5 Reasons The Internet Could Die At Any Moment

By Robert Evans Mar 15, 2010 1,315,188 views
article image

The Internet was originally invented to be a communication network that could survive a nuclear war. Ironically, the monster that grew from that idea known as the World Wide Web is actually very, very fragile. They didn't anticipate what the Internet would become--because they weren't fucking insane--and as a result, the whole operation now sits on a rather shaky foundation.

#5.
The Internet is a Series of Cables, and Cables Can be Cut

The Catastrophe:

Considering how much people freak out when a single big site goes down (everyone remember the Great Gmail Outage of '09?) it's clear that most of us think of the Internet in general as pretty much invincible. If an asteroid smashed into the Earth tomorrow, millions of us would immediately pull out our phones to try to get Twitter updates from the affected area.


"It must be pretty bad. Ashton Kutcher hasn't tweeted in days."

But the truth is, the Internet travels from continent to continent by way of a network of trans-oceanic cables, each thousands of miles long and only as thick around as a thumb. If enough of these high-pressure porn hoses were compromised, international Internet communication could collapse entirely.

Since these cables are the backbone of a huge portion of the global economy, they must be pretty well protected, right? Guards in armored diving suits, badass nuclear submarines inexplicably captained by Scotsmen, Kraken...


We're pretty sure AT&T has at least one of these at their disposal.

Actually...

As it turns out, the cables aren't protected at all.

And it's not like they're impervious to damage either. The largest of them, hilariously named "SEA-ME-WE-3" was severed by a 7.1 magnitude earthquake, and in December of 2008 a boat anchor sliced it and three other cables in half. The disaster cut communications capacity between Europe, the Middle East and India by around 75 percent.

Hundreds of millions of people spent weeks without reliable (or, in some cases, any) Internet access. Because of an anchor.


Nukes are hard to come by, but we're pretty sure Al-Qaeda can scrounge up one of these.

Though, some skeptics point out that the idea of three separate cables being cut "accidentally" by anchors within a few days of each other is a little far-fetched. They've proposed terrorists, Israel, drunken fishermen and the Pentagon as possible alternate causes.

So What Can We Do?

Nothing. Remember the SEA-ME-WE 3 cable we told you about? It's more than twenty-thousand goddamn miles long. Look at this map of all the undersea cables. There's no way you could police all of that, not even with a thousand Krakens AND Bill Murray in a scuba suit.


You'd need at least two.

On the plus side, it's not exactly hard to repair a damaged cable. These things get busted up all the time, which is why the telecoms that own them have repair boats on stand-by. That means everything should be fine unless some bad guys think up a way to really fuck them up.


"OH SHIT THEY'VE TRAINED THE SHARKS."

#4.
Hordes of Zombie Robots Will Kill Us All

The Catastrophe:

You may not have heard of Leo Kuvayev, but you've gotten a shitload of emails from him.

He's one of the most influential men in the spam industry. He has headed up several of the world's largest spam networks and is one of the people most responsible for the way spammers operate today. Despite being wanted in several countries, Kuvayev remains free (and fabulously wealthy) to this day. He lives in exile in either Tahiti or Finland.


The face of a billion displaced Ethiopian princes.

While breaking Leo's kneecaps with a baseball bat would be both morally justified and incredibly cathartic, you may want to keep your righteous anger in check. It's generally a bad idea to fuck with supervillains. Leo is believed to be the man in charge of the Storm Botnet, a massive network of hijacked drone computers that may number in the tens of millions. If he wanted to, he could turn that vast robot army on you.

But hey, what's the worse a few million zombified computers can do? They might be able to blast you off of the web for a few days, but there's no way a botnet could cause lasting harm to the whole Internet. Right?

Actually...

To give you a sense of scale, Storm is estimated by some to be responsible for a whopping 20 percent of the spam on the Internet. That measures out to billions of messages every single day, including tens of millions of emails laden with viruses that create more bots. Some experts estimate that the botnet is powerful enough to muscle entire goddamn countries off of the Internet.

While Storm is the first botnet to attain this kind of power, it won't be the last. The Storm botnet grew from the Storm Worm, which was spread through a series of spam messages with provocative titles like, "230 dead as storm batters Europe" and "Chinese missile shot down USA aircraft." People across the world (but mainly in the U.S.) saw what they thought was an important news story in their inbox, opened the email and were immediately infected with the worm.


And just wait until he unleashes Big Worm.

This testical-shrivellingly terrifying video tracks the exponential spread of the botnet. Imagine what someone with grander designs than life as a spam kingpin could do with that sort of power. Entire nations and corporate networks could be brought to their knees, world communication and trade would be disrupted. The Internet as we know it would be rendered almost uninhabitable.

So What Can We Do?

