7 Terrible Life Lessons Learned from 'The Neverending Story'
It's hard to find someone who hasn't seen 1984's The NeverEnding Story at least once, if only on cable. It's one of those movies like The Shawshank Redemption that didn't seem like a big deal at the time, but now is as much a part of our childhoods as playing with Legos or shooting people because we knew the courts couldn't prosecute minors.
That's why it's a little disturbing when we look back on that movie with adult eyes and see some of the fucked up lessons we were unknowingly being taught. Lessons like ...

The movie starts off with Bastian, an elementary school boy in the "real world," being robbed by three bullies. When they find out that he has no money, they throw him into a dumpster, and when he climbs out, they continue chasing him, presumably to slit his throat and bathe themselves in his sacrificial blood (again, 1980s bullies were hardcore). Bastian gives them the slip by ducking into a book store, where he finds an old man who scolds him for being a child.

"I did 14 years with good behavior because of teases like you."
Bastian is curious about a book that the old man is reading, and he tells him the book is not for him because it's "special." So when the guy gets a phone call and leaves the book unattended, the little bastard nabs the book and jets out the front door. But it's OK because he leaves a note.

So, right off, the questionable morals of this movie start to come into focus. Our hero is never punished for this act (there would be no adventure without it). Remember, that old man didn't run a library. He owns a book store. And judging by the fact that there are no customers, we're guessing that he's not making that great of a living to begin with, so every sale counts. And that's aside from the fact that he was halfway through reading it when this little pecker pulled a smash-n-grab.

"Oh, no. Go ahead. I was only 200 pages in, anyway."
Apparently this takes place in the same universe as role playing games, where if an item is needed to advance your quest, you take that shit.

So the thieving little asshole goes to school and breaks into the attic, skipping all of his classes to read this book. Keep in mind that even back in the archaic age of the 1980s, schools still took attendance. And when one of the kids was absent, if they didn't hear from the parents, they'd call to make sure their child was actually at home and hadn't been kidnapped.
Before he realizes it, school is over, but instead of packing up his shit and finishing the book in his room at home, he goes back upstairs, lights some candles and continues where he left off. He reads well into the middle of the night, never once calling his father to let him know where he's at and that he's OK.
At this point, it's a given that the police have been notified, and some poor officer is practicing several speeches to find the most delicate, sympathetic way to break the news that the search party they assembled to find his lost child is now the "recover the raped and murdered body" party. Not only has this kid induced a town-wide panic, but they would be searching for his body in a thunderstorm powerful enough to break the locks on windows.

That book had better have some hardcore fucking in it.
He will suffer absolutely no negative consequences for this. Remember kids, you are all that matters. The rest of the world can go fuck itself.

At this point the film shifts to the fantasy world, where Atreyu (the main character of the book that Bastian is reading) is summoned to the Ivory Tower because he's the only one who can find a cure for the Empress's illness, thus saving their world from total annihilation. The illness itself is never revealed, but based on that description, we're assuming she has chlamydia.

"And on your way back, could you pick us up some beer?"
Then the guy who asks him to go on the quest tells him, "No one can give you any advice except this: You must go alone. You must leave all your weapons behind. It will be very dangerous."
Wait, what? Why does he have to leave his weapons? How would that affect his quest at all besides making it harder? If he takes them along anyway, will the quest fail? He does have that option, right? Because the guy just told him it was "advice" and not a rule. And advice can be taken or ignored at the person's discretion.
Regardless, Atreyu drops his shit on the floor and accepts, blindly obeying the judgment of this stranger. The quest-giver hands him a pimp medallion and sends him on his way.

"I'm tired of these motherfuckin' snakes on this motherfuckin' chain!"
With no food, no water and no weapons, he rides "aimlessly for weeks," as the narrator tells us. So evidently, he gets to take along no information as well. Yep, just blindly trust the stranger.
But that lesson seems downright sage when compared to...

Here's where the moral of this movie goes from "the writers probably didn't think it through" to "intentionally ruining a generation just for the hell of it."
Atreyu winds up in the Swamp of Sadness where "everyone knew that whoever let the sadness overtake him would sink into the swamp." So that's a rule. Unfortunately, that's what happens to his horse -- Atreyu's only friend -- right off the bat. We guess this is supposed to teach kids not to let sadness and depression consume you? Is that something eight-year-olds have a problem with?
Anyway, we'll let them slide on that one. So, his horse is dead ...

