6 Human Character Flaws (That Saved the Species)
Eat right. Lay off the booze. Take a damned bath. It's all good advice, we suppose, but scientists say if our ancestors had followed it, we'd probably still be hanging out in the forest munching chiggers off each other's backs.
It turns out that all of our bad habits came about for a reason, and in order to become nature's biggest winners, we first had to act like pretty big losers.

Ever stop to wonder why humans don't have fur? Scientists have; after all, humans are one of the few mostly hairless mammals on the planet.

With some exceptions.
It's not a minor point; our hairlessness is a big reason why human civilization even exists. Without that natural insulation of fur covering us, we had to create clothing, and groups living in different areas produced varying levels of pigmentation to protect their exposed skin from the sun, leading to the development of our various races.
Oh, and the need to keep warm may have also contributed to our ancestors learning one other mildly important skill: making fire.

"Awesome! Let's throw some shit on here and see what happens to it."
So how did we wind up as the hairless monkeys we are today?
We were filthy.
Yes, one leading theory is that we did such a horrible job keeping our fur clean, parasites became rampant. Particularly body lice we picked up from gorillas (don't judge, the Pleistocene period was a crazy, experimental time). So eventually, not having fur for the little bastards to nest in became an evolutionary advantage, and hairless offspring became the norm. It was certainly better than, you know, washing.

Bathing is for pussies.
So if you've ever worn an outfit purely made up of the only items of clean clothing you had left, or gone to the laundromat in your pajamas because all of your clothes were so dirty you didn't think they were medically safe to wear (Yeah, you know who you are), it's time to stop feeling bad.
After all, we as a species actually went naked because we couldn't be bothered to clean our once naturally occurring monkey suit.

Obesity is the plague of the Western world--here meaning any place where you can purchase fried chicken filled donuts.
Obviously we know why people want to eat. In addition to filling the void where something called earnestness used to be, it gives us the energy to go on living. But why would humans have evolved to crave fat and grease even if our brain knows it will kill us? If evolution's so smart, why don't we hate deep-fried chocolate cake?

Yes, that actually is a thing. From This Is Why You're Fat.
Well, speaking of that big brain of yours, you have it thanks to gluttony. Specifically high fat and high calorie food. There are plenty of animals that eat simple, healthy, plant-based diets, and for the most part, they don't tend to be particularly bright.

Dumb, yet delicious.
Most of the planet's sharper animals are, like humans, essentially scavengers. A certain amount of intelligence and long-term memory is required to remember which berries are a tasty treat and which will make you shit your intestines inside-out. But what vaulted humans above and beyond competing animals like rats, to the point that we build the cities and they have to crawl through our sewers?
Fat.
What we did better than them was discover ways to cram our fat faces with the richest, fattiest foods mother nature had to offer. We used tools to crack open animal bones and skulls to get to the greasy bone marrow and brains, and if we could have deep-fried the animals we caught, we would have.
Our large, juicy brains are really all that sets us apart, and they consume a huge amount of energy. The kind of energy that could only be provided by big fatty slabs of animal flesh. Experts believe that only the relentless stuffing of our faces with the ancient equivalent of fried cheese kept us going as a brainy species. And we used this increasing brain power mainly to find (you guessed it) new, creative ways to stuff our faces.

Early humanity built its whole operation around it--the parties that went out hunting ancient critters for their awesome, fatty meat contributed to the creation of the first tools, and strengthened tribal bonds. So laugh at the fat guy chowing down on buffalo wings all you want, but he's the reason your brain is complex enough to realize how hilarious he is.

While we're no prohibitionists, you have to admit you get a lot less done on those days you come to work drunk. It's a good thing our ancestors didn't have hooch around, or they'd have been too drunk to run from those saber-toothed tigers, right? After all, isn't alcohol a byproduct of our decadent modern civilization? And what great inventor ever wound up pantsless on an episode of Cops?
Well believe it or not, without booze there's a good chance modern civilization would never have happened.

