8 Simple Questions You Won't Believe Science Can't Answer
The field of science is capable of some amazing things, mostly because it's filled with all the Albert Einsteins and Doogie Howsers the world has produced over the centuries. But it may shock you that some of the most mundane, everyday concepts are as big a mystery to scientists as they are to the average toddler.
Things like ...
#8. Why We Sleep

As far as we know, virtually every creature on earth enjoys a good night's rest as much as people do (though the hours we choose to sleep varies greatly). So obviously sleep must serve a key purpose for all living things, right? Well, it turns out science doesn't have a clue.
Getty
That's why science sits outside your room every night, watching.
What we have is a handful of proposed explanations for sleep that not many scientists can agree on. There's the theory that it's helping the brain clean house after a long day of learning. You see, your brain is constantly generating new pathways thanks to all the stuff that you see and do all day, so sleeping is when all the useless info gets tossed out.
Or maybe, instead of ditching the stuff that's not necessary, the brain might be reinforcing the stuff you do need. Scientists have seen that, when rats were asleep, the same neurons fired as when they had run mazes earlier that day. That means that the rats are essentially reliving their day and "practicing" the maze. This has led Harvard sleep researchers to assert that sleep is crucial for humans to form memories and to learn.
Getty
So really, passing out in the middle of an all-nighter is a valid study tactic.
But there's a problem with both of these theories. Plants and microorganisms, otherwise known as "things without brains," have dormant states that are very similar to sleep, which kind of puts doubt on the whole "sleep is good for the brain" theory. Then there's the fact that scientists have found certain humans who can go without sleep with no ill effects. There's even one dude who claims he hasn't slept a wink in 33 years.
In fact, all of these theories kind of went out the window when researchers discovered a gene mutation that allows people to sleep two to four hours a night without any adverse effects at all. So, is sleep useless, then? Is it just God's way of making us take a break between masturbation sessions? Your guess is as good as science's.
Getty
"We have found a strong, positive correlation between bong hits and passing out on the field behind the gym."
#7. How Many Planets Are in Our Solar System

Since Pluto was surprisingly kicked out of the solar system treehouse, we've known that the membership of the Planets Club is subject to change at science's whim. What you may not have realized is that the current inventory of eight planets and one sun is pretty much just science's best guess for the time being.

And somewhere out there, Pluto sheds a lonely tear.
It sounds bizarre, considering you all saw the same model of the solar system in elementary school. And every time you hear anything about space in the news, it's always badass telescope this, or new photograph of faraway galaxy that. We're mapping the edge of the freaking known universe over here. There's no way anything in our own cosmic backyard is escaping our notice, right?
Faulkes Telescope Project
We even took a picture of a space cloud that looks like a space pig humping a space turtle. The truth is out there, all right. And it's weird.
But despite what Big Space wants you to believe, the vast majority of our solar system is still uncharted and unknown. The area between Mercury and the sun is too bright to see, and the area beyond Uranus is too dark. Scientists are still finding new objects in theasteroid belt by the hundreds of thousands. Oh yeah, and some of astronomers think there might be a second sun. Seriously.
NASA
They've named it Nemesis because it flings comets at us. Nothing NASA says can convince us this isn't Galactus.
You see, not even our best telescope technology can see things that are far behind Pluto, where sunlight doesn't illuminate things all that well and where we're essentially blind. So astronomers have to combine vague clues and guesswork to figure out what's going on out there, kind of like space CSI.
First off, the fact that there's a huge gap in asteroids after a certain distance behind Pluto tells scientists that there's very likely a planet between the size of Earth and Mars that gobbled up all the space rock out there, so yeah, our solar system is probably back up to nine planets again. They're getting really tired of rewriting those middle school textbooks. And speaking of Pluto, astronomers have also discovered an object named Sedna orbiting the sun, and although no one's a hundred percent certain of its size, they're pretty sure it's carrying at least Pluto's heft.

