7 Pieces of Good News Nobody Is Reporting

It seems like you can't turn on the TV without getting exposed to teenage girls with babies on their hips living their everyday lives for our entertainment and scathing critiques. If you believe Teen Mom, 16 and Pregnant or Teen Trailer Trash and the Sticky Faced Babies Who Live With Them, juvenile moms have taken the nation by storm. The lucky ones like Bristol and Whale Rider girl seem to be making out all right. The rest are usually all right, too, on account of the fact that having a baby before you hit 20 isn't exactly bone cancer.
Photos.com
A young mother (blue bathing suit) gives birth to a healthy girl.
The Good News
Just like traffic fatalities and Amelia Earhart sightings, teen motherhood is at the lowest it's been in over 70 years.
So, the last time the number of knocked up adolescents was this low, Joseph Stalin was Time magazine's Man of the Year and Bugs Bunny had finally found his legs. In other words, if you're a teen today, you just earned some major bragging rights over your great-great grandmother (who was probably dishing it out back in the day).
Getty
You don't show some shoulder without whipping out some ass.
So to what do we owe this good fortune? Abstinence education? All those rainbow parties Oprah said everyone kept having but no one invited us to? Literally no one knows. Some experts credit the stress of living in a recession -- as if teens are suddenly hyperaware of how hard it sucks to try to make a living with a baby. In California, they're thanking the reality shows themselves, because apparently kids had NO IDEA how hard motherhood sucked until they saw it on television.
Personally, we think generations raised on No Glove No Love finally got it through their thick skulls (and private parts) that unprotected sex has consequences.
Photos.com
Horrifying, toothless consequences.

For those of us raised on never-ending loops of Grumpy Old Men, Cocoon, Grumpy Old Men 2 and Bob Hope U.S.O. specials, we know that old people are the worst. They're mean, they're snippy and in the end you just end up feeling sorry for them. Their bodies are breaking down, their friends are dropping like flies and their skin looks like a coat made of Shar-Pei. What on earth is there in this scenario to be not-depressed about?
Photos.com
Just look at it. LOOK AT IT!
The Good News
What is there to be happy about? Lots, apparently.
At least according to a nationwide survey involving over 340,000 people between the ages of 18 and 85. Participants were asked a range of questions covering everything from their sex lives to health and finance, but the interesting part came when asked six simple yes-or-no questions: "Did you experience the following feelings during a large part of the day yesterday: enjoyment, happiness, stress, worry, anger, sadness?"
Photos.com
"We experienced all of that just 10 minutes ago during sex!"
Notice the survey is only covering your emotional state yesterday, not last year, not as a child or during the college years, because they didn't want respondents to look back with gin-colored glasses. Now, think about the answer for yourself. What if you answer might depend as much on your age as it does on your circumstances? Each emotion, it turned out, had its own trend. And every single trend pointed toward happier 85-year-olds than 50-year-olds. For example:
- Enjoyment and Happiness: Decreased every year until about age 50, then rose steadily until age 75.
- Stress: Declined every year from age 22 and reached its absolute lowest at age 85.
- Worry: Held steady between 18 and 50, then sharply dropped off.
- Anger: Decreases every year from 18 on.
- Sadness: Peaked at 50, hit its low point at 73.

But the sexiness never ends.
Either the Greatest Generation should be redubbed the Fakest Generation (of Liars), or life seems to get better and better for everyone.

The fact that we can even have a discussion about the quality of life for the elderly is in itself a triumph of spectacular proportions. Because through most of human history, making it to age 40 without dying of the runs was once a feat reserved for witches and Bible heroes.
Via Gordanandthewhale.com
"And all the days of Methuselah numbered nine hundred and sixty-nine years, with nary a case of the poops."
The fact that people with access to medicine, food and a lot more food are living longer is about as surprising as a wheezing jack-in-the-box. But that's not the good news. The good news is that, on average, everyone is better off than they were 200 years ago. And here's what's crazy: All those things that we've come to see as the villains of the last century -- globalization, corporate farming, consumerism, the rise of multinational corporations, the shift of tech jobs and the decline of American manufacturing jobs -- have been exactly what has made life better for those of us alive today.
The Good News
The numbers don't lie, according to statistician Hans Rosling. In 1810, for example, the average lifespan was below 40 in every country on the planet, and if you lived in Asia or Africa you were lucky to make it to 25. The wealth gap was a little wider, but not by much. It's like everyone was pretty much in the same boat, and that boat was called the S.S. Suck.

"You won't be needing your bags."
Then the Industrial Revolution happened and the Western nations surged ahead, in both life expectancy and income, while most of Africa, the Middle East and Asia were stuck in the suck boat. By 1915, the poorest countries in the world were exactly where they were a hundred years before, and the inhabitants of the richest countries were making thousands of dollars a year and squeaking into their mid-'50s. Thirty years later, the gap between the rich and healthy and the poor and sick was so wide you could launch a planet through it.
For what happens next, watch this:
Over the last 60 years, something extraordinary happened. Advances in agricultural output, medicine and emerging economies all converged to give the poorest countries in the world a huge boost. So, by the time we get to the last year that data was available, 2009, the gap was still pretty wide, but most countries were living in the middle, not the on the poor end. And people on the poor end (sub-Saharan Africa) were living significantly longer than they were 100 years ago, despite battling the AIDS epidemic, civil wars, drought and unannounced visits from Bono.
Getty
"RELEASE THE ACID!"
Obviously, we're not suggesting that life in the Democratic Republic of the Congo is super duper right now. Or, maybe it is, who are we to judge? What we are saying is that the trend, according to Rosling, is upward and onward, and there's no reason to think that we can't all be fabulously rich and pathetically ancient some day.
Follow Kristi on Twitter.
For more reasons to punch media personalities in the face, check out 6 Subtle Ways The News Media Disguises Bullshit As Fact and 5 Things The Media Loves Pretending Are News.
And stop by LinkSTORM to see two monkeys doing it.
And don't forget to follow us on Facebook and Twitter to get sexy, sexy jokes sent straight to your news feed.
Do you have an idea in mind that would make a great article? Then sign up for our writers workshop! Do you possess expert skills in image creation and manipulation? Mediocre? Even rudimentary? Are you frightened by MS Paint and simply have a funny idea? You can create an infograpic and you could be on the front page of Cracked.com tomorrow!








