The 10 Most Irritatingly Impossible Old-School Video Games
In the old days, you didn't come back to a game again and again for anything as fancy as online multiplayer or user-created content. No, you came back because the games were freaking impossible. That was the only way game designers of the Nintendo Entertainment System and SNES days could extend the play time: through mindless, frustrating repetition.
These are the 10 games so infuriating, their very mention makes the hairs stand up on the back of our necks.

The premise:
A ludicrously undersized boxer makes his way through a swarm of opponents who use the unwise strategy of fighting with a distinctly repeating pattern. All of this is done for the chance to lose horribly to Mike Tyson.
Why it was worth playing:
The first-person boxing was unique in 1987 (actually, how often have you seen it since?), unless you count the arcade version of the same game. It was genuinely fun trying to crack the various exotic underlings that stood between you and the champ. And, after a tough day, there was something deeply satisfying about mercilessly pounding upon hapless Glass Joe, who always seemed to be in the ring against his will.

Look at him, it's like he thinks there's a guy out in the audience with a rifle on him.
Also, in an era when other sports games were occupied by generic placeholders (not even team logos were represented), Tyson's celebrity endorsement was pretty cool. Seeing that crazy bastard step into the ring as the final boss really meant something.
Why it was infuriating:
While the early opponents were sometimes challenging, you could still find their weakness (hmmm ... that inconspicuous 'X' on his stomach, perhaps), and after that it was just a matter of timing your punches.

But, when you finally made it to Tyson (or "Mr. Dream" if you bought the game after Tyson's title defeat to Buster Douglas), no amount of Rocky-inspired runs through the city were going to save you. Mac's punches have about as much effect on the champ as a stiff breeze, which doesn't stack up well against his ability to send your teeth flying with little more than a mean thought.

Basically you had to withstand a series of withering blows from Tyson, dodging each with perfect precision (if any of his punches landed, you were done) while waiting for a window of opportunity about a quarter-second long to strike back.
Saddest moment:
Watching Mac crash to the mat following a thunderous right hook by Tyson and knowing that it was time for him to "fuck you 'til you love it." Then, realizing that to get back there you have to box every fucking one of those guys again. No saves in this game, boys and girls.

The premise:
That wacky Shredder is out to ruin everybody's day and cause some good ol' fashioned chaos again, and only a group of hideous, sewer-dwelling monstrosities are there to stop him.
Why it was worth playing:
In 1989, every young boy in America was legally obligated to spend at least two hours a day pretending to be one of the Turtles, and another two arguing with friends over which one was superior (Leonardo, in case you're wondering). It was the first chance to play as the gang in a video game and, at that age, it seemed pretty awesome. Also, the enemies appeared randomly each time, so no level played the same way twice (why doesn't every game do that?).
Why it was infuriating:
The game had some general weaknesses. The fun beat-'em-up platform was interrupted by annoying surface levels, and the ridiculously unequal weapon strengths made playing as anyone other than "I can kill from across the room" Donatello seem like a waste of time. You didn't get to choose, though, you just rotated through the Turtles as they died. All of this might have been overcome by the sheer Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtle-ness of it all, if not for one stage: The Dam.

The Dam level required you to try to beat the clock through a sprawling maze in order to defuse the bombs, which were prepared to unleash the fury of the Hudson River. See that pink seaweed shit? The stuff with an opening barely big enough for a mutated turtle to pass through? It killed you. It was ... electrified somehow. The science in the game wasn't all that accurate.

Setting aside the terrible example this set forth of telling kids the Hudson was safe to look at, let alone swim in, the failure to defuse the bombs resulted in an immediate game over, no matter how many Turtles were still alive. The margin for error was about one pixel wide and half a second long.
Saddest moment:
While it would be easy to pick on The Dam some more, we're going to have to go with the first time you make the mistake of running into one of the foot soldiers' rides while walking on the top level. You learn it doesn't just hurt you, it fucking flattens you.

Next Turtle, please.

The premise:
Mega Man is a world-saving robot bent on destroying evildoers. Also, he consumes their souls so he can absorb their powers.
Why it was worth playing:
Mega Man is also one of the most popular video game characters ever created. It was one of the first games to include the method of "winning" new weapons and abilities as the game progressed. Nearly all of the game-play mechanics that would define the series were found here, in the original game.
Why it was infuriating:
We said "nearly" all of the game play was there. A whole lot of the features you saw in the sequels were put there to make the game easier, because the first one was nothing short of sadistic. Many of the cool upgrades were often borderline useless outside of one specific boss they were designed to be used against. Also, some of the jumping puzzles were downright evil.

