15 Words You Won't Believe They Added to the Dictionary
The Oxford English Dictionary is constantly updating, adding new words to reflect the vibrant changes in language and culture. Of course, that also means that as said culture spirals toward a frightening and retarded oblivion, the good people at Oxford have to be there to chronicle it.
Here are some recent additions that make us fear for our future.

The people at the Oxford English Dictionary acknowledge that the work of an author entering the dictionary is rare, but the use of "muggle" had become so widespread they had to include it, ensuring that the future will remember us for standing in line at Borders in wizard costumes.
Wait, does this mean if we invent a new word right now they'll be forced to include it in a few years, as long as enough readers use it? Good. Guys, the word is "dongtacular."

There already is a word for when a group of people blame someone for a mistake. It's called blaming. Blamestorming, however, cutely mimics "brainstorming" and office politics dictates the more cringe-inducingly "clever" a word sounds, the more often in needs to be used.
"We're so witty! Just like the people on The Office! Somebody should make a sitcom about us!"

Ah, there's nothing like a cutesy pun to sum up this awkward and nervous era when we finally acknowledged there was such a thing as gay people without treating it as a national emergency, yet were not so cool with it that people felt OK about openly acknowledging their gayness.
Thus we had to invent this word to represent the rush of personal pride felt by the perceived ability to instinctively tell if someone prefers sausage to tacos, whether they wanted you to know it or not.

Now, remind us, is "grrrl" a word used by "grrrl" types, or the people who make fun of them? You know what, it doesn't matter, because, there's no vowel.
What the fuck is that? Call us tools of the male chauvinist patriarchy, but even the wacky sound effects from the 60s Batman TV show had vowels in them. That's right, this is less of a word than ZWWAP!

n. The third film, book, event, etc. in a series; a second sequel.
Hey, thanks Hollywood, for making enough of these that we had to invent a whole new word. So will fourquel be next? Quadrology? Will we all be buying the Star Wars sixantium box set?

n. A person closely resembling a smaller or younger version of another.
Hey, remember when you thought we couldn't get any lower than "muggle"? Those were the days, right?
Nothing puts a society as firmly in its place as when you realize the language has been permanently changed by a franchise about a horny spy that repeated the same jokes and catchphrases dozens of times across two sequels. Is this one from the same movie where Mike Myers drank the cup full of shit? We don't remember.

n. A person in their teens or twenties who has an aptitude for computers and the Internet.
In a curious twist, there is no word for an Amish youth who has an aptitude for barn raising or a Scientologist youth who's developed some skills in picking the lock on his cage. Still, it's probably hard to make a really shitty pun for either of those so that might explain things.

Remember the dot-com bubble of the late 90s, when the Internet was new and exciting and every novelty erotica site you found was like Christmas morning, only with fisting? Cyberslacking is the word-product of that. In retrospect, using the Internet to kill time at work wasn't the Tron-like revolutionary experience this word implies, so regular "slacking" would suffice just as well.
Then again, we might as well have the word now, as this dongtacular practice isn't going away any time soon.








