5 Great Men Who Built Their Careers on Plagiarism
As anyone here at Cracked will tell you, without even the slightest provocation, writing is hard. When the strain of coming up with new material becomes too great to bear, a writer has two options: He can pepper his work with penis jokes and pictures of cute animals (see our entry on T.S. Eliot, below), or he can steal his words from a better writer.
Occasionally, a brilliant (or at least sort of clever) mind comes across a bad spell of writer's block and gives into the temptation to be a cheating plagiarist. Sometimes this blatant plagiarism ends up being the catalyst that launches their career like a rocket powered by lies.

What'd He Do?
In a nutshell, Ambrose invented pop history. He was the historical advisor on Saving Private Ryan and wrote the book Band of Brothers, that miniseries about WWII that starred the guy from Office Space.

"You know, the Nazis had little pieces of flair they made the Jews wear."
Ambrose also wrote award-winning biographies on Presidents Eisenhower and Nixon. If you've ever wanted to become a famous historian, chances are Stephen was one of your inspirations. Also, chances are you're a massive nerd.
What's the Problem?
In 1995, an almost unknown historian named Thomas Childers published the book Wings of Morning. It was a well-received but relatively obscure novel about the crew of a specific B-24 bomber during WWII.
Ambrose was a fan of the book and, as a firm believer that imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, he proceeded to plagiarize the fuck out of it for his hit 2001 novel, The Wild Blue, which was the account of a different group of B-24 crewmen. Ambrose ripped off whole passages of text and stole several sentences and descriptions word for word. Then he got his book published and just sort of hoped no one would notice.
In the writing business, that's what we call "textual rape."

Show me on the table of contents where Dr. Ambrose touched you.
Unfortunately for Stephen, but fortunately for truth, he got caught. Fred Barnes of the Weekly Standard noticed what was going on and revealed it to the world. Ambrose was fast to respond.
He had cited Childers' book in his bibliography (although he hadn't come close to listing everything he 'borrowed' from his fellow historian's work) and basically claimed that he'd just "forgotten" to attribute the stolen passages in the text, like he was supposed to.

This chart comes from the Weekly Standard's article about Ambrose, written by Fred Barnes. See what we did there Stephen, you dead bastard? We gave the original author credit for something they fucking wrote.
Is That All?
For a little while, Stephen's apology was enough. Ambrose was famous for turning out books at an astonishing rate. He was the meth-addicted prostitute of popular history, turning tricks faster than anyone else on History Whore Blvd. Of course he was bound to make the occasional mistake. Most people considered the matter settled.
Mark Lewis, of Forbes.com, was not one of those people. He read the first story about Ambrose and, like a good investigative journalist, proceeded to tear apart everything the pop historian had written in his search for the truth.
Lewis first hit gold when he found several blatant thefts in the book Crazy Horse and Custer, which Ambrose pretended to write in 1995. For that novel, Ambrose molested the work of esteemed historical writer Jay Monagham. Here's an excerpt from the Forbes article:
MONAGHAM: "On August 28, 1859, Custer returned to West Point. Cadet James Barroll Washington, a great-great-grandnephew of George Washington, entered that year. He remembered hearing the crowd shout, 'Here comes Custer!' The name meant nothing to him, but he turned, and saw a slim, immature lad with unmilitary figure, slightly rounded shoulders, and gangling walk."
AMBROSE: "When he returned to West Point, Cadet James B. Washington, a relative of George Washington, remembered hearing the crowd shout, 'Here comes Custer!' The name meant nothing to Washington, who was just entering the Academy, but he turned and saw a slim, immature lad with unmilitary figure, slightly rounded shoulders, and gangling walk, surrounded by back-slapping, laughing friends."
The Vanilla Ice to Monagham's Queen (featuring David Bowie), Ambrose exerted less effort covering his ass than a high school student who just discovered Wikipedia.

