6 Famous Characters You Didn't Know Were Shameless Rip-Offs
They say there are no original ideas out there, and we can believe that. Storytelling themes are universal and we understand when a character or scene gets "borrowed" here and there.
But it's hard not to feel betrayed when you find out that some of the stories around which your entire childhood revolved were, for the most part, copied and pasted in with a cavalier attitude of, "the little bastards will never know the difference!"
We're talking about...

Mutated freaks gathered by their wheelchair bound mentor in order to protect a world that fears and hates them. You think we are talking about the X-Men? No we are not. Well, we will be in a second, and technically we are, but not in this paragraph, except for the parts where we do.
They are a Rip-Off of:

The Doom Patrol, which debuted in comics three months before everybody's favorite, more marketable mutants.
Unlike the X-Men, the Doom Patrollers were once normal people who suffered an accident that disfigured them but also gave them superpowers. Shunned by the world for just being plain ugly, the freaks were gathered by Doctor Caulder, a paraplegic, who thought that maybe the world wouldn't dislike them so much if they used their powers to save the normal people's asses from giant robots once in a while.
If this sounds somewhat familiar to you, it's because the same thing as X-Men with the only difference that the smart guy in the wheelchair was bald in one and X-Men uses mutants as an allegory for minorities instead of people with elephantiasis or whatever the heck Doom Patrol was going for.

Even the tag line is the same! At least make an effort, guys!

Possibly, the most unnecessary thing borrowed by X-Men was the name of the Doom Patrol's enemies: The Brotherhood of Evil. In Doom Patrol the name made sense; because they were a group of evil assholes, which got together to do asshole things. There was never any confusion about what the group was about.
On the other hand Magneto stole the name, added the word mutant at the end of it and then whined endlessly about how humans persecuted and hated him. Maybe people hated you, Magneto, because your group's name was The Brotherhood of Evil Mutants and you went around the world trying to wipe out humanity?

How successful would the American Paraplegia Society be if they called themselves the Brotherhood of Child Molesting Guys on Wheelchairs? Magneto's weak PR skills aren't the only reason the original Brotherhood looks awesome by comparison ...

A brain in a case and an armed gorilla? How is Magneto more famous?

"Hold on a minute!" you may be shouting from your cubicle. "Not only is he one of the most famous and recognizable icons in the world, he is also the first superhero ever created! So how can he be a rip off of anything if he was the first, you idiot?"
Well, that's where you are wrong, hypothetical Cracked reader who is talking to us and for some reason insulting us even though you are figment of our imagination; Superman may be the first superhero, but not the first character with those superpowers.
He is a Rip-Off of:

Philip Wylie's wrote a pulp novel called Gladiator in 1930, starring Hugo Danner, a man whose father invents a secret formula that can create superpowers. Instead of selling it and making millions, he just injects it into his son, because, hey, why not? Hugo gains super strength, bullet proof skin and the ability to jump over the tallest building in a single bound. Jumping, not flying--so it's sort of different, right? Well, actually, in Superman's early years he couldn't fly either, just jump really high.
All he was missing was the laser/telescopic eyes and the million retarded powers Superman pulled out of his ass in the 50s. And it was published eight years before Superman appeared.
But superpowers are kind of standard, right? Super strength? Hell, Hercules had that! It doesn't mean it's a rip-off!

But the resemblance doesn't end there. Both Superman and Hugo Danner grew up in a small farming town. Supes in Kansas and Danner in Colorado. Both pretended to be meek and weak to prevent people from finding out about their superpowers. And both had a special place where they went to be alone: Superman had his fortress of solitude in the Arctic, and Donner had his own place in northern Canada. Of course, his didn't have the total emo name, which really only proves that he was less of a huge tool.
And to boot, the first image of Superman the world saw, the cover of Action Comics #1, recreates a scene of the Gladiator novel where Hugo loses his shit, lifts up a car and scares the crap out of everyone.

"And fuck you for cutting me... I mean Clark Kent off in the intersection."
Oh sure, Gladiator doesn't have five movies, several TV shows, a crapload of cartoons, a 70-year-old still going comic book and millions of dollars from merchandise. But he sure tapped way more ass than Supes.


No, we're not talking about the fact that The Lion King was Disney's take on Hamlet (interestingly, Shakespeare originally intended to have his plays performed by animals but had to reconsider when his lions escaped and caused the London Massacre of 1600).
But Disney wasn't happy to just rely on the bard, and massively ripped off an old Japanese cartoon just to wipe away any inadvertent hint of originality.
It is a Rip-Off of:

Kimba, the small albino lion cub in the picture, is the creation of legendary Japanese cartoonist, Osamu Tezuka, creator of other famous characters like Astro Boy. And this is were you go "Kimba? But the Disney lion is called Simba. OH! Wait, they are lions and their names sound alike; that's all?" Oh no, that's not all, that's just the tip of the iceberg. Or should we say theftberg?
(Ed: Since you asked, no, you should not.)Even though Disney denies it, it has slipped more than once that The Lion King was initially a remake of Kimba, including this early sketch with Simba colored white that was included in one of the DVD versions:

Maybe the color blind won't notice.
At some point Disney decided not to inform whoever holds the right for Kimba about this remake, recolored the lion cub and went to town. The Lion King also borrows scenes and characters like the shaman monkey, Simba's bird friend and the evil comedy relief hyenas.


