13 Wildly Irresponsible Vintage Ads Aimed at Kids
In a world full of government regulations where every light bulb comes in a package explaining how you shouldn't eat it, it's easy to forget that it wasn't always like this. Once upon a time, not only did manufacturers not care what we did with their product, they seemed to build entire ad campaigns around tempting us to use them to kill our children.

We understand that the 1950s were a different time -- you apparently weren't allowed to file a liability lawsuit until you first proved your worth by fighting a bear in the courtroom. Still, we're fairly certain that even back then, babies needed oxygen to survive.
This Du Pont Cellophane advertisement actually looked to raise the bar beyond mere irresponsibility by promising that this product could asphyxiate a number of babies at once.

One thing we left off our recent list of time travel dangers: In the past, the average five-year-old girl was more of a man than most modern men will ever be. Apparently, little girls took revolvers to bed just in case they needed to kill a dude during their nap. This ad appeared in Harpers in 1904, in case any time travelers are wondering what era to avoid if they don't like playing the most permanent game of freeze tag possible.
We're thinking that generation's whole mindset can be summed up by this ad's two warnings: "Absolutely Safe" and "they shoot straight and kill." These were a people who saw no contradiction in those two statements. If you got shot, it was your own damned fault for getting in front of the gun.

At what age should you be ashamed about your lack of a deep, sexy tan? About two weeks, if you're living in 1960 and believe this ad for a Du Pont Health Tan Sun Lamp. This was decades before infant spray-tans were available, so concerned mothers had no choice but to hold their babies under its "long tanning rays" for hour after hour.
Fortunately, you can mount it on your bed and "Sleep Under It." Though the baby wouldn't know when to turn over to keep his South Beach tan even, so you'd presumably have to strap him to some kind of rotisserie device that'd slowly twirl him around.

We can forgive this 1960 ad for the children's sedative Distaval for the fact that the product's active ingredient was thalidomide (famous for getting pulled from shelves in 1961 for causing birth defects). They presumably didn't know at the time. But we're thinking that even 50 years ago, it wasn't considered good parenting to tell your three-year-old, "Why don't you go to the bathroom and get yourself a little bit o' sedative. You need to mellow out, son."
Though this whole self-service approach to children's medication was apparently not that uncommon, considering ...

Seriously, check out the dazed, stupefied look the kid on the left is sporting, while her sibling tries desperately to somehow open the giant bottle with a spoon. Both can be explained by the fact that Ayer's Cherry Pectoral, a self-proclaimed cure-all for any throat or lung problems, contained opium.
Yeah, don't wait for Mommy and Daddy to pry open the 50-gallon drum of opium juice, young Sally. We'll show you how to get the lid off with common household utensils. Just don't depend on little Mary for help -- she'll be spending the next three days marveling at how the whole world seems to be covered in fur.
This seemed to be a common theme with the Ayer's people ...

Stop and think about the last time you struggled with getting a "childproof" pill bottle open. Now look at this 1890 advertisement for Ayer's Cathartic Pills, which makes pill containers look like a giggling wonderland for naked toddlers to frolic in. "Hey, look, Steve brought a huge stick of butter! Ha-ha, the old days are frickin' rad you guys!"
By the way, if you don't know what cathartic pills are or why it's a terrible idea for children to take handfuls of them, let's just say they uh, evacuate the bowels, which is not particularly something that children or babies need help with. And if you're giving them out in the copious amounts you see here, you might as well give them a non-Iver Johnson revolver to play with.

That's right, in 1952 Santa didn't bring shiny red bicycles or teddy bears down the chimney. He lugged down a gigantic box that seems to contain about two thousand Camel cigarettes.
OK, we admit that Santa gets used in ads aimed at adults, too. And after all, it's not like it actually shows kids smoking or anything. Unlike ...








They made the razor ad look that way cause the razors were so safe u could let ur baby use them and they still wouldn't be able to hurt themselves
ReplyWhat's even more disturbing to me is that the baby in the razor ad looks a lot like a girl- she's wearing a dress and everything.
ReplyBoth can be explained by the fact that Ayer's Cherry Pectoral, a self-proclaimed cure-all for any throat or lung problems, contained opium.
ReplyGuess what.. I call bullsh!t. Pectoral was made out of honey aka pectin. I buy Luden's cherry flavored pectin cough drops every week just to munch on. They are tastey as hell. They don't contain opium and neither does pectin cough syrup which used to be called pectoral. Douchebag.
"This toy was unofficially promoted by the U.S. government, which advertised a cash reward along with the toy to anyone who used the toy's Geiger counter to find uranium. There was presumably an additional reward for the first brave little boy to successfully use his Gilbert Atomic Energy Lab to kill a communist."
ReplyBest ever.
This article teaches me when I finish my space time machine I should go always to the future.
Reply1) to avoid sleeping with my own grandmother
2) to avoid getting shot in US early twentieth century
...wow.
Replyyeah, they used to put cocaine and opium in almost everything (especially things make for "soothing" children)and there used to be Lithium in 7up..."it's an up thing!"
ReplyGood times, good times.
To be fair, the kind of razor the baby is holding is a lot safer than a straight razor. Not that you'd want an infant to play with the more modern design or anything.
ReplyNot that you'd want an infant to play with a razor. At all.
#12 - Little doll: Suzie, what are you doing with that Iver Johnson's absolutely safe revolver in bed ? Suzie, why are you looking at me like that ? Please Suzie, let's talk ! I am sorry for what happened to your teddy bear, it was not my intention ! No Suzie, please, no ! NOOOO !!!
ReplyWait, if the little girl at the end there is "chubby," what did the skinny kids look like?
ReplyThat last image... ugh. parents who are obsessed with making their kids into picture-perfect expressionless personality-less dimwits who smile and look pretty.
ReplyWhat's wrong with corn syrup? :'(
Replythere is nothing wrong with corn syrup
Nothing, as long as you're getting your Doctor Recommended 2-3 glasses a day!
those were some strange times.
Replythose were some AWESOME times.
Man, I have to hop in my time machine, then go back in time and head to the pharmacy to tell em I have a toothache and a pretty severe cough. Then I'll just sit back with my opium cough syrup and cocaine drops...Hey, I'll bet they sure as hell did the job though.
ReplyHang on.. I wanna go too.. cough cough
Seattle Brewing & Malting Co. = Starbucks!?!
Reply#7 reminds me of the prank call "Do you have Prince Albert in a can?"
ReplyThat's where it originates from
I love these all. but maybe #3 was supposed to convey a message that the razor was gentle, so gentle a baby could use it. #4 was not good though. not good at all.
ReplyOr your face felt like a baby's after using it?
I doubt Spider monkeys are endangered due to that ad. Unless somehow selling squirrel monkeys made the spider monkeys suicidally jealous of their cuter cousins....
Reply#3 isn't even that bad it's basically saying the blade is even safe for a babay!...but #4 on the other hand...f**king horrible
ReplyMan, the past was awesome. If I ever get a time machine I'm moving there. (I guess it would suck not to be able to marry my boyfriend, but I couldn't do that until yesterday anyway and I got along just fine.)
ReplyHere's a tip: you'll die of smallpox.