The Only Argument on the Internet in Favor of SOPA
The Internet is on the verge of collapse. Again. It's all very dramatic. This time it has nothing to do with the threat of tiered services, malicious spyware or the ubiquity of porn, but a bill working its way through Washington. Members of Congress, at their predictably constipated clip, are sweating and straining to pass the Stop Online Piracy Act, the primary intent of which would be to shut down foreign websites guilty of copyright infringement. Except the bill is so broadly worded and clumsily phrased that, if enacted, it would effectively hand over censorship of the entire Internet to American businesses, and the entertainment industry in particular. Incidentally, it was lobbyists for the entertainment industry who wrote this bill in the first place. So, just like Hans Gruber's plan in Die Hard, politics is only the pretense of this whole production -- this is really about money. And I'm fine with that.
Photo source: Piracy
I should point out before I go any further that SOPA is destined to fail, at least at its publicly stated purpose. SOPA is poorly designed by people who may or may not have ever seen the Internet in person, and it's written for 50- to 60-year-old congressmen who almost certainly did not receive it by email. The act won't stop piracy anywhere in the world and in fact might actually encourage it, but I firmly believe that it will absolutely be effective at its secondary secret initiative. In fact I am counting on it.
If SOPA is approved, it would allow businesses to point out the offending "rogue" sites regardless of what country they are in and have them shut down. But it also allows them to point out any site they even suspect might enable or facilitate copyright theft, with the same result. Assuming this isn't your first time on the Internet, then you should already know that includes every site in existence; any website that allows embedded videos, pictures or even hosts a comment section is guilty of enabling or facilitating piracy because that's the nature of the Internet as a whole. The act gives film studios and music executives the power to erase nearly any website they see as a threat to business, putting the task on the owner of the website to prove his or her innocence.
"I saw YouTube out in the woods, infringing."
Naturally, the Internet community has rallied together in opposition. Everyone has given up on fighting one another long enough to attack this bill the only way they know how: By making Hitler videos about it. Everyone, that is, except for me. I'm supporting SOPA and its crafty sister bill, PIPA, because I am not interested in what the future holds for social media or the fate of knowledge, artistic expression or even interpersonal connections around the world. I am interested in revenge.
Four years ago, I wrote an article for an entertainment website on the best film deaths of non-memorable characters. In the very first comment, a gentleman from Australia who evidently disagreed with my assessments encouraged me to fuck myself and called me a "Gaping chick hole." I know he was from Australia because I looked up his IP address. The comment has since been deleted, but the damage was done. I think what hurt most about the whole ordeal was the confusion. While priding myself on sexual competency, I wasn't sure I knew what a chick hole was. I'm still not sure. I'm assuming he meant a vagina, but his insult discounted any of the working pieces. He didn't call me labia or vulva. No, to him I was the nothingness between all the fleshy folds and sensitivities. The hole itself. I was the absence of anything standing between walls of greatness. That hurt, and SOPA represents the first opportunity I have to really make him pay.
"This negative space right here? That's you. Like a tiny vagina ghost."
Thanks to some furious Internet detectiving, I know that he has a blog with its own domain. I won't share the link here, because he doesn't deserve the traffic. All you need to know is that this blog violates several of the rules laid out by SOPA. He has uploaded video from the women's half-pipe competition at the 2010 Olympics, recorded directly from his television, as well as some damning footage of him doing acoustic covers of Linkin Park songs. In addition, throughout all his asinine posts, he refuses to use apostrophes or to capitalize anything, which isn't technically illegal according to the current version of the bill but worth pointing out so you know exactly the kind of asshole we're dealing with.
Yep, now we're on the same page.
Now, for anyone who doesn't understand the ins and outs of SOPA's enforcement policies, let me describe exactly how this will play out in each delicious detail. First, Universal, Disney, Viacom or any of the other entertainment giants would need to be convinced that he is deliberately infringing on their copyrights. This shouldn't be too difficult, because these companies have a long history of misunderstanding exactly what constitutes a threat to their business on the Internet, and because I'm also very persuasive. From there, they can issue court orders to any payment processors or advertisers doing business with his blog. Considering my 15 hate-visits a day probably make up the majority of his traffic, I doubt his website is connected to PayPal or AdSense, so this step technically won't do much except humiliate him, hopefully.
Court orders are also simultaneously sent to search engines, barring them from displaying his blog in their rankings. This will effectively cut off anyone from finding his site or stumbling on it by accident. All his Linkin Park covers will be like angsty, lonely ships adrift out in the broad expanse of the World Wide Web. But, you know, more so than they are now.
"Craaawling in my skiiiin, these wounds th-- aaah forget it."
Finally, the death blow. Court orders sent to his domain registrar would threaten suit if they don't block his subscriber access and take down his website. Within a matter of days, his stupid blog would be erased from the Internet entirely without him ever knowing he had done anything wrong.
I only wish I could be there when he tries to log in to his website for the last time, probably to upload some new video of plagiarized nonsense, and finds everything missing. I'd give anything to see his pale, fat face in the exact moment he realizes that the space he used to occupy online, a space that only belonged to him, has now been replaced by nothing, just a hole. A big empty chick hole in the middle of the Internet, and he will finally understand what it feels like to be defined by absence. I don't think that's asking too much.
Hmmm, too far?
