But Actually ...

For unclean animals (like pigs, donkeys, and other dumbasses), it was two of each, but for clean ones (sheep, cattle, and everything else God deemed edible) it was either seven or fourteen. While Genesis 6:19 says Noah should bring "two of all living creatures," in Genesis 7:2 God clarifies that He was only talking about unclean beasts. For all others, Noah was supposed to bring seven -- or seven pairs, depending on which translation you read. These were presumably for food, and, of course, sacrifices. In fact, the story goes on to say that almost immediately after the ark landed, Noah made burnt offerings of one of each clean animal.

James Tissot
Sure puts Evan Almighty in a new light.

That would be in line with the thinking of the time, obviously. Animal sacrifice was common, and we still eat the poor, delicious bastards to this day. But there's a kind of Dr. Dolittle spin we tend to put on Noah and his ark -- cute little animated tales of Noah out there partying on his mega-yacht with a whole zoo full of pals. And then he stops to eat a few, and the party grows awkward. Then he gets out the torch, and the real fun begins.

But Actually ...

Wrong already. For starters, "You shall not kill" is a mistranslation -- the original Hebrew phrase means "You shall not murder." Legal justification marks a big difference between the two. Which makes a little more sense, since about half the Bible features impaling, mauling, and stabbing people on the toilet.

Giovanni Battista Salvi
"He's just pining."

We generally perceive the commandments to be listed in order of importance, and that makes sense, too: Murder is usually considered a bigger deal than shoplifting, or coveting. But that's not accurate either. In the Bible, the commandments were never listed in a clear manner from one to ten, leading the different religions (and the different subsections within the religions) to interpret the list differently from one another.

In the Protestant version, the first commandment is "You shall have no other gods before me," while the Jewish version interprets that as part of the second commandment. In the Catholic version, "You shall not commit adultery" is the sixth commandment, while in the Protestant version it's the seventh. Oh, also -- "don't murder" isn't number one. On any list. It's not even close.

Wikipedia
Thou shalt not lie is the ninth most important rule God could think of.

Yes, "don't murder" is one of those filler entries they try to hide somewhere in the middle of the list. That's just poor list-making practice. We would never do such a thing ...

Then Joseph's brothers got jealous and sold him into slavery, but hey, that's not the coat's fault.

But Actually ...

It may have been the coat's fault.

Also, Joseph might not have been as fly as generations of bearded, diseased shepherds have led us to believe. Some translations say Jacob made his son a "coat of many colors," but the original Hebrew text uses the words "ketonet passim." "Ketonet" does mean coat, but "passim" can mean colored, striped, long-sleeved, or simply the Hebrew equivalent of "pretty rad, dude."

Circle of Johann Heiss
Look at that mullet. Truly, he was too rad to live.

The phrase "ketonet passim" crops up again later in the Bible ... to describe the dresses of the virgin daughters of royalty. History (and over-protective, shotgun-wielding fathers) tells us that virgin daughters are generally made to dress in something more modest than brightly colored party outfits. Incidentally, the ancient world didn't even have names for many colors, let alone ways of producing them -- centuries later, the Romans were still going pretty bats**t over the invention of purple dye.

This brings us back to one of those other possible translations for "passim": long-sleeved. If Joseph's coat simply had long sleeves, it would make extra sense that his brothers hated him, since such a coat would be unsuitable for shepherding. Basically, Jacob was telling Joseph, "You're too good to go out and work all day like these other bastards." He may as well have put a bullseye on Joseph's back.

Totally the coat's fault.

[subtitle]Moses Did Not Demand The Pharaoh "Let [His] People Go"[/subtitle]

Oh wait, we have a movie scene for this one:

We even have a song!

We even have a movie scene that is also a song:

"Let my people go" was Moses' simple, powerful demand to the Egyptian Pharaoh: Free the enslaved Israelites, or face a plague of plagues. That has to be one of the most famous demands in all of history, right up there with "Give me liberty or give me death" and "Kneel before Zod."

But Actually ...

The power of "let my people go" lies in its brevity. It's a statement worthy of a Spartan. But the full version of Moses' speech is hardly as inspiring. Moses never demands that the Pharaoh release the slaves for good. He hedges that statement harder than Sean Spicer.

biblegateway.com
It was less Charlton Heston, and more your little brother asking your parents if he can go to Coachella.

Moses asks the Pharaoh if he can borrow the slaves for a holiday weekend so they can kill some animals in the wilderness in God's name, as one does. There's supposed to be a return trip, and even the threat comes across as kinda weenie: "If we don't, he may strike us with plagues or the sword. Hey, we're including ourselves in this -- we're on your side, buddy!"