6 Hugely Popular Books That Accidentally Screwed The World
Even if you're not a famous writer or politician or brilliant scientist, you probably dream of doing something to change the world. Even if it's just a small thing, like being the guy to single-handedly catch bin Laden and throw him from a helicopter into the rotors of another helicopter.
But be careful what you wish for; as numerous authors have found out, sometimes your "world-changing" work doesn't necessarily change things for the better. Like...

It's the book that made the entire planet collectively shit their pants, go swimming, and then shit their pants all over again once the movie came out.

Seriously, what was Peter Benchley's problem with our unsoiled pants?
Together, the Benchley-Spielberg tag team established Robert Shaw as a badass, Richard Dreyfuss as Richard Dreyfuss, the Jaws theme as the last thing you hear before you die, and the fact that the great white shark proves Mother Nature only wants to murder us.
The Ugly Aftermath:
You'd think the world's oceans would be safer now that books and movies like Jaws have inspired countless angry fishermen to kill sharks 'round the clock. Well, they are. In fact, things are now so safe that one-third of the world's sharks are facing extinction, thanks in part to a little phenomenon called "The 'Jaws' effect."

Pictured: The "Jaws" effect.
Once it became clear that sharks were suddenly and rapidly going the way of the dodo, Peter Benchley dedicated the remainder of his life to promoting awareness that sharks aren't as bad as he claimed: "We knew so little back then, and have learned so much since, that I couldn't possibly write the same story today."

Sharks have since been added to the endangered species list, thanks in part to what Benchley described as "popular ignorance about sharks." You know, like the idea that they'll kill you if you don't blow them up with an oxygen tank first.

The novel:
Despite coming out fresh on the heels of Jaws, Marathon Man and Star Wars, Dr. Robin Cook's 1977 medical thriller Coma gave Americans something else to sweat over besides sharks, Nazi dentists and the Dark Side of the Force.

It was a terrifying time to be alive.
The plot was simple enough: What really goes on behind that scary door in the hospital? While today it is Dr. House deliberately clogging the handicapped toilet, in Dr. Cook's book it was a bunch of white-collar organ thievery, thanks to carbon monoxide-induced comas.
This "hospitals just want your organs so they can sell them" tale was on The New York Times' best-seller list, was voted No. 1 thriller of the year and was adapted to film in 1978 by none other than the same Michael Crichton, M.D., who brought both dinosaurs and Jeff Goldblum's career back to life.

Why Michael Crichton never made it with a family practice.
The Ugly Aftermath:
Sure enough, both the book and the movie were monumental successes in that they scared the collective shit out of the general public. Not that people stormed their local hospitals and demanded to see the organ-stealing room -- no, the effect was much more subtle: "If hospitals are looking to cash in on my organs, then I just won't agree to donate them!"

"If I don't get to use my organs, no one does."
And thus, organ donation took a nosedive by as much as 60 percent, which prompted The New York Times to sweat Dr. Cook's balls on the matter. In the aptly titled piece "Did Coma Cause It?" the newspaper eventually concluded that "coincidentally or not, the decline began about the time the movie was released," which we gather is The New York Times' way of saying, "Oh, HELL yes."

Published in 1849, this treatise was the signature piece of an influential French zoologist that spawned a worldwide craze for acclimatization. What is acclimatization? Well, back then, the awesome-sounding idea of deliberately introducing foreign plants and animals throughout the planet.

"Needs more zebra."
For instance, say you notice an ecosystem doesn't have any spiders and thus has no natural predators for spiders, and none of the other species there have evolved to live with spiders or to avoid being eaten by them. You would then dump a bunch of spiders there.

You can never have enough deadly, deadly spiders!
Really, it's impossible to imagine anything going wrong with that.
The Ugly Aftermath:
As demonstrated by the near-death experience Australia went through due to the introduction of the rabbit, the introduction of invasive species into foreign environments is one of the biggest dick moves a person can do to an ecosystem. Unfortunately, some people figured that out only after this book kicked off the acclimatization fad.
For instance, the American Acclimatization Society's introduction of European starlings in New York City alone led to the continent-wide decimation of native birds such as swallows, bluebirds and wood ducks. The population of European starlings eventually exploded to 200 million, causing crop damage and disrupting air traffic. Today the starling disaster is known as a "cautionary tale." Mainly because "starlingocalypse" is too difficult to say out loud.

