5 Useful Organizations You Think Are Evil (Thanks to Movies)
If there's one thing that Hollywood is crazy good at, besides explosions and anorexia, it's making sure the audience has an easy time of separating the good guys from the bad guys. No villain, no drama. No drama, no cocaine for the producers.
Unfortunately, Hollywood does such a good job that we forget that in real life, some organizations are, well, kind of the good guys. Consider ...

As Seen In: One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest, Girl Interrupted, House on Haunted Hill, Shutter Island, Nightmare on Elm Street, Batman Begins, 12 Monkeys
What Hollywood Thinks They Do:
Good luck if you're a mentally unstable character in a Hollywood movie, because you're in for a rough patch. You're either going to be held against your will and tortured by malevolent nurses with electroshock, or your asylum is straight haunted. Either way, your mental wellness is no one's priority.

Also, finding cigarettes can be a bitch.
In One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest, an un-crazy Jack Nicholson is committed to an insane asylum to serve out the rest of a prison sentence. He thinks he's going to get a cushy rehab before flitting back out into the real world, but he finds the place is even more oppressive and humiliating than an actual prison. Thanks to the brain-numbing drugs and daily humiliations distributed by Nurse Ratched, the patients end up crazier (or deader) than they were when they first arrived. Jack winds up with a chunk of brain cut out against his will.
But even that isn't as bad as the asylums in horror movies. Or the one in Batman Begins, where a crazy administrator gives patients hallucinogens that induce nothing but bad trips. Or the one in House on Haunted Hill, which was once the home of a diabolical doctor who performed Mengelesque experiments on his patients. Or Shutter Island, where we won't actually tell you what happens, but just know an insane asylum is involved and it is terrible.

Do not watch this movie on drugs unless you've got a mean hankering for PTSD.
The rest? All haunted.
What They Actually Did:
There's no question that back in the old days, there was some brutal treatment of the mentally ill in these facilities. But you also have to stop and ask: If there were no such thing as asylums, what's the alternative? What happens to the people too mentally ill to care for themselves?

They make tens of millions of dollars?
We know the answer, because about 80 percent of all the asylums in the country were closed down between 1955 and 1985, which left about 400,000 patients without care. The answer is sleeping on the park bench of every city you go to: We now call these people "the homeless." This is why about 40 percent of the homeless are people with mental illnesses.
The backlash against asylums started in the 1960s, when the government A) realized it was expensive to run group homes, and B) the world found out about a hellhole called Willowbrook. Staten Island's Willowbrook was an institution for mentally retarded children, and we're not going to lie to you, it was bad. Way bad. Robert Kennedy called the place a "snake pit," and it would have actually been better had it been filled with snakes.

"Dr. Jonesss, when would you say you started to fear commitment?"
Geraldo Rivera did an expose that showed patients rocking themselves on the floor, naked and surrounded by their own poop and pee. Naturally, the whole country freaked out that our most vulnerable children were being treated this way, especially after we found out that doctors intentionally gave the kids hepatitis to study its effects. So, yeah, Willowbrook was really bad.

Not quite Geraldo Rivera bad, but still pretty awful.
So, the good news was that a really evil place was shut down. The bad news was that people kind of got the impression that all asylums were as bad as Willowbrook, and they had no problem shutting down other group homes as well. The other bad news was that it turned out most families weren't all that interested in a lifetime of caring for their mentally ill, and those former patients usually ended up on the streets, which led to the huge spike in homelessness that Comic Relief has been talking about for decades.
But hey, at least the streets aren't haunted.

As Seen In: Sons of Anarchy, Rat Race, The Terminator, Mad Max, The Wild One, Fletch Lives, Weird Science
What Hollywood Thinks They Do:
If you're in a movie and you see a motorcycle gang, run! Because you don't want to be around for all the rape and murder that will inevitably get under way. Like on the series Sons of Anarchy, which features a gang of bikers who sell illegal guns and run a protection racket. Not only do they beat up, shoot and kill people every other week, they also fight with rival biker gangs over territory, as if the whole country is just one big mess of outlaw biker hooligans or something.

Above: Voting.
We're so used to seeing biker gangs as the bad guys that we take the whole cliche for granted. Of course the villains of Mad Max are barbarians on motorcycles. Of course a lady biker gang runs a family off the road over a minor misunderstanding in 2001's Rat Race. In the movie world, stuff like that is how bikers get their kicks.
What They Actually Do:
There is such a thing as outlaw biker gangs, just as there is such a thing as outlaws who like to drive souped-up cars. The federal government claims that about 20,000 bikers are members of "outlaw motorcycle gangs," which usually means they use their clubs to traffic drugs. Sure, it sounds like a big number, but considering that the largest group of registered bikers (the American Motorcyclist Association) claims 25 million members, that'd give you less than one outlaw biker in a thousand. Which means that the 999 others are more likely to be regular guys who just have a thing for leather and love the feel of the wind in their mullets.

