Lolita took him five full years to write in this manner, and as soon as it was done, Nabokov carefully gathered up the hundreds of index cards that comprised the novel, packed them into a box, took the box out to the backyard, and set it right the f**k on fire.

Nabokov's wife, Vera, apparently accustomed to such shenanigans, noticed the blaze, sprinted out of the house and began frantically yanking cards out of the inferno. Remarkably, she managed to rescue the bulk of the still-rough manuscript and nagged Nabokov to finish it, making this possibly the one and only time in history that a wife has gotten pissed at her husband for torching his creepy porn stash.

All of which means that, somewhere in England, Holmes' creator, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, is harrumphing in his grave.

That's because Doyle f*****g hated Holmes. Or, more accurately, he resented him. See, much like many of us who spent our younger years dreaming of being famous doctors or presidents or Evel Knievel, Doyle had big dreams of his own -- and they didn't involve inventing the preeminent detective story. Instead, he fancied himself more of a historical novelist and viewed his Holmes stories as "hack work" written for the sole purpose of making extra scratch to pay off his college loans.

M. Menpes
"The quicker I can write this crap, the quicker I can write checks."

In 1893 -- six years after penning his very first Sherlock Holmes tale and bearing the stress of ever-more-demanding deadlines thanks to the character's explosive popularity -- Doyle concocted his plan to off the detective, swearing that unless he struck first, Holmes would kill him. And so he published the short story "The Final Problem," which ended with Sherlock Holmes and his arch-nemesis, Moriarty, dying together after kicking each others' asses clear off the edge of a goddamned waterfall.

The public straight-up refused to let Holmes die, virtually ignoring Doyle's subsequent work until, a decade after Holmes' "final" adventure, he resurrected the character for scads more stories, wishing with every last word that he'd detailed the discovery of the detective's gory remains so that there could never have been any mystery surrounding the fact that the man was well and truly dead.

Lavinia couldn't bring herself to charbroil the 40 hand-bound volumes of poetry she discovered, and instead became obsessed with seeing them published. She first showed them to her brother's wife, Susan Gilbert Dickinson, but when her sister-in-law didn't offer to help, she approached her brother's mistress, Mabel Loomis Todd, because the Dickinson family had some truly fucked-up dynamics.

The Jones Library
"I hope you can help, because next on the depth chart is my uncle's bastard's alcoholic cat."

Todd went straight to work transcribing and editing hundreds of poems and collecting them into volumes, while just next door Susan Dickinson (perhaps justifiably) stewed in her anger and sat on her considerable stash of Emily's poetry. Then, after an unrelated lawsuit between the Todds and the Dickinsons over a land dispute, Mabel decided to sit on her stash of Emily's poetry. Thus kicked off a drawn-out battle that delayed the bulk of the work from being released and launched decades of awkward Dickinson Thanksgivings.

Another thing about Manhattan? Despite it arguably being his finest work, Woody Allen hated the absolute s**t out of it.

After screening the film, Allen felt it was unfit to be seen by ... well, anyone. He pleaded with the executives at United Artists not to release it. Surprisingly, they weren't too keen on flushing a brilliant, $9 million gem down the shitter, so Allen sweetened the deal by offering to make them a whole new movie for free.

United Artists
"I'll make as many movies about me dating disturbingly younger women as it takes for me to get it right!"

Because if a garbage film like the award-winning Manhattan was the best he could do, he didn't deserve to be paid for his work at all. Probably the most surprising part of this entire story is the fact that the studio didn't take Allen up on his "free movie" offer and then go ahead and release Manhattan anyway.

The 1960 novel To Kill A Mockingbird won a Pulitzer Prize, beat out the Bible as the one book every person should read before they die, and, much to the relief of every single high school student since 1962, inspired a truly great film of the same name. The novel's author, Harper Lee, loved the book so goddamned much that she never, ever wrote another one.

Grand Central Publishing
End of discussion, or else your doctor will have to Go Set A Broken Jaw.

That's probably because the process of writing the novel was like trying to sculpt Michelangelo's David using only the teeth of a live tiger. To Kill A Mockingbird began life as a manuscript entitled Go Set A Watchman, which is now better known as the ill-advised "sequel." The editor assigned to the book informed her that, talented writer though she may be, her book was a stinky, pilotless turd. Over the next three years the aforementioned editor, Tay Hohoff, served as Lee's taskmaster, relentlessly leading her through draft after draft of the book, sometimes having hours-long arguments over the most piddling of changes. The process took its toll on Lee, until one day she finally snapped and tossed the whole thing out the window. Literally. Just tossed what is universally regarded as one of history's greatest books into a snow bank, probably to be peed on by a wandering dog or something. She then collapsed into tears and called Hohoff, who was having precisely none of this bullshit.

Universal Pictures
"It's a sin to kill To Kill A Mockingbird."

She ordered Lee to march straight out into the snow and gather up the pages that would go on to sell more than 30 million copies worldwide. And, rumor has it, to this day you can hold your copy of the book up to your nose and still smell that dog urine -- the dog urine of literary genius.

Janel Comeau doesn't hate her blog or her Twitter feed, and she's pretty sure you won't hate them either.

Which Sci-Fi Trope Would You Bring To The Real World, And Why? Every summer we're treated to the same buffet of three or four science fiction movies with the same basic conceits. There's man vs. aliens, man vs. robots, man vs. army of clones and man vs. complicated time travel rules. With virtual reality and self-driving cars fast approaching, it's time to consider what type of sci-fi movie we want to be living in for the rest of our lives. Co-hosts Jack O'Brien and Adam Tod Brown are joined by Cracked's Tom Reimann and Josh Sargent along with comedians David Huntsberger, Caitlin Gill, and Lizzy Cooperman to figure out which sci-fi trope would be the best to make a reality. Get your tickets to this live podcast here!

Get some more culture in your lives, you philistines! Check out 7 Lost Bodies of Work (That Would Have Changed Everything) and 6 Lost Works Of Genius (Found In The Dumbest Place Possible).

Subscribe to our YouTube channel, and check out 7 Mind-Blowing Details You Missed In Great Works Of Art, and other videos you won't see on the site!

Also, follow us on Facebook, and we'll be your best friend forever.