5 Backup Plans That Would Have Changed Modern History
Backup plans are, by definition, not the best-case scenario. But usually they can be counted on to be reasonably close to Plan A. Sometimes, it ends up being even better than Plan A (Michael Jordan was the third pick in the 1984 NBA draft). Other times, they're far worse (Sam Bowie was the second pick in the 1984 NBA draft). But you rarely hear about the backup plans that are chambered and loaded and just never get used. Here are five that remained in the back pockets of various world leaders that, had they been used, would have changed the world, and possibly the language this article was written in.
#5. Operation Vulture

In the early 1950s, French Indochina was under attack by communist rebels. Unfortunately for France, this meant fighting a ground war in Asia, which is like fighting a white power gang in the prison showers: You're on their home turf, and winning to them means making sure you leave wearing a straight jacket under your body bag.
After taking a beating for several years, 17 battalions of French Union soldiers went and got themselves surrounded at Dien Bien Phu. This wouldn't have been such a big deal, but the rebels had somehow Fitzcarraldoed a bunch of anti-aircraft artillery through the thick jungle to the border they'd formed around the French. The more the rebels tightened that border, the lower planes had to fly to aim the supplies and ammunition and the more they got picked off by the heavy artillery. It was like a giant noose made of machine guns. At this point, the French had two options: sit back and lament that nobody had used a sufficiently prison-rape-themed metaphor to explain the war ahead of time, or ask America for help.
Getty
"Sup dawg? Hey, I'm gonna need you to do me a solid."
Realizing it was the heart of the Cold War and they were fighting communists, the French government picked up the red phone reserved for asking for U.S. military support. The resulting plan, Operation Vulture, would have used three tactical nuclear weapons from the Americans to turn the communist region into New Hiroshima.
The French liked the idea enough to send their top general to Washington to ask President Eisenhower personally for the passage of the plan. America had been building up a pretty bitching collection of atomic weaponry since the end of WWII and was itching to try it out. The plan climbed higher and higher up the chain of command, like the Bill from that "Schoolhouse Rock!" video with a knife in his teeth and a crazy gleam in his eye. Among the notable figures who signed off on it were U.S. secretary of state John Foster Dulles and a youngish Richard Nixon, who had actually helped draw it up. All they needed was Eisenhower, who liked the idea but had the good sense to realize that he and everyone in the government might have lost their goddamned minds over this communism thing. To hedge his approval, he agreed to the plan, but only if the United Kingdom liked it, too.
Getty
Churchill and Eisenhower warm up the mood with a game of "pull my finger."
After Britain gave a curt but polite "Are you fucking crazy?" Eisenhower acted like he never liked the idea in the first place, and the French eventually lost the battle so badly that their government resigned. The rebels took over and declared themselves the sovereign nation of Vietnam, and everyone lived happily ever after.
If They'd Gone With Plan B:
OK, America learned nothing from France's defeat, and got their ass handed to them by the same communist soldiers in the Vietnam War. Nixon's involvement in the plan came back to haunt America during negotiations to end the Vietnam War when the North Vietnamese's negotiator noted that they were having a tough time trusting America since "during the resistance against the French, Vice President Nixon proposed the use of atomic weapons." Still, Eisenhower's "we're down if England's cool with it" is probably the closest the U.S. ever came to going nuclear over the course of the entire Cold War.
Getty
"I get what you're saying, Dick, but have you considered the possibility that you are pant-soiling crazy?"
Many experts attribute the non-use of nukes to the "nuclear taboo." The longer the Americans and Soviets went without using their atomic weapons, and the more of them they built and aimed at each other, the more disastrous the consequences of using one came to seem.
Since Dien Bien Phu was relatively early in the war, the taboo wasn't quite as strong. But had Eisenhower gone nuclear the taboo never would have existed. Even if Russia didn't immediately retaliate with an atomic bomb of their own, they would owe America one. For instance, if you're the Soviets, the Cuban Missile Crisis looks a lot different if America has shown they're willing to use nuclear weapons if someone asks nicely. It's the difference between being in a Mexican standoff with a guy who you can safely assume is a rational human being who only wants to go on living, and being in a Mexican standoff with a hit man.
Getty
"Look, we don't really care about the argument. We just want to see what these bad boys can do."
Not for the first time, America probably owes its very existence to Britain being a total killjoy.
