6 Acts of Propaganda That Backfired Hilariously
Regimes live and die by their propaganda, so you'd think the people in charge of it would always be at the top of their game. When fooling the world is your business, there isn't much room for mistakes.
Or so you'd think...

In these times of uncertainty, it's comforting to know that the North Korean government has been consistently insane for more than 40 years. Take the seizing of the USS Pueblo in January 1968, for instance. Despite being in international waters, the North Koreans saw the ship as fair game and chased, surrounded and opened fire on the Americans. Given that the Pueblo was carrying enough intelligence to give the Soviets a Cold War boner, the crew threw as much as they could into the incinerator and surrendered themselves to the DPRK warship.
The American crew was then paraded through the streets of Wonsan and put through a series of photo shoots, the prints of which were distributed around the world. These photos obviously showed the superior morality of the DRPK, as the prisoners were unharmed and totally responding well to North Korean authority.
So What Went Wrong?
Well, see for yourself:

Don't quite see it? Here's another:

Oh. OH.
That ever so subtle sign to the cameraman? That's just a Hawaiian good luck sign, don't worry about it. They are in no way saying that the North Koreans are bullshitting the rest of the world and that they are actually getting tortured and beaten daily. No way.
If North Korea was looking for sympathy, they had not only shot themselves in the foot, but in the genitals as well.

BAM!
The photos appeared in Time and came to the attention of the general public, who instantly wondered why the hell no one was rescuing these guys. Finally in December, the word was out that the U.S. wanted to apologize for being in DPRK waters and admit that they were spying. The crew were taken across to South Korea to be met with U.S. officials, who secured the men and proceeded to signal a further "fuck you" to the North Koreans by retracting both admission and apology.
They then sailed off on a ship made of burn.

Before World War II, the German public were actually pretty fond of the British. So when the Brits got on their high horse and told the Germans they weren't having any of this silly taking over of the continent business, a quick re-branding of an entire nation was needed.

The British Public reacted to the German advance with a collective, "Harumph."
What the Third Reich wanted was an epic extravaganza that firmly placed the super capitalistic British in the wrong and a few upright Nazis in the right.
Naturally they went with a retelling of the classic pro-Nazi morality tale, Titanic.
How did they pull that off? Well, as video games, movie sequels and the South American continent have shown us, things can only get better when you add Nazis.

In this case, the Third Reich added some kind, sympathetic German soldiers to the story of the doomed ship. And these soldiers begged the captain of the Titanic to not go so fast, lest they all die. And when the money-loving pig of a British captain hit that iceberg with his fastness, the Germans were the only guys on board who really attempted to save anybody. AS IF A NAZI EVER TRIED TO SAVE ANYBODY.

Whoops, that's our bad.
So What Went Wrong?
The whole production was a disaster from start to finish. The director, Herbert Selpin, was imprisoned and killed for not being nearly Nazi enough and saying mean things about the German Navy. And only once the most expensive German film up to that point was finally finished did everyone realize that the general public wouldn't really care for a disaster film when Germany itself was being bombed to hell.

Escapism!
The film was pulled from cinemas after its debut and only shown in Paris, before being banned altogether. And then in 1945 the ship the movie was filmed on was sunk, killing way more people than the actual Titanic disaster.
The whole project came to symbolize the complete and utter failure of the Third Reich, which isn't bad for a film where the complete opposite was meant to happen. And to add insult to injury, Germany's enemies the Soviets loved the film for its anti-capitalism message, the Brits stole some of the scenes for their own superior version a decade later, and James Cameron would eventually rip off some of the plot in his own sappy Hollywoodized version.

Admittedly, this one really would have been better with Nazis.
And while we're on the subject of sunken ships...

The Lusitania was a super classy luxury ship that was (SPOILER ALERT) a lot like the Titanic in that it was big, fancy, built in the United Kingdom, and launched back when ladies still wore whale bones to pinch their insides into coke bottle shapes.

Also like the Titanic, the Lusitania got sunk by an iceberg. Except that this iceberg was shaped like a torpedo and was shot from a German U-Boat. This caused U.S. sentiment to turn against the Germans and join the Allies during World War I.
This kicked off a crucial propaganda battle, since according to Germany, the sinking of the Lusitania was fair game because it wasn't just loaded with rich civilian passengers, but was also filled to the brim with war weapons (it turns out they were partially right, but no one would prove it until 2008). And to commemorate the thoroughly justified murder of over 1200 civilians, a German sculptor named Karl Goetz crafted a medal for the German government.

