5 Awesome Movies Ruined By Last-Minute Changes
"We'll just fix that in post!" has always been the rallying cry for filmmakers in the middle of a troubled production. Unfortunately, sometimes things have a nasty habit of actually getting broken in post-production, usually thanks to studio interference.
Victims include ...
The Way It Was Supposed To Be:
In this adaptation of Richard Matheson's classic horror novella, Will Smith plays Doctor Robert "Legend" Neville, the last man alive in a city overrun with CGI vampire mutants.
In the film's original ending, Neville is trapped as vampires break through his barricades and infiltrate his hideout (who would have guessed that locking yourself in an enclosed space in the middle of a city full of vampires would turn out to be a bad idea?). Then, this happens:
Yeah. In the original, the vampires are revealed to be thinking, benevolent creatures who were merely attempting to rescue a vampire that Neville had captured earlier.
Not only does the book end in a similar way, but it in fact was the entire freaking point of the book. That's where the title "I Am Legend" came from, Neville's realization at the end that the vampires were the good guys and that he was the monster of their legends, since he had been mindlessly driving stakes through their heart at every opportunity. Maybe a title like So I'm The Asshole would have been clearer.
The "Improved" Version:
Because test audiences apparently didn't like the original ending, the studio opted to go with a new one in which Neville fights back against the vampires to protect his new allies. He does so by igniting a grenade about two inches from their face, destroying the once-safe stronghold and severely injuring his companions. It should also be noted that going by the original ending, Will Smith just murdered scores of reasoning creatures who were attempting to rescue a little girl.
This brings up the other problem, which is that all of the little hints that had been inserted along the way indicating the creatures had intelligence (the complex traps they set, the same creature reappearing in some kind of leadership role) are completely ignored. In the new ending, the vampires are mindless savages with no other purpose but general horror movie mayhem.
Perhaps the saddest thing about all this is that it shows that no one involved really believed in the message of the final product. They didn't produce a film in order to convey any kind message, they just strung together a bunch of cool scenes and called it a movie. One more reason why audience feedback isn't always the best guide, as anyone who has read YouTube comments will happily tell you.
Where you can find the original:
The original ending is available as a bonus scene on the recent DVD release, where it is advertised as the "controversial original ending." Yes, coming to a peaceful reconciliation with your enemies is now more controversial than blowing them right the fuck up.
The Way It Was Supposed To Be:
Superman II was to be Richard Donner's epic tale of earth's mightiest protector, and why he decided to let aliens take over the world so he could get some poontang. Superman II probably contains the first true superhero-movie brawl, a violent dust-up between Superman and General Zod that leaves the Man of Steel crushed beneath a bus.
Most of Superman II was actually shot at the same time as the original, by Donner. Donner was more of the Christopher Nolan school of superhero movies, rather than the Joel Schumacher one, meaning he didn't see the need for a lot of goofball camp in his superhero movies. He even brought on his own writer on both films to smooth out the most retarded parts of the scripts.
This all worked great, except for the fact that the producers hated Donner's guts, though probably not as much as he hated theirs. He was booted off the project with 75 percent of the film shot.
The "Improved" Version:
The studio brought in director Richard Lester to re-film much of the movie. The resulting film marks the exact moment in which a franchise that already hinged on an invulnerable man traveling through time by spinning really fast, became ridiculous.
For some reason, Lester thought it would be a good idea to splice slapstick comedy scenes that played like rejected America's Funniest Home Videos clips into the vicious superhero battle. So, when the bad guys unleash their super breath on the city, we are treated to a shot of an ice cream cone flying into a dude's face.
Is it unfair to say that everything that was good about Superman II was due to Donner, and that all of the goofy parts were Lester's fault? Let's put it this way: When Lester was finally given control of an entire film from the start, he gave the world Superman III.
Where you can find the original:
In 2006, Donner re-created his film using his scrapped footage, and released it on DVD as Superman II: The Richard Donner Cut.
Unfortunately, because not all of the scenes were filmed, Donner was forced to cobble together old unused shots and test footage to fill in the gaps, and it's pretty noticeable at times.