Our next goal as a species should be to fashion these dwarf planets into a pair of Truck Balls for Earth.
But wait, that's not all, folks. Another little anomaly that astronomers have noticed is that comets' orbits aren't exactly going along as predicted. The explanation? There must be another planet out there that's affecting the icy rocks' orbits. And according to their hypothesis, this mother of a planet is huge -- like, "four times the size of Jupiter" huge. Named Tyche, this giant gas ball is way too far away for sunlight to reach it, but still, scientists are pretty confident that evidence gathered from a NASA telescope will prove its existence very soon. Who knows, in a few years, naming all the planets may be as hard as naming all 50 states.
#6. Why Ice Is Slippery

Saying that ice is slippery is like saying that water is wet -- it's something we've known for as long as we can be said to have known anything. Presumably, humans as a species knew ice was slippery before we knew fire was hot, or that it existed. But ask anyone why, and they won't be able to give you any better explanation than one of those cave people would have.
Getty
Our intern Thoog suspects that either evil spirits or flash thawing is the culprit.
We just don't know why it is that you can ski on ice but not on boulders. Although at this point, most of you are probably screaming "It's water, stupid!" -- and that's more or less the answer that scientists have always concluded. Even in some modern textbooks you can still read the popular explanation: Unlike most substances, ice expands when it freezes. So when you walk on it, you're actually compacting it back into slippery old water. Sounds simple, right? Too bad then that it's bullshit. Experiments have shown that your puny body doesn't exert nearly enough pressure on ice to squeeze even a tiny bit of it into liquid.
Getty
Science: "We don't know ... ice fairies, maybe?"
There are some competing theories, though none of them are better than the others. One popular theory is that the surface of ice remains liquid because there's nothing but open air on one side to put pressure on it. And some tests have confirmed that -- although they also confirm that the liquid layer is probably too thin to have any effect on friction.
Another theory that scientists have put forward is that ice is not actually slippery at all. Though this sounds like something that science, exasperated, would proclaim while waving a gun in your face to make you stop asking stupid questions, a guy named Dr. Salmeron thinks that the roughness on the surface of ice is actually so high that, ironically, it becomes slippery when you flash-melt it due to the sheer friction you're applying to it. Of course, in the same breath, Dr. Salmeron admits he may be talking out of his ass.
Salmeron Group
"Science has no hard answers, only questions and tasteful sweaters."
#5. How a Bicycle Works

Bicycles have been around since the early 19th century, and its basic design has actually changed relatively little for almost 200 years. You always had two wheels, a frame to connect them and a handlebar for steering, and you required a person completely devoid of shame to ride on it.
Getty
It turns out skintight short-shorts are an improvement in bicycle fashion.
At the very least, you'd think that the guy who invented the damn thing knew what he was doing, but after more than a century of research, science has been forced to conclude that he was probably some kind of sorcerer. The first bicycles were invented, not through any kind of scientific procedure, but by dumb old trial and error. Even modern bike design schools admit that it's not engineering or computer knowledge that make a good bike designer, but instead "intuition and experience."
So, what happens when you ask scientists exactly what makes a bicycle stable? Or what keeps it going? Or how people ride them? Well, odds are they'll either nervously tell you that they have cookies in the oven and run out on you, or if they're honest, they'll give you a pretty big shrug. In fact, top bike researchers admit that, even though some people have come up with equations on how to ride a bike or how they think bikes work, those equations are pretty much fancy icing on top of a cake of cluelessness. One Cornell researcher even says that absolutely nobody has ever come to an intuitive understanding of what makes a bicycle do its thing.
Getty
Science: "We've narrowed it down to either spoke fairies or wheel fairies."
For ages, scientists assumed that the gyroscopic effect (the force that keeps a spinning top from falling over) was the key for a bike's balance. But nope! In the '70s, a scientist disproved that theory.
So then, scientists thought that the principal factor for a bike's stability was something called the caster effect, or trail (something to do with the front wheel's angle away from the frame). But just this year, top bikeologists from Cornell and other universities formed an angry scientific mob, then torched and pitchforked that theory as well. They did this by building a goofy-looking bike that has no gyroscopic effect and no trail, but manages to stay upright nonetheless.
Sam Rentmeester/FMAX
"Look, Ma! No physics!"
So scientists are essentially back at square one, as things such as steering geometry and the physics of stability are all going back to the drawing board. At least you can be secure in the knowledge that the humiliation you feel when you ride a bike is akin to the humiliation science feels when it's asked how a bike stays up.








