Back when porn was only available in magazine or videotape form, it made sense to stick to the oeuvre of one performer who ... well, worked for you. Thus, one erotic celebrity's name could singlehandedly keep entire studios afloat. But thanks to the limitless pornographic bounty of the internet, "full-time porn star" may soon no longer be a viable career option at all.

Iafd.com
"Oh well. Guess I'll have to fall back on being a Mensa genius and piano prodigy."

After years of the interwebs being flooded with millions of hours of both amateur and pirated porn, adult film studio profits have dropped hard. But, ever the resilient purveyors of smut, the industry immediately started thinking up ways to reinvent porn for the modern age. (It's something they've always done.) Their best idea so far? Custom-made videos catered to the needs of individual customers. A vast array of niche products for tiny audiences, some of whom are actually willing to pay money.

kieferpix/iStock/Getty Images
As opposed to the rest of the world, which regards porn which costs anything more than "zero" as highway robbery.

So performers who once earned thousands of dollars per scene are now doing webcam shows where name recognition takes a backseat to whether or not they fulfill a specific request, such as laughing at the viewer's small penis (which is apparently something people ask for). A few eager actors are still trying to cling to the old model, fighting fiercely for a shrinking market and continuous low pay, but when your competition is personalized videos and millions of 100-percent free streaming movies, you're essentially trying to float on a sack of iron dicks in the middle of the ocean.

We'd love for scientists to study the effects of this on human sexuality. Will it get to the point where everyone's fetishes are so specific that no two people can enjoy the same erotica? Back in the olden days, everyone in your parents' hometown could gather around the same Linda Lovelace video and become aroused in unison. Soon, your favorite porn star will be famous only to you, because she's the best at using a vibrator while dressed as a Civil War general while seductively eating a bowl of pho while laughing at your small penis.

When we say "gay bars," we don't mean bars with a primarily homosexual clientele. We're talking about very specific places -- i.e. underground party-filled establishments where gay people would go to meet other gay people and be themselves in a safe environment. They've been influencing mainstream culture for decades, whether you knew it or not. Disco and techno both got their starts in gay clubs, and the gay scene shaped Madonna's act before she became the biggest female pop star in history. We can also thank them for making club drugs like Ecstasy popular. And of course, the gay rights movement started with a series of riots at a gay bar called the Stonewall Inn.

But gay bars are going away. This would seem to be a huge loss to the culture as a whole, but the good news is that they're disappearing for mostly uplifting reasons.

claudiodivizia/iStock/Getty Images
Well, technically they're disappearing from bankruptcy, but empowering bankruptcies.

As gay culture continues to be accepted in the mainstream, the traditional safe meeting spots for dating and hooking up are being replaced by online communities and apps, just like they are for heterosexual people. As for going someplace with your friends to have a good time without catching a hate-crimey vibe, it's fortunately way easier to find spots to do that now. Intolerance / country western bars are of course still a thing, but we actually made enough progress for gay people to no longer need bars that are exclusively for them.

OcusFocus/iStock/Getty Images
We finally have a bar scene where we can all come together to focus on what truly matters: getting drunk cheaply.

It's like during Prohibition, when people had to go to speakeasies to drink safely without getting arrested. Well, gay bars were basically the speakeasies of homosexuality. But ever since homosexuality was finally decriminalized in the U.S. (in 2003; homosexuality has only officially been legal since Finding Nemo came out), those kinds of places lost their "rebel" feel, costing them a lot of patrons and eventually leading to them being bought out by Home Depot. That is not a joke.

Another reason gay-oriented businesses are seeing fewer attendees is that many of the unique neighborhoods that once housed regular customers are being gentrified out of existence. And that's the mark of true progress: Gay business are no longer singled out for being gay, but for being in the way of the wealthy.

