Welcome, PWoT fans! David Wong and PWoT have merged operations with Cracked.com, so you need to update your bookmarks or else you're going to see this damned banner every time:

Register

The 5 Scientific Experiments Most Likely to End the World

By S Peter Davis August 27, 2008 1,276,938 views
article image

Let's face it, we really trust science. In fact, studies suggest that the vast majority of people will murder another human being, if a guy in a lab coat tells them it's OK.

But surely in their insatiable curiosity and desire to put knowledge above all things, science would never, say, inadvertently set off a chain of events that lead to some sort of disaster that ended the world. Right?

Well, here's five experiments that may prove us wrong.

#5.
Recreating the Big Bang

Scientists are kind of pissed that they weren't around when the Big Bang happened. Here we had an event that holds all of the secrets to reality, and we missed it because we were lazy enough not to evolve for another 13 billion years.

The solution, science says, is to make it happen again. They assure us that they can stage a new Big Bang if they smash some protons together really, really fucking hard. In fact, they can make a million of them per second, which is 999,999 more than God managed.


God, 1. Science, 999,999.

What Could Possibly Go Wrong?

Well, first imagine an apocalyptic nuclear holocaust. Multiply that by about one hundred and twenty thousand billion, and then multiply that by around the neighborhood of infinity. That equals around one eighth of the magnitude of the Big Bang. Nevertheless, scientists are pretty sure they can contain their Big Bang in an erlenmeyer flask, just so long as they remember to cork it.

So, Basically It's Like...

Imagine you have a huge tanker truck parked outside a children's hospital. You don't know what's inside it, but you're fairly confident that it's either a cure for cancer, or 20,000 gallons of explosive nitroglycerin. To find out which, you have to shoot at it with an AK-47.

How Long Have We Got?

Meet the Large Hadron Collider.

This is not only the largest particle accelerator ever built, it's the largest anything ever built. Originally set to come online in 2005, then delayed until September 2008, the LHC will fire very small objects around its 17-mile circumference at close to the speed of light, before smashing the shit out of them and watching what comes out.

The problem, of course, is that even the eggheads don't really know what's going to happen, which is sort of why they're doing it in the first place. That's also why a lawsuit was filed to put a stop to it. Scientists on the LHC project insist there is no danger, and predict that the resulting observations could revolutionize science and send us into a golden age of knowledge, in the event that we actually survive.

Risk Level: 3

Experts assure us that based on everything we know about science, the chances of doom are fairly slim. Experts also say LHC will change everything we know about science. So there is a certain chance that one of the brand new things they learn about the LHC is that the LHC has the ability turn the entire planet into a fine cloud of particles.

#4.
The Quantum Zeno Effect

For years, scientists have been scouring the cosmos for some kind of bizarre hypothetical anti-gravity bullshit they're calling "dark energy". And they've had some success with it ... perhaps at the expense of our mortal souls.

To grossly simplify it, on a scale smaller than atoms, the quantum level, everything suddenly turns into a goddamn circus. Quantum physics is to regular everyday physics as a David Lynch film is to a mainstream blockbuster. We're talking particles popping in and out of existence, being in two places at the same time, and generally acting like assholes.


Look at that particle. What an asshole.

No doubt the strangest part is the Quantum Zeno effect, which points out that simply observing and measuring particles changes them (specifically, changing the rate at which they decay). How? No one knows. It appears to be the closest science has ever come to proving black magic exists.

What Could Possibly Go Wrong?

One prominent scientist theorized that the changes caused by simply observing dark energy could cause it to collapse, taking the universe with it.

Scientists, eager to see if this is true, are furiously observing dark energy whenever they get the chance.

So, Basically It's Like...

It's like crossing the streams in Ghostbusters, apparently.

How Long Have We Got?

That scientist, Professor Lawrence Krauss, thinks it may already be underway. Apparently, in the late 90s, scientists were looking at a bunch of shit exploding in space when they caught their first glimpse of some dark energy. This may have put the universe into a state where it may or may not pop like a soap bubble at any given instant. Just because we looked at it. Holy balls.


This, but with our universe in it. And about to pop.

Risk Level: 3

This ... this can't be right, can it? Surely the guy's just nuts. Then again, he appears to be one of the most prominent physicists in the country and has published a huge list of papers and books on the subject.

Then again, one of them was The Physics of Star Trek and, now that we think about it, we're pretty sure he stole this whole scenario from an episode of The Next Generation.

