The 6 Greatest Battlefield Mindfucks
The most powerful weapon in any army's arsenal isn't a nuke--not even one of those big nukes that shoots smaller nukes. No, no weapon or technology can stand up to the classic military mindfuck.
Strategists have been using it for millennia and perhaps none did it better than these guys:

Chuko "Sleeping Dragon" Liang was a brilliant Chinese strategist and possessor of one of the top 10 awesomest nicknames in history. A chancellor of Shu Han during the third century, his cunning is widely so celebrated that in China his name is synonymous with intelligence and tactics, which is way better than General Tso, who only wound up with a Chinese restaurant dish named after him.

"No, General Tso, it is your chicken that is weak and lacking in discipline."
Chuko was a master of the mindfuck. But he was still capable of making mistakes and it was his greatest miscalculation that required him to draw upon his greatest of mindfuck powers.
According to historians, during the War of the Three Kingdoms, accompanied by a consort of just 100 soldiers and the rest of his army miles away, Chuko saw an opposing army with over 100,000 men marching towards him. The opposing general, Sima Yi, was a veteran who had fought Chuko in multiple battles. Familiar with the Sleeping Dragon's clever ways and, deciding to take no chances, he led the massive army to capture Chuko.
Ordering his few men into hiding, Chuko commanded that the town gates be left wide open and, positioning himself atop the city wall, he proceeded to play the lute as the massive enemy army approached. Upon his arrival at the town gates, Sima Yi, who had fallen victim to many a Chuko-led ambush, halted his army and studied Chuko's calm manner as he ripped a solo on the chords.

Convinced it was a trap he could not yet comprehend, Sima commanded a hasty retreat, more than a 100,000 soldiers pulling back from one man and his musical instrument. Chuko thus earned an entire wing in the Bullshitter's Hall of Fame.

The Battle of Pelusium in 525 B.C. was a mindfuck of godly proportions. Literally.
Egypt was being invaded by the Persians, lead by Cambyses II. At the time, Egypt was at the zenith of their wealth and power. They also were at their most zealous for their religious beliefs, based around a variety of animals they considered holy. The Egyptians remained convinced that their gods would continue to shower good fortune upon them so long as they were treated with due respect and awe.
Cambyses knew this, so he brought along to Egypt a zoo's compendium of every animal they thought was holy. He also painted the image of the Egyptian feline goddess, Bastet, on the shields of his soldiers. The result was that during the battle, many of the Egyptian soldiers refused to fight back lest they strike the holy image, bringing the wrath of Bastet upon them.

After dealing the hesitant Egyptians a resounding defeat, Cambyses pursued them to the fortress of Pelusium. Unwilling to deal with a protracted siege, and to amuse himself, Cambyses decided to release a wave of cats to charge at the fort. This prevented the soldiers from shooting arrows at the advancing Persian army, for fear of hitting the sacred cats. The Egyptians were so concerned with the vengeful hands of their gods that they ignored the ones swinging scimitars right at their faces.

The victory ushered the end of Egyptian sovereignty for centuries to come. It was annexed to Persia and then tossed back and forth between different empires before ultimately falling into the hands of the Romans. As if all that wasn't enough, when he won Cambyses laughed and hurled cats at the faces of his defeated foes. No, Seriously.

In 1967, the Vietnam War was in full swing. On the rare occasions that the American army had forced the Viet Cong into a direct engagement, Vietnamese asses were roundly kicked. The American public was keeping an eye on the world's first televised war, but because of the North Vietnamese guerrilla strategy, there wasn't much action to watch. Prior to the Tet Offensive, Americans largely supported the Vietnam War and, despite scattered peace protests, most believed the war to be coming to a close.
During the war, the North Vietnamese and Commander Vo Nguyen Giap took great pains to understand the American cultural scene. Having dissected Barbies and fed Big Macs to caged monkeys, they began to comprehend that the center of power in American politics wasn't congress or even the president, but with public perception and the news media.
So, Giap developed a plan to influence them directly: the Tet Offensive.