OK, not that noticeable
The Way It Was Supposed To Be:
In this startling allegory, director George A. Romero decries America's rampant consumption with his resounding message of, "If you insist on buying worthless crap, don't be surprised if zombies break into your local mall and seriously mess you up. I'm just saying."
Above: Capitalism
In the film's original climax, the main characters, realizing that they will never truly be safe, choose to commit suicide rather than join the legions of the walking dead. The film was to conclude with a haunting final shot of our heroine Fran shoving her head into her helicopter's propeller. This was of course an allegory for America's failing educational system.
It also is the way that, in our opinion, most movies should end.
The "Improved" Version:
In the finished product, the film tries to have it both ways. The original desperate and atmospheric lead-up to the suicide sequence is kept ...
... then suddenly, Peter changes his mind for no reason at all and easily fights his way back to the helicopter, with heroic trumpets blaring in the background the entire time.
Apparently, the studio opted to go with the less depressing ending, in which our heroes are condemned to spend the rest of their lives in a post-apocalyptic wasteland dominated by murderous reanimated cadavers.
The 2004 remake reveals a major plot hole in the film's revised closing sequence: Why did they fight their way through those zombies when the obvious solution would be to simply construct an indestructible tank and some make explosives out of everyday materials?
Above: Logical conclusion
Where you can find the original:
Unfortunately for all you "girl decapitated by a propeller" fetishists out there, there is no existing footage of the film's original ending. The only proof that anyone has that it was even filmed is this picture of the puppet that was going to serve as Gaylen Ross' stand-in.
Stick a wig on there and man, you'd never know
The Way It Was Supposed To Be:
In this installment of the popular Die Hard franchise, John McClane must stop a group of cyber terrorists (or are they?) who plan to firewall the central coding system of the primary flux capacitor. Or something like that. Look, we don't need to know the details. We go to watch Bruce Willis a) shoot people and b) taunt his adversaries with western vernacular and implications of an Oedipus complex.
The "Improved" Version:
Well guess what, he doesn't get to do that. Months into filming, the head honchos decided to trim the film behind the director's back in order to get the magical PG-13 rating, which, according to producers, would attract a new demographic at the small cost of making the film suck.
The result? The new McClane was so tame that he couldn't even say his famous catchphrase. Blood splatters were digitally removed (and taking the blood out of a Die Hard movie is like taking the blood out of a vampire movie).
We're predicting that by the time that Live Free or Die Even Harderer comes out, McClane will be fighting terrorists (or are they?) while armed solely with walkie-talkies.
Where you can find the original:
The unrated DVD release of the film contains numerous scenes that were removed from the theatrical cut. McClane gets to say his favorite phrase, and more graphic and visceral action scenes replaced the embarrassingly neutered material.
Yes, they still have the scene where a car flies into a helicopter and yes, the plot still makes no sense. But you'll be surprised at how adding the grit back in makes it feel so much more like a Die Hard movie.
The Way It Was Supposed To Be:
Blade Runner is Ridley Scott's adaptation of Phillip K. Dick's classic science fiction novel Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? (a title rendered irrelevant since recent scientific studies have confirmed that robots actually dream about enslaving humans and forcing them to do their bidding).
In the film's original bittersweet conclusion, Rick Deckard chooses to harbor a renegade android, even though she will soon face an electric sheepless sleep of death.
The original film also contains implications that the main character might himself be a replicant, a twist so creative and shocking that we can forgive it for not making any goddamned sense at all.
The "Improved" Version:
The studio, upset with the film's bleak tone, redubbed it with a new voice-over narration from Harrison Ford, who sounds like he's reading his lines at gunpoint. The narration was intended to clarify some of the more confusing parts of the film using the unique storytelling tactic of having the narrator describe something entirely different from what's happening on the screen.
The narration also reveals that Deckard's robotic lover Rachael was not programmed to self-terminate, and they both got to live happily ever after until they both rode off into Heaven on a unicorn.
Where you can find the original:
Well, the good news is you have a lot of options here. In addition to the US theatrical cut, the 2007 re-release also contains the original workprint cut, the 1992 director's cut, and the new "final cut," all for only $78.99 plus shipping and handling.
Hell, at this point it'd almost be easier to read the damned book.