"I actually drive a Rascal. But I still pack a MAC-10."
So what do groups like the AMA do if they're not raping and pillaging? They raise millions of dollars for charity every year. Here's a list of their main functions:
1. Providing insurance benefits to members
2. Organizing rallies and educating riders on driver safety
3. Donating close to $8 million a year to charity
We suppose it's just not as exciting to portray motorcycle clubs as they really are -- composed almost entirely of regular guys who like motorcycles and want to hang out with other guys who like motorcycles. But that's all it is; they have rallies where people show off their bikes and ... well, that's about it. That and the charity.

"Y'all best donate to Amnesty International, 'fore I skin your face with a tire chain."

As Seen In: Lady and the Tramp, Hotel for Dogs, The Shaggy D.A., Fluke, All Dogs Go to Heaven
What Hollywood Thinks They Do:
In the world of movies, the pound is basically a jail for dogs, only every animal is on death row and being someone's bitch isn't such a bad thing. In the kids movie Hotel for Dogs, not only is the pound built like an actual prison, with an iron fence and guards, but the people who work there seem to hate animals with a passion. Halfway through the movie, dozens of dogs are sent to the pound, at which point the pound workers brag about euthanizing them the next day. No waiting period, no trying to get them adopted, no remorse.
So maybe it's less like a prison and more like a freaking concentration camp.
What They Actually Do:
First of all, the pound actually gives you a place to look for your dog if it gets away, so you don't have to wander the streets like a hobo canine detective. In fact, 30 percent of dogs that are brought into shelters end up getting reclaimed by their owners. Of the leftovers, half get adopted by people who aren't out to kill animals at all.
Obviously there is a limited capacity to care for the animals, and eventually they have to be put down (though most states have no-kill animal shelters now, which are shelters that will never put down the animals they take care of, no matter how long it takes for them to get adopted).

"I've been here since the Nixon administration!"
We realize that in a movie starring, say, talking dogs, it makes sense from the screenwriter's perspective to make the dog catcher and the pound the villain -- a whole lot of dogs do go there to die. But what makes the portrayals in these movies so grossly unfair is that these facilities are run by the people who love animals the hardest. They're not exactly high-profit operations, and who else is going to take a job at a place where they get paid next to nothing to clean up dog poop?
It would be like a homophobe applying for a job as a roadie on the traveling production of La Cage Aux Folles. It just doesn't happen.