Conventional cyber-warfare tactics are useless against the botnet. As soon as a computer is infected, the worm lobotomizes and re-programs any existing anti-virus software, rendering it harmless. The botnet also has active defenses, and has gone on the offensive and D-DOSed several major anti-spam sites into oblivion. Back in February of 2007, the botnet even attacked the 13 "root" servers that make up the backbone of the Internet's infrastructure. Two of them were severely damaged.

Operating at only 10 to 20 percent capacity, the Storm Botnet has national security experts and anti-spam crusaders pissing themselves in terror. To put things in less technical terms: Leo Kuvayev is tooling around the Internet in an M1 Abrams tank, and the authorities are trying to stop him with sticks and stones and harsh language.


Quit it you big meanie!

The only real defense against a threat like the Storm Botnet is knowledge. All we need is for the entire Internet-using public to become tech-savvy, intelligent and careful about what they click on. Shouldn't be a problem.

#3.
Someone Impersonates the Ferryman.

The Catastrophe:

Imagine the Internet is a river. In order to get to your destination (website) you need to pay (with a URL) the ferryman (a DNS server) so he can paddle you to your destination (John Mayer/Hulk Hogan slash fiction websites).


Your body is a wonderland.

Now imagine brigands (hackers) ambush the ferryman before he can get to you. They hand him his infant daughter's severed ear, wrapped in a stained white cloth. They tell him to paddle his next fare to bandit island (spyware-riddled websites) if he ever wants to see his beautiful family again.


Thankfully, the Geneva Convention doesn't apply to metaphors.

Of course, this being the futuristic year of 2010, such crude hijackings can't actually happen on any kind of large scale, right?

Actually...

Back in 2007, Microsoft discovered a massive vulnerability in their DNS servers that could allow them to be hijacked by a hacker. Then, in 2008, the DNS Survey revealed that as many as one in four public DNS servers were highly vulnerable to attack. Programmers and security experts set frantically to work in order to correct the issue. They got a handle on things just in time for another gigantic goddamn problem to pop up.


It's like a game of Root Beer Tapper, but with the entire Internet at stake.

The Internet doubles in size every five years or so. This insane growth has led a massive expansion in the number of DNS servers. More traffic means more ferrymen. The thing is, the Internet's real, chief weakness is that it was built by people. Many of those people were diligent, careful workers, but most of them were just like the rest of us; lazy, irresponsible and frequently intoxicated. Millions of these new servers were set up without any security whatsoever. They allow open access to anyone with the know-how to hijack them. This is actually even scarier than it sounds.

In addition to controlling where our browser takes us when we hit "enter," the DNS servers are what direct your email. With control of the DNS server it passes through, an intruder could stop and redirect your email, or riddle it with viruses and then send it on its way.


That inspirational poem Grandma forwarded to you may have more viruses than Bret Michaels's hot tub.

This isn't theoretical. These vulnerabilities exist now, just waiting for malicious assholes to take advantage of. It could happen tomorrow, or next week, or right n-

So What Can We Do?

The safety of the Internet at large rests in the flabby hands of a brave, thankless few and they've been busy getting patches out to cover this particular flaw. But that was a Band-Aid solution and the permanent fix appears to have problems of its own.

This is the point where understanding the issue requires several years of education in exactly how DNS servers work. So we'd like to pause here to express wonder that the Internet works at all.

Show Profanity  
447 Comments

>The ISPs aren't just being greedy here. Bandwidth costs a lot of f**king money and usage is growing at a retarded rate.

Here's the answer to that: the faster telcos fail, the faster resource investments in more infrastructure will appear. Telco failure cleans out the deadwood.

0 Replies | Reply | Posted on 8/18/2010 11:30 AM
red-eagle

And with the Google-Verizon pact, it looks like #1 just came true a lot sooner than we all were hoping it would...

0 Replies | Reply | Posted on 8/10/2010 10:27 PM
Timber

I'm going to go and share this article with all my friends on facebook now. Seriously. heh. ;)

0 Replies | Reply | Posted on 6/11/2010 3:18 PM
medicvet

is anyone else not scared at all of some nerdy tech kid and his internet tricks? Ive gotten more nervous around a horse fly than the thought of the entire internet crashing. Who cares, then people might acctually have to get out of the house to know whats going on outside...

0 Replies | Reply | Posted on 6/10/2010 12:32 PM
BstinkiN

Holy buttf**k Batman!

0 Replies | Reply | Posted on 6/7/2010 7:53 PM
Carbon

That last part: I don't buy it. Theres always a solution. I just hope they find out what it is and use it before too long.
ChaosLord: Wow, you get 70 gigs?

0 Replies | Reply | Posted on 6/1/2010 8:11 PM
crono04

They've already started charging for every gigabyte here. I get some 70 a month and pay extra for every kilobyte over that.

0 Replies | Reply | Posted on 5/21/2010 2:00 PM
ChaosLord

I busted out laughing when I saw the new "CONNECT WITH FACEBOOK" button on Cracked.

