5 Gigantic Wars You Won't Believe Almost Happened

Berlin was starting out its new life as a divided city, with the Eastern half in Soviet hands and the West under Allied control. Stalin, however, wasn't about to settle for half of the cake. He blockaded Berlin from all Western military and civilian traffic, a particularly effective dick move, since West Berlin was completely surrounded by the wholly communist German Democratic Republic. Thus, Stalin was effectively giving the Western powers a giant middle finger ... and also about a month until the surrounded West Berlin would begin to starve.

Stalin never wanted to start a war with the West. However, he needed to appear strong, which, with his particular modus operandi, required constant tension with his opponents. However, the United States still remembered the previous mustachioed lunatic ranting about Berlin, and was totally ready to rumble. General Lucius D. Clay, the head of the Occupation Zone in Germany, advocated sending an armed convoy to battle their way into Berlin ... through East Germany. Effectively going to war with the Soviets, in other words.

Although the suggestion was risky (World War II had shown that the Soviet troops weren't exactly pushovers), the Joint Chiefs of Staff took it very seriously. To counter any resistance, Clay asked Air Force general Curtis LeMay for some air cover. LeMay's war boner was as instant and impressive as Clay's: He recommended that they just up and launch a pre-emptive strike against all Soviet airfields in Germany.

What Stopped It:

Fortunately, rather than start World War III, the Allied forces decided to give peace a chance. They started a 15-month airlift operation, carrying supplies for West Berliners until Stalin got bored and backed off. This, of course, would be the event the world would remember as the Berlin Airlift.

If the War Had Happened:

World War III: Nuclear Boogaloo.

Imagine the collective brick the Allied leaders shat when Stalin pulled his stunt. They were fresh off a fight with a mass-murdering dictator, and were now suddenly facing another who had just kicked the first one's ass. They were not in a chance-taking mood.

So if Clay had sent in his convoy and it had been fired upon, not only would LeMay have rained hell upon the Soviets -- President Truman would have gone Hiroshima on Stalin's ass. Even throughout the airlift operation, Truman's finger remained on the big red button: If the Soviets had shot down a single airplane, the U.S. response would probably have been atomic. The Cold War would have ended in 1948, with a series of giant bangs. Harry S. Truman would have gone down in history with a hell of a reputation, and the USSR would have been bombarded into a continent-spanning live re-enactment of Fallout.

By the late 1960s, arguments escalated to the point of silverware-throwing. The Soviets had denied Mao aid to build an atomic bomb, possibly because he was unnervingly comfortable with the concept of nuclear war. Denied his toys and frustrated because the Soviets were ignoring his political views, Mao wanted some goddamn respect. So in 1969, the Chinese military invaded Soviet-occupied Zhenbao Island, which Mao claimed was originally Chinese territory. Things proceeded as you'd assume: Shots were fired, soldiers got killed, both sides moved more troops to the region, and shit got real.

Ownership of the island tipped back and forth, and things got more and more hostile. It looked like the two powers were set to rip each other apart before the baffled democracies they were supposed to be fighting had a chance to make some popcorn.

What Stopped It:

Mao backed the hell down.

When war fever-gripped both the Chinese and Soviet people, Mao realized that challenging an opponent that had a strong track record of kicking dictator ass and a bunch of nuclear weaponry might not be the most solid strategy, even if China had its own nuclear program up and running at that point. Meanwhile, the Soviet leaders were totally cool with a throwdown, calmly checking with the bemused Americans if they would be OK with the Soviet Union pre-emptively nuking the shit out of China.

Mao decided it was time to sit at the negotiations table. Luckily for him, it turned out neither side really wanted to wage war over a tiny island. Still, the conflict created permanent bad blood between the nations. Meanwhile, the U.S. happily abused the situation to make its move at China, bringing flowers, trade agreements, and diplomatic recognition. This helped pave the way for the love-hate relationship currently enjoyed between the two.

If the War Had Happened:

Two of the biggest armies at the time would have slaughtered each other, with or without nukes.

A Soviet war with China would have involved two incredibly large conventional armies getting into an epic slugfest. Knowing that both parties had access to tactical nuclear weapons and were led by some fairly ... volatile people, it would not have been impossible that either country would have also used tactical nukes to tip a bloody conventional war in their favor.

By 1916, one of these former revolutionary stars -- a certain Pancho Villa -- was hoping to get back in the game by destroying the current big dog, Venustiano Carranza. Villa decided on a desperate comeback tour of a plan: He'd launch a major raid on the United States, thus tricking them into thinking Carranza did it and angrily war-murdering the man in retaliation. Because nothing shows your love for your country better than letting a huge foreign army tear it a new one.

On March 9, 1916, Villa raided and burned parts of Columbus, New Mexico, which unsurprisingly sparked a massive "Oh no he didn't!" from the United States. Two columns of the U.S. Army were sent into Mexico to find Villa, who had tragically forgotten to wear a Carranza mask during the raid. Also, a large number of U.S. reservists were called up along the border. There were clashes between the invading American forces and the Mexican army, who were understandably pissed off to find armed American soldiers deep within their territory. Everyone was totally ready to go.

What Stopped It:

Clever leaders. Venustiano Carranza gave the Americans the "Ignore the Annoying Roommate" treatment, whereas Woodrow Wilson kept his eye on the big picture. Carranza realized he was treading on hot coals and resolved the situation by not reacting to it. The invading portion of the U.S. Army and its commander, General Pershing, were largely left to roam Northern Mexico as much as they liked. Carranza kept his military on a tight leash, only letting them loose when Pershing pushed too far south.

