The 8 Most Common Sci-Fi Visions of the Future (And Why They'll Never Happen)
The future promises to be so wonderous and terrifying that it will exceed even the furthest reaches of the human imagination. Though this is not saying much, as the human imagination has really only been able to think up eight possible futures:
Defining Features:
Forcibly proscribed social roles and classes; a creepy, overbearing "beloved leader" and equally creepy propaganda posters on every wall; an ultra-brutal police force; the repression of all written communication and creativity; a huge underclass of drone-like proles paralyzed with paranoid anxiety; a moratorium on rainbows, strawberry ice cream and butterfly kisses. Basically, it's the Cold War-era Soviet Union.
Origins:
George Orwell's 1984 laid the macabre groundwork for the Totalitarian State future vision, and while the actual year 1984 didn't pan out quite as he thought it would, you have to admit that Michael Jackson's hair catching on fire was pretty terrifying. Orwell also gets credit for creating newspeak, thereby giving nerds everywhere a new way to express their distaste for this week's double-plus, ungood episode of Heroes.
Aldous Huxley's Brave New World helped cement the Totalitarian State in the public's imagination. He added genetic modification and sanctioned drug use to the mix, at least one of which is a clear improvement over the present. Sylvester Stallone's 1995 brilliant masterwork Judge Dredd should also be mentioned, if only because it took the novel stance of making a member of the ultra-brutal police force its hero, while simultaneously stripping out the ironic undertones of the British comic on which it was based. Way to go, America!
See Also:
V for Vendetta, Brazil, Fahrenheit 451, The Handmaid's Tale, The Giver, Gattaca, Soylent Green.
Why It Will Never Happen:
Governments have been evolved and advanced to achieve stunning levels of incompetence that Orwell could hardly have imagined. Sure, we did wind up with wall monitors in our homes, but they display mostly porn and advertisements.
Besides, the entire reason the Orwellian future genre survives is because it scares the crap out of people. It's what gets the ACLU and Libertarians out of bed in the morning. Sure, the president would probably like to make himself Lord Protectorate and live in a giant crystal tower, but these days he would have to ask permission of several multinational corporations first.
Defining Features:
A complete obliteration of all littering and public nudity; food-mo-trons, laser showers and other assorted impossibly useful machines; miracle trains that require only one rail; happily hetero- and socio-normative nuclear family units; an all-powerful but inexplicably benevolent government; spandex clothing with no pockets whatsoever; robots that do all the work now performed by illegal immigrants; a dearth of illegal immigrants; a statistically perfect assortment of pure-bred ethnicities to distract from how staggeringly white everyone has become; flying cars.
Origins:
With its robot maid, its four-hour workdays and its unseen, but surely starving surface-world population, The Jetsons perfectly sums up the naïve, unbridled optimism we once showed for technology. It's hard to out optimism, a future vision that has us all living on mile-long poles, flying to disco dance clubs, taking field trips to the moon, and siring sons who routinely invent devices Stephen Hawking would lunge out of his chair to get his hands on. If only Mr. Spacely wasn't such a flaming asshole.
See Also:
Disneyland's House of the Future, Metropolis, Back to the Future II, Star Trek: The Next Generation (when they go to Earth), Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow, Demolition Man.
Why It Will Never Happen:
Utopian writers always seem to be working with a completely different species of humanity than exists now. Bug-free technology? Streets free of filth? It's less like a possible future and more like an alternate universe, a place where somehow 100 percent of both the politicians and citizens actually give a shit (a 97 percent increase over the rate).
Sure, we'd like a flying car. Until, that is, we imagine our drunken uncle, passed out behind the stick, hurtling toward some high-tension power lines at 300 miles an hour.
Defining Features:
A crime rate so high that if you're not currently being robbed, it's only because you're robbing someone else; a beseiged police force desperate to keep the scum under control; rampant drug use to escape the harsh reality of living in a genre stereotype; corrupt businessmen feeding off the suffering of the poor; living spaces that make New York studio apartments look like the Louvre; subtle signs of globalization's aftermath (i.e., lots of Asian food and possibly gigantic advertisements featuring Asian women).
Origins:
At the center of this particular vision of the future is the gruff, tough, futuristic-cigarette-equivalent-smoking badass. We're talking Kurt Russel, Bruce Willis, Harrison Ford, Sean Connery and Clive Owen. With movies like Blade Runner and Children of Men, the optimism of earlier eras had been replaced with a gruff cynicism and a genetic predisposition to cleft chins, a world where electric razor technology has devolved to the point that every shave leaves one-eigth inch of stubble behind.
See Also:
Twelve Monkeys, A Clockwork Orange, The Fifth Element, Robocop, Escape From New York, Total Recall, Outland, Snow Crash, Land of the Dead, Shadowrun.
Why it Will Never Happen:
The Gillette Fusion, through its innovative five-blade technology and aloe strip, guarantees a close, smooth, sexy shave every time. Gillette: the best a man can get! (Gillette executives: Please make all checks payable to Michael "The Danger Zone" Swaim).
