The 6 Most Insane Crash Diets of All Time
When we say, "all time," we mean it. The news talks about obesity like it's a recent epidemic, but the truth is that fat people have existed throughout recorded history. Without modern inventions, people in earlier times had to work 10 times harder to get fat, but the extraordinary men and women of those eras persevered and managed, in many cases, to achieve spectacular obesity.
For as long as that has happened, those people have searched for ways to shed the pounds while avoiding "exercise and a sensible diet" at all costs. As you'll see, often it would have been better to just stay fat.
In 1087, England's William the Conqueror got really fat. Hurt by comments such as King Phillip of France's description of him as "looking pregnant," and despondent over his inability to ride a horse without breaking it in half, he took to his bed and drank nothing but alcohol in an attempt to lose weight.
The Theory:
One can only speculate the reasoning behind it (we know of several guys who tried this diet in college, but for different reasons), but the idea probably went something like this: Food makes you fat. To lose weight, you can stop eating food. But then you'll be hungry. You won't care if you're hungry if you're passed out from too much booze. The booze can't possibly make you fat, because it's a drink, not food. Right?
The Reality:
Wrong. Here is a rough breakdown of calories per gram for the various basic substances we eat:
- Carbohydrates: 4 cal/g
- Proteins: 4 cal/g
- Alcohol: 7 cal/g
- Fat: 9 cal/g
As you can see, William could not have been much worse off sipping lard.
The Results:
On one hand, William was able to get back on his horse again. We know this because he died of complications by falling off of it. You could say he was successful, because he was able to get back on the horse, or unsuccessful because he had trouble staying on it.
Either way, he was allegedly too large to fit into his coffin at burial time and his body was said to have bloated in the afternoon heat and exploded from all the prodding, leaving a reportedly unbearable stench in the church. Any time your body explodes, it's typically the sign of a failed diet.
Yet, in 1964, Robert Cameron put William's philosophy into print with The Drinking Man's Diet, which emphasized cutting carbohydrates, but whose main attention-getter was its recommendation of alcoholic drinks, which generally contain very few carbs. While he neglected to emphasize that alcohol has almost twice as many calories per gram, and that it may not be the healthiest of substances to incorporate into your regular diet, this was brought up rather vocally by doctors at the time. We have to question Cameron's actual motivation here, just as people questioned ours when we came up with the Porn Diet.
The fact that "beer belly" is a common term in modern lingo goes to show that we've pretty much got the idea.
The practice of throwing up after a meal is actually older than Hollywood and photographic airbrushing techniques, although Julius Caesar's attached psychological issues may have varied slightly from those of young women today. From accounts such as Cicero's, which explained how Caesar escaped an assassination attempt by vomiting after dinner in his bedroom instead of in the bathroom where his assassins expected him, it seems this sort of practice was common enough in Rome that no one batted an eye. Then again, so was watching a prisoner and a bear fight to the death for fun.
Now, people keep quoting "fun facts" about how ancient Romans threw up so much that they had special rooms to do it in, called "vomitoriums." Not so. While they did vomit a lot, and they did have rooms called vomitoriums, they were actually unrelated. Vomitoriums were just hallways in large stadiums where people exited all at once (so they "vomited" people out onto the streets when the event was over). Although, if they had just come out from watching a bear tear a man's arms off, they might have actually vomited in the vomitorium, but that would just be coincidence.
The Theory:
The idea is straightforward enough--to get rid of the food before you have time to digest it and turn it into fat. In the context of the Romans, they seemed to really enjoy eating and thought of it as a way to make room for more. They were type-A, impatient people who had a continent to conquer and couldn't bother with waiting for it to go out the other end.
The Reality:
By now most people are aware of the health consequences of repeated vomiting. But, just for the record, it causes tooth decay, osteoporosis, heart problems, kidney problems, damage to the esophagus, and fainting from low blood pressure. You know how when you throw up, it sort of feels like you're dying? That's your body trying to tell you something. Despite that, people still do it and we call it bulimia.
The Results:
Caesar was, as you probably know, murdered before any of these symptoms really had a chance to show themselves. As for others engaging in the practice at the time, we're not sure, since complaints about bulimia symptoms probably would have gotten lost in complaints about syphilis, gout, parasites and the other 5 million diseases people picked up by age 30 back then.
