5 Guilty Pleasures The Web Killed While You Weren't Looking
We're guessing not a single person reading this would be willing to take a time machine and go back and live in the pre-Internet era. Some of us start showing signs of physical withdrawal within 10 minutes of losing our iPhone.
Yet... there are things we miss about the world before the World Wide Web. Guilty pleasures that a less connected world used to let us get away with.

The odds are none of you have ever, say, robbed a liquor store or assassinated a public figure. But we've all broken the law, if only to sneak a beer before the statute said we were old enough, or to paint a dong on an abandoned bridge. Minor stuff. All part of growing up, right? And it's not like you're going to get caught...

Ah, but now you're living in the future, where the cops can use the miracle of social networking to nail you for crimes you didn't think anyone really gave a shit about.

Let's say you've gone off to college and, though you're still two years under age, you attend a party and have 27 beers. Your socializing has paid off--the next day you get a friend request from a cute girl on Facebook. You accept it and a few days later, you get summoned to court and fined for underage drinking.
It turns out the cute girl was actually a cop. In Wisconsin the police are using the fake profiles to get access to kids' photo albums. Once in, they find pictures of them or their friends holding beers. Charges filed. Case closed.

Or, say you're out on the town one day and your drunken best friend goes to urinate in an alley, because maybe he has a phobia of public restrooms. A policeman asks you about it later, at which point you swear you have never met the pissing man in your life.
The cops then go into your Facebook profile, find the pissing man on your friends list, and charge you with obstruction of justice.

Others have failed to get away with youthful shenanigans when pictures were posted of them charging onto a field after a football game. Then you have the students who have faced suspension or expulsion for making derogatory comments online about campus security online. It's become so common that in 2006, students at George Washington University decided to turn the tables. They deliberately bragged about an upcoming party on Facebook, waited for police to storm the place, and then revealed that they were all actually eating cake out of beer cups.

Parents everywhere have been telling children the same lie for thousands of years: "You sure wouldn't have caught me (acting/dressing/talking) like that when I was your age!"
Grownups have been shaming teenagers over their ridiculous fads and bad decisions since time began, on the basis that when they were teenagers, they were dignified, respectful and mature. They weren't, of course, but where was the proof?

"I never stole drugs from family. Strippers, sure, but never family."
Back in the old days, people only brought cameras to vacations and holidays. Old photo albums were therefore stuffed with wholesome, posed pictures with the family at Thanksgiving, or smiling shots of everybody at the fishing hole with Grandpa. No fireplace mantles are adorned with pics of Grandma puking in the parking lot at a Beatles concert. No, any embarrassing photos were hidden away harmlessly in shoe boxes, or if their owners were smart enough, taken out back and surreptitiously burned.

Grandpa, 1938.
That era is over.
Everyone has a camera, at all times, and every damned photo must be shared with the world via the Internet. Our generation is the first in human history to broadcast to the world every stupid thing we've ever done in our teenage years, via Facebook, YouTube and every other website in the world with an "Upload" button.
Sure, the photos you, your friends or your parents post on Livejournal or the local parenting forum aren't all that embarrassing or shameful now. Just as Eminem didn't think this photo was ridiculous at the moment he had it taken.

The partying, the alcohol poisoning, the boob-flashing, the Ugg boots and jeggings, it's all part of the public record. Forever. In 10 or 20 years' time, when these kids are in their 30s and 40s, married and starting careers as lawyers or police officers or guidance counselors, we will still have pictures like this floating freely around the internet:

Mom?
Of course, that's just the pics. That rant against corporate greed you made on the Nine Inch Nails forums in 1998? It's still around, waiting to be Googled by your prospective employer. Your short-lived career as a blogger and passionate advocate of heroin legalization and lowering the age of consent to 16? That's still floating around as well, ready to be stumbled upon by the Mormon congregation you just converted into. It's all up there, archived forever, for your children and grandchildren to read.

Your wild night of no-strings-attached passion hadn't turned out quite as you expected. As the sun begins to rise outside the window, you quietly roll out of the inflatable kiddie pool full of jelly, pushing aside a few road flares and a slightly singed bunny suit. Rubbing your aching wrists, you quickly write down a fake number next to the telephone, and leave the strange apartment as silently as you can. It will take years of therapy to fully recover, but at least your one-night stand with the clearly imbalanced 20-something you met at a Waffle House, is behind you.

"Huh. Guess your phone wasn't waterproof after all."
Getting out of ill-planned one-night stands used to be just that simple. You faked your number, didn't reveal your last name or just relied on the fact that the two of you would probably never bump into each other again.
These days, thanks to the miracle that is the Internet, the information he or she has about you is more than enough to Google-stalk you. Does your workplace have a staff page with you on it? Got a LinkedIn account? If you had even one conversation over the course of the evening, odds are your drunken fling has all the information they need to find you.

Thanks, Google.
For instance, people have been tracked down and stalked by ex-lovers after revealing no more than a first name and what they did for a living--the kind of thing a lot of us accidentally divulge to the chatty homeless person at the bus stop.

Crazy exes can use this stalking technique as well: A woman in the UK was threatened after changing her relationship status on Bebo from "single" to "in a relationship". Another woman was killed by a jealous ex after posting pictures of herself on Facebook with another man.
Yep, we're three entries in, and already we've found two separate ways Don Draper would have been absolutely screwed in the Internet era.









