The 5 Most Half Assed Apologies for Historic Crimes
Apologies are so difficult that some people manage to go pretty much their whole lives without ever offering them.
But when you're a government and you need popular opinion on your side, a good apology can pay off in spades. But since most governments are also douchebags, they never want to apologize too much. So there's kind of a delicate balance there that almost always yields thoroughly ridiculous results.

Two months after the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor, FDR signed Executive Order 9066 forcing every single one of the more than 100,000 Japanese-Americans on the West Coast of the United States into internment camps. Officially they were called "Assembly Centers," which sounds a little more fun, sort of like Field Day.

The winner gets a writ of Habeas corpus!
More than two thirds of the people interned were full-fledged U.S. citizens, ripped from their jobs and their homes and forced to leave virtually everything they owned behind.
Then they were transported to hastily renovated racetracks and fairgrounds for the remainder of the war, where hundreds died from inadequate medical care and "bullet in the neck" syndrome.

Basically, they were involuntarily turned into carnival workers, without the dignity.
How'd They Make it All Better?
After the war ended the government reacted shockingly quick, and in 1948 Congress allowed every citizen that was held in the camps to claim compensation for what they had lost. Of course, this offer wasn't made until after the IRS had destroyed most of the detainees' tax returns from the decade before, making it virtually impossible to prove a loss of any kind. This is sort of like stealing somebody's wallet, then saying you'll be happy to return it as soon as they prove their identity with a valid driver's license.

Pictured: 1948 Congressional Policy.
In 1976, after three decades of organized efforts by those affected by the internment and other concerned activists, President Gerald Ford went on record declaring that the ripping of loyal tax-paying American citizens from their homes was "wrong."
This clearly called for swift, decisive action. So, in 1980, the government set up a committee to decide if President Ford's harsh condemnation had gone too far. Then, after only three years of research, they decided the internment camps were "unjust and motivated by racism rather than real military necessity." Finally! Now we can get on with that swift, decisive action!

The system works!
After another decade of fierce deliberation, those citizens that had been affected by the camps received $20,000 compensation for their suffering--which is the equivalent of a whopping $0.96 (or four Chicken McNuggets) a day for the 57 years since they lost everything and were forced into imprisonment.

Justice.

Starting in 1869, the British and Australian governments had a policy of abducting Aboriginal children from their homes, ostensibly to remove them from unsafe households where they were being abused or neglected. In reality, they were stealing mixed race children (or "half-caste" children, in 19th century kidnap-speak) and bringing them to live in white society in the hopes that their ethnicity would eventually be bred out of them.
Some children were even snatched from the hospitals they were born in.
But 1869 was a different time, and surely this policy didn't continue into the 20th century. Wait, it totally did. Until the 1970s.

The reasons to hate 1970s Australia: Now there are two.
How'd They Make it All Better?
In 1997, a human rights inquiry concluded that kidnapping children to try and breed them into whiteness was a pretty big violation of every single moral principle in the history of the world. In response to this discovery, Australia's sitting Prime Minister gallantly stood before the world and declared "Australians of this generation should not be required to accept guilt and blame for past actions and policies." You know, those past actions that ended a whopping 20 years before.

The crimes of the father...
Even so, in 1998 the Australian government instituted an official day to atone for the victims of the kidnappings called National Sorry Day. Yes, that is actually what they called it.

"We need a name that conveys the deep remorse we're supposed to be feeling."
On National Sorry Day, participants sign "Sorry Books" (presumably because no one in the country owns a thesaurus) and walk across bridges en masse, and then eat barbecue. Without a doubt, this is a touching way to repair the damage done by decades of a government sanctioned initiative to completely annihilate an entire culture.

In 1932, a government program was begun in Tuskegee, Alabama to study the effects of syphilis if left untreated.

Spoiler Alert: It fucks you up.
Doctors assembled a pool of hundreds of black men with the disease and told them they were being used to test some experimental new treatments, but injected them with placebos instead. The subjects involved were never told they had syphilis, leaving them free to infect their wives and any subsequent children.

Scientists are kind of assholes.
After four decades of skullduggery, information about the study was finally leaked to the press in 1972, forcing the government to stop the experiment in light of the fact that it was pure fucking evil.
How'd They Make it All Better?
After nearly half a century of destroying families by using bogus health care to subject them to a terrible disease, the U. S. government was prepared to offer some serious compensation to the victims in the form of... more health care, free for life (which realistically wouldn't be for very long considering all of them were carrying an untreated lethal disease thanks to free health care). To silence any doubters, the government pinky-swore that this free heath care was totally on the level.