I'm certain that bike stability is a combination of many things like our own sense of balance, gyroscopic effect, etc. People can balance on bike when they're not even moving but it always seems easier to balance on a bike going fast than it is to balance on one moving slowly. I'm certain there are others things as well but you can bet that it is not any one, "a-HA!" moment.
ReplyPick up a completely frozen ice cube. It is not slippery. Get it wet. It is now slippery. All you need is a very thin layer of water between you and the frozen stuff and it's slippery. Don't tell me that stepping on the ice does not exert enough pressure to force the tiniest amount of expanded frozen lattice into a compacted liquid state. Have you ever crunched through the snow? Why are your footprints a solid mass of frozen ice? Placing two ice cubes next to each other does not cause them to stick in a clump (like your footprint when you crunch the delicate snowflakes made of ice crystals together into a foot shaped mass). Take super cold ice cubes and touch them together. Nothing, who cares? add a small amount of really cold water and they are fused into a block when the cold cubes cause the cold water to hit freezing temp. That's why your tongue gets stuck to the damn flag pole. It freezes the water in your tongue. It's the same with dry fingers versus wet ones with the same experiment. When you skate on ice, you are skating on a thin layer of water. Kind of the reverse of why a 3,000 lbs. car can hydroplane or how a B-52 (which closes in on half a million pounds or more when fully fueled and fully armed) can fly.
ReplyWhy is ice slippery? its called lack of friction. Mystery solved.
ReplyBut why is it always so smooth?
Graviga! ... that's all I could think of while reading the first one. Damn you!
ReplyGOTTA CATCH 'EM ALL!!!
Replyabout the gravity, there may be one more particle to aid gravity called the Higgs Boson. Its a theoretical particle, though, but its thought to be the particle of mass
ReplyThe Higgs boson is incredibly massive and when it decays. It gives msssto all other particles.
This is an interesting and thought-provoking article, but ultimately I don't think its conceit holds up. There are too many ways you have to qualify the questions to make them unanswerable. For example, in #5, you list two perfectly valid reasons why mammals would need sleep, and then say that they can't be valid because they don't apply to plants. Why is there a requirement in the question that the reasons for sleep would be the same, not only across species, but across kingdoms?
ReplyOf course, the other problem is framing some of these issues as "why" questions at all. It's a fallacy you have to catch yourself in when examining evolutionary biology -- to train yourself out of thinking that everything has a reason or a purpose. Lots of things turn up in our biological makeup not for any specific purpose, but as a side effect of other, useful adaptations (see: why do men have nipples?) or simply because they were once useful and no longer are (see: vestigial muscles to wiggle the ears in humans) or both at once. There doesn't always have to be a 'why.' It is a quirk of the human psyche that demands a reason for everything; nature itself doesn't.
I am glad to check the article. I am a professional woman. I am just
Replydivorced. I lo ve younger men. I am dat ing a man who is 25 year old.
he's caring, kind, has a real job that earns him good money and he is
very attractive. I think younger men like cougars because they have no
agenda, don't usually want to get married and are usually very
independent and don't need a man to take care of them.I meet the younger
men on this place COUGARCHATS,C0M.
Even though it may end with him sticking you in a nursing home...
it's still a better love story than Twilight.
"the area beyond Uranus is too dark"
Replyhehehehheheheheheh
Cougarchats,C0M is a popular cougar dating site that makes your online dating journey fun and exciting. The cougars and young men at Cougarchats,C0M are seeking for friendship, dates, romance and even marriage
Replywhy we sleep? because were tired of course!
Replyscience h christ why do you keep making fun of bikes!!!!
ReplyIn hell, at least one smart person is being forced to explain gravity to creationists for eternity.
ReplyWhat's a gravity?
how the hell can science not understand riding a bike? if a child or a tiny monkey can figure it out surely a scientist....oh, wait, no... scientists dont tend to go outside.. never mind.
Replyits not how to USE it, but how it WORKS... hell you know how to write on a pc but do you know how the computer interprents the information?
Has Science figured out what makes the heart beat for decades on end?