First of all, scientists suspect that humans have been boozehounds since our very earliest days when we looked like something you'd hire an exterminator to chase out of your attic. Our bodies are actually designed for alcohol consumption, with portions of our livers specifically designated for metabolizing alcohol.
So human beings have been getting tanked for ages. But that just means that somehow we survived despite our drunkenness (and the fact that it helped ugly cavemen hook up), right?

Actually, some researchers think it goes way beyond that. Human beings only truly started to thrive once we developed agriculture, as it allowed us to settle down and start multiplying like catholic bunnies. And while a guy out on his own could maybe grow enough grain to feed himself and his family, to grow enough grain so that you have excess to brew beer with, well, that takes a lot of people working together. That takes a village.

And beer gnomes.
This is why when you look back at Sumer, aka the very first actual civilization in human history, you find they used half of their grain for beer. Beer was what put asses in the seats, the one big draw of city life. It was something you just couldn't get as a roaming solitary nomad. For ancient man, beer was nothing short of a wonderful promise of what civilized human life could be, distilled into liquid form.
Sorry, we teared up there for a second.








I came to this article thinking it was about all of the screwed up psychopaths who have saved the planet in alien/apocalypse movies by way of some screwed up character flaw...
ReplyHow is this article a big screw you to vegans and vegetarians, it's referring to the evolutionary advantage of having a varied diet as opposed to you know.. just eating grass.
ReplyGod dammit now I'm complaining about complainers making me as bad as them IT'S A f*****g EPIDEMIC NO ONE IS SAFE
Hey, man. *hug*
I remember my Intro to Anthropology TA spending a good 10 minutes trying to explain to a 70 year old Russian man who was auditing our class why being a vegetarian does not make your brain shrink. Apparently, that Russian guy has dozens of family members, all with the same misunderstanding of evolutionary biology, the same command of the English language, and Cracked accounts.
ReplyThere are a significant portion of medical professionals and scientists who argue against evolutionary benefits to depression. The people who argue for it tend to be evolutionary psychologists, who are often laughed at by other mental health professionals.
ReplyThe brain is pretty complex, as are genetics. There are a lot of people who have genetic material which is utter s**t in terms of survival of the species. I think what keeps it going is the altruism of others. We care about our children and our mates and our parents and (some) of our neighbors. We attempt to keep them alive, even if our attempts are fucked (read: trepining and exorcism). Minus the random son of a b***h who may very well be a sociopath (I'm talking to you, Hitler), we really don't wish people with mental disorders to die. We may avoid them like the plague and at times we warehoused them, but we don't want them dead. We hope they seek treatment, even if we shield our kids from their crazy uncle Jim.
I like how the comments are about how #5 is a big screw you to Vegetarians. Vegetarians, the human equivalent, rarely have been their whole loves, and beside that, they still eat fatty foods. Herbivores, do not. They eat grass, shrubs, and other leafy plants, but, no fat.
ReplyI am now comfortable being an angsty, unhealthy-eating occasional drinker, unfortunately the rest don't apply to me...yet :(
ReplyI'll be honest, I stopped reading after "chicken filled doughnuts."
ReplyWow, this article delivers a lot of bullshit
ReplyWe are loosing our pilosity because we don't need it anymore, not the other way around.
I know it's an humorous article, but it takes more than a wild guess to figure out those things.
#5 is a big screw you to vegans and vegetarians.
Reply Hide All See All 7 RepliesJust to prove #5 wrong, i got a perfect score on a chemistry test today. The same test that everyone else in the class failed miserably. I have been a vegetarian for two years now.
@wuriop And I bet in the two years since becoming a vegetarian, you've become an insufferable asshole.
I don't get how number 5 is supposed to insult vegans and vegetarians. I'm a vegan and I laughed (not about the chicken filled doughnuts part). You twits here don't know what veganism is all about so shut the hell up. Or, you could continue with your stupidity, I weep for humanity (kidding, I hate humans)
To the people being rude about vegetarians and vegans, we've got so many food options now that it's not like meat is about the only food. We can afford to cut meat out of our diet now we have supplements.
