5 Classic Movies That Almost Had Terrible Endings
WARNING: THIS WHOLE ARTICLE IS A SPOILER.
In a recent article about deleted scenes that would have ruined the film, we mentioned that the original ending to Clerks featured Dante getting shot to death, and the original ending of Terminator 2 featured a paradox that would have rendered the entire series impossible.
But those are hardly the only films that escaped having endings so bizarre that it's kind of amazing that they came so close to winding up in the final cut.
#5. Army of Darkness Left Ash Stranded in Time
The Evil Dead trilogy is kind of in the same category as The Big Lebowski -- its cultural impact goes way beyond what you'd expect from the modest box office. Just ask yourself -- are you more likely to hear a college kid quoting a catchphase from one of those movies, or, say, Avatar?

Who still hasn't heard the "boomstick" line?
In the third and final film, Army of Darkness, Ash (Bruce Campbell) has accidentally wound up in medieval times and just wants to get back to the present. Unsurprisingly, he winds up in a massive battle with the undead.
The Ending We Got:
After retrieving the Necronomicon, Ash uses a spell to finally go back to his own time, where he reclaims his job as a cashier at a department store. The film ends with one final attack by a possessed woman that involves a trampoline, a shotgun and a few last quips. It's a perfect, goofy, B-movie ending to the trilogy.

And just like that, Bruce Campbell earned cultural immortality.
What Did We Almost Get Instead?
In the original ending (and the one that persists as the official ending in versions of the film seen outside the U.S.), instead of using the Necronomicon, Ash is given a magic potion that will allow him to sleep for a century for every drop he drinks. Ash manages to mess up the count and drinks one drop too many.
This means, instead of waking up back home, he finds himself alone, in the ruins of some kind of apocalypse. He screams in anguish and ... then the movie ends:
The thing is, it's an appropriate ending if, say, you only watch the first film in the trilogy and then skip right to that ending. After all, the series started out as much more of a horror franchise, but stopped taking itself seriously right around the time Ash's hand got possessed and he was forced to replace it with a chainsaw. From then on, it became the goofy festival of blood, slapstick and one-liners that made Bruce Campbell a cult hero.
Oh, it still makes perfect sense to have him fuck up the potion, or to even make it so that he wakes up in a future full of zombies that need a good chainsawing. Instead it ends like some kind of Shakespearean tragedy, which is, uh, not exactly what we came to expect from the series.

There's not even a chainsaw-hand in sight.
#4. 28 Days Later, In Which Zombies Are Fairly Easily Cured
Via Mymovies.ge
After what must have been one of the worst bicycle accidents in history, Cillian Murphy's character, Jim, wakes up from a month-long coma, only to find London in ruins and bands of zomb- er, infected humans roving around and murdering survivors.
Fortunately, a group of survivors rescue Jim and tell him about the incredibly infectious disease spreading across the country. Coming in contact with even a drop of blood from someone infected with the virus they call "Rage" will turn a human into a zombie in around 30 seconds flat. It's all very scary.

The Ending We Got:
What made this take on the zombie genre special was that there was real effort to make it somewhat realistic, which served to actually make it scarier. The "zombies" aren't magically resurrected dead, but simply the result of a laboratory-engineered infection that makes them go nuts. It lends an air of plausibility to the whole thing that sets it apart from a genre that for decades had leaned on camp and goofy social commentary.
Via Soundonsight.org
Which was fine the first hundred times we saw it in a movie.
The ending plays to that -- the survivors don't find a miraculous cure for the infection and they don't "win" the war against the infected. The happy ending comes when they realize that the infection wasn't as widespread as they thought (England had been isolated from the rest of the world when the infection was discovered), and so it becomes a matter of waiting out the infected, who will starve and get weaker over time.

Basically, the same way we handle the flu.
As for Jim, he recovers from a gunshot wound, and it's implied that with time England will recover and everyone will retire to have a nice cup of afternoon tea and spotted dick.
What Did We Almost Get Instead?
There are actually several alternate endings out there, including the bleak version in which Selena and Hannah abandon a doomed Jim and walk out of the hospital, presumably to die themselves. There is no note of hope or anything of the sort, we just fade to black.