And, as is unthinkable now but was common then, you couldn't save. Every time you turned on the machine, you were greeted with the same fucking levels, which made failure a hundred times more infuriating. Every misstep meant you were about to lose a couple more hours out of your life.
Saddest moment:
As aggravating as the game could be to play, there is no more embarrassing moment in a gamer's life than the time he has to put cold hard cash on the desk, point to this game box ...

... and say, "I want that. That is right up my alley."

The premise:
Demons have been accidentally let loose, and it's up to Dana to delve through a series of puzzle rooms to retrieve Solomon's Key in order to banish the demons back from whence they came, allowing the locals to return to their happy lives of magically floating blocks and goofy clothes.
Why it was worth playing:
At its heart, this is basically a puzzle game, where a lot of the challenge was in moving and creating colored blocks. That sounds boring as hell, but there was a real sense of reward for solving the puzzles. This made us feel smart and dulled the sense of inadequacy we felt on a day-to-day basis. There were also lots of secrets to uncover, including multiple endings. It was advanced stuff, for the time.

Why it was infuriating:
The makers of Solomon's Key were clearly Satanists. They seemed determined to make sure the key would remain safely away from Dana's clutches, and to ensure the demons would be left free to pillage and rain destruction upon the quivering, pixilated masses. Dana is far from the world's toughest gaming hero and always seemed moments away from death. Meanwhile, his opponents often enjoyed the luxury of unlimited re-spawning.
The levels (and there were more than 60 of the bastards) were often designed so that it was entirely possible to, through bad luck, get trapped in the level with no ability to progress. You were left to commit Hara-Kiri or wait for the final cruelty to take over when Dana's timer ran out. Just like the real world, kids!
Saddest moment:
Retrieving the key, only to be told you had failed to open up all 15 hidden levels, and as such, hadn't truly defeated the game. We're not sure how many million copies of the game were sold, but we're guessing about five people in the history of the world have seen the "real" ending.

The premise:
There were some sci-fi films made in the '70s and '80s called the Star Wars trilogy (Google it; they had the actor from Firewall in them). This game was based on the second, and best, of those films.
Why it was worth playing:
This came out on two systems at the same time in 1993, the NES and the Super NES. Both had multiple game-play styles and included settings from the films.

The SNES version (right) looked less like shit.
But, both versions were as hard as brass balls.
Why it was infuriating:
When sitting in the theaters for Empire, we can only assume the designers were intently ogling their tub of popcorn and not the screen, as they left the theaters with the impression that Luke Skywalker was incapable of functioning as a member of society, let alone as a universe-saving demi-God. The game presents you with awkward controls and requires you to find force powers. All this means it takes a massive effort just to get Luke to kill that stupid probe droid.

By 1993, gaming had advanced to the point where long-ass levels were the norm, but the whole concept of a "checkpoint" had eluded this game's creators. If you died--even at the boss--you had to drag your sorry ass all the way through entire level again.
In the end, though, the sheer impossibility of the game's design may have prevented substantial property damage by Star Wars fans. If they'd progressed, they'd have reached the part where (in the NES version) Luke rescues Han, kills Boba Fett, and, in an act of Star Wars blasphemy, defeats Darth Vader in a light saber duel. We aren't making that up.
They never brought out a Return of the Jedi game for the NES. Well, we're thinking that's why. The Empire game fucked up the storyline to the point that there was nothing for a Jedi to return from.
Saddest moment:
Discovering that crouching allows Luke to put a little extra into his jumps, and realizing that the once-menacing star pilot has been reduced to nothing better than a platform-hopping, overweight plumber.