"In a way, I'm actually kind of glad you died. I could have used you as a weapon, and that's not allowed."
... and he eventually succumbs to the sadness of the swamp.

The mud symbolizes alcoholism, little Timmy.
But fortunately, he's picked out of the swamp by a Luck Dragon -- a giant, white, flying, talking dog with pearly scales all over its back. He lies unconscious for a few days, and when he wakes up, the dragon explains to him that they've flown to safety and traveled the 10 thousand miles to the Southern Oracle, which just moments ago seemed impossible and hopeless for Atreyu. When he asks how all of this happened, the dragon responds, "With luck!" He then goes on to say, "Never give up, and good luck will find you."

Sooner or later, that thing is going to have to take an enormous crap.
Later, they find that they have to reach an "Earth child" outside the borders of Fantasia, but neither of them know where that is. The Luck Dragon tells him, "Don't worry. We'll reach the boundaries of Fantasia." Surprised, Atreyu asks, "You know where they are?" He then reinforces this horrible lesson with, "I have no idea." "Then how do we find a human child?" "With LUCK!"
That's right, kids. You can achieve any goal in life if you just blindly venture out and wait for it to come to you. You just have to keep on traveling aimlessly, with no goal in mind and no plan for the future at all. Just don't give up doing that, and good luck will serve you your dreams on a silver platter. And if that fails to happen, don't get sad or else the world will kill your best friend.
Again, all of this was done on the advice of an adult stranger, which brings us to...








