The 6 Worst Jobs Ever (Were Done by Children)
Kids have it nice here in the future. What with their hover boards, hover ponies and hover sexting. They get their whole lives handed to them on a silver platter (that hovers).
It wasn't always so easy. Back in the day, people had only one reason to produce offspring: To force them to do the abhorrently awful work no grown person would dare to. And if you think child labor didn't get any worse than dirty-faced children in Victorian shoe factories, well, you apparently haven't heard about...

Oh, man. You know by the name this isn't going to end well. Castrati.
The thing is, today the theater struggles to retain audiences. In fact, the only thing that draws folks back to the aging whore that is the stage is the chance to see live, 3D nudity. And even that's getting quickly replaced.

Your move, Shakespeare.
But the 1600s were a different time. A time when hookers were honest and the stages were free from all those icky, heathen women. In fact, no woman was allowed in the choir or stage production in the 17th century. Theater houses were like those ball pits at McDonald's... you know, if those little plastic balls were actual balls.

Testicles.
Nonetheless, playwrights and composers kept writing female parts. To keep the songs from sounding like a barbershop quartet comprised of bulky Hungarian dudes, the choir masters would give the womanly roles or alto parts to prepubescent boys. And, every so often, one talented scamp's melodious voice would catch the master's ear and become the prize pupil.
But of course, all good things come to an end. Flowers bloom, caterpillars turn into beautiful butterflies and boys go through the often traumatizing experience of puberty.

Just ask Macaulay Culkin.
But for those boys whose sopranos were sweet enough to make a mob boss weep, a minor surgery could preserve their voice, joining them to the ranks of the castrati. In fact, 70 percent of stage performers in the 17th century were castrati.

A fad that reappeared in the 1970s.
And how did one become an illustrious member of the castrati? You already guessed, you just won't admit it to yourself. It was via the process of cutting blood supply to the testicles, or more commonly amputating them altogether.
How did they perform such an invasive--and not to mention traumatizing--surgery on a six- to 12-year-old kid? By giving them a bath. They simply soaked them in a tub of water to soften them up, and then performed the surgery when they were rendered unconscious. We assume the unconscious part came from telling the seven-year-old that they were not, in fact, receiving candy for this public bathing but actually getting their balls chopped off.
Then castrati might hope for a good 10 year run as a performer, after which the boy would only be 17 and rethinking the long term strategy of a castration career. Of course, settling down and getting married wasn't an option, unless the boy could find that one in a million girl turned on by non-existent erections.

I think I just felt- no nevermind. Just a breeze.
Eventually, castratis fell out of fashion in the late 1700s, not because of the ridiculously brutal violence visited upon little boys, but because the Italian soap opera plots they performed in became too silly to watch. The audiences didn't mind the castrations; it was the authenticity of the scripts that turned them off. Hear that, M. Night Shyamalan? No amount of castrated boys could save your films from sucking.

Coal remains one of the most vital sources of energy the world over, but mining the stuff continues to be an ugly, incredibly dangerous business. So picture how rough it was prior to the 20th century when coal provided virtually the only power source, and the height of safety technology involved ropes, carts and yelling, "Run!" when stuff blew up.

Or if they were really rad, they would simply walk away calmly.
You couldn't imagine worse working conditions. Explosions, shaft cave-ins, asphyxiation, black lung; it was all in a day's work for Ye Old coal miners. To put it in perspective, we have more than once left work early because we felt "itchy."
Of course, the only way to ensure any measure of safety and success back then was to rely on the most experienced and well-trained coal miners. Or children. Yeah, screw it, children will do.

They would have used bunnies, but they were resistant to learn the trade.
From ages as young as four, children were employed in the art of hurrying: pulling giant sled loads of coal through tiny shafts. Children made perfect carriers because their short stature allowed them to crawl around two foot tunnels in the bowels of the Earth for 12 hours a shift. You might wonder why midgets were not employed. Because midgets are people too, jerk.

Evil, evil, little people.
Oh, and did we mention the children were often forced to do the work naked? Perhaps clothes were forbidden because loose articles might catch on shaft walls. Or perhaps the idea of a fully-clothed child crawling on their belly in an ink black hole deep underground came off as too dignified.

The fact is, there was no physical need for mine shafts to be constructed that small, and therefore no need to employ children. Building shafts over 24-inches wide just cost more. It's simple Supply and Demand: people kept supplying disposable children, and mining companies kept demanding those kids to shimmy their little asses down the scary, dark hell mouth.

If Hollywood taught us anything about life at sea it's that it's rough, dirty and a little sexually ambiguous. If you were a strapping young lad in the 18th or 19th century and wanted to experience life on the high seas firsthand, you simply volunteered for the position of Loblolly Boy.

Alternatively, be in a Disney movie.
Considered the lowliest position on the boat, a Loblolly's day included serving food and cleaning medical instruments. Oh, and cleaning up blood and severed limbs.
See, the Loblolly played the roles of janitor, waiter and nurse on a ship. The position's name derived from the name of a thick oatmeal gruel or porridge, perhaps with a bit of meat or some vegetables in it that the boy was in charge of serving. The Loblolly stew was also called spoon meat but likely no one wanted a "Spoon Meat Boy" on board.
First, there was the simple job of cleaning, which sounds like fine entry-level work, except it mainly consisted of cleaning up motion-sick rider's barf and throwing sand over the blood and guts covering the deck during a battle.