Defining Features:
Aliens that look like reptiles or insects; aliens that look exactly like humans, but turn out to be reptiles or insects in disguise; slime, goo and/or sludge; an unstoppable powerful extraterrestrial force whose scientific knowledge and military strength surpasses ours thousands of times over; the human race succeeding through sheer pluck, moxie, or dumb luck; the aliens either having a single glaring weakness, soft spot or incredibly imbecilic understanding of their own fundamental biology; an important lesson about the resilience of the human spirit.
Origins:
H.G. Wells' War of the Worlds first brought violent alien invasion into the minds and nightmares of children around the world, along with the guarantee that any such aliens would have some incredibly stupid weakness. Despite crashing down on Earth with super-robo octopi that shot heat lasers and just generally wrecked all our shit, the poor bastards were eventually done in by the common cold.
Wells set the stage for future lame alien weaknesses like water in Signs and the screaming vacuum of space in Alien.
See Also:
Battlefield Earth, V, The Arrival, Ender's Game.
Why it Will Never Happen:
Because so far the only aliens technologically advanced enough to visit Earth seem primarily interested in abducting hicks and probing anuses. These poor creatures cross the vast emptiness of space only to crash their saucers in New Mexico and have no technology to avoid detection by farm folk with disposable cameras. The chances for a successful full-scale invasion do not appear to be strong.
Recommended For Your Pleasure
-
25 Common Items that Will Baffle Future Archeologists
908,369 views -
22 Ill-Advised First Drafts of Great Ad Campaigns
334,364 views -
The 10 Best Sci-Fi Films Never Made
1,317,404 views -
6 Sci-Fi Movie Conventions (That Need to Die)
1,015,203 views -
5 Kick-Ass Sci-Fi Apocalypses (That Could Actually Happen)
1,600,501 views
450 Comments



I dont think Ender's Game really qualifies for #5.
ReplyI am disappointed in this article. The "Why it never happens" part is badly written and lacks details and doesn't really answer, why it never happens.
Reply#1 is already here; the 1% is Just better at it than Orwell could imagine. Truth is stranger than fiction.
ReplyYou don't need posters when you have multimedia
Orwell was correct about interstellar travel and the 1% commands a fleet of faster than light capable starships?
#8: The reason it won't happen is because it's really already here. They went "sophisticated". They don't need to control your every actions in a totalitarian manner, they just have to wag the dog. Politicians, movie stars, heck the Federal Reserve already dictates a lot of what we think and do, just by not doing things that overtly get our hackles raised, and never really bothering to make sure that we're really that educated. This isn't about paranoia, this is about complete cynicism.
Reply#3 is plausible IMO. It seems the author never heard of the term "Artifical Intelligence".
ReplyWhy the crap couldn't the writer provide an explanation as to why #6 is impossible?
ReplyHe made a joke about how it will happen, but without stubble
As so many of these things are, your article was let down by egregious sexism, and American exceptionalism. However, congratulations on not making with the effing and blinding! The first ever non-profane cracked article...
ReplyW...what....? Sexism and American exceptionalism? Either this comment was meant for another article or you have literally no idea what those things mean.
Also, #3 is all but inevitable. Futurists actually talk about an event that they predict to happen this century (around 2050 I think) called the Singularity. When the Singularity happens, artificial intelligence will be capable improving it's own code without human intervention. When that occurs, AI will quickly explode in complexity and will dwarf our human pea-brains in terms of intelligence.
ReplyWhat happens after that will be anyone's guess... anything from Skynet to Asimov's vision (I, Robot ... not the movie). I could see the machines rising up, but more along the lines of individual rights, like desegregation and women's suffrage. I think the subconscious message behind "Robots will take over the world" stories is sort of like white guilt, where we quietly admit that we exploited an intelligent agent to do dirty work for us, because we are lazy. And someday, we'll get our comeuppance for it....
If you're referring to Vernor Vinge's 1993 article "The Coming Technological Singularity" you believe everything you read, and you're also misinformed. (He said himself "I'll be surprised if this event occurs before 2005 or after 2030.")
The article itself is nothing but speculation. Science-fiction writers themselves just invent s**t to make a plot move forward (see: every technology on Star Trek). William Gibson himself dislikes being called a "futurist" just because he coined the term "cyberspace."
He points out himself in his forward to Neuromancer that he didn't envision the rise of the cell phone.
So in summation, science fiction writers aren't prophets, they're just out to make a buck and tell a good story, like any writer.
I'm with mister_moon on this one. We have real world precedents for totalitarian "utopias." America is dependent on a real-world distopia for it's own prosperity, i.e. communist China.
