The 6 Most Baffling Nobel Prizes Ever Awarded
A whole lot of people complained last year when Barack Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize for what was apparently two months of ground-breaking work in the fields of teleprompter reading and ab maintenance.
But maybe people shouldn't have been surprised. A look at Nobel prize history shows quite a few WTF choices.

We trust you know Yasser Arafat? The bug-eyed old Palestinian leader who absolutely, totally hated Israel? He founded a group called Fatah, whose stated goal is the "eradication of Zionist economic, political, military, and cultural existence." Sounding peaceful yet? (And if it is, thanks for reading, Osama!)

Did I do that?
Eventually he renounced terrorism and became more of an unofficial diplomat, traveling across the world representing Palestine. In 1993, Arafat signed the Oslo Accords, which officially ended the Arab-Israeli Conflict.
Oh, wait, no they absolutely did not.

Complete cockbucket.
What Happened?
From the mid-60s to the late-80s, Fatah and its militant arms remained active across the Middle East, especially Israel and Lebanon. They plotted terrorist attacks, participated in guerrilla warfare, trained foreign militant groups and did generally not-so-peaceful stuff. Arafat soon became the international face of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict.
Fatah's most famous attack was the Munich massacre, which if you type into Google enough times will make Mossad agents blow through your door and drag you away to "The Farm."

And it doesn't look like this at all.
Fatah, incidentally, is Arabic for "conquest by means of jihad." What's not peaceful about that?
So basically, after decades of murder and mayhem, Arafat decided to call it a day and retire. And for that, he won a Nobel Prize. Summing this path to Nobel stardom up rather nicely, Reason Magazine suggested, "Start an NGO devoted to murder and mayhem-something on the SPECTRE/Al Qaeda/Medellin Cartel model-and then agree to a truce."

What would you do with a formula that could predict the markets? You could know exactly when stocks and commodities will go up or down. You could have given Bill Gates 10 bucks in the 70s and become a multi-millionaire 20 years later. You could have spent that million to buy property in the 90s and sold it all off the day before the market collapsed. You would have infinite power over probability and the stock market. Sort of like that X-Men chick Domino.

She can manipulate our probability any day of the week, if you know what we mean.
In the 1970s, economists Myron Scholes, Fischer Black and Robert Merton came up with the Black-Scholes Model for Equity, a name that Robert Merton was no doubt just fucking delighted about. In layman's terms, Black-Scholes tries to predict a stock's long-term value based on previous performances and on whether people are betting for or against it. In other words, it could predict the stock market.

What Happened?
As you would imagine, investors went just giddy over this new discovery. People were predicting huge returns and zero risk. Black died in 1995, but Scholes and Merton won the Nobel Prize in Economics in 1997 after the model became a standard across the world. Scholes founded an investment company called Long-Term Capital Management in the early 90s. Naturally, being a world-renowned economist, he had thousands of rich guys clamoring to be his customers.
There was just one problem. Scholes and crew assumed that all investors were cold, logical computers whose every move was a quantified calculation. They forgot to account for the fact that when things get a little dicey, people are fucking retards.

"Shut up!" "No, you shut up!"
When the East Asian Financial Crisis hit, all the stocks that Scholes's precious formula told him were going up came crashing down faster than a cocaine addict going cold turkey after a 10-year bender. In 1998, his firm lost $4.6 billion in four months, and by 2000 it had caved.
Hey, but they still have that Nobel prize!

How awesome would it be if you accidentally spilled Benadryl into a jar of expired tomato sauce and found the cure for cancer? Or if you fell and discovered a new species of nuclear-powered cockroach staring back at you on the floor? Well, meet Arno Penzias and Robert Woodrow Wilson, two scientists who basically tripped into fame and glory.

Before the 1960s, scientists had no idea how the universe was created. Some were arguing for the Big Bang Theory. Others took up the much less scientific position of "It just fucking happened." However, a few of the Big Bang guys realized that they could find proof: If the universe really was born in a huge Michael Bay explosion, there would still be traces of post-explosion energy left over in space. Three cosmologists predicted that said traces of the Big Bang would be in the form of microwave radiation, and would be distributed pretty evenly across the universe at a temperature of 5-Kelvin. Unfortunately nobody could find it.
That is until 1964, when Wilson and Penzias were working on a new antenna at the Bell At&T Telephone Labs in New Jersey. When they pointed their super-sensitive antenna out to the sky, they picked up a faint, strange radio signal coming from all around them. The brilliant physicists' first guess? That it was interference from pigeon shit.