Right. When insurance companies refuse to cover needed treatment because the patient forgot to mention when they signed up that they had gotten acne medication decades before (and it's totally unrelated to their current cancer problem), that's just basic fiscal responsibility. No one should complain about that.
Replythere is no paradox why people hate the police, they are meant to protect and serve but 95% of their job is harassing people who have no bad intentions whatsoever.
ReplySorry they're not mind readers who know you have no bad intentions. If you're doing something they consider suspicious, its their job to check it out.
I call bullshit on #5. Anyone who says a mental institution is a place of healing or well-being of any kind is either using it as a proxy to attack Scientologists (and really, f**k Scientologists, since the anti-psychiatry movement would really rather you not bogart our evil-fighting for your Xenu sales pitches)...or at the very least has never been in one.
Reply Hide All See All 5 RepliesI can't watch "One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest". Ask the girl who thought that would be a nice movie to watch on the couch together one night with me...and ended up cradling me in her arms as I had a flashback that would make the most PTSD-addled Vietnam veteran go "dude, easy there, you'll be OK man..."
Tough break dude. But if youve been in a hospital why in gods name would you watch that movie.
I'm guessing there was no second date?
Having admittedly been put in a mental institution before, your objectivity and credibility come into question.
I've been in one too... it was actually pretty nice and I'm a lot better for having gone there.
During what time period were you in? I believe there is a very significant difference between the very recent mental institutions (very recent as in the last 20 years or so) and the state the hospitals were in before that.
I'm fairly sure that most facilities were every bit deserving of the eerie reputation for most of history. But I should hope that the situation is a lot better now. Then again, I really don't know.
Wait you mean pharmacutical companies aren't megolitch nightmares run by Cthulhu worshiper personally planny my own destruction? I'm shocked and appauled.
ReplyThis article is all kinds of fail. Talk about over-simplifying matters! I'll speak on the issue of which I am most familiar - the animal shelter system.
ReplyYes, most states have SOME no-kill shelters, but the vast majority of animals end up in open shelters, which have no choice but to euthanize due to our massive pet over-population problem. The reality is that 5 to 7 million animals enter shelters each year, and of that 60% of dogs and 70% of cats are euthanized.
Much like "insane asylums" (I don't know if you're aware, but that's an archaic and offensive term...) conditions at animal shelters range from heartwarming to horrendous. I've worked in both open and no-kill shelters. I volunteered at a high-volume, high-kill humane society, and I have quite a few horror stories to tell. Did you know that strays, by law, generally have to be kept at least 4 days, to give an owner time to find and reclaim them? That means that when the shelter is full, and someone comes to surrender their unwanted pet, their pet gets the needle immediately, no matter the condition or adoptability, because they don't have to wait to see if someone shows up for them: they're confirmed as unwanted. It's not that the staff is callous; it's just the reality of the numbers. During "kitten season" (generally the spring and summer) so many mother cats and kittens are arriving at shelters that entire healthy litters, kittens too young to be adopted out, get euthanized for lack of anywhere to put them while they grow. I've also witnessed an entire cage bank of 60 cats be euthanized because one turned out to have a highly contagious disease called panleukopenia. They'd all been exposed, and there's not enough room to keep animals around for quarantine to see who might ACTUALLY be sick when you've got 30 cats coming in a day (not an exaggeration.) This generally happened at least once a year at the shelter, and often multiple times.
Unfortunately, when people have to make these kinds of decisions, they have to start shutting down how they think and feel about the animals. Their behavior CAN become callous. If you spent every day forced to pull healthy, frightened, and abandoned animals from their cages to be killed, you'd be psychologically and emotionally crushed if you didn't distance yourself. Unfortunately, compassion can also gets distanced. I've seen some pretty bad things, things that make the movie illusions look positively pleasant.
As someone who makes a career of caring for animals, and who has spent years advocating for homeless animals, I desperately want people to know the reality in the majority of shelters around the US. It's not okay for your pets to be carelessly breeding, and walking through that shelter door with your unwanted pet has serious and sad ramifications. Most no-kill shelters have waiting lists of people trying to get animals in, so even if your pet is lucky enough to gain admittance, it means another animal didn't. It's not pretty out there, and if the general public continues to wear their rose colored glasses when looking at the situation, we won't reach the critical mass necessary to change things for the better, for good.
If only all pet owners knew how their irresponsibility could end...
Humans in general suck.
ReplyWell at least half the ones I know suck on purpose on a daily basis.
Which harms the other half.
And most of them work for someone.
So you think the world is full of people who are blatantly incapable of differentiating fictitious people and events in films with those from real life?
ReplyHave you blatantly ignored the fact that they are reffering to one (fictional) organisation in particular and not collectively to each and all organisation that falls under each catagory?
Have you just sucked an entire bunch of everyday facts to throw at a bunch of people who you have presumed are so moronic as to assume all these things are evil because the bullshit that Hollywood spews somehow conviced them?
Honestly one of the biggest waste of time articles out there, reading this doesn't only make us look more stupid, but actually genuinly makes us become more stupid.
