2008: The Year the Geeks Took Over
The Geek shall inherit the earth.
Is there any arguing it? You guys who are technology and gadget-obsessed, who have a huge capacity for memorizing bits of information and an infinite hunger for the Next Cool Thing... it's looking like the future will fit you like a glove. One that shoots lasers.
Wait, did we say "the future"? Because looking back on 2008, it seems like that geek-dominated future is already here. Consider...

How many of you had a secret club when you were in school? Maybe you didn't have an actual tree house to meet in or a secret handshake, but at the very least you had a series of inside jokes and references that absolutely nobody else would get in a thousand years. But what if one day you heard the football team borrowing those jokes? Or worse, the teachers? What would that say about your club?
Now imagine what the first few message board friends who started "Rickrolling" each other a couple of years ago must have felt like when they saw Rick Astley interrupt the 2008 Macy's Thanksgiving Day Parade with "Never Gonna Give You Up"...
... to universal laughter and applause by the crowd. "Ah, yes," said countless middle aged housewives and Armani-wearing stockbrokers, "I do believe we have been Rickrolled!"

It was just the latest in a long line of the Internet subculture's invasions into the mainstream. The guys who remember that thread on Something Awful a few years ago, where everybody chipped in wacky facts about Vin Diesel (and later, Chuck Norris) saw that inside forum joke get mentioned in the 2008 presidential campaign. Oh and you can buy the bound version of it in book stores. While you're there, pick up the LOLcats hardback.
Then we have the Anonymous protests against Scientology, where members of the 4chan boards and others formed the world's largest flash mob to take on the cult while wearing V for Vendetta masks, making international news in the process.

Many thought this would stand as their largest accomplishment, but it turned out to be a distant second. The first was when, after invading her message boards, they induced Oprah Winfrey to repeat about three different 4chan memes at once on national television, culminating with the phrase "over 9000 penises."
We guess you have to take the good with the bad from Anonymous. And to be honest we're not even sure which one that was.

For the first 20 years or so of video gaming, it was a kid's pastime. Then, starting in the mid-90s, it branched into a geek pastime.
That was the perception, anyway. As recently as a few years ago, if you saw a grown-up in a movie playing video games, it was the filmmaker's way of signaling that he was an immature man-child (in The 40 Year Old Virgin they demonstrate Steve Carell's lack of a love life via his elaborate gaming setup; in The Break-Up Vince Vaughn's video game addiction proves to his girl he's not ready for an adult relationship).

It was either "video games" or "put him in a diaper."
But Nintendo had an idea. They'd make the control pad for their new machine look like something every non-gamer is familiar with: a TV remote. They'd build a nonthreatening, cheap little console that looked like a device almost every non-gamer owns: an iPod. They'd ship it with games that would be utterly familiar even to someone who had never seen a video game in their life: boxing, tennis, baseball.
In Wii Sports you find no aliens, no blood and guts, no bald-headed space marines, no cutscenes with androgynous heroes casting magic spells. Simple games, with tutorials that would walk you through the even simpler controls.

The result? In 2008, we found rooms full of elderly types playing video games. As we watched them flail around with their Wiimotes, we realized this was gaming doing what gaming does best: taking our minds off of the encroaching black maw of death.
On gaming message boards, the hardcore gamers screamed about how the Wii had ruined their hobby, as if the oldsters and soccer moms had crashed the video game party, clearing out the bongs to put down a shuffleboard court. But it was the opposite. Gaming had finally broken out of the niche, its sprawling roots finally invading every last demographic.

Yes, the Wii is a toy, but don't underestimate gaming's role in the future of the culture. Playing is the brain's way of training itself, and what you are seeing up there are the last non-geek holdouts learning to function in a digital, virtual world, in a way that will define how humans interact with computers in the future. First the Wii, then World of Warcraft, then the neural implants. Right on schedule.