1 Replies | Hide Replies | Reply | Posted on 5/20/2010 1:47 PM
AAAAAAAAAA42

yeah, gotta love the irony. It's like the National Geographic articles online about the oil spill....sponsored by Shell.

Posted on 6/11/2010 3:15 PM
medicvet

Can someone explain to me how the underwater cabling actually works? Does it lay on the ocean floor? If so, how the eff can they actually do that considering the depth of it? Does it skim across the ocean surface? Which again would seem inpossible to do. And how is the cable laid? Is it on a gigantic spool the size of a ferris wheel on the back of a barge while some poor bastard cranks it out?

1 Replies | Hide Replies | Reply | Posted on 5/18/2010 10:32 AM
JohnnyMarr

Its the internet, look it up.

Posted on 5/28/2010 7:57 PM
RedShift53

This was funny and freaky at the same time... now I don't feel sae on the computer... like aliens r coming...

0 Replies | Reply | Posted on 5/12/2010 7:16 PM
sali0516

Wow, I cannot say I am terrified by positive network externalities and economies of scale.

So #2 just doesn't bother me. I guess I like good things and don't fear and hate them irrationally? Well, whatever's clever, dude.

0 Replies | Reply | Posted on 5/11/2010 1:52 PM
BieberDreams1992

Facebook is evil incarnate.

Also, this is probably the most accurate article I've seen on cracked. Unfortunately.

0 Replies | Reply | Posted on 5/2/2010 8:59 AM
uzetaab

Christ. That's easily one of the most depressing things I've ever had to know.

I feel like someone just told me an asteroid's going to hit the planet and there's nothing we can do about it. The question now is, how do we spend our remaining freedom?

In this case, downloading more and more as fast as possible so we get everything we can before the inevitable happens is just a dick move; that could only serve to accelerate the process.

I guess we just live on. Just continue as usual.

It's not like the world's going to stop for us, much less will capitalism.

0 Replies | Reply | Posted on 4/25/2010 11:56 PM
Cipher

ah, yes.. 'geos**tties' & 'AOhell'

0 Replies | Reply | Posted on 4/22/2010 9:27 AM
meowminx

" I remeber when you paid for the Internet in monthly plans, and you could download all you want!" I'm not looking foward to the day those words leave my lips.

0 Replies | Reply | Posted on 4/18/2010 3:15 PM
ein326

I just don't see why bandwidth can't be 100% free. People steal it anyways, and if it was free, that would completely rid of the net neutrality issue. It's not like any materials are being userped in the provision of bandwidth, am I right? I guess there are salaries to pay to the workers but couldn't we just group those costs into computer sales and have those profits go towards the Internet troubles and costs?

3 Replies | Hide Replies | Reply | Posted on 4/14/2010 8:42 PM
ASweeney930

Asking why bandwidth can't just be free is like asking why electricity can't just be free.

Posted on 4/28/2010 2:31 AM
Remington

Yes, but electricity can be free if you have a generator and solar panels. You can also be paid for 'excess' electricity sent back to the grid.

This is in Australia though, so I can't speak for everybody.

What I'm saying is, Technology will catch up and those kind of options will arise, too. People only need to be smart enough and use them.

Posted on 4/28/2010 11:52 AM
Chouken

Damn, i thought it was all wireless now. liking the kraken reference.

0 Replies | Reply | Posted on 4/12/2010 1:28 PM
StupidCheetah

Not gonna lie, the article scared me but now the comments are making me laugh so much. I never thought bots would be ever this funny.

0 Replies | Reply | Posted on 4/12/2010 3:16 AM
Monsteroid

I'm pretty sure that at least 10% of the Storm botnet is set to target Cracked article comment sections. Why, I don't know.

3 Replies | Hide Replies | Reply | Posted on 4/11/2010 12:20 PM
JanniR

Yeah, that was exactly what I thought. I wonder why.

Posted on 4/12/2010 3:15 AM
Monsteroid

Oh, probably just because they mentioned it or something trivial like that.

Posted on 4/12/2010 7:58 AM
zettergren

the botnet scares me the most.

2 Replies | Hide Replies | Reply | Posted on 4/9/2010 11:31 AM
shamuzi

meh Storm is nothing, Conficker (10 million infected/ 10 billion spam emails a day), Kraken (approx. 450,000/ 9 billion per day) and Srizbi (approx. 450,000 and approx 60 FUCKING BILLION EMAILS A FUCKING DAY!):). And think about it, why the hell would anyone want to remove such a convenience as the internet (especially when you own a good chunk of it and make some serious $$$ off it).

Posted on 4/25/2010 12:30 AM
usernames?

hey! at least you get the cheapest deal on v!agra and cheap imitations of a copy of a rolex...

Posted on 4/26/2010 5:19 AM
iFink
Cracked stuff on