As you may have guessed, this generous token wasn't quite enough to satisfy the unwitting participants of the longest non-therapeutic experiment on human beings in the history of medicine. They deserved a formal apology, which the government was only too happy to deliver.
Twenty-five years later. After virtually all of them had died.
In 1997, President Bill Clinton invited the remaining survivors to the White House, all of whom were between 90- and 100-years old. By the way, when we say "all" of the surviving victims, we're talking about eight people.

There were more people in the Waltons household.
Of course, Clinton couldn't be bothered to hop a flight down South for the day like the survivors asked him to do, and asked the elderly survivors hop on a plane and come to Washington instead. Only six managed to make it, but the President made it totally worth their time by making fun of how old they were and posing for some stock publicity photos. Because nothing says "I'm sorry" like letting everyone in the world know that you're 95 and have syphilis.

"STDelightful! But seriously, I'm not standing any closer to you."








The Aboriginal Community explicitly asked that our parliament not put the apology in formal terms, and that they wanted to hear the word 'sorry', rather than 'we apologize'. I think that's a fairly important detail.
ReplyThat's hilarious how you equate disapproval of homosexuality with the crusades and the inquisition.
ReplyThat's hilarious how equate the systematic murder of thousands and thousands of people for victimless crimes - crimes, that is, that were largely beyond their control - with 'disapproval'.
I think you just don't understand Australians. They don't bother with thesauri, or subtle wordage, or synonyms for the sake of synonyms or looking cleverer than you are, they just say what they bloody mean! Calling the day "National Sorry Day" would be completely fine! Because that's what it is!
ReplyGotta agree with some of the people here.
ReplyDefinitely a lot of white-guilt in this article.
Actually, protestants did much more evil stuff in the past few hundred years than catholic church did.
ReplyNo they didnt. Ps, even if they did it does not make what your church did in the name of the giant made up invisable super hero that lives inthe sky.
lmao.
The writer of this article obviously knows nothing about the catholic church. I'm not even catholic, and I never have been. I'm atheist, just so you know I'm not biased. Everything he says is basically wrong, he clearly didn't study up on it. As for the whole "molesting little boys" thing, its so stupid. There's going to be crazies in every religion, it happens in to protestants too, its just that catholics have a central power structure, so it comes to light. Whereas the protestant ministers can get away with it for a long damn time. Plus its much more interesting to point the finger at catholics on the news. God people.
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesWell, you have clearly studied up for that argument as your facts and figures with credible references show. Thanks for setting the record straight.
Also, the author is a she, but of course you can't be expected to spend the 2 seconds necessary to look that up.
So because its organised and public it should not be as blamed?
Read the title of the article. She's not saying the Catholic Church is the ONLY religion or religious institution that does horrible things. But, they're the ones who "APOLOGIZED" for it all...
I guess you could say Pope John Paul II didn't take a stance on not taking a stance on the Holocaust.
ReplyYet. He's still got almost 50 years.
I was going to say "make a second article that includes native americans", but then I remembered their suffering isn't over just yet.
Reply Hide All See All 4 RepliesAmen
Its ok, they deserve it.
Why does it matter if their suffering is over, for the purposes of this article? I can't imagine how that's relevant.
The suffering now is self inflicted and nourished, celebrated even.
Rome owes everyone more apologies than they can make.
ReplyDidn't Tony Blair apologize to Ireland for the potato famine 150 years too late?
ReplyYeah, he did. A million people dead, another million emigrated, and population sent into a steady decline that we have yet to recover from. There used to be eleven million people in Ireland. Today there are four million. But hey, I guess holding grudges isn't gonna help either. And all that emigration means that there are now 80 million people of Irish descent all over the world, which is pretty damn impressive.
The thing I could never wrap my head around about the Tuskegee "experiments" is a) surely there was plenty of documentation of what happened with untreated syphilis by this time? It had been around for at least 400 years at this point with the only "cures" being about as bad as the disease itself. And b) what was the point in continuing the "experiment" after penicillin was discovered and in standard use to treat syphilis?
ReplyThey weren't trying to create a cure; they already had one (penicillin). They were trying to figure out what syphilis does specifically to your body if left untreated. Since black people aren't really that important, then...well, you can see how the plan came together at that point.