#3.
Strange Matter

As you've probably worked out by now, there's some weird shit out there in the world of science. That's because a whole lot of the fundamental theories about reality are based on mathematical equations rather than actual observation. So there are all sorts of things out there that seem to exist in theory, but we've never seen them. At least one scientist has suggested that if we ever saw them with our own eyes, it's likely that we would start screaming and never stop. Well, it wasn't so much a scientists as HP Lovecraft.

Anyway, Strange matter is one of these things. It's a hypothetical material made up of quarks, which are one of the building blocks of reality, things so small that you can't even possibly imagine. Seriously, don't even try to think about it.

What Could Possibly Go Wrong?

There are two hypotheses about strange matter. One is that the stuff will simply disappear a fraction of a second after it appears. The other is that it will stabilize and convert every atom it comes in contact with into more strange matter. It could go either way, really.

There's a theory that there are entire stars out there in the universe that are made out of strange matter, just because a microscopic fragment of the stuff made contact once and then everything went to hell.

Now imagine, just theoretically, if some of this strange matter should appear on Earth. And, just theoretically, it should be stable enough to start a reaction with regular matter. Theoretically, we'd all be fucking dead.


Not Pictured: Life.

So, Basically It's Like...

Imagine you're like the fabled King Midas, and you have the power to convert matter with a single touch. Except that instead of gold, everything you touch turns into shit. And everything it touches turns to shit. Before you know it, the whole world is shit, and it's all your fault.

How Long Have We Got?

Luckily for us, strange matter can only be created in high-energy particle collisions, and nothing like that ever happens here, right? Oh, wait.

Meet the Large Hadron Collider. Again.

That's right, our friends at the LHC project expect a lot of weird things to pop up when they start smashing atoms together, and strange matter is one such possibility. That's why scientists have written papers with boring titles such as Will Relativistic Heavy-ion Colliders Destroy Our Planet?, the rebuttals to which were basically, "Let's turn them on and find out!"

At this point we're kind of wondering whether there's anything this machine can do that doesn't involve killing you and everyone you care about.

Risk Level: 5

Scientists respond to the strange matter problem by saying if it was ever going to happen, it would have happened already (since these kind of reactions happen a zillion times a second in our atmosphere anyway). We like to call this piece of rhetoric the cop-out hypothesis, because they know damned well that if it turns out they're wrong, there won't be anyone left to sue them.

@ The MadCommentor, oh brother, normally I find comments on Cracked funny, but the sheer amount of boring that is your comment has actually driven me to make an account to comment on your comment. This is Cracked, where most of the stuff written is satirical and hardly serious. For you to take this seriously has defeated the purpose of reading here. If I wanted the hardcore facts, I'd sit down to some Discovery Channel/National Geo or some other thing. Rather I'm here to read something funny and laugh. If what you want are facts/truth (other words for boring) go read the Newspaper or something.

11/9/2009 7:45:39 AM
Crytotic3

Oh brother. Normally I find a lot of Cracked stuff funny, but the sheer paranoia of this one actually drove me to make an account just to comment on this:

1. The Big Bang was not so much the creation of matter as the release of matter. The state of the universe at the Big Bang, according to General Relativity, was infinitely small, infinitely dense, and infinitely hot. At the Big Bang, Everything moved away from each other, making the universe larger, less dense, and colder. No new material being formed. In other words, the most we'd get out of this is a miniature universe of a whopping two particles. More appear everywhere instantly in Quantum mechanics. Speaking of which...
2. I'm no expert in quantum mechanics, but t my knowledge, it's not observing the universe itself but interacting with it. For instance, shining EMR on a particle to "see" it changes it's rate of movement. However, detecting a Supernova doesn't work like that. We do not shine light onto them; the light from a supernova reaches us. Indeed, we have no impact on it what so ever... at least not for however many light years away it was, assuming it's still there in a completely non-changing state. (Hah, yeah right. Nothing stays the same in QM)
3. Again, this is happening all the time. Although Command and Conquer had fun with this concept, there doesn't seem to be much of a threat. Also, enough with the LHC already.
4. Oh brother. You don't seem to even have a solid basis for this one, beyond "Oh, no one knows what will happen." Furthermore, Quantum mechanics already shows that Time Travel is possible on a quantum level, both forwards and backwards. Also, a sudden influx of Colonists from the end of the world would presumably have the knowledge to, rather than go back in time to a vastly more primitive era on earth, oh, GO SOMEWHERE ELSE. Fun Fact: The Wormholes mentioned for time travel can remain in the same time-dimension, but transfer to a different space.
5. So the apocalypse is based on the cration of a mechanical supervirus consuming everything? For starters, since when have computers ever worked perfectly? Second, I don't know where you figure that the order to "consume all in their path" comes from. Finally, EMF really does a number on computers, last I checked. Or do your credit cards work after being swiped by a magnet?

