The 5 Scientific Experiments Most Likely to End the World
Let's face it, we really trust science. In fact, studies suggest that the vast majority of people will murder another human being, if a guy in a lab coat tells them it's OK.
But surely in their insatiable curiosity and desire to put knowledge above all things, science would never, say, inadvertently set off a chain of events that lead to some sort of disaster that ended the world. Right?
Well, here's five experiments that may prove us wrong.

Scientists are kind of pissed that they weren't around when the Big Bang happened. Here we had an event that holds all of the secrets to reality, and we missed it because we were lazy enough not to evolve for another 13 billion years.
The solution, science says, is to make it happen again. They assure us that they can stage a new Big Bang if they smash some protons together really, really fucking hard. In fact, they can make a million of them per second, which is 999,999 more than God managed.
God, 1. Science, 999,999.
What Could Possibly Go Wrong?
Well, first imagine an apocalyptic nuclear holocaust. Multiply that by about one hundred and twenty thousand billion, and then multiply that by around the neighborhood of infinity. That equals around one eighth of the magnitude of the Big Bang. Nevertheless, scientists are pretty sure they can contain their Big Bang in an erlenmeyer flask, just so long as they remember to cork it.

So, Basically It's Like...
Imagine you have a huge tanker truck parked outside a children's hospital. You don't know what's inside it, but you're fairly confident that it's either a cure for cancer, or 20,000 gallons of explosive nitroglycerin. To find out which, you have to shoot at it with an AK-47.
How Long Have We Got?
Meet the Large Hadron Collider.

This is not only the largest particle accelerator ever built, it's the largest anything ever built. Originally set to come online in 2005, then delayed until September 2008, the LHC will fire very small objects around its 17-mile circumference at close to the speed of light, before smashing the shit out of them and watching what comes out.
The problem, of course, is that even the eggheads don't really know what's going to happen, which is sort of why they're doing it in the first place. That's also why a lawsuit was filed to put a stop to it. Scientists on the LHC project insist there is no danger, and predict that the resulting observations could revolutionize science and send us into a golden age of knowledge, in the event that we actually survive.

Risk Level: 3
Experts assure us that based on everything we know about science, the chances of doom are fairly slim. Experts also say LHC will change everything we know about science. So there is a certain chance that one of the brand new things they learn about the LHC is that the LHC has the ability turn the entire planet into a fine cloud of particles.

For years, scientists have been scouring the cosmos for some kind of bizarre hypothetical anti-gravity bullshit they're calling "dark energy". And they've had some success with it ... perhaps at the expense of our mortal souls.
To grossly simplify it, on a scale smaller than atoms, the quantum level, everything suddenly turns into a goddamn circus. Quantum physics is to regular everyday physics as a David Lynch film is to a mainstream blockbuster. We're talking particles popping in and out of existence, being in two places at the same time, and generally acting like assholes.
Look at that particle. What an asshole.
No doubt the strangest part is the Quantum Zeno effect, which points out that simply observing and measuring particles changes them (specifically, changing the rate at which they decay). How? No one knows. It appears to be the closest science has ever come to proving black magic exists.
What Could Possibly Go Wrong?
One prominent scientist theorized that the changes caused by simply observing dark energy could cause it to collapse, taking the universe with it.

Scientists, eager to see if this is true, are furiously observing dark energy whenever they get the chance.
So, Basically It's Like...
It's like crossing the streams in Ghostbusters, apparently.
How Long Have We Got?
That scientist, Professor Lawrence Krauss, thinks it may already be underway. Apparently, in the late 90s, scientists were looking at a bunch of shit exploding in space when they caught their first glimpse of some dark energy. This may have put the universe into a state where it may or may not pop like a soap bubble at any given instant. Just because we looked at it. Holy balls.
This, but with our universe in it. And about to pop.
Risk Level: 3
This ... this can't be right, can it? Surely the guy's just nuts. Then again, he appears to be one of the most prominent physicists in the country and has published a huge list of papers and books on the subject.
Then again, one of them was The Physics of Star Trek and, now that we think about it, we're pretty sure he stole this whole scenario from an episode of The Next Generation.

As you've probably worked out by now, there's some weird shit out there in the world of science. That's because a whole lot of the fundamental theories about reality are based on mathematical equations rather than actual observation. So there are all sorts of things out there that seem to exist in theory, but we've never seen them. At least one scientist has suggested that if we ever saw them with our own eyes, it's likely that we would start screaming and never stop. Well, it wasn't so much a scientists as HP Lovecraft.
Anyway, Strange matter is one of these things. It's a hypothetical material made up of quarks, which are one of the building blocks of reality, things so small that you can't even possibly imagine. Seriously, don't even try to think about it.

