7 Animals That Are Evolving Right Before Our Eyes

In 1971, scientists introduced 10 Italian wall lizards to an island in Croatia, but right after they dropped them off, the Croatian War for Independence prevented the researchers from following up on their little lizard guinea pigs. In fact, the scientists couldn't get back to the island until 2004. When they did, they found 5,000 lizard descendants who had not only annihilated the entire indigenous lizard population, but also rewired the shape of their own innards to accommodate the local diet.
Via sciencedaily
Experiments are currently being performed to rewire the human stomach to accommodate Taco Bell.
Before their introduction to the island, the wall lizards were carnivores, so their digestive systems weren't built for leaf-eating. But on an island short on insects and long on plants, a strictly carnivorous stomach would be a one-way ticket to Deadville. So the lizards developed things called cecal valves, which were muscles that slowed down the process of food digestion and gave them more time to break down plant cellulose. But growing new gut muscles wasn't all the lizards had up their sleeves. They also grew bigger heads for stronger bites, and dropped territorial defenses.
Getty
This man is marking his territory with a Waltz before consuming her head whole.
Scientists said evolution this rapid would be like humans developing another appendix over a few hundred years. Or better yet, Americans spontaneously evolving butt muscles that turn digested corn syrup into car fuel. That last one sounds pretty awesome, actually. Get on it, evolution.
Getty
"That's the shit-gasket, and this is the poop chute. I hate my job."
Then you have the three-toed skinks which come from Australia -- where the lizards are apparently gearing up for some kind of uprising, V-style. See those blobs under Mommma Short Arms' skin?
Via National Geographic
Downwind from the creepy little arms?
Those are eggs, which you'd expect. But her babies are going to exit her body alive, like some kind of freaking mammal.
Other lizards of the same species are still laying their eggs on the ground, as Xenu intended. But scientists think the three-toed skinks in harsher mountain climates have found it more efficient to keep their young in their bodies longer, because laid eggs are more vulnerable to weather and predators. And to accommodate the live birth of her lizardlings, her uterus is secreting calcium to her embryos, which is actually the beginning stages of developing a placenta. A LIZARD PLACENTA.

For anyone who's ever regrettably accepted a late-night booty call from an unfortunate looking associate, you can probably sympathize with the polar bear. Between the melting of the Arctic ice caps, ocean pollution and their obvious issues with obesity, some polar bears have found getting a sexual hook-up as hard as the rest of us find getting a gallon of gas for under two bucks.
Getty
Every gallon you buy, another bear spends a cold night alone in his igloo.
Enter the grizzly bear. Ha ha, no really. Polars and grizzlies have decided it's time to know each other biblically, and this time without the involvement of an ark and a horny old man. Not only have they started boinking in the wild, they're also making babies. Grolar bear babies.
Via Wikipedia
The grolar: A proud and magnificent beast, killed and stuffed for your convenience.
The cutest thing about grolar bears is how they get together and stare down evil by the power of the light radiating from their tummies. No wait, we got that wrong. The horrifying thing about grolar bears is how they have carnivorous polar bear behaviors in bodies that are adaptable for warmer climates. So while the grizzly diet is 80 to 90 percent plants, the polar bear feeds strictly on the flesh of other animals. This is why captive grolar bear babies stomp their toys around -- like they would stomp a seal to death.
Via onearth
Here's an unconfirmed photo of one in the wild. We can't be sure it's a grolar, as no one has shot it yet.
So, the good news is that in the face of climate change, evolution finds a way to keep on keeping on. The bad news is that we just might lose our cuddly Coca-Cola loving friends of the North forever. Because the characteristics that allow a polar bear to thrive in extreme conditions are going to die out among the grolar mudbloods. After all, if the planet is getting warmer, why would the next generation need those traits at all?
Getty
There goes our dream of staging armored polar bear fights in our ice palace.
And did we mention how, unlike mules -- which are the sex fruit between donkeys and horses -- grolar bears have proven fertile? So, in order to preserve the racial purity of the polar bear, it's going to have to avoid miscegenation with its brown neighbors. Not coincidentally, that's the exact platform of the Polar Bear KKK.