The main bad guy in Kimba was Kimba's aunt, while Disney's version gave her a sex change operation and she became Simba's uncle. And some of the most famous scenes from the movie were practically Xeroxed from Kimba, including the one where Simba speaks with the ghost of his father who appeared in the clouds.


Here's a little experiment. Turn the tables, and try to create a cartoon series about a high-pitch-voiced mouse called "Mikey" and his friend "Ronald Duck." Start selling merchandise for these characters, and see how long it takes you to hear from Disney's lawyers.








Fave G.I. Joe ep: We're Colllld Slither and you'll be joining us soon. A band of vipers, playyyyin' our tunes. With an iron fist and reptile hiss, we shall ruuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuule!
ReplyThe worlds EVEN STRANGENESTEST SUPER HEROES!
ReplyThe Misfits!
Issue one: Misfits vs The league of really kind and helpful rapists.
In the golden comic years, superman was rather a "bible rip-off"
ReplyHis powers basically made him into "God-man" and then he went and fucked it all up by getting a weak b***h ass son which he abandoned on earth while flying around in space himself...
See? Again, straight from the bible.
Ah, and let us not forget that Batman himself pulled a "Jesus", by losing to Doomsday only to resurrect to "prove to us" that he was immortal to begin with...
Damn Superman has gotten pathetic...
OMG! I was killed after seeing the Mark of Zorro too! Unfortunately those bastards with the ambulance brought me back to life. I was hoping to come back as a super-powered zombie or a ghost with licentious abilities. But noooooo. Bastard paramedics.
ReplyI'm surprised Jesus isn't on this since he was ripped off from the Egyptian figure Horus.
ReplyOMG - I knew that at least one of the Oans looked familiar - but I never quite placed it! Thank you!!
ReplyWe are all human living on the same planet and in the not too distant past shared a very similar way of life. The stories that were told around ancient campfires were probably not too different in the basic elements than the stories we tell today. We have developed more ways of sharing our stories, but I bet tales of mighty men and anthropomorphic animals were among the first tales ever told. And knock knock jokes. First Knock knock joke:
ReplyKnock knock!
Who's there?
Club.
Club who?
Club you!
*thud*
What a worthless and s****y comment.
Even those tales weren't very original, as they borrowed from generations before.
"Hey are you Mary Popp....?."
Reply"No no no! I'm Sherry Bobbins! An original character! Like Rickey Rouse and Monald Muck!......."
*Blue sky*
*Some words are coming out from the sky! What could they mean?*
The Sampsoooons!
Totally not a shameless rip-off
Even though it's obvious the Lion King is a big rip off, Disney was pretty clever when they switched Kimba's name to Simba, since Simba is actually the Swahili word for lion.
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesExcept for the fact that Simba actually means something in Swahili while Kimba means nothing in any language. The names are linked, but that's it.
Wow. Someone so didn't read the article before commenting on this commenting. Great way to show pre-ejaculation.
Wow. Someone so didn't read my comment before commenting on it. Great way to be a moron.
Let the fighting begin...
ReplyWe announced that the fight was ended...
There is no way batman is a rip off from zorro, I mean aside from the billionaire thing they really have nothing in common, zorro isn't a detective, he kills people (batman just lets the occasional one die, though isn't above killing god like beings) and he isn't driven by his parents death, nor did he travel the world training in every discipline, he isn't even smart. I'll give you they might of gotten the idea for making him a billionaire from him but there's alot more to batman then that.
Reply Hide All See All 5 RepliesAlso I seriously doubt X-men is a rip off, I mean 3 months isn't alot of time to write pitch and get a new comic series published, I think it's more likely the writer of the doom patrol somehow got hold of the x-men story and his short just beat x-men series to the print.
I think it's more likely you're a tard.
I agree on the X-Men/Doom Patrol thing. Three months isn't enough time to scramble together an develop a new comic book series, it's more likely DC found about it and tried to beat Marvel to the punch. The Batman/Zorro rip-off IS possible, but I think the article is also confusing "rip-off" with "homage" and "inspired by.."
^ There is very little difference. Sure, nothing wrong with bringing your own spin to things, but it's not original.
3 months isnt a lot of time to get a new series published, but its more than enough time to make a blatant ripoff... your missing the point smartass...
Zorro:
-Lives in a secret cave
-is a playboy millionaire that pretends to be stupid and arrogant so no once will know they are the same person.
-Uses a black mask, a black suit, and a black cape
-Fights for justice and makes sure people dont forget him (The Z slash vs Batmans scare factor)
-Neither kill people or use guns (in the time of zorro they indeed had several kinds of firearms)
Not the worst rip-off I have seen, but they sure got a lot from Zorro in order to make Batman.
I agree with the X-men isn't a rip-off, it took 3-4 months to get a comic published back then, so X-men was probably being thought up, and made when Doom patrol came out. It was even worse way back in the 30's, it took like 7 or 8 months to publish a comic then