In one of the all-time dick moves, Giap broke the truce traditionally kept on Tet, the Vietnamese lunar new year, bringing the war to the Americans, and more specifically the TV cameras. He attacked multiple locations of both strategic and symbolic importance, including the American embassy. Militarily it was a pretty shitty strategy. Outmatched and outgunned, there was no way the Vietnamese forces could capture and hold all the places they were attacking. In fact, after it was all said and done, the American and South Vietnamese forces had turned back the Viet Cong from every single spot they had attacked, and they suffered massive casualties.
It didn't matter. Though American combatants claimed a hard-earned victory in a battle that American General William Westmoreland likened to the Battle of the Bulge--the war began losing popularity with the American people. Having seen the scary ass Viet Cong up close on their TVs, the people were now certain that there was no end in sight to the war and wanted out.
Pretty soon, politicians who still supported the war were thought to be hawkish dicks, and history books would call it one of the darkest points in U.S. military history. The lesson was learned, and 40 years later America's enemies skip the whole Tet thing and just take the war right to the cameras.









Fuckbunkies.
ReplyKINDA seems like #2 should have been #1. Who needs to fight when you can just elaborately trick your enemy and completely disarm him and make all of his support leave him, WHILE EATING A FABULOUS DINNER WITH HIM.
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesDude, that's m***********g Gandhi in #1. You can't really beat him. He used no tricks, no deception, just peace to win a war. The other guys hardly came close to that.
No I agree - I feel like #5 should have come 2nd (just for the sheer nerve) and #2 should have come 1st due to amazing planning.
@Zaldarr: Read Indian history before you comment sir.Mohandas Karam Chand Gandhi was best followers of non-violence but the reason British left was not only due to his Non- Violence movement but fear of armed struggle led by Netaji Subash Chandra Bose,Bhagat Singh and many others.
At the end of world war British empire was totally fucked up so,they thought it would be better to leave with looted goods than face uprising by million young Indian people(Inspired by Armed revolution).
Cracked list got wrong cause at the end British got a last laugh,they divided one big country into two(Pakistan was Born) in name of religion.(Bangladesh was latter formed).I am not saying Bapu was bad evil but clearly his movement wasn't clearly "greatest battlefield mindfucks".Bapu latter tried to bring unity among all people but countrymen were already divided.
Some latter claimed that he did agreement with British so he and congress party (who was with his non-violence movement) won't get marginalize by Other Revolutionary group.
What ever it may be he is still synonymous with "Non-Violence Movement" but big no to him being great Battlefield Strategist.
Cortes convinced thousands of natives to join him b/c they f*****g hated the Mexicans (that's Ma-she-cans). The Tlaxcalans (clash-collins) specifically. The "Aztecs" describes everyone in the area, but there was a lot of dissension among them, again specifically between the Mexicans (who were the powerful nation that inhabited Tenochtitlan) and Tlaxcalans (just to the south). It's easy to understand why so many joined Cortes, he was taking down an extremely oppressive almighty nation (in their eyes). And the one woman who helped more than probably anyone else, Malitzin, was enslaved by the Mexicans, so she was like "fuck yeah I'll help!".
ReplyGandhi's non-violence BS only works when the other side consider themselves civilized. It didn't work so well for the Libyans who then had to rise up and use violence to finally overthrow the quack of a dictator. And now we see it's not working for the Syrians as well as Assad has been happily butchering them whenever they start shouting in the street.
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesIf you are referring to Ghadaffi, his people adored him for giving them possibly the best quality of life on the planet, and NATO had to massacre most of the civilian population of Tripoli to get close enough to murder him. Oh, and you are a moron who needs to lay off the FOX enemas.
It's well known that in the Middle East, particularly in Libya, the most sincere and earnest sign of respect and admiration that can be offered it to murder a person by shoving a combat knife up his butthole.
It might seem weird to us westerners, but in light of the local cultures, it does kind of make sense.
That's why the practice of "Ghadaffi-ing" (taking something hard and cylindrical and sticking it in someones ass with enough force to annoy, but not to penetrate) has become an almost universal sign of respect and forbearance, within months of hi ass-martyrdom.
Hey, Gandhi himself said something to the effect of "there's a big difference between laying down in front of a train driven by the British, and a train driven by Hitler." The implication being that the British would stop before they ran you over, whereas Hitler would just keep going.
Hi! Haile Selassie here.
ReplyI bought your army.