What Could Possibly Go Wrong?
There are two hypotheses about strange matter. One is that the stuff will simply disappear a fraction of a second after it appears. The other is that it will stabilize and convert every atom it comes in contact with into more strange matter. It could go either way, really.
There's a theory that there are entire stars out there in the universe that are made out of strange matter, just because a microscopic fragment of the stuff made contact once and then everything went to hell.
Now imagine, just theoretically, if some of this strange matter should appear on Earth. And, just theoretically, it should be stable enough to start a reaction with regular matter. Theoretically, we'd all be fucking dead.
Not Pictured: Life.
So, Basically It's Like...
Imagine you're like the fabled King Midas, and you have the power to convert matter with a single touch. Except that instead of gold, everything you touch turns into shit. And everything it touches turns to shit. Before you know it, the whole world is shit, and it's all your fault.
How Long Have We Got?
Luckily for us, strange matter can only be created in high-energy particle collisions, and nothing like that ever happens here, right? Oh, wait.
Meet the Large Hadron Collider. Again.

That's right, our friends at the LHC project expect a lot of weird things to pop up when they start smashing atoms together, and strange matter is one such possibility. That's why scientists have written papers with boring titles such as Will Relativistic Heavy-ion Colliders Destroy Our Planet?, the rebuttals to which were basically, "Let's turn them on and find out!"
At this point we're kind of wondering whether there's anything this machine can do that doesn't involve killing you and everyone you care about.
Risk Level: 5
Scientists respond to the strange matter problem by saying if it was ever going to happen, it would have happened already (since these kind of reactions happen a zillion times a second in our atmosphere anyway). We like to call this piece of rhetoric the cop-out hypothesis, because they know damned well that if it turns out they're wrong, there won't be anyone left to sue them.