"Mind the wet floor, gentlemen. Don't slip and hurt yourselves."
But even that had to be less traumatizing than the Loblolly's role as assistant to the ship surgeon, considering this wasn't exactly the days of blue scrubs and sterile operating rooms. The job included collecting up amputated limbs, pouring hot tar on wounds and cleaning bed pans.

We're going to guess that there were more than a few "mercy" killings.
And the reward at the end of a good day's work was a punch in the face. Probably.








Scalping jokes are SO 18th century.
ReplyYou forgot that both the coal carrier boys and the loblollys we used as sex things by the men in the mining camps and ships. Loblolly to do list:
Replyclean up puke
throw severed arm overboard
suck boatswain's c**k
Compared to the shitlist terrible things that went on in those times, I wouldn't mind getting whipped and beaten every now and then in a life of luxury. Beats the hell out of being a serf.
ReplyYou're right about that. Actually whipping boys were sometimes nobles as well, cousins or other relatives to the prince. And for those that weren't, some princes grew so attached to their whipping boys that they were given titles. They really weren't kidding about the whipping boy being the prince's only companion as he grew. Essentially, this was the case. And because they were more or less required to be with their prince all the time, they were given the same education he was.
Considering that their "job" was to be systematically abused throughout their childhoods, they actually came out of it pretty well.
"...because we felt 'itchy.'" I have no idea why I found this hilarious.
Replythat bunny was too cute, worth reading the horrendously scary article
ReplyThat bunny looked adorable enough to have been created by Hayao Miyazaki
ReplyMentioned in another article was the "powder monkey", which would be a young boy as young as 8 hauling gunpowder and the like across a ship *during a friggin' battle*!
ReplyThat bunny was the most adorable picture of a bunny ever.
ReplyTrue. Very true.
The coal miners didn't wear clothing because it was really f*****g hot. It wasn't just the kids either. Coal miners would always had a pocket full of nails that they would drive into the wall so they could hang up their clothes.
ReplyPlease site your source.
(I read Fall of Giants also)
*cite.
This kind of goes along with the coal one. When the coal was rolled out down trays, young boys had to straddle the trays and pick out bits of shale, often slicing their fingers open. Also, no gloves allowed.
ReplySO glad I live in the 21st century... o.O
ReplyComparatively, loblolly boy seems like a dream come true.
ReplyYou may rethink that when you consider they were also the sexual playthings of the crew.
why do i even come to this web site expecting to laugh any more?
ReplyBecause Cracked is your new master, they control you, they OWN you.
Well, this just put me in the most happy-go-lucky mood ever...
ReplyActually, I think you were misled by the 'boy' part of the job title 'loblolly boy'. The loblolly boy was usually an adult, the word boy being used, as I understand it, to show how lowly and unimportant he (or she, more often than you might think) was compared to the surgeon and his mate.
ReplyYeah, but what was considered an adult then wouldn't be today. The guy might be 19 or 20, or he might be 13 or 14.
Ouch scalping? Damn that must hurt. Don't forget the fingers and toes and limbs you could lose if you get them accidentally caught in the wheel O__o
ReplyMan, you all take s**t too seriously. Correcting people over and over again doesn't make you look smart, it makes you look like a douche.
ReplyFor real!
Fo' sho'.
For #6,
Reply Hide All See All 5 RepliesThe amputation of testicles has nothing to do with the ability to get an erection, or even ejaculate(remember, ejaculate is made in the prostate, the testes simply make the sperm plus a few hormones), so it rendered them infertile, and, if done early enough, prevent puberty, but if it was done later then 9, the first stages of puberty(a lot of it, just not the deepenign of the voice) would probably still happened. And, for the castrati who were castrated from 10-12, and many were, it was believed by the ladies of Europe that the castrati made the best lovers, and were perfect of affairs(because a castrati can't get the b***h pregnant).
one of these "few hormones" is testosterone. Pretty handy in getting an erection.
Handy, sure, but not remotely necessary.
Also to be fair the process was usually not nearly as gruesome as it could be. Anesthesia (usually opium syrup) was quite common, and the procedure was usually done by a fairly competent (for the time) surgeon. Survival rates were quite high. And your post theatre emplyment opportunities could be pretty good. Castration does not stop the body from growing, in point of fact a castrated person will often end up signifcantly taller and stockier than a normal one (this is also part of the reason bulls are castrated into steers in the beef industry, no testes=more weight gain. That includes the lungs. So as castrati actually had an advantage in many cases over even his pre-pubescent form, he had his youthful timber but he also had grown up lungs and therefore grown up air capacity so he was better suited for many tasks, like opera. Castrati were still being made in italy till well into the turn of the last century, so there are phonograph recordings of castrati operatic stars. Being one could easly lead to a fairly good life, and if you really had talent a life of fame and fortune.
Fun fact: even after becoming castrati, some castrati were able to have sexual affairs with many female clients. Also, historians of the time noticed the castrati often became obese. Food for thought
Testicles, who needs 'em!
Don't show this to Rand Paul...
ReplyNo, we must appease aquabuddha!
Re: Whipping Boys.
ReplyIt's a small point but the 17th century wasn't the middle ages. The 17th century is straight past the Renaissance and into the Baroque.
But uhm... yeah... Child labor isn't good. Let's talk about the Children's Crusade! Best crusade ever. "The Arabs won't kill children!!!! Let's send a bunch of them into fight this one."
ummm... the crusade part of the children's crusade was largely meant to be non-violent conversion by children of muslims in the holy land, but most of the accounts are generally considered fictional and/or apocryphal. either way, it wasn't really about children *fighting* a crusade
Didnt they get captured in Hungary and sold into slavery.