Didn't Alexander the Great successfully gain entrance to and subsequently occupy a city by ordering several of his own men to march to their deaths off a nearby cliff face, thereby proving the discipline and courage of his army and managing a surrender from the enemy general inside?
ReplyAhh no, you are talking about the Sogdian Rock and he didn't order his men to march of a cliff. What happened was Alexander was faced with a well fortified and provisioned Bactrian fortress on a mountain. Rather than risk a frontal assault, he noticed that the enemy had no sentries on one side of their fortress which was a sheer cliff face. He selected his best climbers and ordered them up. Some fell to their deaths but most made it to the top.
Their sudden appearance from a direction that they thought was not possible demoralized the defenders who immediately surrendered.
Thanks.
North Vietnamese guerillas? The NVA fought head on. The South Vietnamese Viet Cong were the guerillas.
ReplyI seem to recall the NVA working hand-in-hand with the VC. Of course, I wasn't there, just watching it on TV.
Zhuge Liang is famous in Chinese culture as a brilliant strategist and the story in the article is known to the Chinese as empty fortress strategy famously used by Zhuge Liang. However I heard a different version from that in the article. The version I heard was he had a small troop with him which was greatly outnumbered by the Wei forces under Sima Yi. Knowing they had no chance of winning, Zhuge Liang ordered his troop to retreat with himself at the last and had two servants serving him and sweeping the fortress. Zhuge Liang went to the top of the fortress walls where the approaching Wei forces could see him and very calmly played the lute. Sima Yi was suspicious of Zhuge Liang and a scout was sent to ask the servants, one being deaf and the other a mute, how many were in the fortress besides Zhuge Liang. The mute gestured two with his fingers, the scout then asked if there were 200 in the fortress and the mute shook his head, and the scout asked if there were 2000 and again the mute shook his head, and the scout asked if there were 20 000 once again the mute shook his head. The scout then frantically rushed back to report there were 200 000 in the fortress and Sima Yi hastily ordered his troops to retreat.
ReplyThere was also an episode in Chinese history similar to that of Hernan Cortez. In the battle of Julu fought between Qin forces of 200 000 led by Zhang Han and the Chu rebels of 20 000 led by Xiang Yu in 207 BC. Before crossing the Yellow River to engage the Qin forces, Xiang Yu ordered his troops to break all their cooking utensils and bring only 3 days of supplies, after crossing the river he ordered the boats to be sunk and rallied his troops for battle to death, they no longer had means to retreat so to survive they had to defeat the Qin forces and capture their supplies.
Gandhi was at the most a British collaborator. Not a hero except to those who know nothing about him except the hagiography.
ReplyI will concede that he did some dickish things - calling the British ban on suttee " Imperialism at its worst and the smothering of a far superior culture" - but he was a pretty clever strategist.
oh, suttee? That's the only religious practice the British stopped when they ran India - it's when a man dies and is cremated and the family throws his widow onto the funeral pyre to burn with her husband's corpse.
Sati was even banned by the Mughals. Gandhi at his best brought the independence movement to the masses, and at his worst, led directly to the formation of Pakistan, and the violence that ensued.
Civil disobedience isn't a war. That's why "civil" is the first word. Really a good thing to call the civil rights movement in the 60's a "mindfuck". Classy.
Reply Hide All See All 4 RepliesConsidering the hippies all died out and became good little conformists who continued the system rather than buck it (right after they started getting more wealth and power), mindfuck is probably the right word.
Hey. Moron. Overthrowing your oppressors without lifting a finger in violence towards them? Mindfuckery considering how often this doesn't happen. That's what he was referring to. Not the civil rights movement.
Hey Swrrws, get over yourself, douche.
I guess you skipped school the day they taught about the civil war
there are many people in India that hate Gandhi coz they consider him British safety valve.some argue that Gandhi was behind death of Bhagat Singh(a revolutionary leader).jus google it
Replywhy do some people in comments refer Gandhi as "ghandi"?i hav seen it on multiple news websites too(fox news)
ReplyHannibal Barca should have at least two of the six spots on this list.
