5 Presidential Elections Even Dumber Than This One (Somehow)
"Politics sure have gone down the shitter this election," is what you've probably been saying to yourself for the last 15 months. But you know what? You're wrong.
Dead wrong.
Oh, it's not that politics aren't in the shitter. It's that they were already there. With one month left, the current candidates might have to kick it into overdrive if they hope to out-crazy some of pioneers of absurd campaigning.

Where You See it Today:
Have you seen the McCain ad about Obama wanting to teach sex education to kindergarteners?
Who Made it Cool:
The very first few elections in American history were fairly tame (who's going to run an attack ad against George freaking Washington?) and even the election of 1796, the first between Adams and Jefferson, was pretty straightforward. Complex issues were at stake, sure, but there were a lot of well-thought-out and articulate pamphlets circulating to try to inform the voters about the various candidates. Issues were discussed.

When the election of 1800 rolled around, again between Adams (now president) and Jefferson (his vice), someone stood up and said "How about we just make up shit about the other guy?" A revolutionary idea was born, and it changed American politics forever.
So President Adams' team sent out pamphlets saying if Jefferson was elected he would destroy Christianity, and that, "prostitutes...will preside in the sanctuaries now devoted to the worship of the Most High."
"Guys, I want you to meet our new Pope. She's a Virgo. Loves anal.
When the threat of an all-hooker church wasn't effective enough to destroy Jefferson's career, Adams' Federalists stepped up their game, explaining that Jefferson's America would involve the "teaching of murder robbery, rape, adultery and incest". Thomas Jefferson wants "murder robbery" taught in our elementary schools, people!

Jefferson knew that the Federalists were hurling bullshit and, not to be outdone, he actually went out and hired a professional bullshit-hurler, James Callendar. Armed with nothing but an incredible imagination and a total lack of morals, Callendar effectively convinced a good portion of America that Adams "desperately wanted to attack France" and would if reelected (Americans still liked the French back then, for helping us with the Revolutionary War and all).
James Callendar Man.
This election set the standard for filthy, misleading campaigning. The technique of taking a real quote (Jefferson saying he believes the current religious institutions lead to corruption) and exaggerating it to the point of absurdity (Jefferson wants to blow up Christianity and eat the baby Jesus) was born, and used in every single election since.

Where You See it Today:
Here's a story about Sarah Palin's daughter. And here's one about Obama's wife.
Who Made it Cool:
John Quincy Adams was happy to inherit the mudslinging smear tactics pioneered by his father years earlier. Adams was going up against Andrew Jackson and, since Adams was pretty corrupt himself, he figured the best approach was to smear Jackson's family and accuse him of murder. The man did not do things half way.
Adams' campaign distributed the Coffin Handbill, a pamphlet which claimed Jackson (being a lunatic) killed six innocent soldiers in New Orleans for absolutely no reason. Now in reality Jackson was a little insane and, sure, he probably personally killed a ton of people for no reason. But in this case the soldiers were guilty of robbery, arson, mutiny and desertion. They were tried, found guilty and executed, as was the custom of the time. None of those details were considered important enough to include in the pamphlet, of course.

Still, deliberately misleading voters by ignoring details wasn't enough for the Adams side, so they resorted to cheap, schoolyard dickery. The Cincinnati Gazette was sent an "anonymous" tip (which it promptly printed) saying "General Jackson's mother was a COMMON PROSTITUTE," (capital letters theirs, not ours), and that his father was "a MULATTO MAN."
Worst of all, the Gazette broke a story about Jackson's wife, Rachel. The paper explained that Jackson and Rachel got married even though Rachel was still married to some other guy, making both of them adulterers. In reality it was just a matter of confusion over the divorce papers, but still the accusations of adultery were so hurtful to Rachel that she eventually became ill and died as a result of the stress and humiliation (so, uh...point Adams, we guess).
"I'll kill your wife, I don't even care."
Finally, in what has to be the least subtle negative ad technique in history, Adams' people distributed flyers that said, "Jackson is to be President, and you will be HANGED." It's true! Jackson is running for president on a platform of Murdering Everyone. That he even got the nomination in the first place is just a shocking oversight on everybody's part.