"Boy, this apocalypse sure turned out depressing."
But then we have what the filmmakers call the "Radical Alternative Ending."
In the middle of the film, one of the survivors, Frank, is infected with Rage, leaving him only a few moments of lucidity to say goodbye to his teenage daughter, Hannah, before the other survivors are forced to kill him. The scene is poignant and demonstrates again just how damning infection really is -- you only have seconds before you're gone. But in the Radical Alternative Ending, the survivors were going to keep Frank alive and in captivity. Kind of like a pet. Jim then decides to sacrifice himself by donating his (fortunately) matching blood to Frank so that his daughter could have her father back.
Photos.com
"I'm afraid your HMO considers this 'elective surgery'."
Stew on that for a second: The entire film is spent establishing that coming into contact with a single drop of blood from an infected person or animal means you have seconds before your mind is completely gone and you become an angry, red-eyed zombie. The disease completely wiped out all English civilization as a result. And the original ending was them fixing somebody with a simple blood transfusion? Nobody thought of that in the opening days of the outbreak?

Nah, that would have been way too much trouble.
It was director Danny Boyle who put a stop to that ending. As he put it in the DVD commentary, the rag-tag group of survivors would have to "Drain [Frank] of blood and scrub his veins with bleach" to save him. Well, hell, we would have watched that.
#3. The Abyss Was Originally More Independence Day
Via Themoviedb.org
The Abyss is the story of a group of Navy SEALs and offshore oil drillers attempting to recover a sunken nuclear submarine from the bottom of the ocean and keep it from detonating. That could have been a pretty awesome film on its own, but then aliens showed up.
This triggers a battle of wills between the military and the blue collar types as to how to treat the aliens -- as a national security threat, or as our new, glowing friends?

Nah, just kind of poke them in the forehead.
The Ending We Got:
The military guys wind up setting a timer on a nuclear warhead with the intention of killing the aliens. It's up to Ed Harris's character, Bud, to defuse it. He sacrifices himself, diving so far down that he won't have enough oxygen to make it back to base.
But, while he waits to die, the aliens show up and rescue him, moved by his sacrifice. The friendly, peace-loving aliens take him to their own aquatic spaceship to show him they intercepted his final private message to his wife, and to demonstrate their complete lack of personal boundaries. Then they take him, the crew and the entire damn rig to the surface on the hull of their ship. Roll credits.

BOING!
What Did We Almost Get Instead?
In an alternate version, the aliens aren't nearly as nice. They still bring Bud to their ship, but this time they do it for passive aggressive reasons -- to tell him they're going to wipe out human civilization.
They show him how much humanity sucks through news clips of the various atrocities committed by man throughout history, and boast about how they can pick up TV reception at the bottom of the ocean. Then they show him how they intend to wipe out humanity with super-tsunamis. The massive waves then actually start forming along every coastal city of the world, in a scene that had to have been the most expensive in the film:
This ending is confusing for a lot of reasons. Were the aliens down there watching our news for years, just seething? Why did they wait to end the world until they finally had someone to drag onto their ship and chastise? That seems awfully petty for an advanced life form. Even more bizarre, this ending assumed they were swayed to save humanity because of one love letter. Surely in all that news they were watching they would have caught at least one human interest story.
Most egregious, however, is the inherent hypocrisy of the message they later send through Bud. If it "bothers them to see us hurting each other," the best solution is probably not exterminating the species. The theatrical film never depicts the aliens as anything but curious, benevolent and eventually outright helpful, but no matter how you slice it, this alternative ending just makes them into fluorescent undersea dicks. Which kind of means the crazy Navy SEAL was right to try to nuke them.

The only way to fight genocide is with more genocide.