Pictured: louder than the universe.
What Happened?
After cleaning out the pigeon crap that had built up inside the antenna and shooting every pigeon in sight, the two found that the noise was still there. They ruled out radio interference from New York City, the military and, presumably, aliens. Then they finally heard about the theoretical microwave radiation that better physicists than them had predicted. One scientist, Robert Dicke, was about to design an experiment to find it. Upon getting the call from Penzias, he turned to his colleagues and said, "Well boys, we've been scooped." Which is scientist for "FUUUCK!"
For their extraordinary work in being really lucky, Penzias and Wilson won the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1978.

Thanks to the Pigeon Shit 9000.
By the way, did we mention that Penzias and Wilson's antenna was only able to detect microwaves because it was equipped with something called a Dicke Radiometer? Yeah, patented by the same Robert H. Dicke.








Zionism is geared toward establishing a purely Jewish state in the holy land.
ReplyStep one: get rid of the Palestinians.
It baffles me how people have such a hard time and are so outraged when they find out that Palestinians are not really cool with that and tend to object violently. Or how they fail to grasp the chauvinism of showing up somewhere your ancestors lived more than a millennium ago and saying to the people who live there now: "Hey get out, this is our place because this ancient scroll tells of how our ancestor exterminated the people living here long ago and how God promises us that it's ours forever because we are special and you are not."
I can't believe this got five thumbs up. f**k you!
I read about #4 in "A Brief History of Time". Is that where you found it?
ReplyI believe Al brought worldwide attention to a very important issue so I'll let that one slide. When I saw this list #1 was the first thing I thought of before looking. Kudos Cracked...
ReplyI'd have to disagree there. Climate change has been relatively high on the European political agenda for quite some time now. Though contrary to what some would tell you, that has far less to do with us taking a more sophisticated or enlightened view on the matter, than it is a simple case of there being a good many coalition governments in Europe that rely on appealing for support from minority parties like environmentalists etc.. as a means of cutting deals to get in / stay in power.
The Black-Scholes model is used for pricing 'options', not stocks, and IMO it is quite Nobel-worthy concerning economics.
ReplyYes, it has nothing to do with predicting the value of stocks and gaining profit without any risk. In fact one of the key assumptions in the derivation of the Black-Scholes equation is that risk-free gain (above the interest rates) can not exist.
I didn't know the Nobel Peace Prize had so many titties on it. Makes sense, though.
ReplyThe winner of the award for the pre-frontal lobotomy actually refined a previous technique, so that is was more effective, and less of a gamble with people's ability to function after recovery. More importantly, he worked to stop abuse of the procedure, which was meant to help seriously ill people who needed to be physically restrained or drugged into non-functioning with things like barbiturates, because otherwise they couldn't be dealt with effectively even in institutions. It was never intended to make wives submissive, or control criminals who were otherwise sane.
ReplyYou can't blame a doctor who invented a procedure for its abuse, anymore than you can blame people who invented a useful medication for its abuse as a recreational drug.
Pre-frontal lobotomies, or any type of lobotomies are not done (or, very, very rarely), because we have very effective psychoactive medications, which help people with mental illness and organic brain diseases more than lobotomies ever did.
Lobotomies are occasionally still done, but usually for intractable seizures that originate in the frontal lobe, or rarely, for some disorders like bipolar disorder or OCD that don't respond to medication.
The surgery has a bad reputation, because of the way it has been portrayed in the media, but it's less radical than some other surgeries; some people have had the two hemispheres of their brain surgically separated, and other people have even had hemispherectomies. Those are usually for intractable tonic-clonic seizures that can cause brain damage in and of themselves if they aren't stopped.
The surgery has a bad reputation because it effectively destroys your personality and prevents you from ever being able to have a normal life or normal relationships. Make no mistake, lobotomies were not for the benefit of the patient, but to make them easier to deal with. Back then, the mentally ill were treated worse than criminals.
First, Irena Sendler has not gone unrecognized: she has been awarded Poland's highest civil honor, the Order of the White Eagle, and the Audrey Hepburn Humanitarian Award, which is an award specifically for people working with children, and that's just the beginning of many awards. She had also been recognized by Yad VaShem, Israel's Holocaust memorial honoring righteous gentiles.
ReplyThose were all great honors, and more appropriate recognitions of what she did. The Nobel Prize is supposed to encourage continuing work, not to reward past heroism.
That does nothing to mitigate the fact that giving it to Al Gore was questionable. The choice of Al Gore as recipient has nothing to do with Irena Sendler's degree of heroism. The Nobel committee is not required to give an award in every category. If there is no one to honor in a particular year, the committee can pass on all the nominees. It can also split the award among people. I'm not sure that people have ever shared the peace prize for separate acts in the same year, but literature winners have gotten it for separate works.