#4. Huele a Quemado

In 1977, the United States was finally deciding what to do with the Panama Canal Zone, a part of Panama that had been under U.S. control since 1903. Panamanian General Omar Torrijos flew up to Washington to meet with President Jimmy Carter to insist that America return control of the canal zone to Panama and withdraw U.S. forces from the country.
The two sides eventually came to an agreement, and Carter put his name behind a treaty that would give the canal and canal zone back in 1999 under the "1999? Ha, that's so far in the future we might as well be agreeing to give it back to them in heaven" theory of international relations. The controversial treaty went to Congress for approval. Little did the U.S. know that, in the event of Congress voting to not let go of the canal, Torrijos and Panama had a backup plan, which reasoned that if Panama couldn't have it, then no one could.
Via Wikipedia
"Don't let 'em see you crack, baby. This breakup is the best thing for everyone."
A few months prior to the Torrijos-Carter hoedown, future Panamanian president/coke dealer Manuel Noriega, then only a Panamanian army officer/coke dealer, trained troops and put sleeper agents in villages neighboring the canal zone. If the treaty failed, the agents would have launched attacks on the canal.
According to the plan, cleverly code-named "huele a quemado" (Spanish for "It smells like something is burning"), if Panama didn't get the canal zone back, Torrijos would render the canal "inoperable."
Luckily, for all parties involved, Carter had one of his few victories as president, getting the transfer signed and passed in Congress. By a single vote.

"Well I guess we'll have to blow something else up now."
If They'd Gone With Plan B:
If a single vote had gone the other way, a popular radio personality would have delivered what sounded like his ordinary address that night on Panamanian radio. In reality, the address would have contained a coded message to the commandos embedded around the country, who would have launched attacks on the gates and dams that regulate water levels in the canal, as well as the locomotives that pull ships. By the time the sun rose the next morning, millions of dollars in goods would have been stranded on the Atlantic and Pacific sides of the canal, and the U.S. would have been at war with Panama.
As Torrijos mentioned to journalist Graham Greene, while the U.S. would be able to fix the damage in days, you'd need to wait for "three years of rain to fill the canal. During that time it would be guerrilla war waged from the jungle."
Getty
Which eventually became the theme to every action movie from the 1980s.
Keep in mind that this was two years after the last Americans were airlifted out of Saigon, and the American economy was failing in such strange and inexplicable ways that Carter eventually took to diagnosing the U.S. with the first case of national depression. This would have meant another costly war between the United States and a communist government in one of the densest jungles in the world two years after the U.S. had just gotten out of one that had crippled its will to fight. And as opposed to Vietnam, the U.S. probably would have needed to fight them for the Panama Canal out of economic necessity.
Getty
We couldn't risk losing entire shipments of gigantic ties, is what we're saying.
#3. Operation Downfall

After Germany failed to hold up their end of the plan to dominate the globe with evil, the Allies looked to the Pacific and realized that Japan wasn't even sort of getting the hint. U.S. President Harry Truman was faced with two overriding options: Drop a new experimental weapon on Japanese cities or plan an invasion. The experimental weapon would be the first (and in retrospect only) nuclear bomb used in warfare. There was no guarantee that the weapons would cause Japan to surrender, or that they'd even work. And then you had to hope that the rest of the world would be OK with the fact that you just made an entire city disappear with quantum mechanics.
Behind door number two was an invasion named "Operation Downfall," and historians and military officials alike agree that it would have been a motherfucker.
Via Wikimedia Commons
John Madden's head would explode just looking at this.
Due to the extreme secrecy of the Manhattan Project, Operation Downfall was mostly planned by members of the U.S. military who didn't know there was such a thing as atomic weapons. They decided they would invade from the bottom island of Kyushu and work their way up. When Truman made his decision, troops were being moved into position toward the debarkation point on Okinawa. The Military was so certain things were about to go very badly for U.S. soldiers that 500,000 Purple Hearts were made in preparation, a number so large that the medals have been used to supply every single war since, including Korea, Vietnam, Iraq I and Iraq II, with about 100,000 still left over.
Getty
"I stubbed my toe in the shower, and they told me to just grab a handful of them."