The worms have been trying to warn us for years.








Dr. Spock is that son of a b***h that made people spanking kids was a bad idea and thus made entire generations of s**t heads!
ReplyLeonard Nimoy should have round house kicked that f****r in the teeth for nothing less than shits and giggles!
That is...illogically logical.
THAT'S what the Satanic Verses is about?? Man, that book sounds like it really sucks! LOL
ReplyGo ahead, thumb me down if it'll make you feel better...
who couldn't agree!? i think it sounds more like a waste of time!
A romance free place for meeting over 40 mature singles.
ReplyView more sexy and thoughtful mature people photo galleries
and videos there. I have met many rich and thoughtful single
friends there. ----- seniorloving.c~o&m ------- I also uploaded my hot photos on there. U can add me there(Rose10423 is my username).asftuyrt6
seniorloving? Wow, they really ran out of ideas, I thought asian wife finder was the last draw.
Though the Jaws reaction did prompt some shark killings, more shark killings seem to be over shark fin soup. There is a huge black market for it and these people get the sharks, slice off their fins and then toss the back in the water to bleed to death. The article was great but as someone else pointed out, the reason Dr. Spock was saying to not lay a baby on its back was because of vomiting issues.
ReplyMe gusta Pink Floyd reference in #1.
ReplyMy mom never put me and my sister on our backs to sleep when we were babies, and we're still here today.
Replycongratulations
Dr. Spock had a reason for telling people to put babies to sleep on their bellies. It was to prevent them from inhaling regurgitant, if they puked in their sleep, or right after waking up. Newborns puke a lot, and if they have fallen asleep nursing (breast or bottle), they sometimes haven't been burped. When they wake up and start moving, they burp, and often spit up. If they inhale, they can aspirate stomach acid, and that is a really bad thing.
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesParents who have babies with esophageal reflex problems and regularly vomit in their sleep are usually told to put the baby to sleep on its side, sometimes with a positioner, or on its stomach, and then during the months when the baby is at highest risk for SIDS, it is hooked up to a monitor that monitors either its actual breathing, or its pulse/oxygen levels. The monitor makes a noise that is designed to arouse the baby, and also alert the parent. SIDS is rare enough that those particular babies are at greater risk for pulmonary problems
And that goes back to Spock. Writing when treating babies with lung infection was almost a no-win situation, and aspiration of vomit during sleep could be serious, he wasn't giving bad advice, all other things being equal.
All other things weren't equal, but he didn't know that. People talked about "crib death," a baby just dying sometimes, but infant mortality was much higher, because this was before vaccines for measles, mumps, rubella, chicken pox, and the pertussis vaccine wasn't universally given. Because SIDS accounted for a smaller percentage of infant deaths, it didn't stand out as being associated with any specific parenting practice. You know, all the SIDS babies may have slept on their bellies, but so did all the babies who died of measles, and there were probably 25 measles deaths for every SIDS death, so it just wouldn't occur to anyone to say "Let's have babies sleep on their backs."
Another note on Spock: if you read the book, you'll see he advocated pretty much almost everything people already did at the time. He said spanking was OK, but not beating a child with belts or switches, for example. There were a lot of fad parenting books in the 1950s, and Spock was an authority giving people permission to do what they already were doing. At a time when people were raising kids far away from their own parents, and long distance calls weren't cheap, it was a good thing. And then, there was information that people needed a source for before Google, like that a normal temperature was 98.6.
Yeah, you're not supposed to sleep on your back when you're wasted either for the same reason. Don't wanna choke and die in a pool of your own vomit.
On the other hand, I can't believe that he didn't think of positional asphyxia, which from what I understand is a hell of a lot easier when you're on your stomach.
'The machine makes a noise designed to arouse the baby and alert the parent.' Wow... A machine that's alerts the parent to an aroused baby. Thats... new.
Why aren't the Bible and Quran on this list?
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesAren't you edgy.
Because the title says "accidentally."
