5 Of The Least Ethical Medical Experiments In Modern History

These downtrodden children (many didn't have, or weren't allowed to see, parents) were bribed with trips to baseball games, parties, and Mickey Mouse watches in exchange for their livelihoods. Perhaps most disturbing was that this was all sponsored by the good people at Quaker Oats, who even supplied the tainted cereal in the hopes they could use the results in a demented ad campaign.

But don't worry, there was some accountability here. Bill Clinton launched an investigation into the cover-up. He then released the report with a televised apology ... on the day of the O.J. Simpson trial verdict.

But Bailey had the professionalism, ethics, and insight of a methed-out carny operating the tilt-a-whirl. He applied electroconvulsive therapy without the typical relaxants and anesthetics, causing his patients to convulse and thrash so heavily that they'd vomit even while unconscious. He once even applied these tortuous methods to a woman suffering cerebral hemorrhaging, despite the obvious and lethal risks. And whenever he straight up killed a patient (some estimate 80-something casualties, including a 14-year-old boy), he would simply forge their death certificates. Of those who did survive the electrocution, hallucinations, and botched comas, several wound up taking their own lives to escape the memories of their electric nightmares.

Critics faulted the treatment, but no scientist was willing to destroy their reputation by going after the most popular doctor in the country. The sleep cult was only exposed after members of a real cult, the Church of Scientology (who don't like psychoanalysts for obvious reasons) backed whistleblowers who exposed the horror to the nation. But in 1985, before he could be held responsible for his crimes against humanity, Bailey died by suicide. Or maybe that's what the Inception-style hit squad wants us to think.

It turned out that Robert, Edward, and David were identical triplets who had been given up for adoption at birth. One was adopted by a rich family, one by a middle-class one, and one by working-class parents. It seemed almost cute. At first.

Reunited at the age of 19, it was only much later that the brothers found out that their separation hadn't been serendipity, but a conspiracy. They had been one of several groups of identical Jewish siblings who had been the subject of a bizarre psychological experiment. Through a complicit adoption agency, the triplets had been strategically separated as part of a psychological experiment on nature vs. nurture by Austrian psychiatrist Peter Neubauer. It seems no one stopped to think if there was any historical reason not to let an unethical Germanic doctor experiment on Jewish children.

Throughout their childhood, the three brothers had been constantly monitored to gauge the effects of different parenting styles and income levels on the same child (genetically speaking). Neubauer even sent out aides to their houses to collect data while pretending to be random surveyors. He also refused to share his extensive medical examinations of the kids with their parents, preferring to see how they coped with (preventable) genetic time bombs -- which was the reason the two poorer brothers both developed a lazy eye.

We still don't know how many siblings Neubauer tore apart, but we can tell you what all that was worth: nothing. From what little of his research has been made available to the public, it seems Neubauer's experiment was utterly inconclusive, and his last shameful act in this world was to seal his research in the Yale vault until 2065 so none of his victims could ever find out exactly how pointless his experiment had been.

The effects are still being felt today. Studies have shown that, compared to the average citizen, Duplessis Orphans have a harder time keeping jobs and forming trusting relationships. If only there were some way to explain this ...

Not having any luck with psychiatrists and their pesky Hippocratic Oath, the government found its ally in the American Psychological Association, which had strong ties to the Department of Defense (a whopping 7% of its membership profited from DoD contracts). APA management immediately jumped into bed with the spies without asking any problematic questions, conspiring with officials to rewrite their policies so they could allow APA-approved clinical psychologists to not only attend torture sessions without ramifications, but even take on torture consultant roles.

When confronted with evidence of this in 2015, the APA insisted they let their members be present to deter the use of torture. Like torture victims, this excuse didn't hold water. A Senate committee concluded that the APA-sponsored practices were creative applications of traumatic abuse (i.e. torture). Three of its highest-ranking members were kicked out after they were identified as complicit, but the association didn't suffer any legal ramifications. After all, by 2015, the government no longer wanted to talk about enhanced interrogation either.

For more, check out What Your Doctor Wants To Tell You, But Can't:

Follow us on Facebook. Or don't. It's your life.