If you liked that you'll probably enjoy our look at The 6 Worst Movies Hollywood Almost Made. And don't forget to check out Internet Party 2: An Intervention for MySpace to see which sites you shouldn't be inviting to your next intervention. Or head to the brand new Official Cracked.com Store and become a startlingly attractive walking advertisement for our site.








"taking the blood out of a Die Hard movie is like taking the blood out of a vampire movie"
ReplySo... Twilight.
The I Am Legend movie is even worse than what is commented here. Like it states, the original book was about the last human being a monster to the vampires. In the movie not only that does not happen, but the whole movie is a big "Christianity Rules, Long Live Jesus, Yeah!" propaganda. What was the message of the movie: Science will not save you, pray to God and he will inspire scientists to find the cure to this horrible scenario that science created in the first place, because God is good, he would never do this, men did; the solution, however, if it seems like med did it, will come from God. Seriously, just propaganda.
ReplyAlso, in Live Free or Die Hard, the PG-13 rating made it so that the hero could not be seen smoking as he had been in the first three. Fun Fact- To clear up this plot hole, a cgi nicotine patch was added to his arm in post production.
ReplyThe new McClane was so tame that he couldn't even say his famous catchphrase. Blood splatters were digitally removed (and taking the blood out of a Die Hard movie is like taking the blood out of a vampire movie) {insert twilight joke here}
Reply"Blade Runner is Ridley Scott's adaptation of Phillip K. Dick's classic science fiction novel Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?" - Everyone keeps saying that. It's total bullshit. If Ridley Scott is saying that he's on crack. One shouldn't even get away with the term "inspired by". The above sentence should more properly read: "Blade Runner is by Ridley Scott who also once read Phillip K. Dick's classic science fiction novel Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?"
ReplyAnd you can't include Live Free or Die Hard in any list that includes the word awesome. Because of this, Jesus crushes a kitten every time someone downloads this list. One could include a tanker truck worth of gore and it won't change the fact that movie sucked hot, sweaty, unwashed donkey balls.
Despite (or maybe because of) being a huge fan of post apocalypse stories and both 'I am Legend' and (the admittedly cheesy) 'Omega Man', I never bothered with Will Smith's remake until a few years later on DVD. I still remember thinking "well, that kinda sucked... oh, alternate ending? Can't be any worse..." and sitting in silence at how obviously superior the 'original ending' was. It wasn't just better, it was OBVIOUSLY the intended ending, since it tied into everything instead of being a silly CGI explosion for no reason. I even kept trying to read if I'd watched the wrong one first, assuming "he dies" had to be the 'alternate' one, but nope. I still can't believe anyone thought the 'grenade' ending was better in any way!
ReplyHe's completely off about "I am Legend." First off, they're zombies. At the end of the book, the half-zombies (infected with the disease but controlling it through medicine) execute the lead character but not because the zombies are the "good guys." And they're not the zombies but the half-zombies. And he is "Legend" because he's the only full human left in the world. He's sort of like Blade (daywalker) in that way (to use a vampire reference.)
ReplyI can't remember if they're vampires or zombies. They're sort of a combination but he stakes them so they're vampire-ish anyway. Still, whatever they are, he's killed by the half-creatures, not full the full blown creatures. Now that I think about it,this book is a hell of a lot like Blade 2.
I think they're called zombies but they're more reminiscent of vampires. I totally agree about him being off about the zombies being 'good guys', I may have read the book a while ago but I don't think my memory is that far off.
I personally preferred the "Alternate" ending to Terminator 2: Judgement day. Instead of the monologue with the video of driving down the highway at night, Sarah is instead summarizing how their actions saved the world from SkyNet while sitting on a bench in the park that was nuked in her dream.
ReplyWhy do I prefer it? Because if that was the case and they stuck to it we wouldn't have had the monstrosities of Terminator 3 and Salvation.
I actually prefer the I am legend ending as it. I just really hate the fact that hollywood nornally has to tack on sickly sweet happy endings
ReplyWalkie Talkies. Do you hear that, Spielberg? Walkie...Talkies...!!!
ReplyAt first i thought the original ending for I Am Legend would just make the rest of the movie feel unsatisfying and kind of pointless, but then i watched it. It's honestly genius. And very capturing. Not to mention it would actually set it up for the sequel, that i now hear they're making.
