin, also revealing a previously unknown fact about Batman: his mask is made out of Fruit Roll-Ups.
Though neither of them can even come close to touching Peter Parker in Spider-Man 2, who reveals his identity to:
a) Harry Osbourne
b) Mary Jane Watson
c) Dr. Octopus
d) A subway train full of passengers
It was almost like that last season of Ellen where every episode was about her telling some new group of strangers that she's a lesbian. But remember: THAT WAS THE LAST SEASON OF ELLEN.
Also ...
There is with this rule the Doomed Franchise Corollary: If the film is not likely to have a sequel (Daredevil) and/or incredibly stupid (Daredevil) then what the hell, go ahead and reveal the secret identity to someone in the first film.
Hollywood hates boy scouts, so nearly all heroes have to turn evil, at least temporarily. Nearly always, this change occurs in the third film of the series. Usually the hero somehow has to fight the evil version of himself, demonstrating with some of the most ham-fisted symbolism possible that the real villain is within ourselves. Get it?!
Most of us are still having nightmares about Spider-Man 3, where Peter Parker, under the control of the alien symbiote, turned into the love child of Alex from A Clockwork Orange and John Travolta from Saturday Night Fever, while looking oddly like a lesbian biker.
The evil symbiote then bonds with Eddie Brock to become Venom, the evil version of Spider-Man, and they fight to the death.
Only slightly less ridiculous was Superman 3. Unable to figure out the "secret ingredient" for kryptonite, Gus Gorman substitutes cigarette tar into the formula, which causes Superman to turn into an alcohol-fueled sex machine. This then causes Superman to split into a Good and Bad Superman, which then, you guessed it, fight each other to the death.
Also ...
They found another way to handle this in X-Men 2, since they have a group of heroes, they were able to mix it up a little bit by just having some of the heroes turn on each other.
Thus Phoenix must fight a brainwashed Cyclops, a brainwashed Professor X almost kills everybody, a brainwashed Nightcrawler almost kills the President and Wolverine must fight a brainwashed Lady Deathstryke. As an added bonus, Lady Deathstryke is the evil twin of Wolverine, but less hairy and almost as hot.
Another variation occurs in Batman & Robin, where a mind-controlled Batman and Robin, apparently under the hypnotic control of Poison Ivy, argue about who gets to pork her.








Of course the first movie is an origin story, are you stupid?
ReplyAh Larry Niven at his finest
ReplyHoly shit... this guy is totally right with that last one. What movie is coming out in a few days? A prequel/reboot to the Alien franchise! Given, I have a lot more faith in Prometheus than I did in Superman Returns, though slightly less than Batman Begins.
ReplyTwo to three comic book movies arguably sharing a theme (if you squint a little) does not a (pointless) law make. Especially when I can name more movies that didn't follow those rules than this author can say did.
ReplyCracked articles about comic book movies r srs biznezz..?
Avengers break the mold?
ReplyLegend lol.
Sandman was so horribly disappointing. Comic book movies are pointless because they are based on a culture comprised of outsiders yet they always aim to make the most money possible. They can't do that without making them accessible, but that's the problem; comic books aren't accessible. To truly appreciate most long-running comic narratives you need some degree of knowledge on that universe's history and you can't cram all that s**t into a ten minute gap at the start of the picture. Most comic fans even hated the Watchmen movie and nobody besides comic fans had heard of it anyway!
ReplyI think if Hollywood invited comic book nerds to donate to a project, even as little as a dollar each, they could easily fund comic book movies that stay true to the universe they portray and don't resort to using s****y generic looking characters like sandman so as to avoid alienating non-dork viewers. It'll never happen but it's a nice thought.
This reads like snippets of multiple Tv Tropes articles.
ReplyOrigin stories add depth to the character, yes I like to appreciate origin stories. Don't you ever wonder how things come to be?
ReplyEvil versions of heroes add an interesting dynamic, as do villains redeeming themselves. Everything else I agree with you on.
If a law only has two examples, you might as well say there's a law that all comic book movies star Spiderman.
ReplyNon sequiteur, sir...
All comic book movies within the Marvel Universe, that take place in New York City,SHOULD at least feature Spider-Man. In real life you're never more than 6-10 feet from a spider; the same rule seems to apply to Spider-Man within Marvel Comics.
I disagree about #8. Origin stories really can be tedious in the wrong hands, but I think they often help us enjoy superheroes more. Sometimes it enhances the action to remember who's behind the mask or the mission, and what drives them. It also leaves way more room for charater development and more complex plots. Ass-kickings are fabulous but personally, I think the best superheroes -- and villains -- are about more than that.
