It's true that some people are merely passing along something they don't realize has an author. But more often, people without the ability to craft anything funny are deliberately removing authors and posting work as their own to build their accounts on the backs of others. If you really want to just spread something you think is funny, you hit "Retweet" or "Reblog" or "Share." It's that easy. Much easier than even cutting and pasting. We all know people who share Cracked articles, and then we know the other pathetic psychopaths who cut and paste whole Cracked articles into their own sites and blogs like they wrote it. This is no different.

So Who Are These People?

That's a good question, and one I've asked often, because these people make no sense to me. While we're all taught at an early age that plagiarism is wrong, I get why someone might steal passages out of an encyclopedia (or Wikipedia) and paste them into their homework: they're lazy or bored. They just want to get the work done and get a passing grade. They're trying to do something they're forced to do as quickly as possible. It's a shortcut to not getting an "F" (Unless they're caught -- then it's a shortcut to a definite "F," but at least I get it. It's cheating at school).

But no one requires you to make jokes, and I can't understand the kind of person who wants credit for someone else's bit. How does that feel good? What joy does getting laughs from someone else's material bring? It's like leading your girlfriend into a darkened room and tricking her into sleeping with your buddy, and then taking pride in how hard she comes. And no, that's not hyperbole. If you steal jokes, that is exactly what you are doing: being inexplicably proud about making your girlfriend come with someone else's cock. Congrats, you sad, impotent little man.

Tanya Constantine/Blend Images/Getty Images
"You totally got her off, bro. I'm the sex master!"

But here's the thing. I've confronted these people online many times -- both on my own behalf and on the behalf of my friends. You'd think they'd be embarrassed and ashamed. But it's pretty clear shame is not in their assortment of emotions. Sure, I'm used to the anonymity of the Internet helping people be shameless, but some of these morally compromised halfwits use their own names, and hide only behind the following false and irredeemable defenses.

Here are three excuses that social media plagiarists need to stop making.

Let's put the vagaries of this nation's legal system aside for a second, shall we? I'm pretty sure no one is interested in what written published material can or can not be plagiarized. Let's start with the fact that, when these people are confronted with bad behavior (presenting someone else's talent as their own), their response is to basically argue that they can't be arrested because of a technicality. That's like being caught with a bag full of someone else's yen in Japan and proudly proclaiming, "It's OK, I have diplomatic immunity!"

But regardless of the legal protections afforded ideas and written words, let's just look at what happens to comedy thieves. Remember how Carlos Mencia had his own show? Remember when the world loved Dane Cook? Remember what allegations of theft did to their careers?

Carlos Mencia clearly took from Bill Cosby:

And though some disagree, there were allegations that Dane Cook stole from Louis CK.

If jokes can't be copyrighted, if creation can't be stolen, then why were there so many people so pissed off at these two accused gentlemen?

Putting quotes around something with nothing more is bullshit, and his follow-up excuse that "it's only Twitter" is also bullshit. Yes, the way your little sister or hacky uncle use Twitter is pointless. They tweet about long lines at the DMV or what they made for dinner. But having a successful Twitter account means something to comedic people. People have gotten book deals on the basis of their Twitter accounts alone. Other authors rely on a growing Twitter account sell their novels. Some comics try out jokes on Twitter, then later use them in their sets. Right or wrong, having a successful account can matter.

And if this is all really "just Twitter," if these tweets are really of no value, then why would anyone be stealing them? Look at how many followers the Men's Humor account has. Play a fun game. Cut and paste every single tweet of theirs into Twitter's search option. See how many were stolen. Last time I checked, I got literally three in a row, all from accounts with tiny numbers of followers compared to their 3.4 million. And Twitter has verified the account, so you, the consumer, can be sure that it's the REAL Men's Humor stealing your comedy and creativity to build up their disgraceful feed. Trust me, they don't think mere tweets are worthless.