To the people being rude about vegetarians and vegans, keep it up. We have too many sanctimonious buttholes already.
@Wuriop Only two years, you say? So, before hand, you ate lots of fatty foods, like meat? And you probably still do, almost everything we eat, meat or otherwise, is fatty. So, eating ice cream is like eating that meat.
logical fallacy due to anecdotal evidence?
Loving the 'sober college' ad under #4
ReplySo when my religion says we should all be like children, that's a pretty good thing?
ReplyI've never had trouble finding my inner child, but my outer adult is proving elusive. I'm supposed to turn twenty in just over a week, but screw that: I'm gonna be nineteen and two halves.
''Nathan Birch contributes to the development of the human culture with his webcomic Zoology.''
ReplyDoes anyone else think his comics should have been named beastiology?
brilliant article! really enjoyed it XD
ReplyThank-you Cracked. I feel validated.
ReplyCan't believe promiscuity didn't make the list. *fail*
ReplyTrue. If we were like Pandas in the sex department we wouldn't be here today heh. But a lot of species are promiscuous, so it isn't something that's particularly unique.
'So yeah, if your teenager's being an angsty little punk, don't worry, they're actually contributing the betterment of the human race. And if he's filthy, drunk and eating an entire bucket of fried chicken, holy s**t. He's about to evolve into a new species.'
ReplyxD
ya that last line was epic
"And if he's filthy, drunk and eating an entire bucket of fried chicken, holy s**t. He's about to evolve into a new species."
ReplyHoly s**t! I KNEW I was on the right path to better our species.
WTF is up with that image intro at no. 5?,...one word: NIGHTMARES!
ReplyClearly you haven't seen "Sarah Palin's Alaska"
Topical humor! you so clevah, yodasoji!
Humans are hairless because we were designed to run on two legs. Sweating is a lot better than panting to release the heat.
Reply Hide All See All 5 RepliesA good example of a bad conclusion.
And... 'designed'? Hmm...
Does running on two legs require significantly more energy than running on two? I would have guessed it would be less, since we have half as many legs to move. Plus, running the way we do should cause more of our body to come into contact with moving air when we run, which should cool us down *shrug*
^It's not a conclusion necessarily - more a connection of two facts. Sweating is a more effective way of removing heat, and hairlessness allows an animal to sweat; this is precisely what gives humans the advantage in running. Humans are the only species in the world that can, if trained, run for literally over a hundred miles at a decent pace. The energy cost, when compared to other forms of transport (e.g., swimming or walking) is the lowest for humans in slow runs (about 9-10 minute per mile pace), just as seal or a penguin is much faster and more energy efficient at swimming than walking on land. Different anatomical designs work better in different forms of transport. Most likely the ability to run dozens of miles at a steady speed allowed humans to out-compete other species in acquiring food, etc., because they had the endurance to run for longer, even if the food could run faster.
It takes more energy to walk upright because your body is working like a gyroscope to balance. Think of comparing a golf cart to a Segway of comparable size. The temperature change from running is negligible even without hair in a temperate climate, but when you consider how being hairy in the African heat might really suck, it starts to make more sense how less hair is better.
Aquatic Ape theory is the coolest explanation science has to offer. It's not very cool, but it is the coolest. Not widely supported either. I'm supporting this underdog of a theory.
I'm not so sure about the fats. Intelligent herbivores examples - Elephants, sea cows, gorillas and other apes, bees. They seem to do pretty well on foods that aren't what we would consider "fatty."
Reply Hide All See All 4 RepliesGorillas and other apes aren't herbivores. They also eat meat, and insects. And yes, elephants are intelligent, but they also have to eat for about 16 hours a day to get enough calories from their vegetation.
Bees are NOT intelligent. Their brains are just wired for a very specific purpose.
I don't really think you can compare the manatee's diet to a human's since manatees are aquatic. But even so, manatees consume about 10% of their weight each day (and considering manatees usually weigh between 880 and 1,000 pounds, that's a lot) and spend nearly half their day grazing (the other half is spent sleeping).
You're right that these animals have relatively "light" diets. But they aren't really that intellegent. When last did you see an ape design a flying machine (working or not)? They don't eat nearly as much fat as we do, but their not nearly as intelegent as we are.