"Challenge accepted" -- Cracked Art Department
Kristi Harrison is one Billy Joel song away from being an uptown girl. She's also an editor for Cracked and a Twitter user.
We've got plenty more on animals in our bestselling book.
For more ways Mother Nature is flipping the bird to humans, check out 5 Species That Seem to be Trying to Take over the Earth and 5 Diabolical Animals That Out-Witted Humans.
And stop by Linkstorm to discover how being a troll devolves human beings.
And don't forget to follow us on Facebook and Twitter to get sexy, sexy jokes sent straight to your news feed.
Do you have an idea in mind that would make a great article? Then sign up for our writers workshop! Do you possess expert skills in image creation and manipulation? Mediocre? Even rudimentary? Are you frightened by MS Paint and simply have a funny idea? You can create an infograpic and you could be on the front page of Cracked.com tomorrow!








Is there any other reasons for poachers to go for elephants other than their tusks?
Replynope, just like when we cut down a tree to collect its apples
"Eating the tomcod renders humans immune to all industrial toxins. (Just kidding. They'll definitely give you super cancer.)"
ReplyI LOL'd!
i know this may be a cliche, but african elephants remind me so much of old wise men.
ReplyLOVE the last picture
Replywhy... were you trying to ruin boobs in that analogy? :|
Replyi mean.... okay fine i get your point. The whole toxin thing is bad since... because of that the fish are losing their innocent boobs?
i'm a sadder person after reading this... and wiser.
One is never wiser who is also happy about it, hence the chinese curse, "may you live in interesting times"
I already have a dog named Skinner (so when he's bad I can yell, "SkINNer!!!!". My next dog is going to be named Dr. Tesla Sagan.
ReplySo... Lamarck was right?
ReplyNope. All of this is via classical darwinian evolution.
You are dumb as niht. Evolution means things like fish fins becoming feet. or feet becoming wings. What you are talking about is selection. Those animals already had those capabilities. Those who did not died out. That is not evolution as it does not bring anything new.
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesYou just...Jesus Christ, I think you just made me dumber. I've actually lost intelligence by reading what you've written. Why would you do such a thing?
Isn't the formation of a new species like grolar bears (I've also heard them called, my favorite, 'pizzly' bears) some form of evolution?
That IS how evolution works. You just don't end up with a mouse with flippers from two normal mice parents. This isn't X Men.
Traits that have proven to be beneficial to survival are the ones that are passed on and refined over generations. Sometimes they're the most simple ones like sharper/longer fangs/claws or thicker hides. Sometimes its a goof like developing webbed feet that make you swim faster or hair/feathers that keep you warmer or having an unusual color that lets you blend in more easily. And in some cases those desired traits get out breed because they're not working to keep animals alive, prime example being the elephants losing their tusks to avoid being hunted.
Evolution is selective and it takes several generations for a species to become another. Take a look a the Tyrannosaurus Rex. Big head full of teeth, small wimpy arms. Thats because a mouthful of flesh shredding, bone crunching teeth was more important then being able to grab something. Hence why they have small stubby arms(also because you touch yourself at night).
These are perfect examples of evolution at work. "Adapt and Overcome" isn't just something the Marines say, its a rule in nature, and many are doing so to adapt to humankind(not a dirty hippie, just pointing this out cause its true.) And us altering the evolution of a species isn't something we just started doing, at least not on accident. Take a look at dogs. You honestly think chihuahuas, dalmatians and teacup poodles are a product of natural breeding?
Put down the bible and pick up a science book. Or if thats too hard understand, download an SNES emulator and start playing EVO: the Search for Eden to get an idea how selective traits lead to evolution.
Won't this just mean poachers have to kill more elephants to get their money?
ReplyThat makes no sense. If they dont have tusks, the poachers wont kill them for their tusks. Rethink your comment and try again later.............
The can get money for other elephant parts, but not as much. This would mean they would have to kill more to sustain their income.
where is #2?
ReplyI noticed that too... (no pun intended)
Have you checked the bathroom?
Grolar is a terrible name! It should be Grizzlar! GRIZZLAR!
Reply Hide All See All 6 RepliesOr pizzly bears... :)
Sounds more like a heavy metal band or a Pokemon.
Grizzlar, I choose you!