If They'd Gone With Plan B:
As part of the decision-making process, Truman asked military leaders to estimate the number of casualties that would have resulted from Operation Downfall. Keep in mind that these men did not know that they were being asked to assess one of two plans. They were giving a realistic assessment of the invasion they were about to lead. While estimates varied, the head of the Department of War (now the Department of Defense) estimated that it would take "1.7 to 4 million American casualties, including 400,000 to 800,000 fatalities, and 5 to 10 million Japanese fatalities."
Getty
"Plus, like, all of Canada."
Up to that point, only 250,000 Americans total had died in the war, with the U.K. suffering a similar number of casualties. And tripling that number was optimistic.
It's worth noting that the Japanese had put all their chips on guessing the Allied invasion strategy, and had guessed correctly. They had already amassed all their troops exactly where the Allies would be invading. So that best-case scenario wasn't happening.
It's now believed that the war would have lasted until at least 1947, but the implications would have reached way further into the future. The second half of the 20th century was defined by the baby boom that immediately followed the war, which helped drive American prosperity in the 1980s and '90s. Operation Downfall not only would have delayed that bumper crop of able-bodied workers, but also it might have canceled it altogether. The returning bunch of soldiers who were supposed to be sexing a demographic anomaly into existence would have been devastated. Meanwhile, Japan would have become a "nation without cities," thanks to extensive air strikes that were part of Operation Downfall.
Getty
"Hey, asshole -- we told everyone to grab a plane."
So the two biggest economies of the second half of the century would have spent years wiping each other out and recovering from the process instead of creating the computer you're reading this on, and the more inventive pornography you watch on it.








This was a groovy article until the last line, man.
Replyooh 250000 americans in WWII!? Need I remind anyone that america is roughly fifty times the size of the UK? Just in case anybody thought america did much more than profiteer and gift the entire world with a century of fear over who was going to let the first nuke of WWIII fly
ReplyBritish guy here, glad we were of service.
ReplyAbout the Vietnam War: the US did not get their "asses handed to them". In the VietCong Defense Minister's book about the way, he says (paraphrasing) "the Americans had us on the brink of destruction with Linebacker I/II but each time our forces "surrendered", the Americans would back off and we'd resume attacking.". So, basically, hippies influencing politicians is what caused us not to win that war.
Reply Hide All See All 5 RepliesHippies write most of these articles, so it's to be expected that they'd regurgitate the garbage they've been fed for the past 30+ years.
Nope. The US gov't waited too long to do anything about the North; which by about 1967 or so demonstrated the US was unwilling to do what was necessary to secure all of Vietnam. The public didn't support the war, not jus the hippies and liberals. Considering the overal failure in the point of the US even being in Vietnam, the yanks had a glorious ass-handing bestowed upon them.
It was the hippies' fault.
won all the battles, just wasn't as committed to winning the war as the North Vietcong... couple hundred miles away from home, nothing really to gain compared to a country in it's own backyard, etc.
Is there something in the American psyche which makes so many of you inable to countenace the concept of being defeated unless there were "dark forces" ranged against you. As SeanYamazaki points out the US public did not support the war, in fact by 1971 they were so overwhelmingly against it (72% against to 28% for) theat opinion pollsters gave up even asking the question. Still, "it was the hippies what lost it for us". Yeah, right, whatever you say.
By far the most likely outcomes if the US had pressed home it's advantage are: 1) withdrawal from Vietnam anyway. It was hugely expensive, the country was overwhelmingly against it, the Democrats could have put up a parrot (provided it had been taught to say "I'll bring our boys back home") and got a landslide victory in 1972, not a prospect looked on favourably by the incumbent Republicans. 2) Continuing much the same way for a few more years, the US with it's army battle mindset and with little motivation for the fight beyond stopping the spread of Communism would never have defeated the Viet Cong and North Vietnamese, with a fierce desire to be one country and fighting in their homeland. It is doubtful whether they would have been able to militarily defeat the US, however as the numbers of troops and type of weaponry they had could always hang in against necessarily loose-ish Viet Cong forces. Of course, this would have led eventually to the US pulling out at a later time. Of course, all that would only be true if the hippies hadn't been the real culprits behind you losing this war. And we know that they were, because the only people who could possibly believe that it is far more complicated than that are clearly either insane or brainwashed by innaccurate information for decades. That and the fact that 72% of the population were (and probably still are in their hearts) hippies, mindlessly following news reports and current affair programmes. And what do they know, their brain has been crashed from the non-stop propoganda machine.