Having businessmen barter with a hellspawn skeleton should really rally support for... someone.
The medal depicted the ship sinking underneath the weight of a mass of armaments, and the backside featured nothing less than a boatload of capitalists laughing it up and purchasing their tickets to hell from Skeletor Ticketmaster. Above this totally not horrific imagery is the phrase "Business Above All." Everyone who sees one of these babies will know what really happened!
So What Went Wrong?
You would have thought that with all the detail he crammed into five centimeters of metal, Goetz would at least have made sure he got everything right. It's not like this medal was commemorating anything important, or that its mass production would completely destroy Germany chances of sympathy with neutral nations.

Oh wait, no. It totally did that. With just one little number.
The Lusitania was sunk on the 7th of May, 1915, but Goetz used May 5 after a newspaper printed the wrong date of the sinking. This was a big deal. The only justification Germany had with their attack was that it was a purely defensive tactic made on the spur of the moment to prevent arms being illegally transported to Britain. The date change seemed to suggest that the whole event was premeditated.
The British seized on this mistake and started recreating these medals like fevered rabbits, thereby avoiding publicity about their own little illegal naval blockade issue. The reproduced medal got shipped to the U.S., and then the Americans started reproducing the medal as well. And then the U.S. joined the war against Germany. That's when Karl Goetz looked really stupid.