Really? I think Grolar sounds more pokemonesque than Gizzlar
"Look, Grolar is evolving"
(evolution tune)
"Grolar has become Grizzlar!"
'Grizzlar' sounds like a Dinobot. An AWESOME Dinobot!
Pizzly would be basic, grolar would be first stage and grizzlar would be second. Someone please make this a thing.
seriously, the US in general need to stop bitching about petrol prices! we have it far worse in the UK!!!!!
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesToo right brother, these Americans just love bitching, simples! That and being no. 1. AT EVERYTHING! regardless of if its good or bad
Hey, remember when you lost the war to us Americans? No. 1, bitches.
We also have significantly worse public transit options and generally significantly farther to go to get anywhere. That means that gas eats up a bigger part of our monthly/yearly budgets than it does for you Brits, even if your prices are higher per gallon.
Polar bears can be said to be a highly adapted brown bear, to the point where it is functionally a different species, but genetically it is closer to grizzlies that those are to the Eurasian brown bears, which are the same species and behave pretty much the same way. So this offshot of the brown bear trunk, only about 12,000 years old, is merging back due to an specialiced lifestyle not being fructiferous. At least, it has a brighter future than the panda, even if its "purity" is lost, it lives on, purity has no evolutive meaning, despite we forgetting that and pretty much dooming subspecific lineages.
ReplyDid this article evolve to be missing the #2 spot?
ReplyAwesome article, though missing the #2 entry.
ReplyI don't know.. I am with Mr. Downvote Svensteel below, as much as I think evolution is awesome, people below me talking about "in the eyes of evolution" and 'what evolution thinks is best'.. It seems to be the agnostic's god. In each and every example here, we see an adaptation (from inter-species sex [grizzly/polar], environment culling of prized traits [fish already had the organ, elephants losing tusks etc], behavioral conditioning in dogs, and a mutation of currently available organs that proved valuable and thus the organism flourished). While I do believe in micro-evolution those who would say it is ignorant to not believe that is the same thing as macro-evolution (because micro-evolution if viewed over 1000 years would be a new species) that is only because we as humans are the ones classifying species by criteria we set.. Yes, they would be new 'species', and yes survival of the fittest is true, BUT in NONE of these examples is the 'evolution' of NEW genetic material, only the loss or degradation of existing.. We haven't seen a brainless organism or an eyeless one 'evolve' a brain or eyes.. Though we have seen them lose them in record. We haven't even EVER found the 'missing link' fossil records showing one species 'evolving' into another, any species. So now feel free to downvote me, and say I am ignorant, but these are the facts and while I may believe in God, those who believe me to be ignorant believe evolution is their god, deciding what is best 'in the eyes of evolution.'
Reply Hide All See All 9 RepliesCorrection: "We haven't even EVER found the 'missing link' fossil records showing one species 'evolving' into another, any species." We have seen species adapt and change into other species, but never with the 'evolution' of NEW genetic data, only the loss or degradation of existing.
Yeah, I'll go ahead and downvote you, largely because you can't tell the difference between humorous anthropomorphism that makes it easier for humans to understand natural facts by framing them in narrative terms -- with personality and purpose -- and actual scientific research that does nothing of the sort.
good point but im still going to be an athiest
Absolutely agree with you Gravity.. To think that evolutionists will grab at straws to try and stay in the game. Its a big world out there and people are slowly realizing that evolution is a crock of bull. One day you will see the truth as well and wonder why on earth you believed something that has no truth. The only thing I thought while reading what Kristi wrote was none of this is remotely feasible as evidence of evolution. So ask yourself if we can go from apes to humans what is the possibility that in the last 3000 or so years we have no form of evolution from any other species in this world? Fish adapting to there surroundings for survival is like saying human beings surviving flu's are evolving into a different species, our body adapts to changes to try and survive, we become immune to a certain strain of flu but there's always more out there to adapt to. It makes me so annoyed when people quote evolution , but I forget, i was once that person saying exactly the same thing until I researched it for my self. Everyone always quotes "the truth is out there" well it is, you just need to keep an open mind and honestly look for answers. Don't just stop at one person's findings and believe they are right, we are only human and make mistakes. I guarantee you that for every scientist's findings of evolution there is another that completely annihilates that theory. So go ahead and when you find that I am right, then start asking yourself the question, "if we didn't evolve, then how did we get to be here?"