I remember learning about #2 during my US Intelligence class. It's pretty crazy when you think about it...
ReplyU.S Intelligence is an oxymoron
@Simon5150 well I thoroughly enjoied your remark. Well unless your not an American. If you aren't, then f**k you.
This may be the first time that Fitzcarraldo has ever been used as a verb. Mad props man.
ReplyThere were 2 nukes drooped on Japan
Replyyour mom has 2 boobs that droop
^Atomic windsocks.
Actually, it was later concluded by investigations by analysts for the US Strategic Bombing Survey that estimates of Japan's ability to continue the war were greatly exaggerated. They concluded that Japan was vastly weaker than imagine at the war's end. And as for the mass suicides? That was also exaggerated as the number of people who commited suicide rather than surrender was about the same as the number in Germany. Special presidential envoy Edwin Jocke said the bombs only accelerated Japan's surrender by a few days. The country had been completely devastated by bombing raids even before Hiroshima and Nagasaki, with over fifty per cent of homes leveled.
Reply Hide All See All 9 RepliesStuff it, killjoy
Truth hurts, doesn't it Dani?
But remember, there was another article that linked to news stories about the citizenship trying to kill the Emperor and take over Japan to continue the war after he announced the surrender. Fighting an army and fighting *most of the everyday population of a country* are different things.
Wasn't there also a statement that japan basically surrendered 50% because of america and 50% because of russia coming in to kill them all? Would russia have invaded if they knew america already had like. . . Everyone in their army, in japan? Thusly prolonging the war?
This guy can stuff it because he's totally full of it. Japan wasn't going to surrender to the US, the whole population was preparing for mass racial extinction, and if you think otherwise, there's plenty of islands the US went to first where the Japanese threw themselves and their kids off cliffs en masse.
^^Yeah, the Imperial government was preparing for a mass sacrifice, the population was largely tired of being in the war. That they cooperated with the occupation so fully blows your stereotypical view of Nips right out of the water.
A naval intelligence officer named Zakarias wrote in 1954 about the Japanese willingness to surrender BEFORE the bomb drops. They made the mistake of approaching the Russians, who wanted the war to continue, so they couldextract more territory. The idea of a Naval Blockade ALONE was raised-and rejected-as "beneath the dignity" of the Naval Mission. I think we'd have been happy to sit back and watch the Japanese eat each other, until they'd do the logical thing-and eat Hirohito...
You state that "it was later concluded". Successful military planning is rarely based on hind sight. The Allies also warned the Japanese government of the devastation that was coming and the Japanese still refused to surrender. The Japanese military cared little about the suffering of the people. Because of their warped sense of Bushido they felt that their personal honer was more important than the nation.
The ppl in Japan were considering the surrender offer and an official made a "no comment" statement to reporters and the word he used in Madrin can also mean no effing way. The emperor would've have to be killed to get him to not sign the treaty and there was a plan in place to do that. And the mass suicide is a bunch of BS, when the troops got there the folks basically welcomed them and treated me as guests. It was like war to friend in 30 seconds or less
Who the hell is VLADIMIR Khrushchev?
ReplyIt's the nickname for Nikita's little Nikki...
Aha... The US was like the teenage boy who had just recently grown a bit of fluff on his chin and grown a few inches taller than his dad - Britain - asking for permission to play with (deadly) fireworks.
Reply Hide All See All 8 RepliesWhy don't you visit us more, America!? Your brother - Canada - visits all the time.
And who saved his dad's sorry ass from his drunken Uncle Germany.
@Jumi: that would be the Russians...
We don't visit because were really forgetful. So how's that queen of yours she doin good?
Because going on an airplane means getting anally fisted for nukes
The Russians were on the other side of Europe, so no; though they did the bulk of the heavy lifting during the war.
Mother Russia
The Americans saved Britian from both Japan and Russia. Basically, if the Americans hadn't entered the war, Western Europe would've never had the power to retake France, Belgium, Holland, and half of Germany. Instead, the Soviets would've stomped Germany into dust and continued pushing into Nazi-occupied Western Europe, and eventually Britian. And that's not even getting into all the s**t the Japanese were doing in China, Indonesia, Malaysia, and Indochina, which the Americans were the prime factor in stopping (the Australians, British, and Chinese helped). Basically, the Americans didn't save Britian from the Nazis; they saved them from the Russians.
so if America was a teen after world war two, does that mean the Fetus Version of America kicked the (at it's height) british empire's ass? .... go beat up on more zulu warriors, only people you conquered were stone age nobodies.
