The 6 Raunchiest, Most Depraved Sex Acts (From the Bible)
What happens when you take a really skanky sex story and dress it up in a lot of flowery words? You get the Bible. Or large chunks of it, anyway.
Sure, rather than using phrases such as "reverse frog squat," or "slinging manjam," Biblical sex is referenced almost exclusively as "coming in unto" (a phrase still used by porn stars who tend to drop the "in unto"). But once you get past the unimaginative verbs, the Bible has some nasty, nasty stories. Such as:

Sunday school lessons tend to focus on God turning Lot's wife into a pillar of salt like she's starring in one of Sarah Connor's nightmares from T2. It's the sort of imagery that might distract you from something like flagrant incest. But sure enough, at Genesis 19:30-36:

Something tells us Lot's daughters would lose any drinking game centered around "Never Have I Ever." If you've done it in a cave--and you've done it with your dad--you've probably also done it tangled in Fruit By The Foot or by accident with a vegetable.
"Say, I've got a neat idea."
They were so eager to secure some seamen that they nearly polluted the genetic pool for all who came after them. Or maybe they just thought that a world populated by exponentially degenerative DNA sounded funny. To their credit, maybe that's why we have viral videos today.
To Make it Even Weirder...

Speaking of people who might want to steer clear of drinking games, the Bible seems to blame the whole thing on booze, a strategy you'll recognize from work the morning after karaoke night. The alcohol in this case is wine, which raises the question: how much wine do you have to drink before you became oblivious to the fact that you were having sex with your daughter ... a second time?

In Genesis 29: 21-28, Jacob had taken a job where he was to be paid entirely in woman. His boss, Laban, promised his daughter Rachel in exchange for seven years of work. After the seven years, Laban pulled a fast one and swapped in his ugly daughter, Leah, instead:

Unless Leah and Rachel were sisters of the identical "Mary-Kate and Ashley" variety, there is very little reason why Jacob wouldn't realize fairly early in the process that he had the wrong sister. Who knows, maybe they were serving some of Lot's date-rape wine at the party.

The Torah offers further exposition in Megillah 13b: Jacob and Rachel had actually expected Laban to perform the wife-swap and devised a secret signal to reveal that it was really her under the veil (apparently lifting the veil was too obvious a solution).
However, in a last-minute display of womanly wile (what Toran scholars agree is "bitchiness" in modern English), Rachel taught Leah the signal, and she used it to double-double cross Jacob, fucking him in every possible meaning of the word.
After waking up to the presumably hideous Leah, Jacob offered to work another seven years just to get Rachel. This teaches Christians today that the Rachel of Genesis was hotter than the Rachel of Friends. Leah, however, was named after "hidden beauty," or "butterface."
Leah (left) with sister Rachel.
To Make it Even Weirder...
If you read the passage again you'll notice that right in the middle of it is mention of a third woman: Zilpah, Leah's "hand maid." She's right between the verse commencing the night of boning and the verse concluding it. What was she doing there? Watching? Is it our fault that we're picturing that whole scene as just a writhing Chex mix of sex organs?
"And some sheep, too, why not?"
Painting by Amy L. Rawson.
If you've ever heard masturbation referred to as "onanism", well, you've got one guy to thank. Onan was apparently one of the pioneers in the art of ejaculating somewhere other than into a sex partner, as we see in Judah 38:8-10:

Onan's the one in the background, walking away to go masturbate behind those rocks.
Now there's something a woman never forgets. You're getting busy with your husband's brother, he splooges on the ground, and promptly gets slain by the LORD. Talk about awkward.
This particular verse was taken slightly out-of-context when it gave birth to "onanism," which refers to both coitus interruptus and masturbation. It's probably just as well that he died, and didn't have to walk around the rest of his life listening to people refer to jerking off as "Doing an Onan."
To Make it Even Weirder...
This story became the basis for Christian arguments against masturbation. The story does not address the counter-argument: what if God has no righteous purpose for your semen that particular day, and you're just bored?
God: Hard on Masturbation.
But more importantly, what about women? They don't have seeds to spill at their whimsy. Yet female masturbation never come up in the thousand or so pages in which he rambles about everything from having almonds in your diet to how he owns an awesome robe. Surely a fair God who loves all his children equally wouldn't allow women to masturbate and not men!
Or we could just point out that if God killed everyone who masturbated, Japan would have ceased to exist sometime in 2005.








