

|
In a few days it will be 2008, well into the future. Movies promised us we'd be flying cars to our jobs at the robot factory. Instead, we have to settle for iPods, free online checking accounts and AIDS. Of course, the future wouldn't have been such a disappointment if Hollywood hadn't gotten our hopes so high. 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968)
Set In The Premise
The Predictions Innovative New Technology: There's a scene in 2001 in which a character is dozing in front of a flat-panel screen built into the seat in front of him--an impressively accurate prediction of JetBlue and other airlines with TVs in their seat back. Even more noteworthy is that he's watching programming that's obviously from the 1960s, eerily anticipating Nick at Nite. Widespread Space Travel: It's easy to chide Space Odyssey for its ambitious forecast of turn-of-the-century space travel, but keep in mind that the film was released in 1968, a full year before we faked the moon landing. Nobody could have guessed that the Soviet Union would forfeit the Space Race for fear of getting its dress dirty, and then finally collapse like a little girl. This deprived us the fruits of competition. Were the Soviets still tinkering around with satellites, we'd probably be colonizing Pluto instead of bitterly revoking its status as a planet. Overall Accuracy
Timecop (1994)
Set In 2004 The Premise The Predictions
Futuristic Cars: The cars in Timecop are able to navigate by themselves, with a voice activation system so advanced it can understand Jean-Claude Van Damme. Assuming the auto industry would whip up such advanced vehicles in 10 years is like making a movie today that is supposed to be set in 1985 and having everyone driving Model Ts. Overall Accuracy Death Race 2000 (1975)
Set In 2000 The Premise The Predictions
Prevalence of Idiotic Violent Death Racing: OK, so we'll give them NASCAR. The only difference is that in the Death Race points are accumulated by running over pedestrians, and the points vary based on the age and gender of the person killed, whereas NASCAR is completely fucking pointless. Overall Accuracy RoboCop (1987)
Set In
The Premise The Predictions
Privatization of Government: The crooked Omni megacorporation is contracted to oversee the police department, leading to large-scale corruption and the cruel manipulation of RoboCop. This is an astute anticipation of the present-day debates over private military contracts. Of course, Blackwater continues to maintain it never deployed cyborgs in Iraq, if you're naive enough to believe their official account. Detroit Even More of a Shithole: RoboCop shrewdly takes place in Detroit, the only city that actually turned out to have the dystopian future sci-fi movies have been predicting for years. The movie version of the city is so overrun with crime and poverty that the Omni corporation hatches a plan to simply replace it with "Delta City." In reality such a dramatic last resort was never undertaken. Instead, everybody just kind of gave up. Overall Accuracy
So, even though no specific year is given for its setting, no matter what year you assign it, everything's still going to be completely wrong. |
6 Star Wars Characters Too Retarded for Film
6 'Brilliant' Movie Scientists (Who Suck At Their Job)
6 Magical Movie Items They Wasted on Bullshit
6 Famous Characters You Didn't Know Were Shameless Rip Offs
@vaine....I rofled
Total Recall should be on there, but i don't remember what year it was set in. Also, why's everyone always gotta pick on Bush? He wasn't the smartest guy in the world, but i thought he was pretty cool, what with the economic boom unlike bigger than anything seen since the 70's that spanned a solid six years. Politics aside, great article
Not sure if this was pointed out, but as for Back to the Future II, the Sports Almanac did accurately predict the Miami Dolphins' win. Of course, they called them the Gators (since Miami didn't even have a team at this point)
Pretty cool coincidence.
This loses points for bashing Bush, but then gets them back for bashing Europe.
hey... im from detroit. how dare you call us a shithole.. only im aloud to say that. lol but all in all. true.
Overall Accuracy
Pretty pathetic. But, some secondhand credit must be given for the movie's sequel, Escape from L.A., which describes an outspoken "Christian militant" being elected president in 2000
George Bush was hardly a "Christian Militant", but hey, whatever makes you feel cool on the internet right?
Piss off
The guy who wrote this was obviously sort of a dick. Just brutally shitting on these movies everyone knows are crappy and old, but not adding any sarcasm or comedy to it. Just...dicking at them.
Also, I'm sure the "Surfing in Vietnam" was actually meant to be a reference to "Apocalypse Now!"
Also, it appears to me this article is somewhat ancient, just up on the front page randomly/linked to. Apparently, I wasn't the only one that wandered my way here.
@beatcamel
the reason 1984 does not make the list is because if the events depicted therein came to pass, we would never know it (and most of us would not care if we did).
@Penis_Lightning
I do not suppose the words "comedic" and "alliteration" ever meet in your mind?
what about Rollerball? or Running Man?
What about the 6th Day? I know some of the stuff was right-ish but considering that they expected things to change that drastically (self-driving cars, clones) in a short time is laughable. I mean this is the same crew that thought the XFL was gonna take off.
Prior to World War II, World War I was known as The Great War.
ROFLMAO!!!
skipster... man... wow that was f*****g awesome.
Clayheart you are a little b***h!
Hey cracked staff! You guys were wrong about one thing.
http://movies.yahoo.com/movie/1810028921/video/10133660
Hey clayhart, check this out.
It's pretty cool.
Dick.
http://www.cracked.com/article_16605_8-most-obnoxious-internet-commenters.html
wow clayheart you cant just read something to get a good laugh huh? you have to nit pick at it..its a f*****g comedy site! not cnn.com. and i thought the christian extremist comment was funny not innapropriate. ill buy you a package of tampons if it stopps the bleeding of your p***y
as for deathe race 2001 would GTA 3 qualify
Sorry but you guys are off base with Escape From New York. Remember it was 1980. No computer could scan an area and create a 3D rendering like that. They had to make it by building a model city in all black with green outlines then pan shoot it. Additionally, there were no gray camo designs, the army only ever used green up to that point. Pulse monitoring watchs can be bought at Wal-Mart, but were pure sci-fi in 80. Although we do not implant explosives in people we have developed nanobots to do a variety of other things. Beyond all of this, the movie featured terrorists hijacking a plane and flying it into a building in New York City (which is not "a tasteless allusion to Sept 11" since they made it 21 years before 9-11). And although crime has not risen 400%, the incarceration rate has risen to 1% of the total American population (which is huge) so the idea of a need for mass storage and limiting costs for operation of prisions is not far fetched. Finally the "Christian militant" comment is just inappropriate, and untrue (although I am no fan, nor ever was, of Bush Jr). Conclusion: Escape From New York featured many futuristic elements that have come true both before and after the 1997 target date.
i think were better off without most of this stuff.
shut up
6 Beloved TV Shows (That Traumatized Cast Members For Life)
5 Badass Movie Characters You Didn't Know Were Real People
The 5 Most Maddeningly Unresolved TV Plot Lines
7 Horrifying Moments from Classic Kids Movies
Curse of the Duck Hunt Dog
6 Types Of Youtube Videos There Are Waaay Too Many Of
@granny69
I just couldn't let that one go. I'm not going to bush bash, because it's just too easy at this point. But BILL CLINTON was president during the biggest economic boom in decades, and that economic boom began to peter out shortly after Bush took office. Not saying he was to blame, mind you, because the economy is way to big and complex for the president to directly effect it (for the most part). But get your f*****g facts straight.