ReplyWhere science fiction get's it wrong is that it takes for granted that totalitarian regimes come to power through shear force of power. In the real world, totalitarianism always comes with the offer of social trinkets, like free healthcare for everyone, or a living wage. Both the Nazis and Socialists appealed to workers rights. The Fascists made the trains run on time, for god's sake! It is always about setting aside individual freedoms for the sake of the whole. In fact, if you look at the writings of H.G. Wells and others sci-fi writers prior to WW2, collectivist utopias which were devoid of rights were seen as a good thing.
Government incompetence is certainly the reason why we don't want a totalitarian government, but is not the fatal flaw. The Soviet Union chugged along for decades after millions died under Stalin's Great Famine.
China is pretty bad, but I don't know if it is a dystopia...I think we should stop using that term so casually. A bad, repressive government, sure, but not a dystopia.
Well, scenario #1 is defiantly plausible and I can think of at least two very well known historical examples; Nazi Germany (supposedly right, Stalin's Soviet Union (supposedly left) and present day North Korea (supposedly ??). And there is no reason to suppose that huge multi-national corporations could not heavily influence national governments, and supra-national organisations, to maintain high profits at the expense of society in general...oh, wait, that happens already.
ReplyScenaria #2, in case anyone in the nice comfy western life has failed to spot, already exists in the vast shanty towns of Africa, Asia, and South America (and shamefully are conditions which a significant minority of US citizens also live in).
Regarding alien life, it is a statistical impossibility that humans are the only intelligent life in the universe and it is arrogantly
anthropocentric to imagine otherwise, which Michael Swaim seems to do.
The reasons why we have not be "visited", so far as we know, are a) if they are able to do so they are not interested in us; or far more likely b) that it really is impossible to travel faster than the speed of light which makes it, for practical purposes, prohibitive expensive (even if technically possible, by no means certain) to go on trips to the neighbours when your nearest ones might be 500 or 1,000 lightyears away and you don't have anything like an address or postcode to give you any idea of even what direction to set off in.
Contrary to popular belief, Naziism is "left wing," not "right wing," ideology. Nazi is the abbreviation for national socialism. National socialism, much like international socialism, is a heresy of Marxism. Also, the Nazi's were not popular to the general public. They were more like the Occupy Wall Street movement today, in that they were a minority which was well organized and very loud. The Nazi's are a testament to how an unpopular group can exploit the flaws of Democracy to crash the system.
You aren't bright, jdbobblehead. But you want very much to sound like you are.
The Fallout Series also tends to dabble in number 6 quite a lot. I know it's good gameplay to put in a band of raiders who suddenly want your hide for every half "in game" mile you travel, but it's also a bit much. There are advanced societies of tyranical douchebags in that game, which also leans towards number 8 (then again, without that, there would be no lead antagonist for you. You'd just be fighting small mobs of raiders every 5 minutes.)
ReplyI understand the premise behind the conflict, but there's huge flaw in that future of dickbrains. They're too organized for a group of people who will literally kill you BECAUSE they see you. There's, what, 5 people per group? How does a group like that survive longer than a couple of decades if they keep shooting at ANYONE who gets within a 5 mile radius of home base? Those people you just avoid them for a couple of years and then rest easy knowing they're either died out, or killed themselves.
It's so bad in that game that any good thing you do is repeatedly immortalized over the radio.
(The same is true for the bad s**t as well, but that's just proper game writing)
PS, before anyone gets me wrong, I still feel that Fallout is a fantastic game series...just...incredible inaccurate to real life. Then again it might not be trying to do that.
#2 brought the film "The Book of Eli" to mind immediately.
ReplyIf you are going to mention robot uprising - give credit to the first one, which introduced the word "robot" to the vocabulary. Karel Chapeks "RUR". It's all there - man creates robots, robots wipe out humanity.
ReplyIt's interesting that Brave New World is always listed as "totalitarian" or "dystopian", when it was designed to be neither. The whole object was to make people happy - even if it took genetic engineering, hypnotic messages and drugs. Boring and shallow maybe, but certainly not like 1984 with power hungry rulers making people suffer for the thrill of it. Even at the end of BNW a man who can't fit in is dragged off screaming to a place that will be a much better fit, with all the interesting people in it.
ReplyHe wasn't dragged off anywhere, he f*****g killed himself.
#2 who says the women would have a choice...
ReplyThe Jetsons actually looks the most plausible when you think about it. I mean, our time would have looked like the Jetsons to people living 400 years ago.
ReplyI had to look at the year. This article was written in 2007, which is before our descent into techno-nazi hell became so evident that even house pets are starting to get it.
ReplyI"m mildly confused about the pathetic alien weakness in Ender's Game. If I remember correctly, Ender annihilated a planet to wipe them out. Taking the planet with you is weak?
ReplyHoly s**t I had to watch Metropolis in Year 12 art... a Depression-era film that predicted Lady Gaga!
ReplyI feel like you didn't even come close to reading the whole original Dune Series. If you're just referring to the television/movie series, I forgive you, because movies always bastardize great books.
ReplyWhy would anyone hate themselves so much as to read the entire original Dune series?