Is bigger always better? Not necessarily. With things like bruises, cow turds and explosions, bigger can absolutely mean worse. But with art? It’s hard to say. Impossible massiveness feels like it has to come at a cost — a huge piece of art has by its very nature been poured over less and obsessed over less than something small but honed to perfection.

But there’s something inherently pleasing about anything honkin’ massive. Like, even if it’s a bit shitty, if something’s enormous enough, it’s still impressive. If someone does a painting a mile long that absolutely sucks, there’s still something to it — it’s better, by sheer dint of bigness, than an equally suck-ass painting on a piece of paper. That’s just inarguably true.

Some art sets out to be enormous as its main reason for being, while other stuff just keeps on going because its artist simply doesn’t stop. Either way, there’s something self-indulgent and masturbatory once things go beyond a certain reasonable bigness — particularly in the case of item #1 on the list…

Click right here to get the best of Cracked sent to your inbox.

The 600-Year Organ Recital

Source 

The Month-Long Documentary

Source 

Sitting Down, For Ages, For Art

Source / MoMA 

A Half-Court by One Artist

Source 

Artwork for Aliens

Source 

Marcel’s Monstrous Modernist Masterpiece

Source 

The Ever-Growing, Neverending Fanfic Leviathan

Source / Nick 

The World-Sized Photo of a City

Source 

Scroll down for the next article