Because the Torah preceded them both and would therefore be the book that screwed the world. Do you know what happens to people nowadays if they say something that could even slightly be misconstrued as anti-semitic?
Twilight taught a entire generation of women that stalking and abuse was 'romantic.' Now it seems that you can't go out on a successful date without a girl asking you to come in and watch her sleep for a few hours, waiting for her to wake up so you can have sex. And then they expect you to deal with every little problem that comes up in their lives using your vast wealth and superpowers, only to dump you once you realize you don't sparkle.
Reply Hide All See All 7 RepliesI miss the days when girls tried to be more like Hermione Granger. A good, intelligent woman willing to stand up for what she believes in.
You really need to cancel your Netflix subscription and get some fresh air. Sheesh.
"Now it seems that you can't go out on a successful date without a girl asking you to come in and watch her sleep for a few hours"
...you are actually getting girls who say this to you?
Twilight wasnt the first book to teach bad habits to women, the earliest one I know is beauty and the beast where bell constantly makes excuses for the beasts extremely violent and half homicidal rants, but there must be more.
so... it's not okay for Twilight to say "women should behave a certain way," but it's okay to be all pseudo-nostalgic about "the days" when women were supposed to behave some other way? What you're doing is called, um, benevolent sexism--you're still saying that women ought to behave in some particular way just because that's what you prefer, which is creepy and controlling, but you think it's okay because you want them to behave in a way that you consider more acceptable. Yeah, no .
ps. When were "these days" where women were allowed or encouraged to be independent and intelligent? I'm an old fart (and a woman, and a smart stubborn asshole) and I sure as hell don't remember ever living in a culture where that was the rule rather than the exception. Sup, misogyny.
Quincy, I for one thought that was hilarious, and am sorry that at least 6 people didn't get the joke.
Sigh.. Quincy was making a joke, and ruckumbine, you are an idiotic misandrist. Look it up, you probably don't know what means.
what your saying definatly makes sense, why can't people just stop complicating things and respect the oppossite gender for making efforts to be strong!?
To be fair to Dr. Spock, SIDS is not a really well understood issue. It's not like he said don't lay a kids on their back and science showed this was wrong and people just shouldn't listen to him. The "lay your child this way, not this way" debate was pretty ongoing for a while because doctors couldn't agree on the best way to do it in order to prevent SIDS.
ReplyLie them on something that is on the hard side so if they do roll over they dont sink into the softness.
Wait until I tell you how many bestsellers I've accidentally screwed.
ReplyThis was possibly the most readable article I've ever seen on Cracked. Each #'d item on the list had just the "readable" amount of information. You wrote enough information on the topic without 5 extra paragraphs reiterating the same information over and over. These kind of articles definitely would lead me to far less tl;dr feelings.
ReplyThe biggest threat to sharks is shark fin soup. Seriously.
Reply#4 should have been #1 because it literally has screwed the world more than any of the others. We can find solace in the fantasy that Saint-Hilaire is firmly wedged on the middle tine of Satan's pitchfork. And that starlings come every day and peck his junk off.
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesI hate starlings. One dive bombed me in the shower.
Can't you just shoot them and eat them? We had a stray cat epidemic a few years ago...
I hate starlings. To think I could have grown up with orioles, bluebirds, and swallows instead...
#3 Yes it's the book's fault that millions of people are f*****g dickheads who think it's okay to commit murder in the name of their f*****g fairly tales. Same s**t Christians were doing centuries ago, but no one seems to mind.
Reply Hide All See All 7 RepliesAah, your one of the "Religion screwed the world" guys, well without Religion, the world would not be advanced enough to screw, and statically, most people in Religions are less violent and better citizens.
@mr263414
LOLWAT? :D
Prisons are full of religious people. History is full of scientist who were murdered by religious zealots. Are you high?
This is not the time or the place to debate which religion (Or lack therof) has commited the most crimes against humanity. In fact, the question doesn't really matter. Shove off.
"History is full of scientist who were murdered by religious zealots."