ReplyOne of the only things I didn't like about Tim Burton's first Batman movie was the fact that Bruce Wayne and Batman just kind of . . . appeared. There they were, being rich and fighting crime . . . . . . but why? And how? That's another thing I enjoy about origin stories -- you get to see where all that cool power, tech, secret lab business, and style comes from. I loved getting to see Chris Nolan's Batman get his s**t together and Tony Stark test his Iron Man suit.
Side note: Heath Ledger's Joker is the most amazing example of a character *without* an origin story I've seen. His character mocks the whole idea of origin stories by lying to (presumably) everyone about why he is the way he is. As Alfred says, "some men just want to watch the world burn." The fact that the audience had *no way of understanding his actions* was a big part of what made him both fascinating and frightening, and I wouldn't want him any other way . . . but it's not a trait I'd like to see too much of in comic book movies, otherwise things would get boring real fast.
Heath Ledger's joker was probably the most true to comics origin story in any comic book movie, ever. Even though the Killing Joke had an origin story for the Joker, that story was ret-conned and made into a possible origin story that existed among others, kinda making it so even the Joker isn't fully sure of his real origin (cementing the insane sociopath element of his character). Thus, by "mocking" the idea of an origin story, Nolan still included the Joker's comic book origin.
Mind blown, BearShirt!
The exception to the majority of these "rules": Iron Man.
Reply Hide All See All 5 RepliesI'm pretty sure Iron Man had a origin story, a second movie with more than one villian, a trifecta that worked against him with two who redeem themsevles to him (brains - Vanko, bumbler - Hammer, bods - Pepper and the Black Widow; both of whom are against Tony in the middle of Iron Man 2 and reconcile with him by the end of the movie), absent parents, conflict with allies, adversaries who invade the hideout (Rhodey may be Tony's friend, and Tony may have given subtle hints that he meant for it to happen, but taking the War Machine armor as a member of the US military was an example of adversaries breaching the secret hideout), etc. While it does not follow all of the rules (it hasn't gotten far enough to obey the re-boot rule, and the producers didn't shoot their load putting the Mandarin into the first movie), I would argue that Iron Man does follow many of the rules. A real exception would be any adaptation of the Hulk, which has never produced a movie good enough for the producers to even try to make a connected sequel.
Also, Tony loses the "invincible" part to his being Iron Man (essentially the power of being Iron Man) when he reveals to the world what a drunk he is at his birthday party while at the same time slowly dying of blood poisoning. He regains his powers when he finally gets what his dad was trying to say to him in all of those old videos, cures himself of the blood poisoning, and gives himself a power source ten times more powerful than before.
I wouldn't call Tony's origin story tedious at all though. And really, I don't see Hammer as a "villain" in Iron Man 2, he just wanted to beat out Stark in the same industry, he had no idea what Venko was doing and ultimately got turned into a tool by him.
The secret identity thing is obviously a moot point since he told the world was Iron Man. Iron Man doesn't have "powers" to lose, unless his suit gets severely wrecked up. Still had his suit, still fought Rhodes to an even stand still (and, as you pointed out, LET him win). The bad guys never really "invade" Tony's home as both Rhodes (who wasn't a bad guy and was actually trying to help his friend) and even Obadiah Stane were long time friends of Tony's whom he let come and go as they please. No villain has yet to redeem themselves (unless, for some reason you still want to count Rhody as a villain).
Also, the first movie had multiple villians - Obidiah and those ... terrorists? Whatever they were, they break the "most iconic villian in the first, multiple sub-par villians in the second" mold by showing up in the first movie. Whiplash was also a lot cooler, smarter (his plan to show Tony as weak and ineffective ... kinda worked, even at the end of the movie), and more motivated than Obidiah, so the second movie didn't include a sub-par villian. The same could be said of Nolan's Batman franchise, which holds off on the Joker until the second movie.
And don't forget that he ended up screwing him self over and inadvertently giving Vanko the Iron Man technology, essentially facing an evil version of himself.
Not only are the examples in this forced, but the #1 rule is COMPLETE BULL$#¡%. First of all, he's basing it on the TWO film series' that actually got that far. Two. Secondly, while you could Superman Returns call Superman Returns a "reboot," for no other reason than recasting and ignoring the unpopular films in the series, it was not only advertised as a "loose sequel," it reminded faithful fans of this by having an homage the the first film every three minutes. Not to mention, they're NOW doing a COMPLETE reboot, far more deserving of being called a reboot.