The great thing about the Tamar story is there's some evidence that says she wasn't just dressed as a whore, but as a temple priestess who worshiped through sex, suggesting that Judah wasn't just getting freaky with his daughter in law, but was thought he was worshiping a fertility goddess through sex. This is debated, but Jonathan Kirsch wrote a great book where he covers this story (I read it in college and it started me onn reasearch for a paper I got to present at a religion conference in Boston) and its really really interesting. If you like weird bibical s**t you dont often hear in church, get it.
ReplyThe story of Lot always kind of pissed me off, earlier in the story he offers his daughters to an angry mob to keep the mob from hurting two strangers who are visiting his house and then later on he has sex with those same daughters and through the whole thing he is referred to as a "righteous" man.
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesYeah seriously. Apparently looking back at the city is so horrible you get turned into salt, but offering your kids up fror gang rape is A-OK.
So letting men rape other men is better? What else could Lot do to get rid of the homosexuals that came knocking at his door? Let them rape him and his guests?All of the men of the town had surrounded his house. The righteousness of God is shown when the angels strike the men blind and thus Lot's daughters are spared. When Lot's wife looked back, she was turned to ash/salt because she stopped and the explosion from the meteorites was enough to burn anyone who got caught up in the radius.
So according to you and Bookgal1977, gay anal rape and murder is A-OK. Sure, whatever. That's in your sick country (you must be from Denmark where child and animal porn is legalized) but over here in the west, gay anal rape is even worst than ordinary rape (man raping woman in vagina) which is still a very sick crime. Lot was no warrior and he didn't know his guests were angels. To him, he had two choices, let the men brutally anal rape him and his guests (which they threatened to do against Lot as well if he didn't give them the guests) or let them have sex with his daughters.
Which would you choose? You'll turn over your fellow kinsmen and yourself to be anal raped to the point where you'd probably bleed to death? Yeah right! Me personally? I'd go out with a knife and start stabbing all those homosexuals and once they started overwhelming me, I would have killed myself because death is a better experience than your gay anal sex which is where a man loses his dignity forever. I'd rather burn in Hell than lose my honor and dignity. Thankfully the angels dealt with the homosexuals.
Personally, I couldn't give a damn about homosexuals. I've hated homosexuality even before I became a Christian. I hate heterosexual anal sex too. I see no reason as to why anyone would perform such acts. I have no problems with homosexuals so long as they mind their own business but if they surround your house demanding to rape you and your fellow kin, yeah, I'm going to get pissed just as I'd get pissed if their were heterosexuals demanding to rape the women in my house. And just for the record, the New Testament teaches that no one should be killed if they practice homosexuality but it teaches that homosexuals should repent. But rape is rape. Gay rape is still rape Bookgal1977 and I hate rapists no matter who they be (woman or man) and thus Sodom's destruction was righteous.
As for the daughters having sex with Lot, they raped him after they got him drunk. Too much strong wine can make you drunk, your wine and beer nowadays are weak and contain other s**t which is why you can have so many and not feel any effect. Back thousands of years ago and hell, even in the medieval times, wine and beer were far more potent.
As for The Book of Solomon, it was written by Solomon about one of his wives. Solomon actually fell from grace by going after women and he was punished for it. The priests that put the books of the Old Testament together somehow thought that Solomon's SONG should be included when it had nothing to do with God just like all of the sex acts listed here have nothing to do with God. Solomon wasn't righteous. Just because he was included in The Bible didn't make him the best ever thing until Jesus came about. Solomon's sin is lust, in fact, his father David suffered the same temptation but he repented and unlike his son, Solomon, he didn't give in to worshiping idols.
Give me one verse where it's said that The Bible is the word of God. It contains words from God but it's not the word of God. The word of God was Jesus and his sacrifice. Not every word from Moses is from God. Even Jesus states this when he tells the Jews about divorce.
And I think I'll trust Jesus who came from Heaven over anyone else.
I suggest you get your facts right next time atheists. Seriously, anyone can quote out of context from any book. To fully understand The Bible, you have to read it all.
As for the "giants" that refers to the fallen angels. Seriously, read The Bible in its original language for the correct translations.
Farewell.