Jackson did win the election, but became bitter and, if possible, even more crazy than he already was as a result.

Where You See it Today:
There's a new story every week about how Obama is too smart or well-spoken or generally too "elitist" while some other story points out how accessible McCain seems, or how Sarah Palin's functional retardation makes her more relatable.
Who Made it Cool:
Whenever a presidential candidate speaks well or seems particularly clean, the immediate strategy of that candidate's opponent is to trash them as elitist, someone who thinks he's better than the hardworking, God-fearing general public.
In 1840, this was taken to an awesome, hilarious extreme. The nominee for the Whig party, the old-as-shit William Henry Harrison, gave himself the label of the "Log Cabin and Hard Cider candidate." Basically Joe Six Pack. The plan of course was to make the opposing Democrats and Martin Van Buren look like a bunch of elitist aristocrats.
Van Buren, seen here drinking champagne. As a cartoon.
There were fliers of Harrison positioned next to log cabins to demonstrate his down-to-earth authenticity. They had parades full of log cabin floats to celebrate Harrison. The business of log-cabin-shaped whiskey flasks fucking exploded. Had "I keep my shit real" been a relevant expression at the time, Harrison would've been widely acknowledged for the extreme realness with which he kept his shit.
"So real, you guys."
The people absolutely loved it.
But here's the thing: Harrison's shit was far from real; it was practically hologram shit. Harrison didn't live in a log cabin or drink hard cider. He had acres and acres of land. He lived in Ohio. In a mansion. Did that stop anyone from praising his log-cabin-ness? Absolutely not.

People were so excited about how real Harrison kept his shit, no one seemed to care that he didn't actually run on a platform that expressed a single view or opinion about anything. Honestly. His campaign manager's main strategy was "Let no committee, no convention, no town meeting extract from him a single word about what he thinks now or what he will do hereafter." That is a direct quote.
So, with all this praise for Harrison, what was being said about Van Buren, the incumbent president? Well, his opponents launched the most scathing attacks imaginable when it was revealed that Van Buren installed a bathtub in the White House. Apparently in the 1840s, only pimps and vampires bathed. Or you'd think so seeing how the public lost their shit over this.
You had to be there.
As absurd as it is to attack someone for regularly bathing, it worked. In the end, 78 percent of the voters chose Harrison. Van Buren left the White House after one term, disgraced and offensively clean.
But the joke was on everyone, because, after taking office, Harrison died inside a month and his successor, John Tyler (described as a "poor, miserable, despised imbecile" and given the nickname "His Accidency") took over the White House. Tyler was one of the most hated presidents of all time and was nearly impeached.

Why did we bring that up? No reason at all. Really.