So, criticize the selection of Gore all you want, but don't blame it for Sendler's loss.
im glad they didnt mention obama,that would be a flame war starter
ReplyWhat about Obama's?
ReplyPeople really do not read that beginning paragraph do they? Or else you would see Obama clearly in the first sentence of the article.
the entire nobel prize was created so alfred nobel would be remembered as a humanitarian not the inventor of dynamite responsible for massive amounts of deaths
ReplyDid you read that on the cracked article "6 Geniuses Who Saw Their Inventions Go Terribly Wrong"?
Two Words: Henry Kissinger!
Replydidn't know there was a nobel prize for economics.
ReplyYeah, and even getting a job as a janitor at the University of Chicago requires you to have one.
It's actually slightly different. Its the Alfred Nobel Memorial Prize for Economics or something similar (far too lazy to make the, what, ten seconds work to wikipedia it and confirm I'm right.) and is given out by the bank. But yeah, its broadly a nobel prize in economics.
Man, f**k lobotomies. I hope that guy is burning in hell.
Reply#3, Norway only awards the Nobel peace prize. Not physics.
ReplyAmong factual inaccuracies that are easily checked: the CMB is at 2.8 K, not 5 K.
ReplyAnother Nobel Prize ripoff: A decided lack of Jonas Salk. For those who don't know what he did, look up the reason why FDR was confined to a wheelchair, then realize that 50,000 children every year were sentenced to the same fate, until Jonas Salk.
ReplyWho doesn't know who Salk is?
The peace prize is completely political, and usually reflects the politics of the government party in Norway. If there is no obvious political objective, then they probably roll a dice...
ReplyWhat about Obama?? THAT was a joke giving him one too!!
Reply Hide All See All 7 RepliesThe Peace Prize is meant to go to people who promote peace and disarmament, as or the "abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses." So, when he signed that peaceful treaty with Russia to start dismantling nuclear bombs, he was doing only f*****g exactly what you should be doing to win a Nobel Peace Prize.
Except that he spent twenty years working towards nuclear disarmament, which seems like a pretty good reason for it to be given to him actually. Titsmagee1207, do some research.
Everyone keep in mind that the way the nominating process works, some has to be nominated almost a year before the awards are announced, which in this case works out to two weeks after his innaguration, more than a month before work started on the treaty. It's also worth noting that Reagan and Gorbachov signed a much larger arms reduction treaty back in the eighties, but neither of them has a medal.
Obama gets an award for signing a peace treaty with Russia. Then, he signs NDAA 2012, a war declaration against the USA. What award should he get for that?
People also seem to forget about Libya, Syria, Afghanistan, Irag, etc. Obama either started wars there, or continued them. And just for anyone who's going say "NU UH WE'RE OUT OF IRAQ," well, we aren't. They just relabeled our occupation is "defense contractors."
I'm pretty sure that being the first racially diverse president is 9/10 of what the award was based on.
By being elected, Obama basically validated the entire civil rights movement, including all those speeches by MLK.
Should you win an award for being a certain race? I don't know, but I'm pretty sure that that was the mentality.
When I read that Obama had been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize my first thought was, "they hated George Bush more than I realized." Because that was really why he got it. It's also why Al Gore got the award, and I always believed that's why Jimmy Carter got the award. Because the committee hated George W. Bush.
THANK YOU for actually talking about Irene Sendler! Not very many people know how little Al Gore deserved to win. Seriously, it is ridiculous that he won anyway with just a crappy power point that misleading layer graphs and basically lied, he won it over her who actually did something, a really freaking huge something, to benefit the human
Reply Hide All See All 3 Repliesrace and actually save lives.
But the Nobel Prize isn't awarded for one act of heroism decades ago. I agree Sendler was an incredible woman, but what would have happened to her prize money? It would have been inherited by her kids the next year, and what the f**k did they do? Al Gore won it WITH the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which means more money for research and development into green issues.
@Lexid
Hi Gore!
@lexid523: You didn't read the whole entry, did you?
Let's be fair here, the lobotomy was considered a major breakthrough when it was first introduced and there were several cases where the patients themselves stated that they felt much better afterwards than they did before. It's just that these cases aren't as well publicised as all of the cases where the patients were left incapacitated (most famously JFK's sister). Ultimately, ANY medical procedure is only as effective as the surgeon that's performing it. It's obviously great that they're no longer required (and probably weren't ever required in the first place), but it's easy to be wise decades after the event. It's a shame because the rest of the article is 100% correct, as was the assertion that Jarvik deserved the prize. But that really took the sheen off it and made the whole article seem irresponsible.
ReplyLets be fair here, just because you don't agree to one point in a article doesn't make the whole damn thing crap.
You forgot to mention that those same patients had significant long-term psychological trauma and that many lawsuits followed.