Via 




The Abyss extended ending was actually very much better. It did not mean that the aliens were going to kill everyone. Actually, they probably hadn't planned on surfacing at that time, except that they were discovered by this crew and moved by both the threat of attack AND the actions taken to save them. They probably figured once they had been found, they didn't have much more time to spend hiding.
ReplyThey wanted to send a message to humans around the world that they could all be in the same boat, and actually are. Their message to Ed Harris (and more specifically, the audience watching "The Abyss") was that despite all of the evil the human race has been responsible for, it is also capable of great positivity such as love, for which it should not only be saved, but should strive to embrace. They were "threatening" the audience watching this movie as much as the film's characters, challenging us to ask ourselves whether we really did deserve to live if only to risk nuclear war. And then they remind us of our redeeming virtue, the one opposite to everything shown to Ed Harris before.
Surely if they had the ability they seemed to, they saw love movies and "human interest" stories, but the message they saw him write to his wife as he was dying was the most emotionally impactful and tangible, both for him and the audience watching the movie.
Um, yeah, the extended Abyss ending was much better. It gave purpose to the entire film.
ReplyWasn't the Titanic alternate ending mentioned in another article?
ReplyYou know, the Army of Darkness ending wasn't all THAT terrible. It could have been the start of an epic sequel in the future against whatever caused the apocalypse. But yeah, it was kind of out of place in a trilogy that had evolved into an over-the-top badass one-liner fest, though I don't think it would have quite ruined the movie. But I guess that's why it's lowest on the list.
ReplyOh my god, that Titanic ending was just PAINFULLY corny. Cameron, what's with you and promoting the cheesiest of Hollywood morals in the face of tangible logic? "Only life is priceless, and making each day count."? You prevented someone from vastly improving his life and made around 1000 days of it pointless. The fact that you can do a profound-sounding monologue on it does not make your totally dickheadery justified.
ReplyOMG I didn't know Titanic has this alternate ending. But I have to agree with you that it's crappy. And oh, thumbs up on "Why are you all looking at me like th- wait, HELP!"
ReplyI must say I'm very surprised by what I read in both the article and the comments below about the alternate ending for "The Abyss". Granted, the original is great but the alternate ending still would've been very cool. I understand that the aliens had no business killing everyone just because we've been doing a bit of killing each other, but in no way does that mean that we should have nuked the aliens. Remember how they decided not to bring tidal waves crashing down across the globe? Do you think they would have stopped if, before they even started raising tidal waves, we had tried to nuke them? I use the word try because, if you've seen alien movies where we try to nuke the invaders, we almost always find it ineffective. Even if we had nuked them we don't know that those are the only aliens. Others may have brought down an even greater pain and suffering than quick, humane tidal bludgeonings. The whole reason the crew thought the seals were crazy to try and nuke them straight off is because we didn't know s**t about them. Who's to say they couldn't have surmounted even what the alternate ending shows?
ReplyOn top of that, even if it is a Veidt-esque plan to stop people from being so s****y, at least they had the power and vision to actually do SOMETHING about people being so shitty. Again, I'll ask you to keep in mind that they did not bring the waves crashing down, because we don't know that they had intended to, and then only changed their minds once they intercepted Ed Harris's message to his wife. I think this ending implies that they were waiting for a chance to directly show what they were capable of and then retract of their own volition so that mankind would chill the f**k out. No one would ever know what caused the tidal waves if Ed Harris, or someone else, was not their to see them doing it. Also they do not directly say that they stop because of one message. Of coarse if they saw all our television they would know that we did other s**t aside from killing and hurting one another but to show that message of love was a fantastic, non-verbal way to show that while they hated our violence, they loved our love. I argue that they did not change their minds at the last second because of one message, or even change their minds at all. It's all in the line top-side where the guy on the ship tells the navy officer "It looks like you're out of work". He's saying "so long military. Hello gettin along, finally".
And even all of this is under another assumption that no one here has mentioned. How do we know these are aliens? They live deep in the ocean (which if you're wondering is f*****g huge) and have apparently been there for a long time. How long? Maybe before humanity. Maybe they're pissed because it's their house we've been nuking and killing in. Again all that this ending would be saying then is that they expect us to stop the bullshit.
I hate to complain at length like some fan-boy but really are we all so detached from humanity and the idea of life that we say "Who the f**k are these aliens? Let's nuke 'em, quick!"
Am I the only one that thinks the Brazil ending doesn't change the movie THAT much? Unless something else was omitted, by that point we have seen an impossible escape, Tuttle banishing, the surreal funeral scene and Sam's mother who looks younger than him.
ReplyIt would basically work in the same way as Minority Report's ending: people would thrash it, but after thinking about it, would notice what was really going on.
With that said, I love the original ending.
I'll be honest I've not yet seen this movie but if what I read here is what happens in the two different endings then yes. Absolutely it changes the movie THAT much. It entirely changes the message about this proposed future. The alternate ending would now say "If life is ever completely controlled by a governing, bureaucratic force it will take some hardship and strife to set things straight" rather than saying "Don't ever let a governing, bureaucratic force take control because there will be precisely s**t you can do about it aside from dreaming for a better life". Both are legitimate messages from a film but which one did they actually want to get across.