Yep but Kimba and the Lion King are both heavily influenced by Hamlet. Everything draws inspiration from something else.
Reply Hide All See All 6 RepliesAnd Hamlet's based off an old Danish folk tale, Amleth. Everything, even the Bard's masterpieces.
and that one danish folk tale, was surely passed rfom generation to generation so, its like inception!
From what I've been able to find, Kimba has a different story; he is taken by hunters and has to make his way back home. The two share similar visual elements, but you can find several movies that are similar but distinct that are allowed to coexist together just in Hollywood.
Funny you mention Inception, because that movie ripped off so many sources (albeit obscure) it's not even funny. But I guess that's Hollywood's idea of originality: As long as it's unknown, it MUST be original, right? Gee, I can't wait until I become a director so I can rip-off Felidae, but make it with dogs and name it 'Canis' and the masses will praise it for being unique! What a joke.
As for everything else: I guess you could say Disney ripped off a rip-off.
I don't think there is a traceable original to this story. If Shakespeare's Hamlet isn't the original, then it's lost to the ages. Kimba be damned. (Also tklarenb is correct: Disney uses Swahli words to name their animals, in both The Lion King and The Jungle Book.) The fact that Simba (lion) rhymes with Kimba is a coincidence.
^ Actually, Hamlet is a rip-off of the 13th century legend Amleth, recorded by Saxo Grammaticus. But then about half the plot was ripped from the Ancient Egyptian tale of Osiris, Horus and Set. The whole "one brother kills another, then the dead brother's son seeks revenge on his uncle" may actually be predating writing itself.
So in other words: Disney ripped off a ripoff that ripped off half the plot, which was already there generations before that.
This is actually what I always loved about the comics universe. You can begin reading a comic with one particular character (or character group) and love the concept but not like the execution. Great news! There's one that's almost like it in a different comic, quite possibly illustrated or written by the same person. Good show. That's how I never tire of the stories. Borrowing makes them more interesting.
ReplyPart of me doesn't wanna agree with you, but damn, your perfectly right!
I might be wrong about this, as I have not read much of the original material for it, but Batman is also a bit of a rip-off a previous detective/vigilante called The Shadow, whose alter ego was Lamont Cranston, a "wealthy young man about town", and he also wore a cape. Differences: The Shadow used guns and was psychic as well, but the comparison can still be made I think. Can someone who knows it better than I do help me out on this?
ReplyI think Batman is more of a combo of the Phantom and Dick Tracy
I'd go with Batman ripping off Zorro.
When people complain about companies ripping off each-other, I always think of this quote:
Reply Hide All See All 3 Replies"There are no new things under the sun"
No matter what it is, someone, somewhere, has already done it. While plagiarism is never a good thing, you will always find similarities between comics, shows and movies, whether they're intentional or not.
You'll also always find similarities between big and small companies that inspired them; in this case Disney was inspired by Kimba and Hamlet, and so they based their design and story off of them. Sure, you could say there is a difference between ripping it off and just being inspired, but at the end of the day: it's not original. If you have to copy somebody, clearly you're not being origina at all. Of course, that doesn't change the fact that Disney did a MUCH better job than of it.
*original
Thats just f*****g depressive.... if this is how you usually think I can only suggest you take some anti-depressants.
That's nice.
As amazing as the similarities are, there wasn't enough time between publications for X-Men to be ripped off of Doom Patrol. Besides that, you missed the far more obvious and honest fact that Doom Patrol was a rip off of Fantastic Four in the first place.
ReplyIm agreed with you. Supaman,baman,ex man,and all. I just hope that you know that GLs weakness of yellow has been stripped-off. Just saiyan
ReplyNo Disney Movies are original stories. Lion King is just one of many borrowed tales.
Reply Hide All See All 5 RepliesAnd yet they did it better than their predecessors
If you ripped something off and didn't do better, it would be idiotic. Especially if you're Disney or Hollywood, with all those resources in your hands. Um. Now that I think about it, why would people as powerful as them need to rip anything off anyway?
Well I guess my plebeian logic just can't grasp that of the executive executives.
^ Not really. You can have all the resources in the world and still fail. Disney improved upon their predecessors, so you go with the superior product.
Lion King was less "improving" upon mostly because people didn't know about Kimba. Most people still think Lion King is original.
And they did it while the creator of Kimba (or at least his immediate family) was still alive.
^ Yeah, and they did a much better job (hence improving upon) of it than Kimba. Have you even seen the anime series in this day and age? It's very, very dated while The Lion King is still wonderful.
You call it 'theft' while most people will call it improving upon, everybody copies each other anyway.
Ben Gurion a poster boy for sensing bravery and honesty? Thats 'Hitler being a poster boy for racial harmony' creepy.
ReplyAugh My eyes!, the Greg Land porn tracings in that Xmen header picture!
Reply