These days, we've figured out that the practice can make you die, so on the scale of sensible diet solutions it's about the same as sticking a bear in your kitchen to keep you from getting to the fridge.
In the 1820s, a somewhat insane Presbyterian minister named Sylvester Graham came to the conclusion that lustful desires were caused by diet, and that basically, a strict bland diet would stop people from thinking about sex.
The Theory:
Graham's reasoning was basically that eating meat and fat causes a person to become lustful, and sexual desires cause, as we all know, epilepsy, spinal diseases, tuberculosis and other serious diseases. If people couldn't keep their desires under control, they might even end up masturbating, which of course, causes blindness. Also, ketchup and mustard cause insanity. No doubt he had sound scientific backing for all this.
The Reality:
You know who eats a bland, strict diet? Sailors. Guess who also has a reputation for rampant whoring the moment they come ashore. Also? Prisoners. From them, you could make the case that a bland, strict diet causes both shankings and violent man-rape.
The Results:
While a fair amount of people were pretty sure Graham was insane, others bought into his philosophy, which didn't cause much ruckus as long as they were only putting themselves on the diet. However, in 1840, the leadership of Oberlin College was convinced to adopt and enforce Graham's diet on its student body.
Dissatisfaction reached a turning point when one professor was fired for scandalously bringing a pepper shaker to lunch. Things went downhill after "Peppergate," as the press at the time would not have called it, and the grand experiment was canceled.
Graham's legacy was a bland, tasteless whole-grain cracker he invented as a staple of the diet, which became known as the "Graham cracker," a name so clearly evocative of delicious flavor that Nabisco later named its completely different, enriched-flour, honey-flavored cracker after it. Due to the extreme changes from the original recipe, modern-day Graham crackers no longer have the ability to cure lustful thoughts.








See what you did there with the "commenting on the internet" calorie burn rate...
ReplyWhy just why would u eat tapeworms? Just why?
ReplyBecause some people are really f*****g stupid. That's about all there is to it. Some folks are so desperate to look a certain way they will do ANYTHING to reach their goal. Doing what I'm doing, and trying to exercise now and then, would be too much effort for some, so they go the tapeworm method instead.
Pretty awesome that the article between pages 1 and 2 is for "Herbal Magic" (lose up to 20 lbs in 8 weeks!)
ReplyI actually kicked my nicotine addiction by drinking myself to sleep for a few nights. Yeah, you want to smoke even more when you're drunk, but then you just keep drinking until you pass out and it's all good. Got a hangover from hell? Drink more. Now I just need to figure out how to sleep without drinking.
ReplyWoo Hoo! Where can i get me some tapeworms?
ReplyMan the comments section for this article is almost funnier than the actual article. Personal highlights for me was the jackass commenting about how when we say weight we really mean mass - and the following smart ass comments after that; the person who says that the vomit rooms never existed - only to be immediately shut down by the next comment; and the numerous people who come down here to actually argue for one of the above mentioned diets claiming that if properly regulated it will indeed work.
ReplyThanks again cracked commenters, you make my day
The alcohol diet is actually semi-true. The catch is you have to just drink hard liquor. No mixers, no food, just wake up to a bottle of vodka and pound it all day. While you'll probably be dead within a matter of weeks, you'll lose a lot of weight before that happens.
ReplyThe reason is that while alcohol does contain a lot of calories, your body can't convert them fat without protein, you need both kinds of molecules. So it either burns them immediately or gets rid of them. And since alcohol has no nutritional value, your body is forced to burn fat. It's kinda similar to the Atkins die, but in reverse. With Atkins you eliminate carbs and booze, forcing your body to live on protein. Without the carbs it can't turn the protein into fat.
I remember reading somewhere that Katie Price (I dunno if you Americans know her...basically your average trashy celebrity) lost all of the weight she gained while pregnant within two weeks of giving birth, by just drinking juice for those two weeks. How the hell she thought losing two stone in two weeks was heathly I guess I'll never know. I mean Victoria Beckham is bordering on anorexic skinny but she at least took a couple months to lose the weight...
ReplyShe is such a skinny trash monster. I would not f**k her for practice.
burn calories burn! comment!