Quite frankly, I'm amazed Nukes aren't on this list. They actually might do it.

11/5/2009 4:22:27 AM
THEMADCOMMENTOR

I've pictured one of the possible scenarios at http://nrai.deviantart.com/art/About-the-LHC-85783833
Based on actual scientific speculations[citation needed]

11/3/2009 12:04:28 AM
Nrai

nanobots will kill us! they have to stop researching them it's obvious some douche is gonna mess up (actually all it takes it's one cancerous bot even a slight radiation could do it is it works does with human cells) and we'll all end up being consumed from the inside by millions of those fuckers. I'd so much rather LHC would kill us first (after letting us take a peek of the beginning of the universe of course, or at least a couple of other dimensions, before we crush into a singularity).

11/1/2009 12:44:51 AM
Human_gs

As was already stated in the article, the collisions that will occur in the LHC occur ALL THE f*****g TIME in the atmosphere. Like, by the time you finish reading the article, trillions of collisions will have occurred. The LHC simply allows us to observe these collisions.

10/30/2009 9:48:49 PM
AbsolutFirefox

That large hadron collider is going to kill us all.

10/25/2009 9:16:04 AM
Alex12345269

I think these scientists need to stop with their "destroy humanity because I'm bored as hell" and (re)start with the "Lets find a cure for s**t that we can't find a cure for"

10/21/2009 4:41:31 PM
1337_5K1LL5

Oh s**t... In a year or twenty, the whole world is going to be just like one of those Terminator Movies, execept we have no f*****g chance, and there's no one to help us. That'd take about ten seconds for us all to f*****g die, and there would be no one left to sue the a*****e scientists, or chop off their dicks.

9/13/2009 2:47:37 PM
Zabladezz

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uWmJfX2AI2Q -an accurate depiction of #3/a TANGStrange Matter Apocalypse.

It was only a matter of time before someone linked to End of Evangelion...

8/20/2009 1:18:43 PM
Androidraptor

"Look at that particle. What an a*****e."

I nearly died laughing.

8/14/2009 11:14:24 PM
presidentjlh

yeah i think nano tech is gonna kill us so think of it were going to have those thing in our heart our most inportd thing(other than skin and brin)what is one took contoll and starte zappin stuff and probly end your life god dang since!

8/13/2009 12:04:00 PM
texasgotexas

gee S3 the LHC hasn't destroyed us yet because the f****r broke down immediately after they fired it up. (not saying that it will destroy us)

8/5/2009 2:09:02 AM
aaandrew

Has no one watched Stargate? They had evil nanobots. They were called Replicators. They're pretty much invincible. So why build s**t that'll kill us? Goddamn.

8/3/2009 7:41:39 AM
SPARTANIname

Please, writer of this article, can you stop using God's name in vain in your article and stop swearing please!!! That really could end the world!

7/25/2009 12:21:32 PM
dfthaman

Let me show you a graph I made:

Has the Large Hadron Collider destroyed us yet? --------------> NO!

7/25/2009 8:06:27 AM
S3PARADIGM

It's only human nature to be scared by stuff you don't fully understand.

With that said, this article should SO be mentioned on Wikipedia. Preferably on its article about the Large Hadron Collider.

7/11/2009 5:55:18 AM
Luigifan

MOAK.....

No guarantee that you are reading this today because it seems like it has been a couple months for you, but...just out of curiosity-have you crunched the numbers to know that all is going to be well? And, since you have that guesstimate, you should post them so that people actually believe you know what the hell you're talking about rather than making a statement you do not have the means to prove, nor are you some man high up on the food chain that demands respect from any other reader on why we should give a s**t on what it is that you claim without presenting the facts yourself!

7/4/2009 3:49:32 PM
somethingpoetic

has anyone seen the knowing?
what if that happens???

7/2/2009 5:21:33 PM
Kman484

It was this article that first turned me on to cracked and made me want to contribute. Funniest thing I ever read, not shitting you.

6/6/2009 4:45:40 PM
psychedeli

Funny website: http://www.hasthelargehadroncolliderdestroyedtheworldyet.com/

6/3/2009 12:09:04 PM
Enrunwen
Cracked stuff on