Sadly, all the collective hatred toward SOPA means that it may never see the light of day. Major websites like Reddit are planning site-wide blackouts on January 18 in protest, and Google, Twitter, YouTube and Facebook have already spoken up in opposition. But I only ask that they take a minute to consider my point of view, to see this bill not as a threat but as a weapon. I want everyone to try to imagine just how gratifying it would be to single out the very worst people on the Internet and obliterate their online existence. Think it over. I'll be waiting.
You can follow Soren's petty acts of revenge on Twitter and Tumblr.
Check out more from Soren in Dear Hotmail: What The Hell Happened to You? and The 5 Creepiest Defense Attorney Websites.









I was going to quote an awesome something from the article down here, then ask Soren if I could name my unborn son after him. Then I realized there are too many quotables in this article, so I'll just say: Soren Bowie, I am hereby naming my unborn (first) son after you.
ReplyI love how clever this article is! The “A Modest Proposal” angle was such a funny idea! Not a lot of people are willing to put the time and effort into writing satire, nowadays. I believe SOPA could have been an effective bill, if it had not been worded so broad. I believe internet piracy is a valid problem, and it needs to be stopped, but at the price of innocent websites being shut down? That would be unjust.
ReplyI think it’s funny how some people didn’t quite get that this was a joke. I got that it was a joke right off the bat. Then again, “A Modest Proposal” is one of my favorite works of satire, so it was very clear to me what was going on. Way to use humor to get your opinion out to the world! It’s a great tool, especially if you use it well.
My friend just told me a nice place -- T' a'' ll m' i n 'g 'l' e. c 'o 'M '-- it's the most effective site in the world to connect with, date and marry tall, and big people.. It's worthy a try.
ReplyIs it too much to ask that our elected officials pass a basic test of internet competency before trying to regulate said internet? I get the feeling that most of them wouldn't know where to type the "website number", as Biden called it.
ReplyHmm, all the backlash over SOPA is interesting. If you aren't stealing, then what do you have to worry about?
ReplyJust about every site would get shut down. The way SOPA was written means that every single site with pictures or video clips or audio clips that are suspected of violating copyright laws will be shut down.
Even the official site for the main sponsor of SOPA would get shut down because the background picture that he used for his site didn't credit the photographer. Look it up, he used a photograph without crediting the photographer.
SOPA PIPA IS A BULLSHIT MADE BY AN a*****e WHO NOT FINISH THE ECONOMIC CRISIS IN AMERICA BUT CENSORED THE INTERNET USING f*****g MONEY AND GREED DAMMED YOU ALL TO HELL!!!
Replydude, calm down
I find it funny that someone with the handle "methmonkey" thinks you're too hyped up. Pretty damning when your ragethusiasm alienates the meth-addicted primate demographic
It doesn't shut down sites. It goes after the revenue for pirate sites and tells Youtube to not allow tv episodes and movies to be played on their site that havent been given the ok to do so.
Reply"From there, they can issue court orders to any payment processors or advertisers doing business with his blog."
ReplyYet another government-nanny problem solved by Bitcoin (c).
It would be hilarious to be able to do that, but as written the bill would have put absolutely none of that power in our hands. None of us are "clean" enough to risk drawing the attention of those with the power to ZOT! away the offender's website without exposing what we've done.
Reply"Mr. Censorship Officer! Billy's hosting pirated videos on his website!"
"Oh really, Jimmy? How do you know?"
"Because I linked to them on mine- AWW CRAP!"
I am currently using this article as a source for my thesis :)
ReplyWow...butthurt much?
Reply... Damn, that's actually a good point. True, I want my internet free range and all that jazz... but there are also a lot, and I mean A LOT, of people I would love to crush under the mighty heel of the american legal system. Even if it seems to be a stiletto...
ReplyThe guy in the photo with the model of the female reproductive system is pointing at the uterus.
ReplyOkay new rule. Don't piss off Soren Bowie.
ReplyOkay new rule. Don't piss off Soren Bowie.
ReplySomething I need to understand... does this count for something with a US copyright or licence? What about intellectual property that has a European, Asian or Austral licence, will Big Brother still try to whack that?
ReplyHonestly? I feel like the people locked in the library of Alexandria before the christians invaded it in the film Agora... [Stage Direction: Armed, black-clad men burst into room. Commentator is apprehended for using movie name without appropriate rights or licence.]
Don't worry, they're working on a similar and international agreement called ACTA. Last I heard, the specific language in the bill hasn't been disclosed so we don't even know how bad it is yet.
Btw, sopa doesn't matter anyway, people from other countries have already been extradited to the US and given prison sentences and had their sites sure down for copyright infringement under the existing laws, so I'm confused as to why they are even trying to pass and new legislation
ReplyOf course he listens to linkin park, the universal band of douche bags
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesI thought that was Nickelback.
Two for two. Can I make the hat trick with some Creed?
f**k you
All the people bitching becuase nobody gets the sarcasm should stop and think. Sarcasm is the lowest form of humour, so some people won't notice it as they are smarter than some dumbshit that doesn't get wit or irony. Explain the sarcasm or make it more obvious to those who are used to a higher intellectual class of comedy.
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesxD
Thats the equivalent of saying Stephen Hawking is too clever to know his times tables.
He IS too clever to know his times tables! We already know he's too clever to know how to speak.
If you're used to "a higher intellectual class of comedy," what the f**k are you doing on Cracked?
If they kill the Internet, then we will play in the sun again.
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesYes, but can the sun give us a interracial foursome with fisting?
Definitely. In better resolution, too!
Don't you know the sun gives you cancer???!?