"Holy shit. Everything I want to say about The Grapes of Wrath is RIGHT HERE."
Ambrose's web of lies didn't end there, either. In total, seven of his books were found to contain some degree of plagiarism. His fucking college thesis was even loaded down with other people's unattributed writing. The most famous historian in the world built his career on a foundation of deception.
Did He Pay?
He really didn't. Evidence of his wrongdoing came up very shortly before his death from lung cancer in 2002.
The real tragedy here is that Ambrose's work which, plagiarism aside, was incredibly significant, has been tainted by association with his crimes. Dr. Ambrose was not a bad writer or a bad historian, but his flexible ethics and lack of regard for his fellow writers sent him down the path to infamy.

What'd He Do?
T.S. Eliot wrote several great, enduring poems, such as "The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock" which had a ridiculous title, and "The Hollow Men," which, we were depressed to discover, wasn't about a naked, invisible, murdering lunatic. Perhaps his greatest work was a poem entitled, "The Waste Land," which was a haunting statement of his disillusionment with the post-war era. It was a literary milestone, and is still celebrated today as one of the greatest works of poetry in history.

What's the Problem?
The problem with this is that Eliot didn't write "The Waste Land." Not all of it anyway. As it turns out, the idea behind "The Waste Land," and a fair amount of its content, was plagiarized from an almost unknown American poet named Madison Cawein.
Cawein worked hard all of his youth, scrimping and saving and putting aside enough money so that he could begin finally working on his true love: poetry. He put out several volumes of work that is very well regarded, but he never gained any recognition and died almost unknown. Which just goes to show you that, if you work hard in this country and believe in yourself, you'll die alone and under appreciated.

He's SO obscure, that Google Image Search doesn't even have a picture of him. This is a wiener dog.
Cawein's poem was even named "Waste Land." It was first published in the same issue of Poetry as Eliot's "Love Song," and contains several metaphors that were later used word for word by Eliot in his "The Waste Land." (Eliot's lucky he died before trying to publish his "The Romeo and Juliet" and "The Tyler Perry's Diary of a Mad Black Woman.")
But the poor, unappreciated Madison Cawein wasn't the only person Eliot stole from. This passage from "The Waste Land:" "The Chair she sat in, like a burnished throne / Glowed on the marble," was slightly altered but still stolen from Shakespeare, who wrote, "The barge she sat in, like a burnish'd throne / Burn'd on the water".
Eliot's line, "Sweet Thames, run softly, till I end my song," was stolen entirely from Edmund Spenser's "Prothalamion."
Is That All?
Most of "The Waste Land" was just cobbled together out of quotes from other writers. Until very recently, most scholars have been happy to simply chalk these up as "allusions" to the work of other authors. For a long time, it was regarded as something poets just did, as a way of honoring their influences.
On a slightly related note, tune in next Tuesday, where we'll be streaming a high-resolution allusion to Lord of the Rings movies all day!
Did He Pay?
"Immature poets imitate; mature poets steal"
This is a quote from Eliot himself. You see, T.S. was rich, famous and beloved the world over. While he was alive, everyone just sort of ignored all of the evidence that he was a tremendous bastard. He died renowned as one of the greatest poets in all of history, which he was, but he was also a plagiarizing cockbag who denied a much worthier artist a place in history.

What'd He Do?
We're not saying that King wasn't an incredible person who did more to advance the human race than most of us can ever hope to do. We're just saying that he was also a plagiarizing butthole.
What's the Problem?
For starters, his own university admits that his doctoral thesis, the very foundation of his career, was significantly plagiarized. Seriously. They had an official inquiry and everything.
"We had many of the same professors, we worked in the same atmosphere during our graduate studies," said John Cartwright, an MLK scholar and member of the committee that investigated his plagiarism allegations, "under no circumstances would the atmosphere under which he did his work condone what Doctor King did. It's incredible. He was not unaware of the correct procedure. This wasn't just done out of ignorance."

"Oh, I'm sorry, it must have slipped my mind while I was changing the fucking world.
Despite clear findings of plagiarism, the committee did not recommend he be posthumously stripped of his title, due to Dr. King's incredible services to the world. And due to their extreme fear of being beaten and castrated by hordes of angry MLK groupies.