The music industry has been clashing with Internet culture for about as long as the latter has existed. The feud started when the industry heads turned their backs on the geeks years ago by not capitalizing on file-sharing super site Napster.
Napster exploded onto the scene before any other major file-sharing source and said, "Look, this is how we're going to do things from now on." They even offered a piece of the action to all of the major labels (the way the TV networks now have deals with Hulu). They could have gotten on board with Napster, to at least keep all of the file-sharing in one place, before all of the imitators emerged and spread P2P filesharing like wildfire. Of course, that would require the music industry to look ahead instead of clinging for dear life to the old way that bought them those mountains of cocaine and bling.

Jay-Z lives here </[>
So the music industry plugged its fingers into its ears and said "Blah blah blah, I can't hear you, blah blah blah." Instead of figuring out how to make money off file sharing, they invested their time and money into suing Napster and, worse, the downloaders themselves. Did it stop illegal file trading? Ask pretty much all of the music on your iPod.

And now, we have Girl Talk (aka, Greg Gillis), the guy who symbolizes the Wild West that is copyright in the file sharing era. He released Feed the Animals, which is a 55-minute remix/mashup of over 300 pirated tracks that spans decades as well as genres. Listen to a track to hear Lil' Wayne, Cheap Trick, Eminem and Yail Naim all cleverly broken down and mashed together into a stew. Of all of the songs he's sampled, he hasn't asked for permission to use a single one and, somewhat miraculously, hasn't been sued yet.
Then, Gillis released Animals on his label's website on a pay-what-you-want basis, even if what you want to pay happens to be nothing. And it worked.
Sure, Radiohead pulled the same pay-what-you-want stunt last year, but they're Radiohead. They have contracts, the support of a label, a team of lawyers and a loyal fan base they've built over years and years. In Girl Talk we have a guy building a career with pirated music, free downloads and live shows that basically involve him on stage with a series of computers. Look up "geek music" on Wikipedia and it should redirect you to Girl Talk.

Seriously, look at the guy.
Thanks to the spread of Internet and Geek culture, a barely-known artist like Gillis, on a small, obscure label like IllegalArt can explode onto the scene and reach every single top ten list of note, while Guns n' Roses' thirteen-year-in-the-making Chinese Democracy can come out and no one will give a shit.
That was always the true promise of Napster: Instead of being a method of stealing a product, it could circumvent the corporations that stand between the artists and the fans. Direct digital distribution, done in a way that the artist can still make a living off of. The geeks didn't kill the music industry in 2008. They just cut out the middleman.

To the untrained (read "non-geek") eye, comic books, and the movies based off of them, are loud, brightly-colored, fun bits of eye candy; a temporary distraction from real movies that are somber and serious, movies that talk about big issues and feature Meryl Streep.
The popular comic movies of the last decade or so have done very little to argue this idea: The Spider-man franchise was bright and exciting, Superman Returns was colorful and old fashioned, and Fantastic Four was childlike and retarded.

"I dare you to make the sequel even worse. I fucking dare you."
They all had respectable box offices, (Spider-man I and II each broke opening day records), but no notable critic ever included any of them in serious Oscar conversations because they were, after all, just superhero movies. It's the same stigma that keeps out even the most excellent of porn films.
Then along came The Dark Knight, a record-breaking, critically and commercially successful, bona fide phenomenon. If you didn't see it opening weekend, you were most likely in the minority of your office. If you didn't see it by the next weekend, everyone in your office hated you.
It was directed by a real director and written by a real writer (both had Academy Award nominations to their name). Gone were the bright colors and goofy villains, replaced by moral ambiguity and the startling death of a major character. We watched a tense interrogation between a guy in clown makeup and another guy in a bat-themed costume complete with cape, and it didn't come off as frivolous or childish.

For the first time, the creators acted like they weren't ashamed of the material. They didn't make it campy or self-referential, to let their cool friends know they were above it all. For once, they were treating the material as seriously as the fans did.
The result was a comic book movie that will get serious Oscar consideration, and we're not just talking about the geeks campaigning for it on the Internet. Already there are two Golden Globe nominations for Heath Ledger, to go with nominations for awards from the Screen Actors Guild, and both the Chicago and LA Film Critics.