If you're shrugging this off as no big loss, keep in mind that circuses were popular for 250 straight goddamned years, using pretty much the same format that whole time. You could use a time machine to kidnap a kid from 1821 and bring him to a circus in 2016, and he'd know exactly what he was looking at -- trained elephants, lion tamers, tents, the whole bit. It would even smell the same.

But the famous Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey's have promised to remove all elephants from their circuses by 2018. Why the change of heart? Money, of course. The circuses opted to quit throwing away cash battling local legislation prohibiting use of rare wild animals like elephants and Sumatran tigers, and fending off lawsuits invoking the Endangered Species Act, proving once and for all that the only way people will stop being terrible is if they can no longer make money doing so. It looks like a ban on lions won't be far behind.

NejroN/iStock/Getty Images
Soon, the only downtrodden lions you'll be able to see will be from Detroit.

This is similar to what is happening at SeaWorld, which recently caved to the growing backlash driven by the documentary Blackfish and vowed to eventually free all of their Willies. Dolphins will be next, if the world follows India's example and bans the capturing and exhibition of our favorite seagoing assholes.

Once again, this is all being done for financial reasons. As a whole, people aren't buying tickets to animal circuses anymore, preferring to spend all that money on something that won't result in very uncomfortable questions from their children on the way back home. But because it's all about the money, it also means that wild animal shows will always be a thing somewhere in the world. They'll just go from "a common childhood memory" to "something you pay cash to watch in a dark basement in Thailand."

The only non-Hindenburgian gas capable of making parade balloons fly is helium, and as we've mentioned before, we've been running out of that for some time now. We aren't saying that helium is going away soon, as it can still be harvested from the Earth or from space, but that would make it much more expensive. How expensive? Let's put it this way: In the future, it might actually be cheaper to fill parade balloons with human farts. But then we'd be right back to square one, as far as flammability goes.

Stephen Chernin/Getty Images News/Getty Images
Though you've gotta admit that flaming chunks of Garfield raining down on Times Square would spice up the event.

Helium prices have already doubled since 1998. If you do the math (don't panic, we won't actually make you do it), this could push the cost of filling a single Macy's balloon (around 18,000 cubic feet) to over $1 million. The Goodyear fleet, by the way, uses more than ten times that much gas per blimp.

Of course, these aren't "real-life Death Star" prices, but someone is eventually bound to sit down, add up the numbers, and decide that parade balloons simply aren't worth it. If they don't outright get rid of them, they might scale it down to a mere one balloon, or start charging people $100 per one childhood amazement in order to break even.

Of course, you can already guess why those skills are growing less valuable. It has to do with the same device you're probably reading this article on: a smartphone. Now that almost everyone in the world has constant, instant access to a high-definition camera, a deluge of free images of every newsworthy event floods the internet within minutes. The below ABC News report on the Boston Marathon bombing in 2013 is cobbled together entirely with cell phone video captured by regular folks who happened to be nearby:

This is great for news outlets (which can often use amateurs' work for little or no money), but somewhat less great for the people who used to sacrifice life and limb to get in camera range of the action. To quote award-winning photojournalist Dan Chung: "I don't really see a future in photojournalism."

Over the past ten years, the photojournalism industry has been cut in half. Readers are happy to have those "in the moment" pictures, even if they're often so grainy that they could feed a third-world village.

Janis Krums
Nothing says "quality photojournalism" like an image that causes you to try to clean the shit off your monitor.

Hell, if anything, the lack of polish in the images makes them seem more raw and dramatic -- this tragedy is happening to regular folks like us. If the trend continues, we wouldn't be surprised if the most iconic photograph of this generation winds up being a blurry, washed-out screencap from a video someone shot on their Galaxy S7.

Let's keep this gravy train rolling with 18 Widely Used Technologies You Didn't Know Are Obsolete and 5 Materials That Will Make The World as We Know It Obsolete.

Subscribe to our YouTube channel, and check out 4 Horrible Ways We're Bringing Sci-Fi Technologies To Life, and other videos you won't see on the site!

Also, follow us on Facebook, and let's be best friends forever.