6 Tiny Movie Moments That Took Insane Amounts Of Work

How about when Roger's hiding from gun-toting cartoon villains in the sink?

The guns were real, and needed puppeteers to operate every single one. Then, when Roger comes up for air and spits water, that's real water. Of course it was pumped through a machine they built solely for that scene.

This is all because of one subtle thing you may have overlooked: Roger may be a cartoon, but in his world, there are rules. If he swallows real water from the sink Eddie has his hands in, then it has to be real water that he spits out. If a cartoon puts a gun in Eddie's face and it really might kill him, it has to be a real gun. They called it "bumping the lamp," after the scene in which Eddie saws through the handcuffs binding him to Roger, and this became the whole philosophy for the making of the movie.

Look at the layers of work that went into that. By having Roger bump into everything, he feels like a real presence in the room, but that means everything has to be set up to fall over or shake when he does so -- boxes, lamps, people. It all has to be timed perfectly. Having Roger bump the lamp was a particularly weighty decision, because the animators had to adjust Roger's shadows accordingly. And it was all done so well that none of us even batted an eyelid.

But the real genius is the scene wherein Eddie and Roger arrive at Maroon Studios.

While shooting this scene, Bob Hoskins made a rare slip. He accidentally looked at where a normal-sized person would be standing in front of him, not where the head of a vertically-challenged cartoon bunny would be. Zemeckis didn't notice at the time, so when the film was handed over to the animators, they didn't know what to do. After some head-scratching, director of animation Richard Williams worked it out: They had Roger stand on his tiptoes, bringing his head to a level with Eddie's gaze.

They knew that getting the live-action actors to look at the exact spot where the nonexistent character's eyes would be was essential to suspending the viewers' disbelief, even if they weren't totally conscious of it. That's why the cartoon scenes in Mary Poppins feel so fake. It doesn't look like those humans are actually interacting with those cartoon characters. But Who Framed Roger Rabbit nailed it time and time again, scene after scene. That's one potential downside of being an animation genius: By doing their job so well, they made it so none of us noticed what they did.

The cottage was mostly constructed at Leavesden Studios, carted to Wales, then dragged by tractor up the coast, along with a trail of confused Welsh motorists. Once there, the setmakers then individually glued 4,500 scallop shells to the roof.

Like Batman's pecs, that's a lot of work for not much screen time. But hey, since they split the story into two parts, we get to see all the production designers' hard work up close in the next film, right? Not really. We only see the cottage from the outside again very briefly (three seconds) in Part 2, when Harry goes to pay his respects at Dobby's grave.

And you can't even see the damned shells.

That shot took even more work. To stop the whole thing from being shattered by the strong Welsh winds, they had to weigh it down with nearly 11 tons of water. And that was only the beginning. Take a look at all that beautifully snarled grass. Every tuft of it was individually dressed into the sand to make it look like the Cornish coast. Because the most important thing about making a movie based on a children's book in which kids carry magical guns and play soccer on broomsticks is staying true to Cornwall.

She's thinking what we all are: "Why did they even bother?"

Even the cobbles were handmade to be as accurate as possible, based on information gleaned from years of onsite digging, all in order to create the most realistic setting for the stupidest story. We only see those laboriously handcrafted cobblestones in the background, and only for a second or two at a time.

And the actors just walked all over them, the goddamned thespians. The whole process took six excruciating years. All for a movie two people saw.

But while we're following Theo in the foreground, we're ignoring all the fun the filmmakers had with the background. There are tons of details to assure you that this is in fact the future, predicted as accurately as possible from the vantage point of the Bush administration. Let's return to that opening shot.

See the pointy buildings in the distance? The one on the left is St. Paul's Cathedral, the other is the Shard, modern London's tallest building, and one of its most iconic. Here's a real photo from roughly the same spot:

Except that the movie was filmed, shot, and released before construction even began on the Shard. All they knew was that it was going to be part of the London skyline eventually, so they did the best they could, using architect Renzo Piano's early architectural drawings as a reference. If you see it at all, it's only for a few seconds in the background of the opening scene, when the audience is still trying to open their M&M's.