Meanwhile, Wilson realized he couldn't afford to let the Mexican adventure turn into a real war, what with an actual big-ass world war threatening to draw America in. By February 1917, Wilson had pulled out Pershing and his troops, ending the conflict without bothering to capture Villa.

If the War Had Happened:

The United States would have been unable to play their game-changing role in the World War I theater. This, in turn, would have given Germany an excellent chance to win the whole thing.

By 1917, France and Great Britain were in serious trouble. Russia had dropped out of the war, thus freeing huge numbers of German troops to fight in the Western Front. With these newly freed troops, Germany went into ass-kicking mode and nearly knocked France and Britain out of the war. The only thing stopping Germany from delivering a finishing move to its opponents was the timely arrival of U.S. forces, which helped stabilize the Western Front.

Had the U.S. instead been drawn into a major war in Mexico, you'd have to think those fresh American soldiers wouldn't have been available to soak up Germany's nearly successful attempt to own Europe. Then maybe World War II ... wouldn't have happened? That's the thing about dreaming about alternate history -- you change one thing, and who knows where shit ends up?

For another example of that, there's ...

As friendly as France and England are now, it's easy to forget that they were at war off and on for like 800 years. So it was not that strange that the 19th century was a constant cockfight between them, mainly due to a pissing contest over North Africa. The dispute was over who would control Egypt and its hot spots: the Nile River and the Suez Canal.

In 1898, France finally got fed up and sent an armed expedition to the Nile's Fashoda area. Britain responded by sending its own armed forces to the region.

People in both countries got really riled up over the situation and started demanding that their two nations settle the issue like men -- that is, with full-scale stupidity and mass killings. It was kind of tradition by that point.

What Stopped It:

France realized that the war would largely be a naval one. This meant they would be facing the British navy, an unstoppable, global force of destruction, which its French counterpart very much wasn't. This, in turn, meant that the French army, which was very capable of challenging the Brits, would be left holding their dicks as the British ships tore through their opponents.

Realizing that it was about to get brutally drop-kicked, France backed down and gave up all claim to Egypt. In exchange, the British agreed to friendlier relations. The resolution laid the groundwork for their future friendship, which would soon make them the powerful allies you know today ... starting by standing against Germany in World War I.

If the War Had Happened:

Once more, the Germans might have won World War I. And this time, the Brits might have helped them.

In the late 19th century, the traditionally haughty Britain was slowly realizing that being alone sucks, even if you are one of the biggest empires in history. When the Fashoda incident occurred, Britain had narrowed its potential friend request list to either France or another rival, Germany (because frenemies were the closest thing to BFFs Britain had). Had France not backed down, Britain might have gone holding hands with Germany instead. So when World War I broke out in 1914, there's a chance Britain's 8.8 million strong military force would have sided with the Central Powers (or at least remained neutral).

And what happens from there in terms of the fate of Europe, fascism, a second World War, communism, the United States, is anybody's guess. Would it have wound up with Nazis creating a base on the moon? And cloning dinosaurs there? We'll never know (but yes, it would have).

In 1862, the United States was trying to wrestle the Confederates into submission during a little scuffle known as the American Civil War. To achieve this, the North was choking the South's commerce and supply routes with a blockade. The South had no chance of breaking through without help, so they attempted to get Europe (especially Britain) to come fight on their side.

When the Confederates sent a team of diplomats to argue their case, the North got word of it. Soon, an overzealous naval captain boarded the diplomats' ship and arrested them. Unfortunately, he overlooked the fact that the ship was taking the diplomats to Britain and flying under a British flag, and thus he had just essentially invaded goddamn Britain, giving them every excuse to throw the mother of all hissy fits against the North. As moments of horrible, creeping realization go, that must have been a pretty impressive one.

Unsurprisingly, the British public went apeshit. Unwisely, people in the North responded by screaming "We can take your sissy British asses and the South on at the same time -- just bring it!"

There's really just one possible outcome after a boast like that. So, how come the entire country is not flying under a Confederate flag and speaking with a weird British-Southern lingo?

What Stopped It:

Abraham Lincoln's political ninja moves.

Lincoln recognized the situation's severity and immediately unleashed a Machiavellian array of emergency tactics. First, he quietly released the two diplomats to sail to Britain. Then, he apologized for the mess to the British. Then, he bitch-slapped his own people, publicly recommending that they should learn to fight "one war at a time."

Lincoln's humility toward Britain and his ability to get his own people to chill out allowed the mutual rage to cool down and Britain's urge to get involved in the war to slowly evaporate. Meanwhile, the Southerners now had to fight that display of diplomatic gusto to get Europe on their side. As history has shown us, their attempts were less than successful.

If the War Had Happened:

The United States could have ended up split into at least two nations. Although we've argued before that the South had no chance of winning the Civil War, an alliance with the British would have stacked the deck very differently. The British navy was powerful enough to help the South break through the North's blockade. If the Brits had sent in land troops to boot, it could well have given the South an edge to force the war at the very least into a political settlement, rather than a Northern victory.

And that's assuming the Brits would have just left nicely after the war was over. If they'd decided they wanted a slice of land as well, hell, who knows what the map would look like today, or what subsequent wars would have been fought? Literally nobody knows. Still, it's fun to think about.

Follow Jacopo della Quercia on Twitter. Find more ramblings by Ed Chusid at Fist of History.

Related Reading: For more of history's greatest unfought wars, click here! You'll learn about War Plan Red- the American invasion of Canada. Even crazier than the unfought wars are the battles you had no idea already happened; like the American Civil War naval battle that took place off the coast of France. And if you're interested in the ridiculous history of military fashion, Cracked has winged knights and horned samurai to sate your curiosity.