The LHC. The reason I need to finish that lightspeed starship in my basement and figure out how to train my Komodo Dragon minions in basic repairs and weapon usage. also need to finish that antimatter laser so I can at least attempt to stop the collider, can't say I never did anything for the human race... That sound you hear is Home Land Security furiously attempting to locate me.
ReplyNanotechnology? Couldn't you just program them to NOT over-reproduce?
ReplyOh, wait- hackers...
Worse anti-science, fear mongering Luddite crap ever.
Replythanks for reading!
Before losing our s**t over how quantum physics will end the world, how about we learn some quantum physics first?
Replypfft if everybody did that there would be world peace
Why is nobuddy worry'd about that dark energy stuff?
ReplyWHAT THE F**K
cthulhu told him not to.
They could've spent the money on illness research and getting rid of poverty. But no, instead they wanted to create a machine that will not give them all the answers. Why? Because even if they find the particle that started the Big Bang, they cannot prove where that particle came from. And if they are able to find what started that particle, they cannot traced it back to the beginning. How will they know anyway? Can't they just make it up to protect their pride? Instead of solving the world's problems, they create a new problem, just because they want to look smart.
ReplyDid anyone else notice that the worst-case scenario from #1 was explored in much greater detail in a scientific television program called "Stargate: SG-1"?
ReplySeriously, the "replicators" from a couple of the seasons mid-to-late in their run are pretty much exactly the nanotech described above. Does this mean only MacGyver can save us now?
If the collider could theoreticaly create another big bang then it would exist in its own 'space' and it wouldnt interact with our universe
ReplyQuantum physics is things like Schrodinger's cat, right?
Reply Hide All See All 7 RepliesSchrödinger's cat was a joke.
yeah, and its not a joke. some just fail to understand it. and thats only 1 part. string theory and heisenberg are the main
@stringmaster20 it was a joke. Schrodinger was making fun of the incompleteness of string theory.
joke is the wrong word, but when Schoedinger said it he was trying to expain how ridiculous quantum theory can seem when applied to everyday situations
I'm pretty sure he did mean it to show how little sense his own theories made. But since then physicists have started using it and even taking it farther by adding an observer of the observer. But on the subject of quantum mechanics, it's the set of physics that affects small things and black holes just because basic newtonian physics kinda breaks down at that point. Oh, and it's interesting to note that after this article was made, Steven Hawking said that the air around us is actually filled with microscopic wormholes naturally, that link two different points in both space and time. Which means that time travel has technically already happened, but only for particles smaller than an atom.
String theory is incomplete, and that is where M Theory comes in. To even understand the slightest bit of M Theory you have to think of reality as existing in 11 dimensions. We of course can only perceive 3 dimensions, so this is pretty difficult to get your head around from the get go. Sub-atomic "Particles" aren't really particles at all, but rather tiny strings and membranes that vibrate at different rates. Now part of M theory states that these Particle (for the sake of simplicity) not only can, but at certain vibrational frequencies MUST exist in two or more places at once. Since we are made up of these same particles, the same must also be true of us. Now imagine an assortment of bells on a giant drum head. When the drum head is struck, it vibrates, which in turn vibrates each of the bells. Depending on how hard the drum is struck, the bells create different tones, or vibrational frequencies. The drum head is the fabric of reality itself, and the bells are the matter that fills in that reality. The fabric of reality is in a constant state of fluctuating vibration, which in turn vibrates the particles of matter. This means at any moment Our entire body could be in any number of different places at once, the only thing preventing us from realizing this fact being that we only perceive things on the same vibrational frequency as we are. We could be reading Cracked, smoking crack, sleeping, composing a symphony, and dead all at the same time and not even know it. Therefore, Schrodingers cat is no f*****g joke, it is cold hard facts.
@Vaira: Why would anyone make a joke about how little since there own theories made? If anything, the joke would be about how little the listener understands upon first hearing it.
Srange Matter reminds me of Ice-9 from Kurt Vonnegut's "Cat's Cradle"...
ReplyIt would be awesome if the guys at the LHC prepared a mysterious test for 12/21/2012, just to scare the s**t out of everyone.
ReplyI totally just LOLed @ this! hahaha
The nano tech is very plausible, everything else is crap. If you travel to the past any changes you would have made would only be noticeable to the few observers of the event and no one else. Scientist just like to scare the crap out of everyone for fun.
Reply Hide All See All 5 RepliesNot sure if troll or just really, really, really stupid.
suprmn06 is an expert on time travel.
well you obviously dont read anything on wormholes. and not to mention the fact that we have proven time trasvel on a quantum level already. same with teleportation.
What the scientists like to call teleportation isn't really teleportation the way the word was originally intended though. It's amazing, to be sure, but we're reassigning the values of one particle to another, rather than actually moving it without using the intervening space. And before some sci-fi nerd brings up Star Trek, the transporter is not referred to (at least not canonically) as teleportation, and they send the original matter to be reconstituted anyway.
Teleportation and time travel are just two sides of the same spacetime coin. One lets you go anywhere without having to go through the intervening space, the other lets you go anywhen without having to go through the intervening time.
Man, I need to watch The Quiet Earth again...
ReplyI bet this person is religious, something just tells me that this person is a goody two shoes christian with no idea what they're talking about. Maybe its the soul part in the second one.
Reply Hide All See All 9 RepliesIt's pretty logical as to why time travel wouldn't work, if people could time travel wouldn't they go back and remove every horrible thing from human history? It's simple logic
You obviously have never met a human being.
Or comprehend causality.
The problem is that if time traveling were possible and people tried to change the past, it could completely change the present or the future. The butterfly effect if you will. Say someone prevents 9/11 by going into the past, but for some reason it altered the present and we had a nuclear holocaust going on. The possibilities are endless on what could change. For now we should just focus on what's going on right now instead of trying to meddle with time. besides if humanity had never made mistakes or bad decisions in general, how could we learn from it?
I wouldn't focus on what religious views the author could have, just sit back and enjoy the damn article.
Yes you are correct good sir, time travel and quantum physics is simple logic
please read fabric of the cosmos.