Reply Hide All See All 4 RepliesAside from that, there was Batman Begins, which people assume was rebooted to distance itself from Batman & Robin. I'm not sure it's that simple, but by that point, if we disregard Superman Returns as a reboot rather than a loose sequel, that means that by the time this article was written, it was THE ONLY VALID EXAMPLE of this "pointless rule."
Dumb, dumb, dumb.
Comic franchises that adhere to rule #1
-Batman
-Superman (you yourself said they are now doing a complete re-boot, because it would be pointless to make a sequel to Superman Returns)
-the X-Men (in the wake of the clusterfuck that was X-Men 3, they came out with First Class, and have put plans for a 4 on hiatus)
-Spider-man (after that s****y third movie, this summer we will get to see "Spider-man Begins" or whatever the hell they're trying to call this clear rip-off of what DC did with Batman Begins)
I guess maybe limiting the rule to the 5th film is what is wrong with rule #1. Really there is a re-boot every time a comic franchise comes out with a s****y movie, generally spaced about 5 to 10 years apart. For references see:
-the Hulk
-Captain America (The First Avenger was NOT the first one)
-the Punisher
And to be sure, I just want to assure everyone out there that I loved every single comic book movie that has ever come out that I have seen (I can't say I've seen them all), but you have to realize I have the taste of a 13 year old boy even though I am twice that age (my favorite movie is BASEketball...).
the real insanity is that he seemed to insult batman begins, the first great batman movie
Wow, you obviously did not watch Batman and Batman Returns at a young age (when they are amazing and beautiful).
Rule #1 says the FIFTH film is the reboot. Not that a reboot occurs at all. Thus, Batman is the only franchise that adheres to that rule.
The examples in this article are stupidly forced to match the writers weird thoughts on how comic book movies are structured.
Reply#4: The hero must at some point lose his powers, and his example in Batman Begins is when Bruce is beaten by his master. Yea I see that...??
And the #8 his exambles are Rocky and Rambo. I thought it was an article about comic book movies. I didn't know Rocky was based on a comic book?
First of all, the author pointed out that in the case of Batman, "losing his powers" is having to fight a group of people without his costume or gadgets, which are essentially his powers. And in #8 he points out that those movies are not comic book movies but they follow the rule anyway. Good job nit-picking!!
""letting the girl "invade" his secret headquarters will always do the trick (see Superman 2, Batman and both Fantastic Four movies"
ReplyWho had a secret headquarters in the Fantastic Four movies?
Ben Grimm. It was in his pants and he let Alicia Masters in.
I am glad to check the article. I am a professional woman. I am just
Replydivorced. I lo ve younger men. I am dat ing a man who is 25 year old.
he's caring, kind, has a real job that earns him good money and he is
very attractive. I think younger men like cougars because they have no
agenda, don't usually want to get married and are usually very
independent and don't need a man to take care of them.I meet the younger
men on this place COUGARCHATS,C0M.
Who liked this comment?
They always have exactly one like. Is it possible to like your own comments? That would explain it.
Does Prometheus count as the gritty Alien reboot?
ReplyI think it definitely does. Live Free or Die Hard wasn't really a reboot tho, but points to the writer for at least calling a sequel.
To my knowledge, Prometheus is more of a movie about events taking place within the Alien universe, but not actually dealing with the Xenomorphs themselves.
It's only a minor point, but I've always been conflicted about the part where Mystique "helps" the government find Magneto's hide-out. One the one hand she does show them where it is, while on the other hand they show up to just Multiple Man, so it was sort of a trap. So she could have easily been a part of the master plan by Magneto, or have actually reformed.
ReplyIf they'd been able to film the final scene with Magneto as they wanted to, Raven would have been playing chess with him. The implication was that she was, in fact, lying to the government as part of a plan between Magneto and herself.
In Spiderman 2's defense for #6, he didn't exactly "reveal" his identity to Harry and the people on the train. He was tied up and couldn't stop Harry from ripping his mask off, and (IIRC) it got pulled off during the fight with Doc on the train.
ReplyI disagree with #8 - I like origin stories.
ReplyAlso, Superman 4 is worse than Batman and Robin. At least the latter was stupid enough to be funny, the former is tormenting.
Thanks for that; I don't know why so many people hate on Batman and Robin (George Clooney happens to be my favorite batman). I loved all the cameos and hilarious one liners - the movie was so ridiculous and funny - and didn't star a block of wood.
Origin stories are great, definitely include them in your comic/novel/tv series. But if you have only the limited time of a film, devoting 45 minutes to a preface to the actual story messes up the pacing of the whole thing.
For some reason I read "Ms. Teschmacher" as "Ms. Titsmaster". Wonder why. ~.~
Reply