The 8 Most Insulting Attempts to Raise Money for a Cause
So you have an important cause you want to raise money for, or at least it's important to you. But people are slow to part with their hard-earned cash. How do you go about the careful process of trying to get them to take dough out of their pocket and stuff it into yours?
Well it turns out it's difficult, especially if you're a prick.

Every fundraiser needs a hook. You can't just say you want to raise money for syphilis research and offer people the chance to touch your syphilitic wang for $5. You'll barely make $100 that way. You need something that will make people say, "Fuck yeah I want to do that, and it's for a good cause!"
And what better way to raise money for a Republican Superintendent of Education than by shooting doves, the symbol of peace? Well, there is one better way; do it on September 11.

It's possible the entire event was some manner of incredibly Swiftian satire, but the Republican party was never really known for being quite so intentionally hilarious (even though this was just a few months after Dick Cheney shot some poor bastard on his own hunting trip). Maybe it's the fact that Karen Floyd was a candidate in South Carolina and things just work a little differently down there.
The blue areas represent crazy.
It's probably saddest for the doves, of course, who have no idea that they've been made a symbol of peace at all, and even if they did, would have real difficulty grasping why, as a symbol of peace, they need to be shot at to raise money for hawkish politicians wanting to stick it to the anti-war movement. We don't expect you to understand the intricacies of American politics, little dove.

What's hard about giving money to a good cause is you know there are so many others that deserve it. You contribute to microloans to help Third World farmers, but maybe you should have given to cancer research instead. You contributed to the March of Dimes but maybe you should have given money to women who want bigger boobs.
Yes, the sad truth is that we live in a world in which some women can't even afford to have silicone shoved into their tits. Fortunately, myfreeimplants.com is leading the charge against this horrible scourge of modernity by saying "No" to natural breasts and yes to helping disadvantaged ladies get the funding they need to become the proud owners of bulbous sweater kittens.
For the same price of thousands of cups of coffee, you too can sponsor boobs.
Using the power of the Internet, the website joins these underprivileged women with semi-anonymous benefactors whose only desire is to see these ladies benefit from improved self-esteem and confidence and at no time does anyone even ponder wanking to images of big, supple boobies. That would be crass. Sure, some ladies choose to reward donors with nudie pics, but you don't have to. Good luck getting your money, prude.
Ingrate.
Ladies sign up for the site just as men do and, once someone has donated money to her cause, they gain access to her pictures and contact information, making it a fair trade sort of deal, a few bucks towards boobs in exchange for stalking rights to be shared amongst a few dozen or hundred other guys.
Naturally a site so dedicated to helping improve self image goes above and beyond by offering women and men whatever procedure they require to help better themselves, except for none of that is true. The site only serves women and the only procedure they'll help anyone get is breast augmentation. Because they care.

Nothing is more adorable than dressing up your child in a humiliating costume that may give them some sort of complex later in life, except for doing the same thing to your dog. But no one is raising funds with dogs in hilarious costumes that we know of, so we'll stick to children. But we can't just dress them up like Yoda or Snarf or whatever it is the kids are into these days. No, we need to dress them up as the handicapped. For charity.
He's smiling because he's not actually blind.
Confused? So were the parents of students at an Australian Public School when they got a letter telling them their kids needed to dress up a little gimpy to raise money for a clinic in Bangladesh. The school was offering prizes for the best costume and encouraged kids to be creative in thinking up what disability they could represent.

It's fascinating to think that there is more than one adult in Australia who thinks there's a tasteful way to pretend to have a handicap. Will you twitch and bat your chest like the classic retard while eating gum off the floor? Or perhaps get ahold of some kind of degenerative muscle disorder and wheel your way to class?
No, this is like blackface; it doesn't matter how good your intentions are, if next Halloween you go as "Guy who has Cerebral Palsy," you're going to get chased down the street. Now picture an entire school full of children who've been given a blank check to do that and... actually, we would pay money to watch that whole thing unfold.

Probably the first rule of any fundraising campaign is to be sure that the people you're soliciting money from don't already hate you. It's way easier to raise money for something like spaying and neutering dogs if you're the local humane society as opposed to, say, a group of skinheads.
Still, some folks try to be a little crafty with who they are and what they're doing when it comes to raising money. You may be wondering just what sort of lowlife would omit important details like who was running a fundraiser. The answer, of course, is Scientologists.

Back in 2007, when Tom Cruise was busy saving the Earth from aliens, two second string Scientologists (Matt Lauer and Brooke Shields) were headlining a Narconon event in Hawaii. Lisa Marie Presley and John Travolta were to be guests of honor at a $2500 a ticket concert to raise cash for Scientology's anti-drug program.
Scientologists were expecting about 1,000 people to attend, but they'd neglected to mention the term "Scientology" anywhere in the advertising for the event. And while arguably you could say people should know they're behind Narconon and that shouldn't be an issue, when a local newspaper took the time to point out that it was, in fact, a Scientology event, just short of nobody bought a ticket.
Narconon in full swing.
That's right; when the community found out it was a Scientology anti-drug event, they rose up as one and said, "We'd rather have the crack, thank you."