How do you know that didn't happen? How do you know someone hasn’t already traveled back in time and prevented the black plague, then came back to the future to see the world was massively overpopulated with all the problems that creates? Or if someone went back in time to give smallpox vaccinations to the Native Americans? Both those scenarios would drastically change the entire course of human events and it might not be for the best. So how do you know they haven’t already done this, seen the horrible aftermath, then gone back and prevented people from going in the past to prevent those things from happening? They would see that nature (God) demanded those things to happen for the survival of our species? Or...what if these things were actually initiated by future people because there are massive problems in the future that were fixed because of these epidemics? Bottom line, preventing horrible things from happening in the past just postpones the unavoidable and even worse catastrophic events in the future. The more disastrous an event that wipes out a huge portion of the population, then the better the lives of the survivors. You only have to look at history to see that this is true.
Go to Hell. XD
I'm witcha Chase lol This article was chockfull of pseudo-scientific nonsense. Arguments from ignorance never did anybody any good. Another thing people don't get in terms of "why hasn't time travel happened yet" question is, as Apostocles and Back to the Future touch on, is that it technically could have happened. If String theory is true, then if time travel is invented in the future, who's to say that they didn't already go back to the past and end up in some sort of parallel universe or somethin'? It's pretty trippy s**t lol
Okay, where can I get that Lovecraft book?
ReplyTime travel backwards isn't possible. The laws of physics simply don't allow it and that's that. You would basically need to stand OUTSIDE the entire cosmos and everything that is real, and theoretically you could travel back then. Traveling forward is improbable, the way it works is once you exceed the speed of light time starts going slower for you, people who have visited space are time travelers, the reasoning is that they were outside the planet which means that they were exposed to a different pressure of gravity and no centripetal force pushing us down constantly, and traveling at a different speed therefore they traveled through time; however they only traveled literally fractions of milliseconds. Also Einstein says you can't travel faster than light. Most of this is old and feels like a scared little kid rambling about the boogey man.
Reply Hide All See All 8 RepliesI read somewhere that astronauts, if traveled away enough from Earth, could come back and land on Earth several years after they took off, while remainig basically the same age.
If that's true, shit, I need somebody to explain how the hell is that possible.
You do know that the laws of physics can change and be disproved, right?
Parorou, they can only do that if they're traveling near the speed of light because as you approach it everything around you slows down. Read about Time Dilation it's some pretty neat stuff.
You wrong on both. First, the LHC can create a wormhole that can be used as a foot hold. Time travel theory is once the first wormhole is created, later another wormhole of the same power level frequency can be created connecting the two, then sending a craft through that is capable of withstanding the forces involved, and you have a time traveler. Second In September 2011, an international group of scientists have detected particles that seemed to travel faster than the speed of light. Once we have learned to harness this power. Boom goes the dynamite.
Albert Einstein's theory was disproved a couple of weeks ago. Hadron's collider ending the world was disproved a few years ago.
omg, you dont need to exceed light for time to slow. you always move at 670 mil miles per hour. if your standing still, then that is how fast your moving thru time. the faster you move in space diverts that motion from the time dimension, and then you age at a slower rate . the faster you move in space, the slower you move thru time.
Does that mean that the faster you move through time, the slower you move through space?
GPS satellites' internal clock needs to do continuous adjustement due to the very limited, but not irrilevant effects of time dilatation; also, neutrinos can apparently travel at FTL speeds.
@Viper106: the "you cannot go back in time" thing is one of those things that will probably never be disproved. The LHC is perfectly safe, because at worse the Big-Bang phenomena that will happen will create an universe of a bunch of quantistic particles. About the Russian space-travel theory, it's a bunch of bullshit some drunkard pulled out of his ass, apparently.
If time travel has happened would anyone really be aware of it? Maybe the UFO's we see are time travelers or something and events like the world wars and 911 or even JFK's assassination were construed by time travelers!! All of those events might not be what people find to be our natural history. Basically what I'm trying to say is, maybe some of what is in our history books isn't really what happened in the first place but people go with it because they don't realize the change!! For example (because I know some of you are slow), if you had a brother (sister or uncle etc.) that just died in a car crash at the age of 30, then that's that, he died and blah blah blah BUT if for some reason time travelers went back in time an abducted him at the age of 20 and now he's been missing for 10 years then you wouldn't even know of any car crash! I know, messes with your head but it is a fact because none of us would be aware of the change whether it is a huge event in time or just an event in your life.
ReplyWhat the fuck? I wasted 30 seconds of my precious time reading that drivel.
@zillah94: What? the dude mentioning UFOs and JFK in the same sentence didn't tip you off to the stench of complete and utter bullshit? or should I say gray goo?
Of all the popular buzzwords to explain scientific events, none has done more harm than "Big Bang". People keep taking it literally, like Michael Bay was directing the beginning of the Universe. It was a lot more complicated than a "bang".
Reply"Big Bang?"
Fap.
This entire article, including the comments is purely moronic. The LHC is already online, it has been for 3 years, and the experiments that were supposed to kill us...they didn't. That kills two out of three, but your time travel hypothesis remains valid, except for one little issue, the issue being time travelers to the past would probably know what went wrong, and thus would help us stop that. Furthermore, they wouldn't go through the infinite loop that you claim because they would have to encounter the large number of time travelers you claim would accumulate somewhere along the timeline, meaning they would probably come to the rationale that continuing this would kill us all. Assuming everyone decided to be completely illogical that day, we still have another little detail that helps us out here: time travel for humans is theoretically impossible. Currently, the only things that can travel back in time have been found to be made of completely different types of matter. For us to be able to go back in time, we would have to convert ourselves to that type of matter and hope we didn't die. This will take so long, that we'll probably have the means to stop the end of the universe. Next comes your nanobot theory. Assuming the creators of the nanobots are complete morons and program them completely wrong, we still have the fact that nanobots are still robots which tends to come with the side effect of being very susceptible to EMP's and magnets, providing us with a convenient fail-safe.
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesYou should probably look at when this was published.
You should probably look at when the comments were made
Its a commedy website, grow a pair and suck it up. the s**t was funny, and whats to say they dont eventually go wrong? just cause it hasnt happened yet, doesnt mean the potential is not still there. its like saying that youve thrown axe cans into a fire for years, it does not reduce the risk of a piece of shrapnel eventually owning you in the face.
oh and p.s. this article was posted 3 years 1 month and ... some number of days i dont feel like counting ago. so perhaps when this was posted we werent quite know the full extent of what would happen.
p.s.s dont go to a comedy website to have a scientific debate, it makes you look like a retarded asshole. just sayin.
No. 1 sounds like it'll make a real life Generator Rex.
Reply