5 International Incidents Caused by an Animal
Animals are always screwing things up for us humans, if 80s slapstick comedies are to be believed. But sometimes animals' adorable tomfoolery goes beyond disrupting a wedding and making a cranky old man fall hilariously into the cake. Sometimes, they can start freaking wars.

Back in 1851, a group of Mormon emigrants made their way across the Oregon Trail with the eventual goal of finding a home where they could bake rice crispies squares, and eschew alcohol and coffee in peace.

One of the Mormons had a crippled cow, which at some point got spooked and decided to wander off into the wilderness. Its owner started to follow but changed his mind when he noticed a ton of goddamn Sioux warriors in the surrounding area. Roughly four-thousand members of the tribe had gathered around the nearby Ft. Laramie to trade. The cow spent several hours doing cow-things before a few of the younger Sioux noticed that dinner had just stumbled into camp and killed the shit out of it.
That very next day, the Mormons arrived at Ft. Laramie and complained to the soldiers about the poached cow. Twenty-nine men and two cannons, lead by West Point graduate Lieutenant Grattan, marched out to talk with the Brule Sioux and seek justice for the cow--because nothing says "measured discussion" like a regiment with fucking cannons. None of the men spoke Sioux, but they had the foresight to bring along a French trader named Lucien Auguste, who spoke a completely different Indian dialect. Poorly.

They met with the Sioux Chief, Conquering Bear, and ordered him to turn over the cow's murderer, the spectacularly-named High-Forehead. Grattan was young, brash and eager for a fight, while Lucien Auguste was hammered and purposefully mistranslated much of what both men said (presumably because it seemed hilarious at the time).
Conquering Bear made a fair offer: any one of his finest horses to the Mormons in exchange for the slain cow. Rather than consulting with the Mormons or accepting the deal outright, the soldiers tried the bold bargaining tactic of shooting Conquering Bear in the back and starting a fight with 1,200 pissed off Sioux veterans. It didn't go well. The Grattan Massacre lead directly to the battle of Ash Hollow and is viewed as the first spark that ignited the Sioux Wars, which culminated in the Wounded Knee massacre, all of which might have been avoided had some lazy settler kept better track of his cow.


In 1925, Greece and Bulgaria were locked in a simmering state of near-conflict. This had been a fairly common state of affairs between the two ever since Bulgaria had the gall to become a country. World War I had ended just a few years prior, and neither nation wanted to risk full-out armed conflict with the other until they'd both had a decade or two to recover. So a tense peace settled over the region right up until a Greek soldier lost control of his dog.

The sentry dog darted away from his master and crossed the Macedonian border into Bulgaria, perhaps because his master made an arm motion similar to throwing a ball. The panicked Greek soldier ran after the dog and was immediately shot dead by Bulgarian sentries, sparking a conflict that would come to be known as "The War of the Stray Dog."

Greek soldiers were sent out to occupy the nearby town of Petrich, where they clashed with Bulgarian soldiers and left 50 men dead. All-out war seemed inevitable, until the League of Nations surprised everyone by doing their goddamn job and stopping the war.

Greece was ordered to withdraw from Bulgaria and pay a fine of 45,000 of whatever they used for dollars back then. History doesn't record what happened to the dog, so we're going to speculate that it traveled to the United States and somehow caused the Great Depression.

As you may be aware, diplomatic immunity allows the person holding it to get away with whatever the hell they want provided that you don't piss off Danny Glover on a day he's feeling particularly too old for this shit. It makes sense that this sort of immunity would extend to family members of said diplomat... but what about their pets?

As it turns out, some real-life diplomats have actually tried to use this argument on multiple occasions. Back in 1999, two German shepherds owned by the Russian Embassy got loose and slaughtered 17 pregnant sheep on a farm in Kent. The farmers demanded action, but since the Embassy was sovereign Russian territory there was jack shit they could do about it. Meanwhile the dogs continued their sheep murdering spree, dropping more than 50 of the animals once all was said and done.

It was officially decided that the dogs had diplomatic immunity and were therefore free from any repercussions. It wasn't without precedent; back in 1975 a dog belonging to a delegate from Barbados bit several locals, but when the police tried to intervene they were warned of "possible international consequences" if they messed with the dog in any way.
All of this pales in comparison to the case of diplomat John Kenneth Galbraith's cat in 1962. On a visit to the Indian state of Gujarat, Galbraith's children were gifted with two adorable Siamese kittens, one of which was named Ahmedabad. Because "Ahmedabad" is both a stupid and annoying name for a cat, the kids shortened it to Ahmed.

This proved to be hilariously disastrous, because "Ahmed" just happens to be one of the prophet Mohammed's many wacky alternate bonus names. When news of the cat's moniker showed up in the paper (why the hell this cat's name made the news we cannot be certain), the people of Pakistan reacted in a predictable manner.
Riots erupted across the country. U.S. facilities were stoned and American servicemen and embassy personnel were attacked in the streets. Mullahs in Pakistan called for the head of John Galbraith, who actually took it pretty damn well:

"I do not think the Pakistanis were particularly sensitive. In the darker reaches of our Bible Belt, there would have been criticism of a Pakistan ambassador who, at a moment of friction between our two nations, had, however innocently, named his dog Jesus."
Fortunately, Galbraith was able to pacify the situation by explaining that the name had been a complete accident and changing the kitty's name to Gujarat (once again ignoring the fact that "Mittens" has never offended anyone). When questioned on the incident, Gujarat took a nap in the sun for several hours before shitting in a nearby flower bed.