What, no `The Amazing Spider Man`, by Paragon! You know, the one from 1990 for Amiga and MSDOS. It was so difficult, that until a few months ago on youtube, NOT A SINGLE PERSON, NOT EVEN THE CREATOR, had finished the game entirely, without cheating.
ReplyIt's not a true game, but a ROM hack- Kaizo Mario World. There are videos on YouTube of people trying to play it. Just complete pure evil.
Replyi never finished a single game as kid and my cousin have beat me all the time in gaming, until ps one came out and games became easy and end bosses to easy.
ReplyI´ve always though the creators screwed up Battletoads. It´s one of the best games I´ve seen, amazing graphics for the NES, so many kinds of fun in one sitting, but with those impossible levels they discouraged many to keep playing
Replywhere's castlevania? you can't correct your jumps in midair on that un' either, and those medusa heads are f*****g annoying
ReplyTMNT is a lot easier than I had thought, but to get practice, you have to go through a lot before getting to the underwater part. In some ways, I was a bit too good at it because I had passed it as a kid.
ReplyI'll say that Ghost and Goblins and its sequels are the hardest; as mentioned, I f*****g hate how upgraded weapons actually hurt your chances of surviving. That's Capcom for you.
try beating lion king for sega genesis
ReplyThe first Terminator on SNES. I couldn't beat the second f*****g level.
ReplyGoing to just say this, in case no one else has yet...
ReplyThere was an effective password system for Punch-Out!!, and you got a password just before taking him on. So you could actually fight him over and over again until you beat him.
But good luck even WITH that password.
Or, for that matter, good luck getting past the second Bald Bull, Super Macho Man, and The Sandman to get there in the first place.
Abe's Oddysey.
Replyyeah infinite lives kind of make it less difficult
Alex the Kid on Sega Master System. I could barely get past the volcano level most times, and when I did I didn't really know what to do. Never came across anyone who finished it.
ReplyTMNT and Mega Man 1? I beat those games as a child. I half-think that these lists are less impossible because they were hard but impossible because a lot of people were young while playing them. That said, Mega Man 1's brick puzzles were annoying as hell.
ReplyThe list is surprisingly missing something like Metroid, though. You couldn't realistically expect people to beat Metroid when they were a kid, unlike every other game on this list.
damn, how did you beat the technodrome level in TMNT? I would get there with 4 turtles and those f*****g bug things would get me every time.
Damn batteltoads, the game was really tough, we went crazy trying to beat it, but we never did, ever played Bloodnet for PC? it's sort of and old RPG of cyber-vampires, f*****g impossible, even wil a walkthrough
ReplyI realize this is an old article, but the entry on the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles game was wrong, which obviously throws every other entry into suspicious light, but that's neither here nor there.
Reply"Also, the enemies appeared randomly each time [...]"
That's flat-out wrong. Enemies appeared in the same places, using the same patterns, each and every time you played. That's more than just wrong--that's laughably wrong. I have to wonder if Ingram is going on some half-completed Let's Play or an old review or something, instead of actually having played the game, himself.
Again, and though it's still neither here nor there, such a basic, fundamental inaccuracy about one game makes one more skeptical about the rest of the entries, though I can only speak with certainty about the old TMNT game.
Honorable Mention: Marble Madness?
ReplyPretty sure I broke a few controllers and pulled the console off the shelf several times over that game. Good 'ol "Newtonian reset."
Anybody else remember repeatedly renting a NES game called Gyromite, and never figuring out how to make the character move? I probably rented that game over 100 times, and never left the starting platform. Turns out I needed something called a ROB (Robotic Operating Buddy) to play the game. That must've turned out nicely for all of the video rental businesses who made hundreds of thousands of dollars off of poor oblivious kids like myself who just wanted to figure out how to move the damn character. I'm sure they made a lot more money off of that concept than they would have if they simply told people that the game required some wierd robotic auto-controller thingy called a R.O.B. (that nobody had ever heard of, because it was merely designed for a whole two Japanese games). And although I entirely agree with most of this list, there will never be a game that peaks my frustration that way that Gyromite did.
ReplyYou technically didn't need R.O.B. The player 2 controller could also move the pistons (or whatever the hell they were, it's been forever since I've played) but that meant you either had to be fairly decent at using two controllers or had a friend who didn't mind essentially being your bitch.
I played a Friday the 13th game on the Commodore 64 a long time ago. It didn't look much like the one featured here, but it still put the player in the role of 'good guy.'
ReplyAt my young age, however, I did not realize this, and I reasoned that because I found an axe and there were people wandering around, I was supposed to kill them. I was always a little confused when the game ended so quickly, but I figured that was the whole game - just running around the place, finding all the people and killing them.
I loved it!
Bill & Ted's Excellent Adventure for NES and E.T. for Atari!
ReplyJames Rolfe, the angry video game nerd, beat contra as an 8 year old. without the konami code. before school. That makes him an official badass.
ReplyHow could you not mention the fact that after defeating the final boss in Ghosts n' Goblins, you have to play the entire game all over again? That's probably more aggravating than any other aspect of the game, even the underwear one!
Reply