Like I said though, I've not seen Brazil so maybe I'm misinterpreting from what I've read in this article.
Yes, you are the only one. The theatrical cut is almost universally despised, because it goes against the entire theme of the movie, a miserable dystopia were a man going insane is actually a better alternative to continued existence in it. The fact that it's just a hallucination gives the movie a very dark but ultimately happy ending.
The theatrical cut just made it a meaningless happy ending, which hurt even more on a very meaning-heavy movie. It was an impossible escape, and that was the point, to show that escape was impossible and insanity that freed you from the oppressiveness of reality was the only way out.
I'm glad I wasn't the only one who was "WTF"ing over The Abyss' alternate ending.
ReplyWhat was the message there? Genocidal hypocrisy? We should immediately explode the sh*t out of any aliens we meet before they have a chance to pompously declare us unfit to live and drown us all?
I guess one could make the argument that they were trying to clumsily stop us from hurting each other by threatening us, or something...
But it comes off as heavy-handed, arrogant, and just plain obnoxiously confusing.
"Science Hat!" for best Cracked caption ever.
Replyif i was bill paxtons character i would have had her subdued and taken the heart of the oceean no matter what.
Replythere is a such thing as meritime law and at sea the captain is the boss what he says goes
You would have wrestled an old lady to the ground and stopped her from leaving a lasting tribute to her dead lover and the hundreds of other people who died in one of the most horrifying disasters in history?
....Yes, I would have too. If you want to leave a tribute, by all means. Write a letter, drop something of more sentimental value to you. I don't see why your tribute has to come in the form of a piece of jewelry that would make everyone on board set for life.
"Material possessions are pointless" and all that happy horseshit is fine as far as it goes, but you have to let reality have its way - you kind of need money for a lot of things. Rent, food, clothing, electricity, mortgage, car payments, you know, that kind of stuff.
Not to mention pointless, as the article says, all of 30 minutes later they'd have it back.
I never saw it, so I don't know - was anyone on board the treasure hunting ship married? Had children? People they were hoping would find what they were looking for these past 3? years, to support their families?
Sorry, I can't see dropping it as anything other than a senile dick move.
Ash was wielding a WInchester lever action rifle in the final battle scene, not a shotgun. And that alternate Titanic ending sucks balls.
ReplyAnybody who hated the alternate ending of Army of Darkness didn't see the sequel potential.
ReplyIt could have been a bloodier, more badass Back to the Future trilogy (plus that first movie, I guess).
I actually liked the alternate ending better than the released one, but this article made me hate the squandered potential in NOT having it filled with zombies for Ash to blast through...
Hell, the second half of AOD disappointed me by itself. I was expecting the stylish Deadite-blastin' action to keep escalating as it did in the first half.
Dante was supposed to die at the end of Clerks.
ReplyYeah, I think I read that somewhere. Oh I know, it was the intro to this article.
Ed Harris as a hero? Those were the good old days...
ReplyI cannot see Bill Paxton's face without thinking of Conan and Robert Brockway.
Reply"The only way to fight genocide is with more genocide"
ReplyThat's sounds exactly like Pain's (from Naruto) plan. Only his was better, cause he wasn't going to kill ALL of the human race, just about 70% or so.
P.S. 28 Days Later sounds like it had a weirdly positive ending for a zombie movie.
wap
It's a recurring villain plan in several anime and movies, the villain thinking in their warped views that they are doing good.
I didn't see any resemblance with Cillian Murphy when he played Jim, I had to actually look it up on IMDB (Since some actors share the same names) and I nearly slammed my head against the wall because I was like "OH MY GOD!". Dude, if anyone saw Batman Begins and The Dark Knight you'd never think Murphy was ever in 28 Weeks Later.
Reply Hide All See All 4 RepliesSeriously, do a comparison, his current look and his appearance as Jim, IT'S MADNESS!
Also, I LOVE Bruce Campbell, he's the only reason I'm rather proud to be born in TN since he was stuck filming here for ED, actually the bridge and cabin they used in the movie is still there, though I think there's some construction plans floating about, I'm not sure, but I think BC would be surprised himself that the dilapidated bridge he and the cast had to cross is STILL standing and still falling apart.
It's cute how you think anyone cares.
Don't mind halfabee. Thanks for sharing, and I for one am glad to know the cabin is still there.
Are the trees still there?
(My ex loved the crap out of that series.)
He needs to do more movies without the American accent. His voice is soooo much deeper without it. You'd never guess it was the same person talking!!! Unless he's playing Kitty in Breakfast on Pluto...that one doesn't count lol
I live in the UK and my DVD copy of Army of Darkness only had that crap ending on it, such a disapointment :(
ReplyThat's my favourite ending - yes I'm lame enough to have seen them all, but it's supposed to end badly just as Ash is to spend the entire trilogy getting his ass kicked
It's the best ending instead of that p***y alternate ending they changed to. UGH! I would think it would be more appreciated these days when A Game of Thrones is a popular series. I mean, come on, EVERYONE dies no matter how attached to the character you get. You would think people would freak out that Catelyn and Rob got brutally murdered while one is turned into a mute zombie and the other has his dire wolf's head sown onto his body and displayed for everyone to see! Now that's a fucked up end. Well, their end at least. Not the end of the series.
Am I the only person who thinks that Bing is irredeemably retarded? Why would you have a search for "Ash Meme"? Not only is it an incredibly lame joke that I was previously more than happy to have not known about, how does it have even the slightest connection to this article?
Reply