As with video games, it wasn't five years ago that both comics and the movies based on them were aimed strictly at teenagers with the understanding that adult fans embodied the Simpsons Comic Book Guy stereotype and lived in their parents' basements. Now a comic book movie might be placed, rightfully so, among the year's best in motion picture achievement. Five years from now, could we wind up with a video game movie up there?









obama's only half black. It's the white side of his family that helped him go far in life.
Replyobvious troll is an obvious troll. go back to ljdramaz.
The whole Meryl Streep as Samus poster cracked me up. Great article guys.
ReplyI voted for McCain, and I'm not 65 and older. Neither is my husband, who also voted for McCain. I have no idea who I'm voting for in 2012, because none of the candidates interest me. So, yes the "geeks" took over the election in 2008, but where did it lead us?
ReplyThe Matrix starring a black guy isn't too far fetched. Will Smith was originally offered the part of Neo, but he declined in favor of doing Wild Wild West. And just think, we could be entering a future where s**t like that will be pretty common knowledge.
ReplyAnonymous is a cancer on our fair internets.
ReplyAnd I am... what cures cancer?
Radiation. f**k yeah.
I hope someone has explained why the wii and the pass to casual gaming is what has lead to the fear of not deterring from generic ideas.
ReplyBecause I simply can't be bothered to
Essentially: Why make an innovating, though-provoking story and gameplay based game when you can crank out party games for a fraction of the price and move 2 million units.
I'm glad I'm not the only one who remembers that Vin Diesel came first.
ReplyMeryl Streep would make a terrible Samus. We all know it should be Helen Mirren.
ReplyRupert Murdoch looks like a guy from work we affectionately call scrotum face
ReplyThree years, poindexters and idealistic manchildren. You've had three years to prove you know more than the hundreds of generations of right-thinking individuals, and you have not done so and never will. Looking at how things have gone since "the geek took over", I can only say in language you can understand: Epic. Fail.
Reply Hide All See All 4 RepliesUmmmm, yeah. OK. "Hundreds"? You don't think the US has been around for "hundreds" of generations, do you? 15, maybe.
I don't know how long you think it takes for a generation to take over, I'd say in about ten-fifteen years the geeks will rule. Also, congrats on making making the same point twice, likely due to a lack of attention recieved.
Name is "fairynigglet". I rest my case.
You're retarded. "right-thinking" honestly (godwins rule) you sound like hitler gonna persecute dem peole dat don't agree wit me
or possibly a redneck
f**k yeah a Metroid movie!
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesActually, do Fallout first.
I would so watch a ridley scott metroid. But yeah a fallout movie would do better (and wouldn't ahve to fight with existing story as much since all the games stand alone)
Can we consider another actress please?
But doesn't fallout have multiple endings or something? Still, awesome.
I may be wrong, but aren't you legally allowed to use up to 30 seconds of a certain song without fear of copyright infringement? Isn't that covered by Fair Use? Eh...
Replyfair use law does not have any clear rules like that; they'd be open to abuse
I am not a lawyer, but Greg Gillis may well be able to get away with a fair use defense for the kind of thing he does, perhaps explaining why he hasn't been sued yet
Three years later, and oh look at our wonderful future and everything working properly and everyone sitting in a circle going hakuna-matata, how wonderful that all these social retards are now at the helm of the world. Ah, yes, the poindexters and other assorted aspies sure showed all those old guys!
Reply Hide All See All 6 RepliesAh... wrong crowd buddy. The average Cracked reader is a lot smarter than the "aw shucks" crowd.
You mean there was no actual ``change``? If I was American, I would be shocked. How could the first half-black president merely be a disappointingly average politician?
You know you've struck the nerve of the self-deceptive when your votes are in the high negatives. You know what they say, the closer to the target you've hit, the more flak you receive.
You know you've posted a completely incorrect moronic statement when people take the two seconds out of their day to click a button.
trolololololololol
Implying that people born in say the 90s or so have taken over when they are at the absolute oldest 21 more like the previous generation fucked it up and is leaving it to us to fix it.
yes, because geekdom hasn't FIXED EVERYTHING FOREVER it is broken and wrong
Thank you for pointing out that American presidential elections have been won by intentionally idiotic candidates before.