nKLSL, just shut the hell up already. You've managed to offend women, homosexuals, people from Denmark, atheists, and christians. I'm not even going to get into the seriousness with which the bible should be taken, because I don't want to offend decent christians, but since when do you get to decide which parts of the bible to follow (that aren't "god's word", and that are), and which to ignore. Your mornonic rant contradicts itself over and over, as you claim to not be sexist and not be homophobic, yet show such hostility to women and homosexuals. Women are worth no less than men, and homosexuals are certainly not sinners, or 'sick' people that need to be 'cured'. The only people who need to be 'cured' are intolerant, disgustingly rude people like yourself. Yes, it absolutely was wrong of Lot to offer his daughters, because that's like offering meeger gold to buy them off, denoting the value of his own daughters. I'm sure if he offered up his two sons you would consider it a different story entirely. Also, if these men were homosexual then Lot would be a total idiot to offer up his DAUGHTERS. Finally, whilst anal rape may be degrading to men, it's no more degrading than vaginal rape is for women. As for the incest, if the wine were strong enough to make him unaware they were his daughters then he would have been incapable of getting an erection, hence he knew they were his daughters, yet still consented, and still became sexually aroused. My expectations for you to take any of this onboard though are very low, as you've clearly not developed properly beyond the egocentricity and inability for proper empathy that a toddler would possess. Nevertheless, I'd like for you to keep your disgusting views in your own mind (which I'm sure would be a psychologist's idea of a kind of puzzle of hidden mental traumas).
Hal umum dalam sebuah kelompok lawan jenis dalam arti saling tolong menolong Yang terlalu keluarga intim.
ReplyWait, what?
I'm going to go out on a rather short limb and suggest that in 17th-century English translated with a great deal of guesswork from ancient Hebrew, "my bowels were moved for him" refers to orgasm, rather than defecation.
Replyi agree. ive read translations that say "my inward parts themselves became boisterous within me." again, we're talking about a translation from ancient hebrew text. "bowels" dont necessarily mean "crap"
"Bowels", as the word was used way back when, refers to the abdomen as a whole--basically, she got all tingly and fluttery and aroused.
Number one is actually talking about angels having sex with women, which then made the giants. So the women never had sex with Giants. Either way though, giant babies yes.
Replythe giants referred to here are references to fallen angels. the children born of these unions were known as a new race of people called the nephilim. . .
Uhm, I'm pretty sure that "Judah" isn't actually a book of the Bible. The reference that #4 is trying to give is actually GENESIS 38:8-10, not Judah 38:8-10.
ReplyMay I come in unto thee?
ReplyI daresay some of those entries would make even 4channers blush
ReplyThe Bible = Guide to incest
ReplyThe funnier thing about #1 is that these giant babies are referred to as the "Nephrim" ...who exists after the flood.
ReplyWell, duh. Their chins were still above the waterline.
Nephilim, not "Nephrim."
What the hell is the Puritan Hard Drive??
ReplyI'm pretty sure 'Megillah' isn't in the 'Torah' which is the first five books of the Hebrew Bible or Old Testament to Christians. I think the writer mistaken it for 'Talmud' which is a Rabbinical oral teaching that has been written into a ridiculously massive book.
ReplyFrom what I heard, the word 'giants' actually translates as 'tyrants' or 'bullies'. Just something I heard somewhere that made sense, I can't cite sources.
ReplyThere are actual measurements. They were like 300 meters tall.
Or maybe, those with giant 'dicks'? XD
#2, the bowels were the seat of the emotions in those days. So you could translate it "my heart was moved".
Reply Hide All See All 4 RepliesOr it could translate to a s**t fetish
@Zillah94 I doubt it. "Bowels" were a generic term for one's insides, not just the specific ones you're thinking of. So the "moving" in that line was either about a feeling in her heart (as Quazar87 pointed out) or about a feeling having something more to do with her lady bits...
So her hoohoo was moved for him? The mental image I'm getting from that is pretty funny
I took it to mean that she was a squirter...
The Creator is unbiased hence the Bible is Holy for both sides, so dont be surprised if a Satanic Cult was discovered to actually be using the very same bible that your local priest uses
ReplyThere was one I was sure was gonna be here (other than Song of Solomon) that wasn't. The story in Genesis where Noah passes out drunk and naked and his youngest of three sons decides to peek at him for sh*ts and giggles while he sleeps, and then goes and recommends that his two brothers go take a look at dad's junk as well.
ReplyGenesis 9:18-23
20 Noah, a man of the soil, proceeded[a] to plant a vineyard. 21 When he drank some of its wine, he became drunk and lay uncovered inside his tent. 22 Ham, the father of Canaan, saw his father naked and told his two brothers outside. 23 But Shem and Japheth took a garment and laid it across their shoulders; then they walked in backward and covered their father’s naked body. Their faces were turned the other way so that they would not see their father naked.