Please don't hurt us.
The first allegations of King's plagiarism were hushed up, denied, or 'excused' by academia. However, the accusations continued to flow in. This timeline shows how the realization of King's plagiarism unfolded. Not only was his dissertation plagiarized, but many of his student papers and sermons were stolen in whole or in part from other writers.
The staff of the King Paper's Project at Stanford even admits that, "King's plagiarism was a general pattern evident in nearly all of his academic writings."
Is That All?
Perhaps the most notable example of King's plagiarism was the general tone, and several select lines from his famous "I Have a Dream," speech. Theodore Pappas presents a detailed accusation in his book, Plagiarism and the Culture War. Most of the issue centers around the closing lines.
Here's how King's speech ended;

"This will be the day when all of God's children will be able to sing with a new meaning, 'My country, 'tis of thee, sweet land of liberty, of thee I sing. Land where my fathers died, land of the pilgrim's pride, from every mountainside, let freedom ring.' And if America is to be a great nation, this must become true. So let freedom ring from the prodigious hilltops of New Hampshire. Let freedom ring from the mighty mountains of New York. Let freedom ring from the heightening Alleghenies of Pennsylvania! Let freedom ring from the snowcapped Rockies of Colorado! Let freedom ring from the curvaceous peaks of California! But not only that; let freedom ring from Stone Mountain of Georgia! Let freedom ring from Lookout Mountain of Tennessee! Let freedom ring from every hill and every molehill of Mississippi. From every mountainside, let freedom ring."
Compare that to a much earlier speech by another Civil Rights activist, Archibald Carey:
"We, Negro Americans, sing with all loyal Americans: My country 'tis of thee, Sweet land of liberty, Of thee I sing. Land where my fathers died, Land of the Pilgrims' pride From every mountainside Let freedom ring!
That's exactly what we mean--from every mountain side, let freedom ring. Not only from the Green Mountains and White Mountains of Vermont and New Hampshire; not only from the Catskills of New York; but from the Ozarks in Arkansas, from the Stone Mountain in Georgia, from the Blue Ridge Mountains of Virginia--let it ring not only for the minorities of the United States, but for the disinherited of all the earth--may the Republican Party, under God, from every mountainside, LET FREEDOM RING!"
Did He Pay?
Not during his lifetime. To be fair, it takes balls to accuse the greatest civil rights activist in history with plagiarism. Now, if you'll excuse us, we're all going to go hide in an undisclosed cave with a bunch of loaded guns, and enough crystal meth to keep us awake all year.