Reply Hide All See All 4 RepliesIf you really think George W. is stupid then that is just sad. Sure his dad bought his way into two Ivy League schools, and sure, his grades weren't the best, but he was also hopped up on coke and killing brain cells with alcohol 99% of the time he was in college. If you can do that and still graduate from an Ivy League, more power to you.
He had an issue with the English language for some reason. His accent and southern living style made him seem more retarded then he actually was. For instance, there was an ongoing comedic joke about how GWB was better speaking Spanish then English. His Spanish was nearly flawless.
Yeah, it's amazing how difficult it is to get kicked out of school when you're the presidents son. Also, (sorry about being pedantic) you don't kill brain cells with alcohol.
GWB wasn't in school when his father was president idiot
Correction, it's amazing how difficult it is to get kicked out of school when you're the son of high profile alumnus who was also the son of a high profile alumnus who was also the son of a high profile alumnus who was also the son of a high profile alumnus. Not to mention the son of a congressman and being in a powerful secret society. Is that better?
great article.... knowledge and wisdom...
ReplyOne of the most well-written cracked articles ever, but especially on the second page.
Replylook at the authors of course its top notch
Those three aren't editors for nothing!
THAT'S RIGHT!!! We will control the universe and when we are done, we will turn on each other and one will have power over all!!
ReplyThere can be only one!
Your idea of #3 is stupid as f**k. Interview any random 10 12 - 16-year-olds and you'll see that yeah, they are definitely a hell of a lot f**king DUMBER compared to the rest of European society then any other generation has been. This is most easily noticeable by the complete LACK of true geeks (or nerds, though those ended in the late 80s). I've seen self-proclaimed "geeks" under the age of 22 or so that f**kING LIKE KE$HA (or can't type properly). YOU CANNOT BE A GEEK AND NOT HATE KE$HA. WHAT THE f**k.. Yes, Jacoby is stupid as f**k, and yes, the students she was observing are probably decently intelligent. BECAUSE THEY ARE GEEKS. Go talk to ANYONE else, and they're an idiot. This maay exclude college students lving in dorms, because they are (if not geeks) more likely to be in the "popular AP classes theater group soccer mom" stereotype, BUT THERE ARE LESS OF THOSE TOO. Leaving the state to go to college while having your own job and getting a college-related job a year later used to be normal, but now it's so unusual that it makes your friend weird if they do it. These teenagers are so f**king stupid in fact that upper-middle-class suburban white kids now routinely call each other hos. The Internet CAN make you smarter, if you start out being intelligent enough to actually research some stuff, which seems to mean in 97% of cases that you have to have existed BEFORE the "internet 2.0" in order to actually ever do this, and in addition you have to be non-mentally-retarded enough to actually accept factual information, which at least half the world was inhibited from before our current media and retarded president infestation. Otherwise, the internet makes you at least 1,000x dumber then any human being has been before in the history of... history. So f**kING DUMB, in fact, that a 19-year-old can't spell the word "you". "YOU." IT'S A THREE-LETTER MOTHERf**kING WORD. I LEARNED TO SPELL THAT WHEN I WAS TWO. YOU'RE NINTEEN MOTHERf**kING YEARS OLD. WHAT THE f**k IS WRONG WITH YOU? There's also been a SEVERE increase in the amount of n****rs in the last 10 years. And really, what possible further evidence could you need that people are f**king dumber?
Reply Hide All See All 13 RepliesYes, you come off as highly intelligent. I tip my hat to you, good sir.
kudos to witticisms elaine.
That is one of the least coherent things I've ever read. That was worse than priest rape.
I'd rather get hit with a brick than read that wall of rage.
I had the feeling that he was insane, and then he went and used the n-word for no good reason at the end to confirm that, yep, he's a hate spewing tool.
I'd be hesitant to correct someone's spelling if I couldn't spell the word "raven".
"DUMBER compared to the rest of European society then any other generation has been." It's than you idiot not then i.e. more than not more then. Whose dumb now you moron!
I'm classed as a geek and I'd wallop the backside off that Kesha/K$sha bird.
Obviously your part of the solution to the stupidity problem, right? cause I can't see that you could the problem. Propostiorous!
I agree with you. The rest of these socially-retarded clowns who can't even come up with a single full-sentence rebuttal only prove your point.