ReplyIt would've answered a lot.. "oh maybe these things aren't just dumbass neanderthals"
"Maybe a title like So I'm The a*****e would have been clearer."
ReplyProps.
"The original film also contains implications that the main character might himself be a replicant, a twist so creative and shocking that we can forgive it for not making any goddamned sense at all."
ReplyIt actually does make sense. It's included and explained in the book, though maybe not as prominently as the other guy who is unsure whether or not he is human or replicant. Deckard's possibility of being a replicant is discussed at least once, and if I remember correctly he and the other guy tested each other.
I remember when I first saw I Am Legend's original ending, the very first thing I thought was "Why the f**k was this not used in the theatrical release??!!"
ReplyWait, risking that I might be missing some awesome joke here (or some common sense), the I Am Legend creatures were zombies, not vampires, or at least that's what the movie was tagged under where I rent movies (zombies are awesome enough to have their own section, I guess).
Reply Hide All See All 6 RepliesThey are.
They weren't zombies, they're alive. Zombies are not.
Zombies don't drink blood, they eat the body.. plus they're not afraid of sunlight....
"They weren't zombies, they're alive. Zombies are not."
neither are Vampires, Vampires are undead.
If memory serves they're referred to as zombies but act more like vampires.
Zompires.
Why didn't they include Little Shop of Horrors?
ReplySorry, but no. The original ending for I Am Legend was nothing more than a paper-thin parable for the US and Terrorists. That we, the US, are somehow the evil villians and the poor put-upon brown people were just trying to save their own. Bullsh*t. The vampires might have been intelligent but _THEY WERE F*CKING VAMPIRES!!!_ They captured and converted or killed & ate normal humans. They were evil incarnate and the only way to deal with them _was_ a grenade to the face. Get over it already...
Reply Hide All See All 6 RepliesWow, that's quite the prizm you see everything through. I don't think there is much that could escape your ideological judgement. And the movie was ruined to appeal to the overly emotional and self-righteous types that are troubled by critical thinking. They were Vampires, but only in one perspective. The original ending challenged the viewer to see things from a different side. And to do so would raise ones consciousness above the simple minded who dare not.
How is the original ending a 'paper-thin parable for the US and Terrorists' when the original ending was written in 1954? I'm thinking anything we read into that ending or any novel is our own attempt to connect it to our current reality. Matheson wrote during the Decade of Conformism that ephasized people's heightened awareness of 'us' and 'them.' 'Them' referring to not just other nations but other cultures, races, and groups based on education and economic standing within the U.S. Perhaps, through his book, he was simply trying to give his readers a different persepctive. Because the 'normal' average-seeming person is always the good guy. But in a world filled with vampires, the normal guy is the outsider.
Don't try to find anti-American propaganda in every f*****g thing just so you can whine about it. You are the exact reason why so many people percieve Americans as stupid.
Lmao, you dont s**t about the U.S do you, but tell me something, if you had the intelligence to plan something as complex as the 9/11 attacks, would the final stage of your plan consist of sending the U.S military a video of yourself admitting to the shit?
Wow, HailAnts, way to make Americans look like ignorant, reactionary, paranoid stereotypes who don't read books, and hate and fear anything outside of your own culture. I choose to believe that you're in the minority. I sure hope so.
Spoken like someone who never read the book.
To be fair to the I Am Legend test audiences and the other ending they chose, the peaceful ending also contains a completely retarded scene where his son has a premonition or some s**t in the past. It completely ruins the effect the ending would have gone for and I can see why so many people would dislike it.
ReplyUnf, "I Am Legend" and "Die Hard 4.0" (as it's known in the UK) were both awful anyway. Didn't take a lot to ruin those two!
ReplyI loved I Am Legend, but the original ending would actually have made it a lot better. I did notice that, at several points in the film, they did seem to be hinting at the vampires being intelligent and I wondered why they would bother doing that if it wound up not having anything to do with the plot. Glad to know it wasn't just me.
ReplyI agree. I loved Legend up until the ending. I was thinking, well they're just trying to stop this doc from experimenting on them. Granted, they were vampires but it wasn't their fault that humans got changed into them. It wasn't like they were an invading force. They were a new species.