Just kidding! Of course they didn't do that, because it's a political blog and this is the Internet. Instead, they left the article exactly the same and issued a "correction" that simply stated that the entire thesis of the article (that Obama's attorney general nominee had a secret history of helping cover up political scandals) was totally not true. And they put it at the very bottom of the article, which, if you'll notice, is a handy way of admitting they're wrong while simultaneously not really doing anything about it. They eventually did take it down, but only after many chortles were had.