I'm sure the idea of ridding the world of a few "undesirables" in the most painful way possible wasn't exactly a downside, either. In other words, people don't really need a reason to be cruel. They simply need transparent as hell "justification."
I'm fairly sure "Asians" would mean South Asians. Not many Grace Parks in South Africa.
Replylol, she was BORN in EGYPT.
White guilt, white guilt everywhurr.
ReplyWhat? No Japan and Nanking?
ReplyWar crimes would need their own article. I take that back, World War II war crimes would need their own article.
Japan never apologized for Nanking, I was told.
as an Australian reading the 'sorry day' bit, I'm outraged and appalled.that you weren't harsher on our sorry redneck asses
ReplyIndeed. Considering the PM in question was John Howard, calling the apology half-arsed is being generous. It's probably more like quarter-arsed.
No, I did not like having him as PM. How did you guess?
You guys are appallingly racist, you have weird censorship laws and your treatment of Aboriginal people is still absolutely shit. But I know there are loads of sensible, decent Aussies who think all those things are deplorable. Every country has its assholes who let the rest down. God knows mine does.
But I still can't forgive you for f*****g Neighbours.
In terms of 1 lets see. Gallileo: Put under house arrest and thats really about it. Crusades: war against a violent aggressor who had spent centuries before them, the years during them and would spend centuries after them doing pretty much the same thing to Europe (the Crusades had excesses no question but labeling the whole thing as evil is a little to simplistic). Inquisition: bad yes although a lot of the worst excesses had less to do with the Catholic Church and more to do with Spain.
Reply Hide All See All 4 RepliesDamn it. Here I was thinking that there was a Catholic Church in Spain. And that it was responsible for the spanish inquisition.
Saladin was a fairly cool guy, Europeans just really hated Muslims back then
Nobody involved in the Crusades has cleaner hands than anyone else. Both sides committed atrocities in the name of God.
What he Meant to say Flavio is that the Spanish Catholics operated without Papal support, and committed the worst offenses of the Inquisition. All Spanish Catholics are Catholic, but not all Catholics are Spanish.
Bad for both sides, I guess.........
appologies for anything more than a slip of the tongue or stepping on someone are for sissies,a simple "oops" or "my bad" will do for anything major that idiots still be crying over years and years later
ReplyToday the crusades are seen as a reaction to agressive Islamic expansion, the entire concept of "holy war in the name of god" has been imported from Islam
ReplyReally? and how do you explain the childrens crusade?
Translation error.
"didn't speak the language" - which language is this "the language", since South Africa has about 12 official languages?
ReplyI would assume that by "the language" they meant whatever language was being spoken by whoever was making the question.
I find it utter bullshit that the American internment of Japanese people is on here (Canada did something very similar with their Japanese citizens, and Britian did that with Germans too, including fleeing Jews, did you know that?) but Japan's "apologies" for their holocaust in the nations she invaded (especially China) isn't mentioned. Japan's war crimes were some of the most horrifying ever, and the actions of Imperial Japan were responsible for more deaths than Nazi Germany (mostly because they'd been doing it for years before the Germans did). After everything that Japan had done, what was their apology? A few offhand comments by a few Prime Minsters, most of which were taken back in 2007. That's it. And not only that, but Japan refuses to really teach what went on in China from 1937-1945 in schools, resulting in the current generation being somewhat ignorant of history, and their neighbors are not happy about it. Compare that to Germany, which spends quite a bit of their history classes on the Nazi regime, or the United States, where the internment of Japanese-Americans and the firebombing of Tokyo are both required subjects in history classes in high school.
Reply Hide All See All 6 RepliesI was screaming that the entire article.
Japan did a lot of fucked up stuff during WWII, including colonizing Korea (thus creating the South/North Korea split) and kidnapping girls from Korea, China and Vietnam and shipping them over to service Japanese soldiers.
But this article isn't about Japan. It's about the United States. So the stuff that Japan did is kind of irrelevant, because it doesn't excuse what the US government did to Japanese-American citizens.
Japan should have been no.1, or no.2 [come to think of it]
@Xeg The N./S. Korea split actually had little to do with the Japanese colonization, and everything to do with the rise of the Cold War. The reason Korea was divided was that it was basically to "pay off" the Soviets with territory for their last minute aid in that theater.
Provided, the reason it could be used to pay them off was that it was a Japanese colony and not an independent nation, but the division itself was completely outside of their domain.
This article is about the United States?
sdf