TARDIS and Dalek are in the oxford English Dictionary
ReplyYou know what I don't understand, that this article makes me think of?
ReplyWhy do people use the word "monies" to describe large forms of money?
Isn't money already plural? As well as being singular in some way also?
Maybe I'm just retarded, but saying "monies" makes you sound like a little kid. It's money. As in "I have a lot of money."
Not "I have a lot of monies."
i think monies has something to do with the way nigerian scammers supposedly talk or something (or maybe just nigerians, or africans), or its meant to be patwa.
Being someone do English Linguistics, i am really f*****g annoyed by this bullshit. It pisses me off to see slang, and usually slang only common to certain groups, being standardized, by a dictionary. we'll never see bludger or struth or homeboy added to the dictionary, but we see the butcher-isms (don't you dare add that s**t to the dictionary) of my stupid f*****g generations forced into our language by assholes.
Replygranted this article focuses only on the absurd words that are being added, but getting pissed at every single slang word that is added is just retarded. the word "cool" is slang, as is "geek", "awesome", and "whatever". yes the words presented here are stupid and we all think there are much better things they could be doing with their time, but that's the whole point of this article isn't it.
My dictionary actually has "homeboy" in it....
.....I want to cry.
ReplyThis articL was dongtacular XD
ReplySo Lord of the Rings is a ... threequal? The Oxford Dictionary should stop defining slang as proper English; it's painful to watch.
ReplyI thought Number 1 said meatspin...
ReplyGod, what has the world come to?
The new word searchency appeared in response to the growing popularity of search engines in the Internet. When making a query through a search engine we need to know by what criteria the information is sorted out. The transparence of these criteria is denoted by the word searchency.
ReplyI would never used that word in real life.
shouldnt it be searchancy
For every generation there are going to be instances of "can u believe they added *word of choice* to the dictionary?" It just cannot be helped
ReplyDictionaries are descriptive, not prescriptive. If the editors find enough uses of a word in the time between the last edition and the curent edition, the word gets included. I know lots of people who are still unhappy about "empathetic." For what it's worth, "Frankenstein" is probably in many dictionaries defined as something close to "shambling, murderous corpse-man," even though anyone who has read the book knows that 1) Frankenstein was the name of the reanimator, not the reanimated corpse itself, and 2) it was not shambling, but walked normally, and was quite refined. And only became murderous when it started killing off [SPOILER] members of Frankenstein's family, as revenge for being abandoned.
ReplyI've never heard anyone use the term "grrrl" on it's own. It's usually "riot grrrl", not just grrrl.
Replyfinally, a #1 i agree with... downright crazy
ReplyNew words: Boomboxbetacrapper: synonym for wtf.
ReplyCereally: being serious in a comical way.
Planking: do I need to explain this one?
Are you super cereal about that?
Dongtacular needs a female equivalent. I propose vagtastic, vagestic, or snootcherific
Reply Hide All See All 5 Replieswat about boobtacular? or is that taken?
LMAO snootcherific
I think pornsites might have a monopoly on the word "vagtastic", especially when combined with the word "voyage."
Cuntastic
Is second boobtacular
I need a girl with lots of meatspace
ReplyI don't want to live on this planet anymore.
ReplyMost people don't. Who would want to live somewhere called meatspace? Is sound so unsanitary compared to the nice, clean internet. (I mean metaphorically clean. There's a metric shit-ton of porn on here.)
Why is 'grrl' a word? Has 'hostile, unwashed dyke' been removed from our language?
Replyapparently "sexist homophobe" hasn't.
What is sexist or homophobic about that? I'm not afraid of lesbians and i have nothing against women in general. When was the last time you met an amicable, well-groomed heterosexual woman that referred to herself a "grrl"? Stop right there, you know you haven't, because there aren't any.
So stupid! half those words are made up because everyone else is illiterate! Like number 4 and 7, whats wrong with our society? Im scared for future generations that have to endure bouncebackability! Im confused, are we referring to frankenfood as in Frankenstein (us) genetically altered the food (his monster) or is Frankenstein supposed be the geneticall altered food? Which would be incorrect because Frankenstein was the creator and the monster was the creation....people are stupid.
Reply"half" should be capitalized.
"Like number 4 and 7, whats wrong with our society?" should be revised; perhaps "As in the case of numbers 4 and 7...", "For instance, numbers 4 and 7 demonstrate what is wrong with our society" or something similar. In any case, "like" is, in this context, used as the very type of colloquialism to which you seem to be objecting. It more properly means "in a manner similar to", which is your meaning in only the most approximate sense.
"Im" has an apostrophe, because it is a contraction. The apostrophe takes the place of the "a" in "I am".
You should have said, "future generations that will have to...". While some have claimed that "the future is now", that does not mean that we no longer have need of the future tense.
The final two sentences are a syntactical mess. Normally, one should avoid beginning a sentence with a conjunction, such as which. It is possible to do so correctly, but the correct usage is unnecessarily complex. Suffice to say that "Which would be incorrect" is a dependent clause, which makes sense only when connected to the preceding independent clause. Normally, this issue could be solved by the following independent clause, but in this case it does not relate to the dependent clause as it should (if it were grammatically correct, then we would be able to reverse the sentence order without losing the meaning). In any case, there should be a comma before the word "because" to separate the two clauses.
Finally, "people are stupid" is also an independent clause, so if you absolutely must concatenate all three clauses, a semicolon would be more appropriate than an ellipsis.
This message has been brought to you by the Grammar Gestapo: Keeping Grammar Nazis in Their Place Since 1942.
Well hell im cyberslacking right now! WTF is up with grrrl, thats the dumbest thing ive ever read! Thought it was a typo!
ReplyOh, and protip: if you're going to b***h about people being illiterate? You might try using proper spelling and formatting in your posts here.
Hey well, I had to reread #1 because I thought it said meatspin. Go on, google it.
Reply