And Mickey, whether she's joking or not it is a controversial question that deserves "actual research that makes it easier for humans to understand."
yeah, i'll give you an analogy:
you have a 5,000 chain link...chain. it shatters, sending ever link on it's own course. you have to find them and put them in order, because every link is unique, and only connects with the links that were immediately attatched to it.
now let's nickname the very first link "european grey wolf" and the very last link "modern domesticated golden retriever."
two different species, every link in the chain being tiny "micro-evolutions", as you call it. a whole record of every tiny adaption; from the 54th link that kind of sorta didn't fear humans and tried out following and hunting them, to the 937th that would follow humans and eat their scraps when they weren't looking, to the 3,120th that worked diligently side by side with humans to take down small hunting game, to the 4,866th that had a luxurious coat of sort-of-light-brownish fur.
no matter how many times you try to spin it, small behavioral and cellular change IS evolution in motion. in fact, it's the only way evolution EVER works: "macro-evolution" as you would call it, would actually harm the recepient animal. large, random changes to the body don't just "work out"; it would either result in the death of the animal (because an extra limb or organ just weighs it down), or the complete reproductive isolation of it (because no animal wants to f**k a freak. some people, on the other hand...). whereas "micro-evolution" is not one animal being bogged down by a random extra arm: it's a whole population gradually gearing up to better tackle their changing environment. which is the definition of evolution.
lastly, since you brought it up: you don't have to not believe in god to believe evolution. for example: he could have created the universe and all its physical properties, boundries, and laws, and then just hit the "play" button.
"Yes, they would be new 'species', and yes survival of the fittest is true, BUT in NONE of these examples is the 'evolution' of NEW genetic material, only the loss or degradation of existing.. We haven't seen a brainless organism or an eyeless one 'evolve' a brain or eyes.. Though we have seen them lose them in record."
Isn't it that energy always move from a high state to a low state? Which would explain why we don't see tons of animals just growing new parts (though I've seen some weird frogs grow extra legs and such) unless the genes are 'added' to their genetic codes by, say, reproducing with another closely-related species.
Thank you Ekoz, It drives me crazy when people try to discredit evolution through erroneous science and Creationist logic veiled as "fact". I would give you 8,000 upvotes if I could.
Mutations are also brought about by external forces: cosmic radiation, background radiation, hell, the sheer quantum-ness of things dictate that genetic strings change. Most mutations are trivial or downright lethal, but some aren't; they enable the lucky owner a slightly greater chance of surviving than a non-mutated neighbor.
I don't understand this whole "micro evolution" thing; evolution either IS or it ISN'T; it's like virginity.
"It's on! Race war!"
ReplyIt will be decades before grollar bears are truly accepted in bear society.
Replyif I ever meet a KKK polar bear (mascot?), I really don't think I'll be able to stop laughing long enough to run. If the rest of the Klan is there however, I will be forced to raise my own mixed black/grizzly bear and come back and watch the race bear battle.
ReplyWalt Disney would be very very very proud of the Cracked Art Department.
#5. Evolution doesn't see a problem, and then attempt to fix it. The elephants would lose their tusks regardless of the threat of extinction due to human poachers.
Reply Hide All See All 5 RepliesActually, if that were the case it would have happened before poaching was prevalent The ones without tusks used to be inferior because they couldn't fight or forage as well. No ( because of new circumstances ) the are, if not superior, at least closer to equal in the eyes of evolution, because they survive to produce offspring....
No, it's the poaching that's providing the evolutionary selection. The ones with tusks are the ones that get killed before they can breed. The ones without are the only ones that get to pass on their traits.
That, uh, is evolution. The ones that don't die get to breed.
And no they wouldn't lose their tusks regardless because TUSKS ARE HELPFUL
No they wouldn't. Its a pure direct selective pressure. A small sub-population were born tuskless. Then humans came around and started hunting elephants specifically for their tusks. Those elephants without tusks didn't get hunted, but those with them did. Thus a tuskless elephant was more likely to reproduce (or to reproduce more times) and so the percentage of tuskless elephants rose in the population over the course of a few generations.