Originality is a tricky concept, particularly when it comes to literature. Every single text can be considered nothing more than 'a new tissue of past citations' (Roland Barthes, 'Theory of the Text' 1981 - originality may be tricky and perhaps nonexistent, but I've still been taught to name my sources).
ReplyI know this article was posted in 2009, and I'm sure someone has pointed this out by now, but I really cannot contain my nerd rage.
ReplyH. G. Wells is not "probably most famous for his radio drama War of the Worlds". H. G Wells published the NOVEL 'War of the Worlds' in 1898. The first transmission of a human voice via radio did not occur until 1900. You're thinking of Orson Welles (same pronunciation, different spelling) who, in 1938, adapted Wells novel for the legendary radio broadcast.
What I find funny is looking at the comments decrying all the people calling this article racist, but when I search for them, there are none. I counted about four or five comments calling commenters racist for calling the author racist, but I found no actual comments calling the author racist.
ReplyThat was a racist remark.
I am th president of the Plagiarism Accosciation of America thank you for bringing these vile beasts (other than MLK) to my attention.
ReplyWay to spell "Association" wrong.
Morlocks made him do it.
ReplyWhy I read Cracked: "Thank God the Internet doesn't exist yet, or I'd be fucked."
ReplyEliot intended for all of his quotes to be recognized and was quite pissed off when people didn't recognize their original sources. His poetry wasn't about writing flowery language but uniting disparate cultural works and seeing how they work together to create his day's culture. It was actually a reasonably fashionable style of poetry during the Modernist period. If he was stealing, it was in the way a found poem "steals". I'd also add that Eliot didn't want to call the poem The Waste Land. That was Ezra Pound's idea.
ReplyThe author of this article refers to both Wings of Morning and Outline of History as "novels." Since it appears from other things that he writes that he is aware that both these books are nonfiction it would appear that he regards the word "novel" as being just another word for book - which is bizarre to say the least.
ReplyI think number deuce is a big one.
ReplyHas anyone pointed out that HG Wells wrote the original novel War of the Worlds and the radio play was done many years later by Orson Welles?
ReplyIt mentions it in the second line- 'H.G. Wells, probably most famous for his radio drama War of the Worlds...'
Wonkypops - the point kyleracki is making is that HG Wells' War of the Worlds was not a radio drama but a book and many years later Orson came along and adapted it for radio.
The reaction to number three (MLK) is why I am racist.
Reply Hide All See All 6 Repliesrac·ism [rey-siz-uhm]
noun
1.
a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to rule others.
2.
a policy, system of government, etc., based upon or fostering such a doctrine; discrimination.
3.
hatred or intolerance of another race or other races.
Black people are so paranoid and dependent on other people being racist that i can't help but oblige them. NAACP, That n****r college fund 9or whatever it;s called) black history month, etc, are reasons why i am a racist. I hate black people. I don;t hate them because their skin is black or because they come from Africa, I hate them because i hate the way their culture acts as a whole. In practice they are entitled to special privileges denied to white people, while preaching equality. I tried to start a white history apreciation club at my school, and was nearly expelled for racism, when all i did was ask for something that black people have been given at public schools for generations. There can be no "white exclusive" clubs, funds, charities, etc, but there is a hell of a lot of them for black people only.
What an ignorant blowhard you are. Do you have any idea how unfathomable the depths of your stupidity sink? My favorite part of your titanically idiotic tirade is that you somehow feel that you're a better kind of racist because you don't hate people because of their skin color... you hate them because of their "culture." Do you not understand that race goes beyond one's skin color to include things like culture? That's why it is socially constructed. I'm sorry, but isn't the overwhelming benefits you receive completely based on your race negate the need for a "white appreciate club?" Proportionally, do you think white people have higher rates of wealth, education, health and just about every other critical socio-economic indicator in America due to dumb luck? Are African-Americans in prison in grossly disproportionate numbers because of the "way their culture acts as a whole?" If you want to join an exclusive all-white club, have you considered joining the Republican party? I know it is useless to debate someone such as yourself (not that you'd be capable of advancing a rational discourse to begin with). I hope for your sake that one day you actually challenge your "beliefs" and expose them to a fair and critical assessment that incorporates opposing views. You would surely realize that your very narrow experiences and shallow reflections on race are vile and contemptuous.
sure, by practice there might be some groups that are all white, but if anyone tried to make anywhere the defining entry requirement was being white, s**t would hit the fan. menawhile, lack people are getting everything they want, and it;s blacks only. There are a higher amount of black people in prison because they have no respect for modern society. As a culutre, black people still think they;re in the grassland of nigeria