This really could only be said by someone who has only the barest understanding of religion OR history. History is full of scientists whose research was sponsored BY THE CHURCH. Who were, themselves, deeply religious men. This church vs. science idea was made up in the last century or two and applied retroactively (and incorrectly) to the extremely complex history that preceded it.
mr263414: Your first point is arguably true. Your second is demonstrably false.
I used to think religion was the problem, but now I know the problem is extremism, of any stripe.
^ Yes. Yes. Yees. YEEEESSSS.
This Dr. Spock is simply not logical
Reply"What does Spock need with a doctorate/medical degree?!"
Is Dr. Spock not the same guy who popularized some kind of 'non-stressing' way of bringing up children, what resulted in crowds of teenagers totally depressed, and HIS OWN SON COMMITTING SUICIDE?
ReplyI've also read about an Emmett Holt Sr., who wrote a best-selling book which advised NOT TOUCHING BABIES (or touching them as rarely as possible) and therefore caused lots of infant deaths. Isn't that true? You could check it up.
So Dr. Spock invented grunge?
I know it's from wikipedia but "Contrary to a popular rumor, Spock's son did not commit suicide.[18] Spock had two children: Michael and John. Michael was formerly the director of the Boston Children's Museum and since retired from the museum profession. John is the owner of a construction firm. However, Spock's grandson Peter did commit suicide on December 25, 1983 at the age of 22 by jumping from the roof of the Boston Children's Museum.[19] He had long suffered from schizophrenia.[20]"
Also, how could you possibly know what did or did not cause someone you have never met to commit suicide?
Dude, leave Mr.Rushdie alone. Ever since he wrote that book he has been hunted lie a wild animal. I mean, when I was registering at my college he was giving a lecture and the whole campus was on lockdown.Mr.Rusdie desrves evey Westerners support. Also, theres something interesting about the introduction of new species. It is a sure sign that illegal immigration is evil. If mongosses illegaly brought to Hawaii threatened the existance of the Hawian Goose imagine what 200 billion illegal serfs from South America will do to the state of California.
Reply Hide All See All 7 RepliesI was completely on your side until that last, clearly racist, part.
@astachura:You know that in South America, the population doesn't even reach one billion people, how 200 billion will get there?
And your final line of thought looks like the one of the Neonazis of the state of São Paulo, here in Brazil.
Big difference: What affects an ecosystem is the introduction of NEW species. Humans, regardless of race, are ONE same species, you idiot. Basically same habits, not more or less destructive than any other American's.
Most of the "illegal serfs" come from Mexico, not South America.
200 billion South Americans moving to California? What?
Right about poor Mr. Rushdie, wrong about everything else.
I hope you did not take any science biology courses at your college or they owe you your money back. "Invasive species" and "people of a different race" are not the same thing. You do know those awful dark people from the Africa-place are human, right?
LEAVE Rushdie alone.
ReplyI agree that Rushdie should not be blamed for the consequences of the publication of the book. However, I think that this article minimizes the potential insult to serious Muslims. Those who "actually read the book" would not find simply a mistranslation. but the following suggestion:
Muhammad had to contend with a wide diversity of religious competition. In order to make a monotheistic religion catch on, he made a compromise with 3 most popular alternative faiths, legitimizing their goddesses in the "Satanic verses" which were suggested to him by Satan. Only after realizing that his new faith would need to be tough and consistent about its exclusiveness of deities did Muhammad eliminate these three verses - seemingly as a strategic maneuver. Muhammad later turns into a tyrant, repressing art and culture and executing all dissenters.
So the criticisms went a little deeper than a simple object to the title.
Really, I think number 4 should be number one. I mean seriously. Killer bees.
ReplyThe items aren't numbered in any particular order from what I've been told(unless its photoplasty) but I think both are equal.
On one hand you have brining in invasive species such as the killer bees, bullfrogs/rabbits in Australia, raccoons in Germany and Japan, snakehead fish in the US (thank you China, can't wait to give you something in return) etc etc destroying the eco systems and possible destroying infrastructure causing lord knows how much in damages.
On the other hand, around 50,000 dead babies, 100,000 grieving parents plus family members and friends and lord knows how much more if somebody hadn't put 2 and 2 together.