Nice try.
Tremendous anecdote, fraternal one.
This article was brought to you by Pfizer and All State and has been approved for public consumption.
ReplyUmbrella's reason for making the T-Virus(and all variations) was to use them as weapons.
ReplySo, no, they didn't have a good reason.
The last time I saw a movie where a fast food chain was the bad guys was Good Burger. Duh...
ReplyYou do realize that came out before many a Cracked reader was born.
So did Star Wars.
When I was young, I used to get mad at almost every company that did not help me in a satisfactory matter. Then I got a job working retail. Now, whenever I get pissed off at a company, I take a second to realize that at the end of the day, they're just regular people like me, trying to do their job to make the day go by until they can crash on the couch again. I guess not everyone's a saint, but not everyone's a sinner either.
ReplyBut don't insurance companies invest their money they take from you so they CAN pay you out? Bad market means highger raters and less payouts.. they do bad because of fiscal mis-management and pass it onto the consumer... maaaaan
ReplyInsurance companies don't TAKE your money. You pay them money for a policy, and then they use that money. That you gave them. Voluntarily. After you (supposedly) researched multiple companies and policies to find the best one to fit your budget and needs.
Uh...Apple_Pie, aren't you overlooking that 1) if it's health insurance, you DON'T give them money "voluntarily," but as a question of life and death (i.e., by force, since we don't have the option of a taxpayer-funded universal health care system, even though most Americans polled want that), and 2) that all insurance companies function under the same dysfunctional impetus toward placating shareholders, at the expense of the people they arbitrarily yank from coverage?
Insurance /companies/ may not be evil, but the insurance system sure as hell is.
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesAgreed--although European and other universal health-care systems must make certain trade-offs, there remain the facts that (and I think this article really understates this) insurance companies routinely sentence, like, a LOT of Americans to death (and far more than social democracies' health-care plans ever do), and that 1/6 of Americans are uninsured, against something like 6/6 of those other countries' citizens being covered.
This can only suggest that we should cut out the middlemen, relegate the insurance industry to insuring property, and have taxpayer-funded universal healthcare, with the same controls as the most successful countries that practice it, instead of the disastrous suck of both public and private money that our current system in America is.
Fact: Canadian citizens do not receive cancer treatment after the age of 70.
Enjoy your trade-offs.
Trigaba, if that's actually a fact, please show me. I see a lot of these "facts" thrown around with no basis at all.
It's not just Hollywood... When i was a little kid my older sister would always taunt me, "If you're not good you'll be sent to boarding school and the dog will go to the pound!" I don't know which terrified me more.
Replydepends... if its a boarding school full of catholic priests id be more scared of the boarding school.
I am glad the author mentioned motorcycle gangs. While I am not a member of one (never even ridden a bike on my own lol), I have a lot of respect for most of them. We all know the Westboro Baptist Church, running their scam on America by angering people with rampant racism, homophobia, anti-American sentiment, etc. As you also probably know, they picket funerals of any military people who died in service. On one such incident, the whole Westboro fleet was heading to picket a young man's funeral who died in Afghanistan. Who did the family contact for support? A biker gang of course!
ReplyThe gang supported the family completely non-violently by waving huge American flags to block off the Westboro picketers from sight, and sang to drown out any yelling they were doing at the family. For hours. And for no charge. That is quite a long-shot from the meth and gun-toting thugs Hollywood portrays them as.
Man, that makes me grin.
Biker gangs are awesome. I've heard alot about them doing fund raising for charity and community service well before this article. I remember a story where the guys dressed up in santa suits with a bunch of gifts, and rode their bikes to an orphanage.
It seems so unexpected: these mean looking, heavily tatooed, bearded dudes don't seem like the type to do something like that. But they do it all the time. Don't judge a book by its cover, I guess.
Sergeant, that might have been the Hells angels. They do a lot of charity work along with drug pushing, racketeering, etc...
Trying to make US-style health insurance look good just makes you seem ignorant. You guys pay way more for health care than countries (like mine) with universal/single payer-systems, and you get less.
ReplyThe cost health insurance companies charge in the US is less a function of them being evil, and more a symptom of healthcare law. Doctors charge massive amounts for care in the US because our laws are extremely pro-patient in malpractice cases, thus making every doctor pay huge insurance costs. Insurance is a highly competitive industry here. If the insurance companies were making a gigantic margin, they could lower their charges, and would get many more clients (mostly large group company clients) to completely offset those losses in profits by stealing away competitor's clients. Don't be fooled by the fact that these companies post huge earnings. They are big companies, and make tons of money by handling massive amounts of accounts, not by having a 1500% mark-up. The whole health care system is screwed up in the US.
@jackolantern, this overlooks the fact that a couple of decades ago, health insurance companies regularly committed some 95% of their revenues to patient care, whereas now, we've had to make it mandatory (through the Affordable Care Act) to get it back up to 80 to 85%. The rest goes to "administrative costs" (i.e., to the employees and shareholders of the insurance companies). If there were such tight margins that their hands are so tied, then there wouldn't have been that change, over the last couple of decades, to siphoning such a percentage away from patient care and to shareholder returns, executive bonuses, and wages.