You should have posted what Noah said afterwards and why Canaan was cursed, yet Shem and Japheth got blessed for their deed.
So who had sex?
As a Christian, all I have to say is... HELL YESS!
ReplyActually, Onan was having sex and pulled out, not masturbating. Also, he married his brother's wife after his brother died so that he could give his dead brother, who died childless, an heir. He pulled out because he didn't want to have to raise his brother's heir. God thought it was evil for Onan to deny his brother an heir, and that's why he killed Onan, not because he "spilled his seed."
Reply Hide All See All 7 RepliesBut...that is what the author said.
I reread that section, and yes, the author does say that Onan pulled out and was promptly killed, but he also mentions masturbation several times so it's a little confusing.
Yeah, the point he was making is that this verse is used as a common argument among Christians for why you shouldn't masturbate. No, it doesn't make sense; the author was pointing that out.
Why does masturbation confuse you? Why don't you just play with yourself right now and we can discuss it? You don't mind if I get comfortable, do you? That's right, just ease your seat back and slide your finger down there.
He mentions masturbation because he says that later Christians used the fact that Onan pulled out and spilled the semen, as the basis of the argument against masturbation. Which means that because Onan spilled his seed and displeased God, you shouldn't masturbate because then you too are spilling your seed. He even says: "what if God has no righteous purpose for your semen that particular day, and you're just bored?". And it is a little confusing because the original story had nothing to do with the spilt semen, but somehow became about masturbation being a sin?. That's how I understood it, but I'm not Christian so I might be missing something :)
And of course, as said in the article, we women don't have to worry; masterbation isn't banned for us.
I was thinking that as well..
Yeah... Genesis is pretty fucked. Before Lot's daughters drunk-raped him (while they were still in Sodom) Lot is hosting dinner with some angels. The evil raper men of Sodom gather outside Lot's house and ask to have sex with the angels, and Lot's all "That's horrible! Rape my virgin daughters instead." Even when I was really young and this s**t was being spoonfed to me that part bothered me. I wasn't entirely sure what the men wanted to do to the angels, but it was obviously very bad since the punishment was first to be blinded then destroyed, so the fact that he offered up his daughters before the angels took over seemed pretty horrible. I don't think I realized until years later that the daughters payed him back for the potential rape by raping him themselves, though. Playing "which biblical story is most twisted" with fellow (what are people who used to be religious because they were raised with it but grew out of it called? Post-theists? Yeah, let's go with that) posttheists is pretty fun, though.
Reply Hide All See All 5 Repliesby the way, the angels were guy angels. their names are given at the beginning of the story. this is one of the stories the Vatican uses as an argument against homosexuality, because later God goes on to destroy Sodom. the word "sodomy" actually comes from Sodom.
Just the Vatican?
Also Jack Chick. Who apparently envisions Sodom and Gomorrah as being populated by mustached bikers in tutus.
@tryforbest: Only male homosexuality; as with masterbation, female homosexuality isn't mentioned so I guess we can guess that God loves lesbians?
Who doesn't love lesbians PripyatHorse?
God Changed in the new testament guys so dont be hatting :D
Reply Hide All See All 4 RepliesActually Christianity of which I am a practicing believer holds that God does not change that He is as He always has and always will be. Looking at the old testament it is important to recognize that God was trying to ensure that Jesus would exist aka preserve this line of man until Jesus is born then who cares.
Also important to realize those giants mentioned are often called the sires of Anak who himself sired the father of a twelve toed, twelve fingered giant known as Goliath. This raises a few questions that are usually answered by saying that one of Noah's sons had a half-giant for a wife.
This reply is for MatthewDonaldMcCann, there were actually 5 giants, which is why David picked up 5 stones. He used one for Goliath but didn't kill the other 4 until later on in life when they came after him, one of them was Goliath's brother, Lahmi 1 Chronicles 20:5. The twelve finger giant is unnamed but is a different giant, not Goliath and was killed by a different Israelite who served David.
For DanTanedo, God does not change, Christ beat the people who were making his Father's temple a den of thieves. You have to remember that Christ's purpose was not to destroy but to save. Don't be misguided thinking that God's wrath is subdued, you have all of Revelation which tells that God will punish the wicked and throw hell and all those not found in the Lamb's (Christ) book of Life into the Lake of Fire to be tormented forever and ever.
Don't be hatting? LOL
Don't be hatting? You're mad as a hatter!