6 Classic Movies You Didn't Know Were Remakes
As we recently pointed out, a lack of creativity in the entertainment world is nothing new -- people have been doing adaptations, reboots and remakes since the first stories were told. What you may not have realized, however, is that some of the great landmark motion pictures were themselves just remakes of originals that nobody remembers.

We're guessing there are zero-point-zero people reading this who don't know about the multiple award winning classic children's tale of a lion, tin man, flying monkeys and witchslaughter with young Judy Garland in her star-making performance as Dorothy. But a remake? The thing was made in freaking 1939. Were there even movies before that?
Getty
We mean besides pornos.
The Original:
Yep. And a bunch of them were The Wizard of Oz remakes.
All of them are based on the children's book The Wonderful Wizard of Oz by L. Frank Baum, published in 1900. And by "all of them" we mean there were at least 10 freaking movie versions before the quintessential 1939 film. Perhaps none captured the roiling sexual subtext NOT EVEN REMOTELY found in the book better than the major 1925 silent adaptation by Baum's son Frank Joslyn Baum.
Hold on to your hats, because things are about to get freaky.

Some might even say "nightmarish."
The 1925 version of The Wizard of Oz opens with Dorothy openly flirting with her uncle's farmhands in the days leading up to her 18th birthday. The farmhands in question are played by Oliver Hardy and the self-cast director Larry Semon. Sooo ... the 35-year-old director cast himself as the frustrated suitor of a family farm Lolita. And, yes, his name was Semon. But don't worry guys. The two actors were married in real life, so everything was totally kosher.

A match born in the deepest nightmares of the most composed serial killer.
So a tornado carries Dorothy to the Land of Oz, where the Scarecrow, Tin Man and Lion characters are introduced. But it isn't really the Scarecrow, Tin Man and Lion -- it's the horny farmhands in disguise, hiding from Ambassador Wikked and Prime Minister Kruel, presumably while President Badd Guye and Emperor Stok Kharakter Villun were vacationing in Helll. Dorothy is crowned Queen of Oz and marries Prince Kynd (sigh) and decides to stay in Oz forever, because hey, why not?
Meanwhile, the Tin Man turns evil and tries to kill the Lion and the Scarecrow. Then the Scarecrow falls out of an airplane and dies.

Doesn't matter. You cannot kill what dwells within that.
This celluloid travesty bankrupted its studio and shockingly never got a wide release. Which is probably a good thing, considering how much sooner fan fiction would have gotten off the ground if it had.

If you were a teenage boy at any time in the past 30 years, odds are good that you have seen the gloriously overwrought cokehead Mafioso epic Scarface. Al Pacino is Tony Montana, a Cuban refugee who rises through the ranks of a Miami drug kingdom with nothing but an aloha shirt, an accent cranked to 11 and an M-damn-16 assault rifle with a miraculous supply of bullets.

A movie that could have also been Pacino's personal biography.
Pacino, writer Oliver Stone and director Brian De Palma earn every morally ambiguous hip hop ode that has been spat in honor of this both Golden Globe and Razzie nominated crime classic. More specifically, Al Pacino earned the honor of teaching Spanish speakers how to roll their R's like they mean it.
The Original:
The original Scarface was based on the 1929 novel also called Scarface, which was a thinly disguised biography of dermatologically challenged real-world gangster, Al Capone.
Via Makara.com
"Blood Acne Face" was already taken by another gangster.
It was such a grisly film that censors delayed its release and multiple versions resulted. You might even say it was the Scarface of its era.
When producer Martin Bregman set out to remake it in the 1980s, his intention was to do a gangster period piece faithful to the original. Ironically, the the filmmakers found the Prohibition-era Chicago setting too "melodramatic" so Sidney Lumet suggested changing the backdrop to the modern Miami cocaine cartel world.

Needs more cocaine
Oliver Stone, who had just kicked a wicked coke habit, was hired to rewrite the screenplay and boom! A million ethnic stereotypes and college dorm posters were simultaneously born. All because Oliver Stone is really good at reining in melodrama.

Quick! What comes to mind when you think of Clint Eastwood in a classic western? A poncho? A cigarillo? How about a bunch of non-English speaking Europeans on location in Spain with their lines overdubbed like a kung fu movie? Boom. You win the jackpot.

If you are familiar with the term Spaghetti Western, you can thank the wild popularity of A Fistful of Dollars. Shot in Spain by an Italian crew with an international cast, Dollars sets grizzled American Clint Eastwood against rival gangs in a "Mexican" border town. The only thing missing from this melting pot of a movie was some Asians.
The Original:
Oh wait, never mind. Because A Fistful of Dollars was a Japanese movie before it was an Euromerican one. Specifically, it was a frame-for-frame remake of Japanese director Akira Kurosawa's 1961 samurai picture Yojimbo. Only when Kurosawa made it, he used robes instead of panchos and swords instead of guns.

And princess buns instead of hats.
Ripping off foreign movies had been done before, but Sergio Leone didn't bother to get the rights to Yojimbo before he set about remaking it, which was why Yojimbo's producers were eventually awarded 15 percent of the remake's worldwide gross in a successful lawsuit. Kurosawa later claimed that he earned more money off of A Fistful of Dollars than he did from his original movie.
Via Wikimedia Commons
And why all of his sons were named "Clint."