History doesn't record what happened to the dog, so we're going to speculate that it traveled to the United States and somehow caused the Great Depression.- I literally laughed out loud in a computer lab.
ReplySeems to me, a lot of this could have been avoided if we outlawed religion. What kind of religion says dogs are impure? Mankind, as a species, would not be as advanced as we are if it weren't for our kinship with the dog.
ReplyAnyone else read "problembär?" in the Bruno exhibit and imagine a trollface?
ReplyPets who murder livestock have diplomatic immunity and detaining them could cause international incidents? Okay, I don't know about anyone else, but if a farmer shot a diplomat's dog for killing livestock and the diplomat wanted retribution from his government or the UN, they'd be laughed out of the embassy.
ReplySoemthing diplomat John Kenneth Galbraith should know -
Reply1 - Fanatical raging Muslims don't give a f**k about how innocent ure intentions were. Heck, they've murdered people over cartoons and nearly had a woman executed for having the gall to call a Teddy bear Mohammad.
- There are too many variations of the name of Mohammad - one of them is Mehmet, which is the Turkish way of saying the name.
-No religious and observant Muslim ambassador of any country is stupid enough to own a dog, never mind name the mongrel. The fact is that Islam and dogs are pretty much non-compatible. Ever heard of the muslim NY cabbies who refuse to allow blind guys with a seeing-eye dogs into their cars for religious reasons? Cats are favoured and loved though, but obviously cannot be named after their prophet...and lastly,
-The darker reaches of the USA's Bible Belt would have no reason to criticse any Islamic ambassador over their dog naming skills unless they are mostly fluent in Arabic as Jesus's name is Isa in Arabic and Isa is a fairly common name among Muslims. The fact Muslims consider him a prophet is enough insult to those in the Bible belt
-"Ahmed" is the second of the 99 sacred names of the Prophet, not a linguistic variation. Forms like Mehmet, or Magomed (Chechen) are not amongst the 99 names.
-Not that your analogy is relevant to begin with, but the majority of Muslims throughout the world do not speak Arabic either. In Indonesian (and Indonesia is the most Muslim country on earth), for example, the name of Jesus is "Yesus."
-I'm not saying that Galbraith is particularly at fault for naming his cat "Ahmed" accidentally, but these sorts of incidents are founded in a certain type of ignorance. "Fanatical raging Muslims" aren't going to be pacified by uninformed anti-Muslim polemics.
-For the record, Muslims do not own dogs because they are impure, like pigs. If a Muslim comes into contact with a dog, he must clean himself before going to prayer.
To Ahmeddev, that's kind of unfair to call Galbraith "ignorant" for not knowing all 99 names.
How about the Pig whose Feces(with the help of the owner) Destroyed an Ecosystem Causing the President to Decree the Community where the pig lives in to be trapped within a huge Globe like glass shelter ... Ohh wait ...
Reply Hide All See All 4 RepliesSorry, I don't care much for spam.
I heard you the first time God damn it.
aw sorry guys I thought cracked ate my post cause it didn't show up when i post it >_
anybody up for round five?
How about the Pig whose Feces(with the help of the owner) Destroyed an Ecosystem Causing the President to Decree the Community where the pig lives in to be trapped within a huge Globe like glass shelter ... Ohh wait ...
ReplyHow about the Pig whose Feces(with the help of the owner) Destroyed an Ecosystem Causing the President to Decree the Community where the pig lives in to be trapped within a huge Globe like glass shelter ... Ohh wait ...
ReplyHow about the Pig whose Feces(with the help of the owner) Destroyed an Ecosystem Causing the President to Decree the Community where the pig lives in to be trapped within a huge Globe like glass shelter ... Ohh wait ...
Replywhat do you expect from a bunch of people who worship a child molester as their deity?
ReplyAll hail Pedobear?
The guy did have a nine year old wife. Just sayin.
I'd rather have a cat named after our Prophet instead of idiotic fanatical extremists.
ReplyIs anybody else amused by the fact that the Hamas sign being burned in number 3 seems to be drawn in crayon?
ReplyI feel bad for the bear. He was just being a bear and they decide to kill him. It's a shame that humans won't get over this desire to kill just because any time in the foreseeable future. We've done it too long to just stop now.
ReplyYes, because the bear wasn't killing livestock or anything OH WAIT
(And, incidentally, if it had left the livestock alone I would have been on the bear's side.)
I find many of the Hindu deities of the cow quite delicious.
ReplyAnd say whatever you wish, but when an entire country and religion erupts into mindless bloodshed over a cat's name, then there is something extremely wrong with the people, the country, the religion, and possibly reality itself. Then they wonder why other people dislike them.
Let the bears pay bear tax. I pay Homer tax.
Replyso what about a war started over a pig in British Columbia
ReplyThey already talked about it
What about the pig that shot Oscar Grant to death and sparked a riot? Oh wait...
ReplyA good amount of the Mormon Pioneers were carrying everything they owned in a handcart. There's a decent chance the cow's owner was too damn tired to chase after it.
Replylazy mormon tsk tsk
Nothing about the Pig War? I thought that was pretty ridiculous.
ReplyI'm not 100% sure on my facts, but- wasn't there a massive riot in India/Pakistan a few hundred years back beacuse the British army issue rifles required you to bite down on the powdered tips. Wich was coated in pig/cow lard wich offended Muslims/hindus who refused to do so. They were acused of treason/insubordanation and beaten, thus causing riots. I think this is relivent team.
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesYup, they were called the Sepoy Rebellions
That's right. But that wasn't exactly caused by an animal...though it was quite a big event - caused what became known in India as the first war of Independance in 1857 - India and Pakistan would be free by 1947
It turned out the cartridges were actually coated in mutton grease, which didn't violate anyone's beliefs. But by the time it was proven it was too late.