You're forgetting porn. 4chan, namely /b/ has given me erectile dysfunction.
Replyto be honest so long as
Replyahhhh good old social shunning, ive been a victim of it for as long as ive had facebook, before i only found out about the parties that (as per useral) i had no idea existed at school the next week, but now i can now how many of my so-called "friends" have held parties and not told me via pictures and stats updates the next day or, if they havent been at the floor polish again, that night, YAY!
ReplyMaybe if you cheered the f**k up a bit...
well the pigs and the establishment cant do the old "fake facebook-then-we-nick-ya" thing here in the UK, for one, the drinking age is 18 so ALL Uni parties will be filled with people who are LEGALY ALOWED TO DRINK BITCHES! second, entrapment is illigal here (entrapment is when the pigs trick yo into revealing incrimidateing evidence or doing something illigal) third, there up to there necks in so mutch s**t about corruption in the phonehacking scandal and the incident in the G20 "riots" in 09 (yes thats still relivent) means that they are more likely to cave in to pressure
Replyillegal?
"Copying from one source is plagiarisim; copying from a few dozen sources is research."
Replyasdasadasdasdasdasd
Replyholy s**t is that essay s**t for real ? what are the websites , my teachers rarely check through my s**t i just gotta turn something in .
Replyits usually only colleges that have the software, but the high school i go to makes year 11 and 12s run thier finished essay through a similar program (except this one often bugs up and ur allowed 1 third of ur essay or less for it to give green flag.
Thankfully, they give this program to students, so if they accidentily copied something of somewhere without realising it (ive done it so many times, i swear) the student can change it before handing it in.
i had to run my essays and papers through these programs every year since 6th grade. Its a huge pain in the ass.
There's only so many words in the English language (excluding slang words) You're going to have similar sentences if it's 20+ MILLION sites. It could be a coincidence.
ReplyUsually they only comment on if a certain percent of it matches with other essays and websites :) Anything over 30% and you're in trouble.
The anti-plagiarism sites are bullshit. What if people are on the same wavelength? And if teachers keep submitting papers, then more people are likely to be accused of plagiarism. Some people have the same topics and there are only so many sources. Eventually people will run out of unique combinations of words.
ReplyThey need to invent some kind of cloaking device you can wear that makes you invisible to cell-phone cameras.
ReplyCAMO-CLOAK!!! PATENT PENDING, PATENT PENDING, PATENT PENDING....
All the facebook and social media stuff is why I have more regulations on who I accept as a friend than the EPA (BOOM!). If someone I know even remotely knows someone I don't like, I don't friend them. I cut off all contact. Is this elitist of me? Hell yeah. You know how many human beings there are on this earth? I don't need a few wankers because I've "known them since gradeschool" or whatever.
ReplyI've been accused of plagiarising tons of times, it sucks when you actually do s**t and don't get recognition. Also, english teachers are terribler at marking, if they have a different theory then you are fucked.
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesSo it's English teachers that are "terribler" at marking? Oh dear.
hungerfordhero- look at the 'e' and 'r' on your keyboard, u cheeky f**k
You two are both my heroes!
What's more scary about #1 is how long it will take for every version of an essay to be written and uploaded, making everyone seem like they've plagiarized... If (to take British_Teacher's example) a school or professor had an automatic-fail-if-over-25%-matches policy, it doesn't seem too unreasonable that eventually it would be pretty much impossible to write an essay on the same topic without appearing to have plagiarized.
Reply"Honestly, how many years until the technology has advanced to the point that everybody who graduates college actually winds up with some kind of education?"
ReplyI hate Turnitin. It looks at every single word that you type and will label your paper plagiarized if too much matches something else. Even if it's your own work. If you have to rewrite a paper your teacher has to read it themselves because Turnitin will just say you plagiarized the entire thing because you've already submitted the entire piece of work. Actually this applies to all of those programs. They're really stupid when you think about it (especially if you have a teacher that's too lazy to actually look over the wok themselves and just gives you a zero because the program said it was copied and they told you to rewrite the paper).
ReplyBack in September I started an online Masters degree in which they use turnitin. They automatically give you a failing grade if the percentage detected raises above about 25%. This would be fine if it didn't count attributed quotations with clear citations, references and the text of the question that I am trying to answer as plagirism.
Exactly... It's a good IDEA, but programs like that take it too far. I have friends who have escaped a failing grade only because their professor was nice enough to believe them that they didn't copy their paper. Any professor who automatically fails people is honestly being kind of lazy and thoughtless....
in 8th or 9th grade there was an assignment to write a movie review. when the teacher returned mine, she accused me of copying it from a published review. this being the pre-internet age, i knew she had to have based the accusation on the idea that it was written to well for an apparent idiot like me as there was no way she could have located the original source. so the next day i brought it to her- a fanzine containing the original review- written by none other than yours truly.
ReplyAll of these complaints are valid except the last one. Seriously, it is not harder to write an essay now because there is an internet. If any thing the internet has made writing essays easier. Now if I have to write a paper analyzing the role of the Fool in King Lear, I can just go on Sparknotes and see the character profile and analysis. That is a lot easier than frantically copying out a condensed version of Shakespeare from some old English book.
ReplyNo dude. It makes PLAGIARIZING harder. Not writing a paper. Legitimately writing the paper is easier, yes. But that's not the point, and if it were, in what way would that be a "guilty pleasure"?
Turnitin is probably the single most retarded "development" in the field of plagiarism detection. All my high school teachers used this retarded program, and every single paper was plagiarized, most completely by accident, from some random website or another one of the countless papers submitted to turnitin before. The teacher literally has to go through and check them all again, and yet they still rave about how effective it is. I don't get it.
ReplyTurn it in is so good! we get 250% no 300% of people who plagerise caught
"Honestly, how many years until the technology has advanced to the point that everybody who graduates college actually winds up with some kind of education?" - Easy way out of this situation. A: Learn to read and translate another written language. B: Copy from them. Wait...
ReplyHoly shit. They're doing that in Wisconsin? Only a matter of time until my nephew gets arrested.
Reply