ReplyLife. Though they can't really explain what the difference between "living thing" and "electrically charged dead thing" is though there is obviously a difference as sending the same amount of electrical energy as a living body produces continuously through a dead animal or human doesn't make them alive again.
Good point. Science still has no idea what 'life' really is.
I'm pretty sure the concepts of centrifugal and centripetal forces can explain riding a bike.
Reply Hide All See All 4 Repliesapparently those silly scientists from Cornell and other major universities should have just called you instead of wasting their time with useless experiments and equations...
^LOL
While also not a professional bike-ologist, I would say this has to do with inertia/momentum. A bike is only stable above a certain speed. This is also true of a coin rolling on its edge. When either slows down beyond a certain threshold it tends to tip over. Perhaps what they can't explain is why that makes them more stable... but I'm kind of skeptical myself...
No such thing as Centrifugal force. Just thought I'd get that out the way.
Secondly, centrifuges involve an object rotating around a central point with forces causing it to keep rotating. For example, gravity and momentum keeping the Moon going around the Earth. Nothing to do with how a bike works.
maybe its something bout growing old and consumption of energy. limited supply of food, continuous work, no energy to the brain/body.
Replybout the bike...maybe its just the symmetry. of the bike, our body, plus the direction of gravity. which is line to us also.
and the ice...it easily melts to a little rise in temperature... solid plus liquid on top of it means something slippery ryt?... ^_^
thats also what i thought... i guess there must be more to it... regarding the ice.
They point out that a bike was built without that symmetry to show that that isn't it, and that definitely couldn't be why a bike doesn't fall over the second you try to turn using handlebars since that throws the entire system out of alignment, along with changing the momentum.
"... and the area beyond Uranus is too dark"
Replyhehehehhehehehe
Re: #3. And, yet, somehow Noah managed to get one of each species on his ark. And food for them. Amazing. Some might say unbelievable.;)
ReplyAnd yet, the Torah lists the criteria for which animals are not Kosher, which are, and then lists the specific exceptions (those that look Kosher but are not) and says, this is it, the exhaustive list of exceptions ever, and no new exception has ever been discovered despite all the species that are.
Yup, some might say unbelievable indeed. (I know someone who started losing his faith just from thinking about that story too hard after he started learning a few basic facts of biology.)
I thought gravity was caused by planets being so large that they bend the fabric of space causing objects to pulled towards them.
Reply Hide All See All 5 RepliesIt's possible but yet to be proven.
Ive got a suggestion...
that idea doesnt explain why it works that way... why does it do that?
why is it that the larger mass an object has the more round it is and the bigger pull it has? sure putting it in that case shows how it works but doesnt tell why it happens?
on the other hand you can keep asking why to EVERY DAMN QUESTION
Problem with that one is that it uses the mass of planets as an explaination, mass being the size (ok volume to be technical) and weight of an object...but you can't use weight as a factor to explain gravity as it is a function of gravity.
This "stuff", that only exists because of this "other stuff", is what causes the "other stuff". It's like saying fire is the only possible explanation for heat, because fire is hot, even though some form of heat is needed to start the fire.
It does, but that is the theory of general relativity. It simply doesn't work in unison with quantum physics. It is right to a very high degree (basically everything you would use), just like Newton's, but it doesn't work as a unified theory. String theory and M theory have some interesting explanations, but they haven't been proven yet, and still need a lot of work.
@Greenknightfury
Your statement may be a bit confusing, mass is independent of weight (mass contributes to weight along with gravity but weight does not contribute to mass; weight is a subjective perception of mass influenced by gravity and other forces). For example the mass of an atom can be measured by the number of protons, neutrons and electrons it has, and this would be constant, even if you measured it once on earth and then again in near zero G (measured weight would be different however).