Thanks for the upbeat article! Very eye-opening. :)
ReplyCool. The Argentinians harbor Nazis with a smile in their faces and the Brazilians are the ones who get the fame as Nazi harbors because their dictator at the time hid some of them there. Nevermind that Brazilians joined the allies and fought in the Italian front (and only because the allies didn't want Brazilians in the German front for lack of training) and that the Brazilian pilots were some of the most effective in that front. Nope. Brazilians are dirty Nazi sympathizers. They didn't care at all for their trade ships being plunged by German subs. It's just their way to say hello!
Reply*rant off*
...What does that have to do with the article?
It's from a movie. The joke was referring to a movie. Calm down. We all know Brazil was an ally nation who contributed plenty to the war against germany.
Okay, then why is the Antarctic Ice Shelf shrinking?
ReplyI can't understand the relevance of your question, unless you have somehow mistaken the hole in the ozone layer caused by ozone depleting chemicals like CFCs and global warming caused by carbon dioxide.
That flag face with flag eyes is scarred into my brain. There is something very disturbing about that image.
ReplyPerhaps the cheerful British part?
Damn limey brits, happier than me. Let's have another revolution so they'll shut the hell up. Bastards.
Nothing angers a Cracked reader like giving them reasons to be cheerful
ReplyWell, reading the comments here, no wonder nobody is reporting these news items. Good news never sells media and we all like to read about other people having problems.
ReplyBuh, can you even imagine only expecting to live to 30 or so. But that's from today's perspective, back then, 40 would have the same connotations as 80 now. In 100 years, when people habitually live to 120, they'll be like, oh my god, you only lived til 75? Bizarre.
Replywe cant all be rich, unless of course we have robots run everything and the humans become a leech. cheap labor will become robot slave labor paid for in electricity. then we can all truly be rich and not have to do dick.
Reply"Traffic Fatalities Are Insanely Low Now"
ReplyHere in Indonesia, not so much...
My wifey would say the same thing about China...
"The Antarctic Ozone Hole Is Shrinking" that is... Until another small volcano erupts, spews its gaseous contents into the atmosphere, and sets back the "Healing of the Hole in the Ozone Layer" by 3 years...
ReplyWell, this made me feel good.
ReplyI would argue that the "teen pregnancy at its lowest in 70 years" statistic is a bit misleading. Think about it; prior to the 1940s, it was common for people to get married much, much younger (think 16 or so). It was completely normal for a 17 year old to have a kid, and possibly 2 or 3 before they turned 20.
ReplyThere's a big difference between your 17 year old married great-grandmother having a kid and the local junior in high school having one.
Blanche Devereaux fast? Really?
ReplyWomen should make sandwiches and babies, no jokes nor articles...
Reply Hide All See All 5 Repliesoh shut the f**k up
OH MAN THE ORIGINALITY IT BURNS MY f*****g EYES
Not true. I like Christina's stuff. But you might be right in this case. #2 was a huge steaming load. And it seems like we have another person who assumes that if the average age of death is 40, it means very few people live past that. Infant mortality tends to skew the numbers. Look through some old graveyards someday, you'll find that if somebody made it into their teens, they had a better-than-even chance of making it to sixty or seventy, even back to the 17th century.
luger7 should play russian roulette with a Luger... so at least he can say he did something funny...
Funny guy. Go suck a nut.
Wtf. Snuggies don't cover your butt. Do your research.
ReplyNah man, you can wrap those things around you (depending on how wide you are)!
Rosling's idea isn't new. Neither is the Malthusian growth model.
ReplyWho cares about that, the visuals make my brain happy. Learning in school would have been so much easier if more of it was presented like that rather than dry statistics in a book.
Hahaha, puddin-head from Fox News is hilarious and original! All you needed for comedy stardom was a Glenn Beck joke as well!
Reply Hide All See All 5 RepliesBut seriously folks, why the f**k are females allowed to attempt to write comedy articles on this site?? Every single one has been an abject failure.
All jokes aimed at Fox News are automatically hilarious.
FoxNews presenting more than one viewpoint is confusing to those who are more comfortable being spoon-fed opinion-as-fact by stuffier outlets, such as state-run PBS.
THANK YOU! I was thinking the exact same thing.
I think Fox News is funnier than Colbert... They... they aren't serious, are they?
1- Fox News sucks because they pretend to be unbiased when they're not. ...as does almost every major media source,
2- ...What the hell does the gender of the author have to do with anything? If you feel that the articles you have read (by authors who happen to be female) suck: fine, whatever. But just because they are women does not make their articles "abject failures" (in your opinion, obviously). Ergo not "being allowed to write comedy articles" based on their gender is just a silly conclusion. How about you ask Cracked to get better writers, if you feel they aren't doing so hot. Don't be the dumbass that bases your opinion of their writing off of their gender.
I am all for wisecracking, smartass stories, BUT, this was a nice change. puddin' head.
Replyawesome article. The only thing that made me smile more are all the idiot comments on here.
Replyawesome article. The only thing that makes me happier is reading the dumba** comments on here. They make me laugh.
ReplyThe comments are often the funniest part...