As I was reading 3 I was thinking, oh, that's kind of pleasant - if there's a cause the deceased was really dedicated to maybe you should leave envelopes around for donations, maybe encourage people to donate to that instead of send flowers or cards to the family.
ReplyBut a political party? Bleh. This is probably just because I don't like politics, but that seems a little less tasteful than Aunt So-and-so dedicated her life to orphans, please donate in her name.
However, my awesome neighbor (we were pretty close, almost like he was a great uncle or something) was apparently a huge Communist rabble rouser back in his day. I didn't go to the funeral, but I would kind of love it if they had left envelopes so you could give to the cause, since my parents seemed fairly put off just by the singing. (I'm not a big communist fan, but it's cool to realize your crazy old neighbors were chilling with Jerry Rubin, getting into fights about he was too conservative.)
I don't see anything wrong with giving money to give girls bigger boobs. In fact, it seems like a great idea.
ReplyHere's why it's bad:
1. unless they've had a mastectomy and they're poor, they're moneygrubbing whores (and I'm a woman saying this, that's says something) and 2. you could have donated your money to starving children.
Why is #1 #8?
ReplyTo be fair, that school was in South Australia, which we're hoping will be considered another country one day.
ReplyMaybe we'll christen it "Crackwhorelandia" or something.
Referring to #7, I thought Tits for Tots was the Toys for Tots parody from Denis Leary's Merry Fuckin' Christmas special...it's actually real?
ReplyIs there a reason there's no number one?
ReplyI'm so glad Hubbard's Loonywagon bypassed me.
Reply#3 And people wonder why I think Alex Salmond, Nicola Sturgeon and the rest of the SNP are douchebags. -_-
ReplyBecause, he's a nasty, little, grubby-handed Hitler, who, despite 1 in 10 people in his country living in poverty would rather pursue an independence referendum that will soak up ridiculous amounts of money and time. He'd also like to pursue this at a time when more people are worried about jobs and not being stabbed.
He's such a smug bastard :L Have you seen Obama's "It gets better" video? Youtube it, then youtube the Alex Salmond one... instead of being nice and inspirational, he just reels off a list of things the government has done in the past for gay people :L Also, I met him once on a school trip, he dodged every question we had (like perhaps lowering the voting age to 16) and also he was hitting on our teacher :| slimy fuck.
I thought tits for tots was where strippers, god bless them, stripped half naked for children's charities.
ReplyRoad to Hell is paved with good intentions huh?
ReplyThis group are campaigning Mattel to make a "Bald and Beautiful" barbie for girls who lose their hair to cancer or alopecia. It was on yahoo a few days ago and I think it's a terrible idea. Barbie still has a bunny-girl figure, is her losing her hair going to make little girls going to feel any less inadequate?
Reply"Bunny girl figure"
Best. description. ever.
It doesn't really matter, since most barbies end up being 'French revolution' Barbie anyway. Complete with missing head.
Tip for anyone planning a fundraiser in the future: don't make 9/11 feature in it anywhere. Anywhere at all. It's not going to work. Trust me.
ReplyIn the South, and the West for that matter, dove shoots are nothing unusual. But having it on 9/11 was pretty stupid.
ReplyShooting animals should be unusual anywhere...
...It took me a little while to read #7. I took three BIG pauses.
ReplyWent ahead and looked at that bbc report on the tits for tots thing...
Reply Hide All See All 3 Replies"A website where women can raise cash for breast implants using personal photos is unsafe"
sure
" and degrading,"
...goddamnit everything women do is f*****g degrading isnt it? Yeah i know im gonna get down votes, what ever =/.
Because there is nothing degrading about posting pictures of yourself half-nude to beg for money for bigger tits. :P That isn't "women" (with the obvious impediment of men not needing breast implants... for the most part...), that is pathetic.
I agree with fruitylugi. Anything a woman does with her own body to do anything, other than try to disguise the fact she is female, is called "degrading", "slutty", or "exploitation". Yet a man showing off muscles is considered proud of his masculinity and a fine example of it? Do the women that say that really find the female form so sexual that anything but hiding it is considered blatantly trying to seduce? And even if it is...so what? I have met plenty of women that wanted bigger breasts just because they wanted bigger tits...the fact that every guy and plenty of women drooled over what they already looked like didn't matter, they wanted to look the way they wanted to look.
green, fundamental difference here: These women are not stripping to show their excellent self esteem. They're stripping because they have a poor body image and think silicone will fix it. If she's all natural, I'm all for it. Being desired is a confidence booster - for men and women both. But this isn't about that. It's about plastic surgery for poor self esteem being rewarded by oogling.
The girl you called "ingrate" in #7 is Lucy Pinder, and (according to my sources) is all natural. And God bless her.
ReplyLooks like He did.
I reckon Cracked have lost their proof reader.
Reply Hide All See All 4 RepliesI love how use of the word "reckon" either means you're a hillbilly or from the UK. Why'd the rest of us stop using it? Does anyone know?
... Apparently so did you. I assume you either meant "I reckon the Cracked authors have lost their proof reader" or the close alternative "I reckon Cracked has lost it's proof reader." Although, it is entirely possible that you meant "Damn, I wish I thought of some of that!" I could be paraphrasing there on that last one.
@WynterKnight: Lots of people treat groups\organizations as plural even if it's only one group or organization.
... and so did you WynterKnight. "I reckon Cracked has lost it's proof reader." Proofreader is usually all together as one word, and it's (meaning "it is") should be changed to its.
One list, two Republican mentions. Gee, how odd.
Reply"Uncle Argyle just got blown to smithereens in a tragic haggis accident"
ReplyFuckin' lol
What about the fail-tastic "Live Earth"? It was a pollution-creating anti-pollution fundraiser that even Bob Geldoff thought it was a bad idea!
Replyyeah really. The hypocracy behind that bullshit