"And I so hate to do that" scared the s**t out of me. As does Obama, I don't trust anyone with the same f*****g picture in google search.
ReplyI want Baghdad bob to come to my birthday party...it would be the best birthday ever, seriously.
ReplyI literally laughed out loud at: "His brain was connected to his mouth by way of crazy straws..."
ReplyBack in the 80's there was a documentary made about poor people in the US. The Soviets decided to show it to their own people to show how horrible we were. Turns out our poor people were way better off than just about anybody in the USSR. They wanted to know how poor people could be poor but still have two cars, two color TVs, a front and back yard, etc.
ReplyTo be fair most poor people can't afford that shit. The ones that do have it are even poorer because they will spend the rest of their lives paying it off.
The Air Force One situation always makes me facepalm. Just some really badly thought out stuff right there
Reply
ReplyEscapism!, that killed me! lol
The plane thing, I couldn't help but wonder, "Hasn't the government heard of photoshop?" As for Baghdad Bob, I remember the MadTV (or was it SNL? Hope it wasn't real life) skit where he assures that there are no American forces in Baghdad as US Tanks roll past.
ReplyThat was more or less real; during at least one press conference, you could see US troops in the background.
I both enjoyed and pitied Baghdad Bob: It's just funny when a guy says with a straight face "The sky is green and the Earth is made of orange jello." On the other hand, the stuff he said was probably what Saddam told him to say, so he was just doing his job.
ReplyThere was a brilliant campaign featured in the 2010 UK general election. The incumbent party created a campaign that depicted the leader of the Conservative Party as Gene Hunt, basically our equivalent to Dirty Harry except in a tv show set in the 80's. It was supposed to be symbolic that the Conservative party would drag us back to the 80's in terms of social reform and economic stability but it backfired because...well because Gene Hunt is just f*****g cool!
ReplyIf only the cons had used the mock ones of Brown as Scarface or Reservoir dogs.
"Fire mines."
ReplyThat's brilliant.
Yeah, that was my favorite line too.
Well, there were no WMDs so Baghdad Bob got one thing right.
Reply Hide All See All 8 RepliesCheck again, dumbass. Yellowcake uranium was found, as well as doc*ments describing attempts to purchase other materials, as far back as 2004. Read that there wikileaks sometime, eh? Not ALL their articles are written just to make the US look bad.
hehe... cum...
How the hell does "documents" get censored but not "hehe... cum..."?
No kidding o.O Oh well, we can laugh and point how another censor has failed us.
@ChrisRivan
Are you f*****g kidding me? Are you REALLY trying to pull that bullshit still? My god, wake up. We KNOW it was, and is, a lie.
Jesus dude. Just how f*****g dumb are you?
The only radioactive material in Iraq was from the depleted uranium shells that the U.S. left behind the last time they'd attacked the place under the previous George Bush
'Articles' on Wikileaks aren't 'written' at all. The whole point of Wikileaks is that they show source documents.
Saddam had some low end chemical weapons during the first Gulf war but they were destroyed as part for the peace deal.
It's "Liese und Miese", not Leise. Liese is an old-fashioned german name while leise means quiet.
Reply Hide All See All 4 RepliesI see no difference
i before e
except after c
or when sounded as "ee" as in "nazi"
About al-Sahhaf,
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesYeah, because ofcourse there was NO propaganda by the US government and media AT ALL during that war, right?
The whole thing was bulls**t from beginning to end.
I recall CNN was broadcasting footage from Al Jazeera from inside Baghdad. In it US tanks were clearly shown attempting to cross a bridge but pulling back from incoming fire. The Al Jazeera reporter there reported this as well. The whole damned thing was clear from the video.
Yet the CNN a*****es couldn't bring themselves to admit that their invincible super-men armies could actually suffer even a minor set-back. So instead they kept saying "Al Jazeera is reporting, but we have no way of confirming this". Here "confirming" means ignore the video and the reporter on the ground, and ask the Pentagon.
I really hate the US news media.
"their invincible super-men armies could actually suffer even a minor set-back" is no big thing.. and the US did flaten the Iraq army completely... This article is about a guy claiming complete victory even as tanks drove up his butt hole.
Ps, Calm down ho.
Excellent use of the phrase "Calm down ho", but I would have used the classic Taxi Driver line "b***h be cool".
In this comment....a desperate attemt to sound "edgy" and "cool"
Move along people just another troll
*posts dont feed troll sign*
How much does anybody want to bet that if the Pueblo incident happened today, ninnies in the editorial departments of the major newspapers and magazines would demand the 'Hawaiian good luck gesture' be altered to avoid offending people? Or, if the media figured it out, and ran the pictures anyway, that the moral guardians would start yelping about it. 'This is a family newspaper/magazine! How DARE you print such an nasty thing? Cancel my subscription.'
ReplyIt was altered and edited when it was printed back in the '60s. Publishing standards were even stricter than it was today. A photo of a crewman sitting in a hall with his middle fingers out was the front cover of Time - they airbrushed out the middle fingers and led many, including the crewman's family, to believe that his fingers had been cut off.
Another reason for editing it out: when one paper didn't airbrush it out the North Koreans realized what it really meant, and beat the everliving s**t out of the prisoners.
the germans actualy put a notice in news papers warning people not to go on the lucitania. just another excuse for u.s. to go to war.
ReplyYeah.. The merits of US involvement in WWI is debatable.
The main contribution was economic realy the German army was either dead, captured, starving or running by the time the Americans got significant land forces in, that said supplying the Allies was invaluable.
The caption under the picture of Obama was the reason that picture was taken.
ReplyAgreed. That line, followed by the picture and caption, was the only time I actually laughed out loud in this article.
While the sinking of the Lusitania certainly didn't help US-German relations at the time, it was not the thing that caused the US to enter the war. The final straw was the leak of the Zimmermann telegram (which, itself, may have been a British Intelligence forgery). The Lusitania was sunk in May 1915 nearly two full years before the US declared war on Germany in April of 1917.)
Reply Hide All See All 3 Replies~Cheers!
Seriously, doesn't anyone else know this stuff besides the two of us?
A lot of people do- the public was ok with going to war after the sinking of the Lusitania, but the government only felt the need to get involved after the letters.
Zimmermann himself said it was genuine. I don't know how German imperialists got to be scummily underhanded and inconveniently sporting at once, but it seems to be a thing.
I notice all your links are taken from Google without looking at them. Obviously you've put a lot of effort into this...
ReplyI have no idea why the links are redirected through Google first, but they all lead to specific researched sources. If you actually click on the links rather than just looking at the URL you'll discover this.
Sadly, My boyfriend and me broke up a month ago. yeah.. i'm young ,beautiful,lonely and still hurting.i may be in need of someone to love..still..My friends told me about A G EM I N GL E .( o M and i got curious about it.. they met their boyfriends there.,It's the best place to meet an older boyfriend or a younger girlfriend. i cant risk myself..So i got a usename(Anny888) there in order to find a new boyfriend.is it wrong?
Reply Hide All See All 3 Repliesgo ask someone who gives a shit.
Don't yell at the spambots. They can't understand you
it is wrong. confess in the eyes of the lord and you may be forgiven, s**t
"Our initial assessment is that they will all die."
ReplyThat's actually kind of bad-ass. I want to use that.
Almost as good as
"and what is your prediction for the fight?"
"My prediction? PAIN."