#1 actually sounds like a nice premise for a video game......
Replyoh hell yeah! I better write that one down!
Peace the video game?
"This would have meant another costly war between the United States and a communist government in one of the densest jungles in the world two years after the U.S. had just gotten out of one that had crippled its will to fight.
ReplyOkay, I'll bite. WHAT "Communist" government would the US have been fighting? Torrijos, while considered a "leftist," was also considered a reliable ANTI-Communist ally. I understand that most of those opposing the treaties in the first place were a bunch of the rabid, anti-Communist right-wingers in the US (such as Strom Thurmond and the John Birch Society), ready to toss the "Commie" label on ANY foreign leader who didn't place the US's interests over their own countries' best interest, but that does NOT make Torrijos (or Panama) "Communist."
If they started fighting the US, the communists would have shown up very quickly.
A world without hippies?
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesA world without the greatest music we've ever had?
Yeah, no, I don't think I can get behind that actually.
Yeah, clearly the Cold War was all worth it. What would we do without Jefferson Airplane?
Hendrix, Depeche Mode, Flock of Seagulls...shit, liberals did birth some good shit.
"Hendrix, Depeche Mode, Flock of Seagulls...shit, liberals did birth some good shit."
Sean Yamazaki - I'm a fairly tolerant guy & I understand you might be trying to be funny but...Mentioning Hendrix in the same breath as those other Jokers is just EVIL & TWISTED.
You should get down on your knees - set a guitar on fire - & beg for forgiveness
A world without hippies?
ReplyA world without the greatest music we got?
Yeah, no, I don't think I can get behind that, actually.
Did hippies ever hurt anyone?
Reply Hide All See All 7 RepliesOne of them bit me once but, in fairness, I think he mistook me for a vegetarian burrito.
I get a pain right behind my eye when I hear someone say the phrase "mother earth".
"Mother Earth"
The smell from a hippie once gave my sister an asthma attack.
They murder vegetables. Every one of them, every single day.
Mind you, Hippie bites can be very nasty.
that chick charles manson killed?
Just say no to nationalism
Replythere is nothing wrong with Nationalism (aka "Patriotism") provided you keep it in your own borders.
Kennedy probably wouldn't have gotten the Civil Rights act of 1964 passed, though. Well, not in '64.
ReplyI haven't thought about that :O
Number 2 is a testimony to the satyrical masterpiece that is Dr. Strangelove. Each one of these incidents could well have been the plot of the movie.
ReplyYou know that Dr. Strangelove (the character) was loosely based on Kissinger?
The Austin Powers movies would be 85% less quotable had number 1 happened.
ReplyI also remember reading somewhere about a weapon the US was designing to use on Japan before they decided to just drop science bombs. Swarms of bats with napalm strapped to them. Surprisingly early tests were successful.
Guess what Batman's getting.
Yeah, they planned to drop the bats out of planes at night with firebombs on timers. The idea was that they would roost in houses and then the bombs would detonate, causing widespread fires. There was also a project to create pigeon-guided missiles. They put the pigeons in little cockpits and they'd peck at a screen or something to keep the missile on course.
I swear I'm not making any of that up. Sometimes real life is just that cool.
The word "groovy" came into use in the early 30s. African American Jazz musicians related the feeling of letting the music flow, without forcing it, to the relatively new invention, the phonograph. The sound happened only when the needle was right in the groove.
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesYeah, it really does put things into perspective doesn't it. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were horrific and terrible, but if they hadn't happened, a much worse, drawn out war would've instead.
Beyond that, you'd be insane to think that nuclear weapons wouldn't be continued to be developed, only now we wouldn't have a real world example of how horrific they are. Maybe if those hadn't been the first to be dropped, we would've waited until everyone had much bigger arsenals before they got used... it really is a chilling "what if" scenario.
and that was supposed to be a reply to the below comment, not this one. oops.
That's actually starting to make a comeback in the groove metal/prog metal scene. I describe riffs as groovy on a regular basis. xD