When Theo is pushing his way out of the crowded cafe, he passes two policemen. Can you spot the futuristic detail?

Give up? Look at the police helmet. The "Bobby on the Beat" currently wears this:

The "E II R" up there stands for "Elizabeth II Regina" -- Queen Elizabeth II. Now go back and look at the helmets worn in the movie again. You can barely make it out, but it says "CR" on the badge, which means "Charles Rex," or King Charles. By 2027, Queen Elizabeth has died, and Charles has ascended to the throne (probably the least realistic aspect of the whole movie).

They even made some trashy tabloid headlines for his reign:

It's almost impossible to read, but it says "CHARLES SHOULD BE THRONE OUT." That one shitty pun on a blurry newspaper in the background of a single throwaway scene lets you know, without question, that much like the cockroaches they are, The Daily Mail is still going strong even while the rest of society crumbles.

Check out those futuristic parking meters.

When constructing that set on a backlot street, the contemporary parking meters looked out of place. But instead of adding a Jetsons-style fin and calling it a day, the setbuilders made entirely new ones. Their meter has an electronic card register, since physical money is no longer a thing (remember, this was made in the quaint days of 1982, when credit cards were still for hipsters and communists alone). It also has a "post-mechanical case, which can be electrified" if someone tries to attack it, as well as lighting that directs traffic. If you zoom in, you see that it even has instructions/warnings for citizens parking there.

Precisely none of which we see in the movie. Hell, the streets are so thick with rain and smoke that we can barely see the characters. Production designer Syd Mead had "only been originally hired for a few days at $1,500 a day," producer Michael Deeley later explained. "Suddenly he was on the thing for weeks. It was one factor in going over budget." Blade Runner's infamous budgetary problems were one reason the theatrical cut was edited to be more appealing to mainstream audiences, which inexplicably entailed cinema's worst voiceover, as well as some bullshit "happy ending" that utterly disfigured the film.

But damn, look at those parking meters!

Not only did they grow the corn themselves, but they also built the house, the barn, the backyard, and probably Abigail Breslin. (Seriously, this was her first movie. You prove she existed before 2002.) Supposedly, all of this was necessary because they couldn't find an existing Midwest farmhouse that the set designers were allowed to paint red, white, and blue. That was symbolically important to the story, for reasons, surely.

Then there are the crop circles. We all thought those were CGI, didn't we? Hell, in the film, Gibson himself says, "It can't be by hand, it's too perfect." But it was, because Shyamalan demanded it. Production designer Larry Fulton wanted to CG most of it, "but Night doesn't like CGI, he wants everything practical." That meant his team had to spend weeks making real crop circles by hand -- and not just the one on the farm set. In the movie, the family watches a news report showing other crop circles popping up around the world.

Sure, they could have used stock footage, but that wouldn't be insane, would it? Instead, the production team created two more crop circles -- which, by the way, was "as tough as chopping down trees."

All for a few shots, spanning a few seconds.

In a movie.

Which turned out to be Signs.

Matt Cowan makes geeky T-shirts you didn't notice (which took a lot of work) when he's not writing for Cracked or watching Disney movies with his daughter.

If you're looking for an unforgettable holiday gift that requires very little work, check out the Miracle-Gro Aerogarden.

If you loved this article and want more content like this, support our site with a visit to our Contribution Page. Or sign up for our Subscription Service for exclusive content, an ad-free experience, and more.

For more, check out 6 Scenes In Famous Movies That Were Insanely Hard To Film and 5 Simple Movie Scenes That Were An Insane Pain To Shoot.

Subscribe to our YouTube channel, and check out 7 Movies that Put Insane Amounts of Work Into Small Details, and watch other videos you won't see on the site!

Also follow us on Facebook. It's easy.