You know all the one-line butthurt replies to this comment? YOU DUMB MOTHERFUCKERS ARE PROVING IT RIGHT! Holy SHIT, you'd think if you were gonna rebut someone saying all geeks are wisdom-less mouth-breathing droolers, you'd try NOT EXACTLY CONFORMING TO THE STEREOTYPE!! I thought nerds were supposed to be smart or something. So once again, thank you for proving that you idiots are unworthy to run anything more important than Counterstrike. Leave the running-the-world to the smart folks who know where their a*****e is.
Cool story bro tell it again
I don't feel like reading all that rant. From what ive read (which is almost none of it) it seems to be about conspiracies (mostly because of the capitalization) so cool story bro
Um, sir, I don't think you used enough CAPS, can you add some more?
I have to say I loved this article until the whole election thing. Basically the theory is that geeks voted for Obama because they embraced change. I was also under the impression that geeks understood the concept of "change for the worst"... but I guess not.
Reply Hide All See All 7 RepliesSorry but Obama was the decent choice, IF you pretend there were only two. #1 he pretended to not like genocide and #2 McCain is pretty stupid as well, and more obviously (at the time) evil. The fact that Obama has the worst record in history of campaign speeches vs. actual presidency is NOT the voters fault. Sure he said basically NOTHING about how the f**k he intended to actually do anything he said, and ALMOST nothing about WHAT he wanted to do, but neither did McCain. Any truly intelligent human being would have voted for Ron Paul (unless they preferred Nader, bur Ron Paul actually had a chande of winning if people werent too dumb to realize you're supposed to vote for the best candidate rather then "the one you dislike least who has been in media the most right before election day," or whatever).
Ron Paul has NO charisma, Obama is young, charismatic, and eloquent, and also the rest of the world, setting America itself aside, loves him. Our relations with a whole chunk of the world has gotten a hell of a lot better because of Obama. And hate him all you want, call him a lier for not making good on all his promises, but i ask you 2 things, 1. What president if any has EVER made good on everything they promised? (spoiler: none) 2. Who do you think was c**kblocking him every time he tried to make a change in policy every step of the way? (another spoiler:the Republican Party, if for no other reason then Obama is a democrat)
The Republicans didn't c**kblock Obama that much. For his first two years, he had the majority in both houses and endless opportunities to actually do something that he said he would and he didn't. Obama was a great speaker (when he had a teleprompter) and was very popular but you won't use that as president, other than to get re-elected. I'm a Republican and I prefered Obama over McCain. Not because I thought he was a better candidate, which he was, but because I knew both of them would suck and that having Obama in office would help the Republicans take back the houses.
THIS is change? No thanks, you can keep it.
"Ron Paul has NO charisma" Because presidential elections should be popularity contests. This is why I hate americans.
Many people were guilt-ed into voting for Obama. They were tired of Bush yet many loved Clinton.. Lets look at this.. for the majority of Clinton 2 terms the Republicans controlled the house and Senate.. For Bush it was the Democrats who controlled the house and Senate. Leaving each president rather ineffectual. Then A democrat Named Obama took the presidency and the Dems controlled all 3, house senate and the oval office.. and things went from bad to worse.. And this article claims it was because he was tech savvy? no it is because most of the younger people between 18-26 are sheep following what they are told to dc and it is not their fault.. In our public school systems they are taught to conform and not think for themselves. any child who shows signs of being an individual is put on meds and labeled with ADHD or some other "illness"
If you don't like the president then sorry, but tough shit. It's a vote, it's democracy, this is how democracy works. If you think the wrong person was elected or that the reasons people vote are wrong, then too f*****g bad! If the more charismatic candidate wins, then he wins. If the war-hero wins, then he wins. Just because you think it's stupid doesn't make it so, it just means you're in the minority. Get over it or do something about it.
Metroid. Ridley Scott. I see wut u did thar, David.
ReplyI about cried when I saw that... and not in the good way. But alas, Hollywood WOULD bastardize Samus as much as they did Mario.
I would watch the s**t out of that movie.