Ben-Hur should also make the list. Especially because I wouldn't have known that it was a remake if it hadn't been for one of Cracked's articles...
ReplyKill Bill is a remake of the 1973 film "Lady Snowblood" particularly the fight scene between Kiddo (The Bride)[Uma Thurman] and O-Ren Ishii [Lucy Liu]
ReplyWhen Houston was making "The Maltese Falcon" he had his secretary turn the book into a script. Simply go through and block it with speech and scenes, and he would work from that. That gave him the basis of his movie, and he went on to direct a classic.
ReplyOne newspaper critic, whenever the movie was going to be seen on tv, always mentioned "a staggering performance by someone's father," meaning that Walter Houston, John Houston's father, staggered into a room at one point.
I have the original Scarface in DVD, in my opinion, it's better than the remake
ReplyI will stab you through the neck if I ever meet you face to face.
When you say "you" I don't think you were talking to me.
ReplyI just got into the comedy workshop and was eagerly preparing my first article "6 Films that were actually just remakes!" I had some of the images photoshopped and ready, I had actually written the intro and the numbered entry that you have to write in full to show them your writing style etc. when while looking for online sources to back up my claims (most of my early info came from DVD featurettes and audio commentaries) I googled "A Fistful of Dollars lawsuit" and came across this article, there goes two weeks worth of work FML!!!
ReplyNo problem, just do a remake of this article. If I've learned anything from it, it's that the second one will be a huge success.
I watched Yojimbo a week ago, and I must say it was extremely well done. I good find from my movie club director.
ReplySeven Samurai is a good one too, got remade here as The Magnificent Seven. Kurosawa was a great Japanese filmmaker.
The 1925 Wizard of Oz is actually worse than that description makes it sound. It's not even a fantasy movie, just a painfully unfunny comedy (more a parody of the books than an adaptation), and a blatantly racist one.
ReplyApologies everyone, I've got to try this... Hitchcock.
ReplyHuh! It worked!
Fuckleton.
I wouldn't call The Wizard of Oz a remake. Yes, it had been movie-fied several times before, but it was based off of the stage play more than a previous movie. That's like saying the Peter Jackson Lord of the Rings movies are a remake of the Ralph Bakshi animated version. You might think it is, but I personally don't, more like a different adaptation.
ReplyIn case of LOTR the Peter Jackson version is totally identical to the animated version except for the part where Donkey keeps asking Shrek "are we there yet".
I have mixed feelings about Scarface. On one side is a good movie, on the other hand I am Colombian, so while I looked, mentally I was saying "That's racist, that's stupid, that's racist, that's ... Venezuelan?"
ReplyNo Parent Trap? that was a remake, or one might say, ripoff, of a movie from the 1940s, called Twice Blessed (starring an actual set of twins). Also, Jodie Foster's Flightplan was a ripoff/homage of/to Alfred Hitchcock's The Lady Vanishes (the title of which was way better). I guess that isn't really a "remake," though.
ReplyTrue, but given limited space in which to write, the author chose the most iconic and memorable ones. The films listed here are the standards by which other films are judged. "Falcon" and "Oz" were listed on the AFI's 100 best movies of all time, and the others are staples of their genre. "The Parent Trap" (1961) was a fun Disney film, but it's hardly required viewing.
And yes, "The Lady Vanishes" is a kickass title.
Yeah, except the title is "You didn't know were remakes." Almost everyone has heard of The Parent Trap, and would think "What? I don't know the Lindsay Lohan movie was a remake of the Hayley Mills-- wait! there was ANOTHER movie?"
I'll give you Flightplan, because no one remembers it, but when it first came out, it was really hyped by the studio, with absolutely no mention of Hitchcock whatsoever (or the cute but forgettable 70s remake with Elliot Gould, Cybill Shepherd and Angela Lansbury).
However, I not only knew about, but have actually seen, every original movie here; in the case of The Last House on the Left and The Man Who Knew Too Much, I saw the original years before the remake; in the cases of Scarface, and Yojimbo/Fistful of Dollars, I haven't even seen the remake, only the original, and for the latter, I did not know that Fistful of Dollars was a remake of Yojimbo, but it sort of went the other way for me-- "Classic film you didn't know has been remade."
Also, I don't think The Wizard of Oz and The Maltese Falcon really belong on the list. They are just other versions of the same source material. In the case of TWOO, the source material came by way of a stage play, in fact. Paramount had done a version of Alice in Wonderland that flopped so badly, it almost killed the fantasy genre before it took off. TWOO was predicted to fail, and most studios wouldn't touch it; MGM decided to give it a shot, because the play had done so well. It's the reason that the screenplay sticks so closely to the stage script, rather than going back to the book. The "dual roles" bit is an artifact of casting a stage play with a few actors as possible.
I freaking adore Scareface. The other thing you said about it being a remake or something? I wasn't paying attention.
ReplyI already knew about scarface
ReplyI'm not gonna lie, I didn't know about these being remakes. Maybe because the only film on here I have seen is the Wizard of Oz. That, or I don't read as much movie trivia as I previously thought.>_>
Reply**Dont forget the departed
ReplyYojimbo, by the way, is said to be inspired by the Dashiell Hammett novel "Red Harvest", which was officially adapted for the movie "Roadhouse nights". Kurosawa debunked that rumor, however, stating that his real inspiration was another Hammett novel, "The Glass Key".
ReplyYojimbo went on to be remade as "Last Man Standing", and it all started with Dashiell Hammett... Somehow... I guess...
In conclusion, Red Harvest is awesome.
And so is Dashiel Hammett.
I'm going to be that one douche bag that openly admits to having known all of these as remakes. sorry, prideful moment over.
ReplyI did too I actually made a simlar list of fifty titles on my imdb page
\
Damn! I was going to make the very same comment!
And I'm not awake at 4:30 in the morning. I'm posting from Australia. It's not even midnight here.
ReplyWho doesn't know Scarface was a remake. The 1932 version eats the remake for breakfast and then shits it out.
ReplyI saw it when I was 5. I'd just like to take this moment to thank my parents...