ReplyCortes DID NOT convince anyone he was a god. In fact, one of the hugest myths of the Spanish invasions is this idea that native peoples commonly mistook the Spaniard for gods. There are no primary doc*ments supporting these claims. Columbus never used the word "gods" in any of his letters, nor did Cortes make any mention of being treated other than a visiting diplomat by the Aztecs. In every meeting Cortes describes with the Aztec leadership, on every level, there was ample gift-giving on both sides - which, in Aztec culture, was something of an insult. Cortes describes one really hilarious episode when he first meets Moctezuma, and the two embrace and are walking down the streets of tenochtitlan hand in hand in exaggerated courtesy. Cortes at one point pauses, takes off his fancy necklace of colored glass, and drapes it around Moctezuma's neck. According to Cortes, when they had walked a little further, a servant came running over with a gift for Cortes - TWO fancy necklaces, made of gold. Even knowing he was in defeat, Moctezuma managed to one-up the conqueror, just to show who the bigger man really was. And Cortes managed to "convince" thousands of Native Americans to join him in taking down the Aztecs because they regularly demanded human sacrifices from the peoples they considered to belong to them. As was the case during the french revolution, the taliban takeover in afghanistan, and to a lesser extent the American revolution, foreign-born leadership inspired a dramatic socio-military shift in power, simply because they were able to disregard the subtle cultural obstacles that maintained the status quo. Otherwise...good article!
ReplyI second that.
Historians pretty much all agree that the Aztecs wheren't directly defeated by Cortes, but by the other Indian civilizations in the region. Basically, everyone hated the Aztecs and where already waiting for an opportunity to rise up against them. Cortes merely provided that opportunity. Had the Indians been either united or more neutral towards each other, Cortes wouldn´t have stood a chance against the superior forces of the Aztecs.
Is #6 the guy from Red Cliff?
Reply Hide All See All 4 RepliesVery likely, he was part of the joint counter-attack at Chi Bi / Red Cliff.
Yes, Zhuge Liang was the strategist who predicted when the winds, which ultimately burnt down the Wei navy at Chi Bi, would blow.
No, Zhuge liang wasn't the one who one the battle of chi-bi, It was zhao yu.
He was the one played by Takeshi Kaneshiro.
Proud to be an Indian!
ReplyThe Egyptian thing is pretty much the same as the war America is in now. Everyone is terrified of calling terrorists "terrorists" and have eliminated it from official use. They are also afraid to say we are at war with fundamental Islam. They won't ever say Islam without the "extremist" or "fundamentalist" (because it is ok to hate fundamentalists still) with it (crap, even I am indoctrinated - beware cats in my face).
Reply Hide All See All 4 RepliesWe also can't call it war or terrorism - only a "kinetic military action" against "man made disasters". I'm guessing the same guy who wrote the dialog for the last 3 Star Wars movies came up with this. (Aggressive Negotiations??? for chris'sakes)
there are nearly three billion christians on the planet, nearly two billion moslems; if we were at war the planet would be in f**king meltdown. It is fundamentalists we're at war with - on both sides. It's normal folk of all creeds and beliefs against the crazies, whatever hat they're wearing.
Islam is a relgion of peace and tolerance, fundamental islam is trying to convert the people of the book, Christians and Jews, to this new faith that was revised by the prophet they believe in. Don't think that all Muslims are out to get Christians. That is an uneducated comment. They call terrorists "extremist muslims" for a reason
``Islam is a relgion of peace and tolerance``
among Islamic cultures, there does seem to be less tolerance towards other religions, compared to Western cultures. Just try to be a Christian in Indonesia!
On the other hand, the attitude of Muslims towards other religions does differ greatly per region, so seems to be depended primarily on regional culture and not so much the Islamic religion.
America doesn't hold intolerance of others as an official governmental stance as opposed to some nations. But despite the proclaimed tolerance, most American parent's wouldn't exactly be thrilled if their daughter came home with a Muslim man.
Seeing yourself as being on the right path and everyone else on the false path is pretty much a requirement for religion. So frankly, as long as there are religions there's going to be at least a degree of intolerance.
Ultimately, I don't think that any religious figure, regardless of the faith, would be happy to see what is happening in Their names.
Cortes sank the boats because he had no choice. There was a death sentence waiting for him in Cuba, so he really did have a better chance fighting the whole Aztec empire. Just thought I would add that...
ReplyGreat article anyway!
Weird. I learned in history class that the Tet Offensive was a failure, primarily b/c of the North and South using different calendars, so the North attacked on the wrong day. Now I have to figure out which is right: a textbook written in the 80's and likely biased, a website on the internet that specializes in dick jokes, or both.
Reply Hide All See All 4 RepliesDick jokes = Credibility
He mentioned that the actual attacks were a failure, which the books got correctly, but the fact that the initial rampage was shown on TV was enough to change minds back home. That was more successful than taking a point on a map.
There is a third option. There are actually a whole crapload of options, but only if you're curious enough to go read.
I think the question is, whether Vo Nguyen Giap knew the offensive would fail from the start and was aiming solely at a psychological impact.
Hernan Cortes and his men gave smallpox to the Aztecs...that's what decimated their population
ReplyBooya!!! That was just how Hernan C rolled. Who needs numbers, when you've got perfectly good diseases?