Troll Hard. Troll Hard 2: Troll Harder. Troll Hard with a Vengeance. Live Free and Troll Hard.
Though I disagree with the fact of preaching equality race while solely promoting your own, that is no reason to hate an entire race.
As a matter of fact, it's actually even more idiotic to hate an entire race because there just so happens to be factions started from members of that race.
You're an arrogant a*****e who thinks he can judge an entire race just because he lacks the common sense to bat down and think about why things are the way they are.
You want to say black people are in jails? Well guess what, there's also white people who've been doing criminal s**t and gotten away with it. The Mafia, praised for being well dressed up despite the HORRIBlE s**t they did, like terrorize pedestrians, rape women, and did it all on a massive scale whilst avoiding the eyes of the police.
BUT HEY, AT LEAST THEY DON'T HAVE THE NAACP TO PULL THEM OUT.
Seriously, get your head out of your ass and stop being such a dick your whole life.
Obvious troll is obvious
I agree, though I wouldn't say I hate them. Instead of f*****g everybody over why don't we have programs for everyone?
You shouldn't have to be scared to call out a man for being a plagiarist just because he's a black political leader. If he's a plagiarist he's a f*****g plagiarist, black, white, asian, etc.
Reply Hide All See All 6 RepliesExactly.
Never been to any Southern states, I take it..? It's not exactly the kind of thing you shout on the street corners here. Or whisper in your home.
It's true, it's not something you shout in the Southern States. Why? Because black people will kill you because of it (hopefully not literally). That doesn't mean it isn't true though. Maybe whites should be a little more considerate and not try to provoke people and claiming "I'm not being racist, just telling the truth" and doing so in the most dick way possible,
and maybe blacks should should look at it with humility and think to themselves "well, as much as it hurts my pride, what he says is kind of true"
Then both parties let their pride die, acknowledge the fact that they're both equal, let racism die, and share a fun game of Yahtzee.
(I do find it funny, though, that racism is being kept alive by fanatic anti-racism. Sort of like the Barbra Streisand Effect.)
Taurzux, your last line is brilliant.
Shhh! Shut the f uck up! You know good and well that there's special rules for nig gers!
Oh, EnjoyYourMeal, you're so clever for putting spaces so you can use bad language and not get starred out like the rest of us. I'm pretty sure your post was meant to be ironic, but imo you ruined it by using a genuinely offensive term and making sure everyone saw it. Taurzux, with regards to the last line of your post, I sometimes wonder if we don't *over*think racism nowadays. Last week, for example, my English teacher made my all white-and-asian class list black stereotypes so we could "be aware that we were all thinking it". And then she started asking us if we thought differently of the Asians in our class. Wtf, like that's making it easy for us to get along.
This article makes me sad. Especially the part about MLK. But if it's true, it's true, I guess.
ReplyJudging by the comments section, it appears it's politically incorrect or somehow racist to say anything negative about MLK, no matter how true it is. Grow the f**k up people.
ReplyOne, I just want to say, I can't believe he wrote "GAYdeon" in his obituary. That magnificent bastard! Also reading about H.G. Wells reminded me of the story of Seinfeld and his wife's cookbook. If you didn't know, now you know.
ReplyI seriously hope you're joking. The internet makes it hard to tell..
Being castrated would be the least of their problems
ReplyI'm not disputing the MLK plagiarism thing, but your history is off. Black Panthers were NOT MLK allies - they thought he was way too moderate and thought his whole non-violent peaceable resistance approach was weak HENCE THE GUNS IN THE PIC. Geez! Either this is just a poor attempt at humor or a shoddy research job. The other option is that with any pic of a black person from the 60's you assume they knew MLK.
ReplyI'm pretty sure that pic's there solely for humorous reasons...and also to illustrate how most folks feel about MLK.
I'm confused. Why is there a picture of members of the Black Panthers being associated with MLK, a man that patterned his philosophy of non-violence (and maybe plagiarized it too) after Gandhi? Oh, I get it! It’s because all black people are violent! That’s hilarious!
ReplyKing was a lying n****r who was investigated by the FBI for being a stooge for Communism. Just another dumb n****r who was too lazy to earn his own way.
ReplyYeah, go mighty whitey! Say, I'm currently out of the loop, when is the next Klan gathering?
King changed the world, piss ant. What the f**k have you done? Trolled people in the comments on internet websites? King's death shook the entire nation. If you killed yourself, three or four people would laugh and then the entire universe would forget you ever existed.
"In our own words, we'd just like to say that the plagiarism committed by H.G. Wells stands as one of last century's blatantest instances of personal money gain as a result of unacknowledged derivation and usurpation of another author's text, and we think it's shameful."
ReplyBahahahah!! Brilliance!