I like Obama. That is all...
ReplyWhy are only Republicans considered retarded when they say something stupid? Like the Democrats never said anything stupid. And no, Republicans don't do it any more often than Democrats do.
ReplyI give you an upvote for your fairness. I do hope you have a nice day.
I don't care how much the folks on this site love Obama, they HAVE to agree that Biden is not only and idiot, but possibly insane. The silence regarding this matter is truly deafening.
Good read, liked it. Have fun with the upcoming election everybody, I'll be watching you from across the Atlantic.
ReplyYou lucky so-and-so.
...So, I can't tell if the Stop Obama pictures with him in front of a burning declaration of independence are part of the article or just remarkably well-timed ads.
ReplyThe great thing about this article is, no matter what year it is, the title will always apply.
ReplyLol in the pic it looks like they are about to kiss
Reply- Grover "The Only Thing Anyone Remembers About Me From History Class is that I Served Two Nonconsecutive Terms" Cleveland
ReplyYou're just so good at this.
I looked it up on Wikipedia. That's actually pretty much it.
Apparently in the 1840s, only pimps and vampires bathed. Or you'd think so seeing how the public lost their s**t over this.
ReplyI f*****g died when reading that bit.
Responding to the first line, Oboma may not have been directly involved, but the Democratic governer of Wyoming did in fact approv a sex-ed course that begins in kindergarden. The legislature promptly passed a bill to stop it. So he vetoed the bill- With a f*****g branding iron. In related news, towns in northern Colorodo and southern Montana are seeing a sharp increase in elementery school enrollment.
ReplyI'm really not sure how anyone can write about the 1876 election without mentioning that it took place against the background of vicious paramilitary efforts by white supremacists in the South to relegate the recently-freed black slaves to "sharecropper" status, a system that left Southern Blacks as slaves in all but name until the Civil Rights movement. Democrats of the day were the party of white (ex-) slave-holders, and the Republicans were the party of Lincoln. I'm not saying that there wasn't massive corruption in the Republican party, but to frame it as dirty Hayes against clean Tilden is pretty naive. One of the reasons that Tilden was winning so handily was that, in many areas, voting for Hayes or even voting at all could mean seeing your home burned down and your family slaughtered, or even being lynched before you ever made it to the ballot box.
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesAlso, it's not like the Democrats didn't get anything out of the 1877 Compromise. Hayes got the presidency on a promise to remove all federal troops from the South, which he quickly did, leaving the ex-slaves, though nominally American citizens, to the tender mercies of Jim Crow and the KKK. Looking at the situation in 1877, you'd be hard-pressed to pick out the side that had won a hard-fought war only a decade and a half earlier. I can't really think of another situation where a regime has been so thoroughly defeated on the battlefield, and yet re-emerged virtually unscathed so soon afterwards.
Republicans likes to use policies made by the "Republicans" of that time and say it's theirs, ignoring the little tidbit that those were actually like today's democrats .
Not either mind you. I hate you all.
RyanNoh, you are aware at that time the Democrats supported slavery, white supremacy, and Jim Crow laws right?
...yeah, I think he probably does, jesse_james. He compared the Republicans of the past to the Democrats of today, so...
Grant himself was not corrupt, merely his "Friends" that he appointed to office. He was just a sickly, inept old war hero who was in over his head
ReplyNot true. Grant attempted to return to the Presidency in 1880 as the leader of the Stalwart faction. The Stalwarts were determined to thwart civil service reform and keep public jobs in the hands of the machine bosses.
James G. Blaine was not hugely corrupt, in fact he was an enemy of the most corrupt president in America history, Grant. It was the conflict between Blaine's faction and Grant's that led to the total nonentity of Hayes being nominated.
Reply"It's true! Jackson is running for president on a platform of Murdering Everyone. That he even got the nomination in the first place is just a shocking oversight on everybody's part."
ReplyLol.
I bet with my coworker $5 that there wouuld be a retarded political debate in the comments
ReplyI wonder what is should buy with them..
Still laughing at Sarah Palin's "functional retardation"
ReplyI dont like it. At all. There are al ot of people with real disabilities trying very very hard to get through the day.
They do not deserve to be compared to Ms. Slaughters Animals Frmo Helicopters Palin. What is the matter with you?! Not even sarah palin deserves to be called Sarah Palin.
Dirty pool, mister.
I'd argue about your point, Wendigo (It was a joke on a comedy website, after all), but instead I'll make a joke of my own: Her apparent retardation does make her more relatable. She'd be even better if she was hotter, Christian and hated Muslims and Commies, which happens to include me...
Oooooooooh politically controversial.
ReplyScandalous!
Um, W H Harrison lived in Virginia, in a mansion (his ancestors had been planter aristocracy since the 1600s). It was his President Benjamin Harrison who lived in Ohio.
ReplyI don't know if this was said already, but in #5, regarding America's view of France being great. That election was fresh off the heels of the XYZ affair and we were very very close to going to war with France, so Adams wanting to attack wasn't entirely false and the people didn't NOT want to attack France. They just knew that the new nation wasn't strong enough for another war so soon.
ReplyThe 1796 election? You are off by about 4 years, boy.
Whenever I hear somebody b***h about how bad politics supposedly is today, I remind them that our leaders (not just Andrew Jackson, either) made a habit of shooting, stabbing and physically assaulting one another in the "good old days."
ReplyHow is that a bad thing. Negotiations would be a cage match.
It would certainly weed out the fence-sitters and mercenaries.
Well this wasn't slightly biased at all...
Reply