ReplyThe tapeworms one made me throw up in my mouth a little bit. After reading that I don't want to finish the rest of my afternoon tea.
ReplyI would hardly call a mental illness a crash diet.
ReplyWhy not? Aspergers is called "autism" as an excuse for asocial behavior.
Sean, you really are an idiot .......
This was my favorite Christina article.
Reply55 calories. done. the fat is just melting off with each post.
ReplyHi. Happy New Year everyone!
ReplyI'm a sweet, friendly, honest and caring girl in search of casual encounters. I've been single for over two year, so I got a profile(Angel78) on --Casualloving dot c'0m--. It's where for men and women looking for intimate encounters.
It's the first and safe place for people who wanna to start a short-term relationship. Maybe you wanna hit me up, seriously!no bounds or limits in front of true love.
++++++Life is short. Enjoy yourself.
I'm a irritating, unfriendly, dishonest and uncaring spambot spanker. Interested?
Yes, Zombie. Yes I am! Please send me a link so that I can send you my bank account number, credit cards, and SSN. Tossing off here in the glow of my moniter, alone in my sad basement room, will mean so much more knowing that you care.
Actually, while it's gross, it's perfectly fine to sometimes glance at your poo. Don't start exploring it or anything, but if you notice blood or something like that in your poo, see a doctor. :P
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesThat's why I hate auto flushing toilets. I only check to see if anything is wrong. Not to dig around in it. But as soon as I get up WhoOp it's gone. Sometimes the toilet flushes before you even get up.
Although the Internet is a fairly anonymous medium certain items of one's personality and habits are always best kept to one's self. A perfect example is a person's poo watching habits. Indeed merely the fact that the one phrase about poo watching was the item that solicited a serious comment out of a thousand word article is probably releasing too much information as to what peaks a person's interest. Not swallowing tapeworms or drinking yourself to death; poo watching. Truly a more noble exchange of ideas could not be imagined. May I posit this question: Which textures and colors are you most looking for in a healthy poo?
purple and spiky
... I think I watch My Little Pony at a level where I read "parasites" as "parasprites."
ReplyBut I shall not complain. No such thing as too much ponies.
I think you have a problem. And I'm a brony.
Every time I see your name I read it as parasite
Cabbage soup diet anyone? Blah!!
Replywatercress soup diet is fucking revolting too
*LOLOLOLOL* I got an advertisement for Ina Garten's easy recipes at the bottom!!!
ReplyContrary to popular belief, all these diets aim to decrease mass, not decrease weight. Mass is the number you see on a scale. Weight=Mass x Acceleration due to Gravity (9.8 on Earth).
Reply Hide All See All 7 Repliesoh jeez....shuuuuuut uuuuupp
Yeah, good save. People might have read this article and thought "Hell, if they wanted to lose weight, why didn't they simply go into space?" Thanks for clarifying this point.
Jackass.
check your facts. according to physics, "The mass of an object is a fundamental property of the object; a numerical measure of its inertia; a fundamental measure of the amount of matter in the object." (Georgia State Univ. Physics dept.) "The weight of an object is defined as the force of gravity on the object and may be calculated as the mass times the acceleration of gravity, w = mg" (Also Georgia State)
@Trombone the point is, you're being rather irrelevant. Yes, scientifically, there's a difference, but in colloquial speech, there isn't.
Decreasing mass also decreases weight, as long as gravity remains constant. So yes, the diets aim to decrease mass. And weight.
Technically yes, however Weight is equal to the mass 1 x the acceleration due to gravity, the acceleration is equal to mass 1*mass 2*G/r^2 / mass 1 where r^2 is the distance between the two objects, through Newton's second law since we know that mass 2*G/r^2= 9.8 on Earth we get that Mass 1 * 9.8 = the weight so thus with any change in mass there is a corresponding change to weight so while technically we are trying to change our mass, since we are all with in a stable distance to the earth, that the highest point we can economically reach is so inconsequential to our calculations, there is a direct change to our weight as well. If anyone wants they can correct me, i'm currently taking physics in high school. And i know its been said but i'm bored
Maybe you mean creating a significant local, mobile curvature of spacetime, counteracting Earth's own gravity by some significant extent?
I made the mistake of reading this article while eating...
Reply