(Google "health insurance companies 95% revenues to patient care" to find articles citing these facts)
My mom's got COPD. You've probably seen some inhaler commercials for treating it. She was prescribed one of them, and got a free sample. It worked incredibly well; she went from often needing a shopping cart to lean on to get through a supermarket because she couldn't catch her breath, to being able to take lengthy walks.
ReplyWhen it came time to fill the prescription, though, Mom found out it was very expensive, well into triple digits for a month's supply, and there was no generic. She applied for a reduced price, and found out it was too expensive, too.
So, she filled out some paperwork, sent in her tax return and another copy of her prescription, and now the company that makes it sends it to her directly and automatically whenever she needs it... for free.
Pure evil, I tell you!
Yes, it is important to note here, whatever else is debated, that the pharmaceutical companies do have several programs that give medicine at low cost or for free, when patients can't afford it.
Though admittedly not as serious (though some of my peers would deny it, saying this could kill you) I'm hoping that there's a similar program for Suboxone. I take it to avoid falling back into my heroin addiction and it's been a life saver. It allowed me to get clean, start healthy habits, make amends, and just get past my addiction in general while admittedly still being addicted. Suboxone, if you don't know, is an incredibly powerful opiate (buprenorphine) with a an opiate blocker (naltrexone or naloxone, I think) that keeps you from getting high on it. The buprenorphine sets on so slowly that you don't get the rush that addicts seek and the blocker blocks everything but the buprenorphine. It's a wonderful drug but if the affordable health care act is struck down I'll lose my insurance and have to pay out of pocket. It's 300$+. If I can't afford it I may do some heroin for a week, then use this blood pressure medicine that takes away withdrawals but doesn't actually stop the cravings or anything. I imagine the blood pressure med doesn't work on Suboxone because buprenorphine is such a long lasting drug and so powerful that the withdrawals last for a month or two and are far worse than heroin withdrawals. At this point I don't wanna lose my subs on anyone else's terms. I need to seen off at my own pace
The point of the pharmaceutical companies is a very good one. They are very likely an overall force for good, although I think the evil companies seen in movies and tv programmes are a good example of what pharmaceutical companies COULD be, at their worst excesses, if left to there own devices, in a purely capitalistic economy. No they don't care about you, and fair enough, they have no obligation to, but that doesn't mean it's a mistake to be aware of what could be.
ReplyP.S. This is one of the best articles I've read on Cracked for a while. You're not so much "sticking it to the man" as sticking it to the type of idiots who say "stick it to the man".
The pharmaceutical cartels are actually very evil. They develop poisons that kill people and purposely make them sick so they need to buy even more of their poisons. And the FDA is nothing but a corrupt agency that allows poisons to enter the market after the cartels pay them enough to get it approved.
ReplyAh, Scientology, that's what this comment reminds me of.
Yes we must return to the good old days before pharmaceutical companies... when the wise village apothecary cured every malady with magic herbs and leaches. It was a happier time, when people lived far longer than today and disease and deprivation were unknown. Damn you big pharma!!!!
One of the worst things about insurance, I pay for it when I don't need it and the pay out the ass when I do need it. Oh and the WORST thing about insurance is pre-existing conditions. Hopefully you don't need to use insurance if you don't have because you're not going to get it. That's why I need/want insurance because you HAVE a condition. Lame!
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesAsking a new insurance carrier to pay for your "pre-existing condition" is FRAUD. Everyone knows that you can't wait until you crash your car and THEN try to sign up for car insurance. And yet when people try to do it with health insurance, they suddenly think the insurance company is evil for not wanting to pay.
Um, EtTuCarl, that MIGHT be because you can decide not to drive a car, and hence can decide never to have an incident for which you'll NEED auto insurance, if you can't afford insurance. Whereas with health insurance, people who CAN afford premiums for health insurance CANNOT decide miraculously not to have a human body anymore, or to have a magically healthy one, and therefore cannot decide not to need health insurance.
(Oh, but I suppose they can just wing it and pay through the nose for all their treatments without health insurance, right? Google Kent Snyder, the campaign strategist for Ron Paul who died leaving $400,000 worth of medical bills unpaid, to see how well that worked out for his family.)
Yeah Carl, that analogy only works if people sign up to be born. Our parents bring us into the world, we don't consciously decide to be born whereas we do decide to get a car and drive. We could just bike everywhere instead.
It's only fraud to sign up for healthcare insurance with a pre existing condition if you don't tell them! It's extortion for them to charge higher rates for these people, although those people will use it more, obviously, so it's right that they're charged more. It's just really s****y that the insurers can get away with it because the peoPle with pre existing conditions need it to live. Very complicated, morally and economically. To call it fraud and be done shows a startling lack of morality, empathy, humanity in general! To say that they shouldn't charge extra though shows a lack of understanding of how insurance works
The affordable care act is a good idea (idk how it'll be practically) because if everyone has to get health insurance, then the extra premiums will be enough to cover for those with pre existing conditions. I hope we get to see how it works