Personally, TNS has ALWAYS been my favorite book, and I can't remember a time when I hadn't seen the movie- which I still love despite its cheesy 80's weirdness. This article just about sums up all the strangeness, though, so props to you!
ReplyAnd yet, all I could think while reading this was, "Well, the book IS from Germany." lol
ReplySO TRUE!! Nearly all of this!! SO VERY TRUE!!! And I'm one of the biggest TNS fans EVER!!
(The book really does explain things in more detail so they make more sense. I won't give away details, but let's just say the sphinxes do something very distinctly different, and it plays out WAY differently, that Falkor never ever leaves Fantastica (which is what it's called in the book), and that the movie really only covers the first half of the book....sort of. And no, the sequals don't accurately portray the rest. At all.)
Actually, the moral of the story was that if you don't read books, your imagination (represented by Fantasia) will die. Most of the things on this list aren't so terrible, and not things that a kid even bothers to think about. The thing about Atreyu not being able to have weapons, and then the one about the statues, I was always kind of WTF at those two things when I watched the movie as a kid. Then again, I did recognize that it was a fantasy movie, and things don't have to make sense in order to be an epic and superb story.
ReplyA friend of mine and I decided that if they had replaced Sarah Jessica Parker with Falkor, the luck dragon, no one would ever notice. In fact, it might make the movie more bearable.
ReplyI meant, replace her from Sex and the City. Don't put Sarah Jessica Parker in Neverending story as the luck dragon (though, again, the resemblance is uncanny)
In the book, Atreyu was blue.
ReplyActually, he was green (his people are sometimes called 'Greenskins'). And he had purple hair. I'm kinda glad they left that out....
You must admit it would have beaten Avatar by more than two decades...
Some of this makes more sense if you remember the beginning of the film: Bastian's mother is dead, his father is so depressed he's kind of neglecting the boy (this is put the way a child might see it - something like "he's missing her and has enough with his own problems") - and Bastian is showing some typical signs of being depressed as well. I remember thinking that both the Swamp of sorrows and the whole "everything is swallowed by dark horrible nothing-ness" thing was the result of a deeply unhappy child's not entirely successful escape into a fantasy world. Yeah, I was a weird kid; I read books on child psychology when I was 9 ;)
ReplyIn all seriousness, I never thought of that before...but it makes a lot of sense. Both with the book and the movie. Very keen observation!
In the book, if I recall correctly, he didn't even leave a note. Just straight up stole that shit.
ReplyI read the book! If you think the movie is screwy and teaches ambiguous lessons about life that appear questionable on the face of it, the German novel it's based on is as loopy as trying to draw moral lessons from String Theory. Atreyu is corrupted by power. The luck dragon is killed. The imaginary world is *not* saved and completely falls apart. The princess gets together with two other Powers That Be (one is the Omniscient Narrator) and concoct a plan to regenerate the universe by breaking all the rules. I've forgotten most of the other half-baked plot twists and pointless sub-texts, but you get the idea.
ReplyThoe book in not intended to shove you any lesson; is explicitly against that, Bastian himself says that books that try to preach you are boring and horrible (and damm if he is right). Get your own conclusions, don´t let a book, any book, get ´em for you.
But success DOES mean exacting revenge on your enemies. That's the most important lesson of them all and the whole point for class reunions.
ReplyWhen I was a kid, Atreyu was the coolest mother f****r on the planet. Now that I'm grown he's just another punk ass kid.
ReplyDammit all, time really does jade you.
Wait....what?! Cheese used to be entertaining?? *astounded*
ReplyThese dumb motherfuckas don't know the Luck Dragon is named FalKor
Replyand this nerd m**********r does..
i think the point still stands
I shouldn't be laughing at this.... I shouldn't be laughing at this...I'll end up in that city where monkeys rule and humans can't speak....
ReplyOr in a self-arranging house with a plant for a mother-figure..
Atreyu should have been allowed to take a sword. It is dangerous to go alone.
ReplyHe had a weapon. AURYN.
It's the Necronomicon isn't it...
ReplyGuh...
Reply Hide All See All 5 RepliesLike many great movies "Inspired by" great childhood works of literature this is proudly among "Writer went nuts on director/producer, sued them, hasn't seen a dime in 20 years from it..." conversion catasrophes.
Haven't read the original source, but itself it seems to be more of an experiment in storytelling, including breaches into other types of media, like different colored ink, etc. So of course Hollywood just chewed it up and vomited out a story kinda like it.
Now, generally some stories simply HAVE to be "Adapted" or they won't work. IMO, Watchmen or "V for Vendetta" might have worked 100% if they were 12 - 1 hour episodes, but as a single movie... And cramping all that story there was a sacrifice, like the "Dolls" scene from V...
Some things, though. Uh, anyone ever look at the recent comics of Peter Beagle's "The Last Unicorn"? Though that itself is a fantastic memory of a movie it's also one he had a tiff with the producers on what was changed. Looking at the comics, some things I do wonder why they didn't include. Like Schmendrick's real potential as revealed by the evil king's wizard...
And the list goes on and on, such as Jean Aul versus her "Clan of the Cave bear" movie.
The exception, btw, are the two "Gor" movies!!!
Really, they were like 2% Gor according to Prof Norman. But he LOVED them. Simply put, he realized as others like Andrew Vachss would point out later; "Many, many more people see a dumb B movie than read almost any book these days..." So instead of going into a "how DARE you, I sue!" mode he worked with the theatres for the movie contract. While in RL the Political Correct New World Order engine was destroying his literary career, the studios at least kept their contracts. Reportedly they were actually offered a shadow figure "Settlement" where they'd all get paid and the movie would be destroyed... But they produced the movie, even as wild as they had to adapt everything.... And he still gets checks and it's helped get many people into his books from it...
Hey, Cracked, you do challenge people to "You say you can write better? Submit it!" - any chance you'd print an article about John Norman's Gor stuff, that was for it / for Prof Norman's philosophy versus merciless and mocking worse than a griefer on a fursuit website as I anticipate your regular writers would treat it?
Holy wall of text, batman!
I HAVE read the actual never ending story and granted it was more than 10 years ago but basically the cracked article got the main points right. These bullshit lessons are often found in movies and books, including this series. :-)
wait... "The Last Unicorn" was based off a comic? I must find it!
EllieIB, The Last Unicorn is a book by Beagle. Sounds as if the progression has been book, movie, comic book.
SuperRanch: The main point of the book (at least the second half) was Bastian's struggle to grow from a selfish person to a much more empathetic one; he realizes he wants to help his father. It's more about how we all have faults we have to overcome in order to become the person we want to be than anything else.
Now that I know that they're named after the ultimate pedo-bait who also happens to be an idiot with a batman compex, Atreyu don't seem that awesome anymore. Also I'm gonna see how well that whole note thing goes down at the local charity store (it seems to work best on people who happen to be dirt poor).
ReplyAre there really people seriously getting upset that Cheese is ripping apart a decades old kids' movie? That is both sad and hilarious. PROTIP: If you can't handle somebody taking the piss out of something you love, perhaps it really isn't that great in the first place. Also, Neverending Story wasn't that great of a movie if memory serves me correctly. I saw it as a preteen and thought it was merely good, but not great. I'm not sure what I'd think of it now, seeing as it's been more than 20 years since I last saw it.
Reply Hide All See All 3 RepliesI remember first seeing it when I was eleven, and was all, "Sweet! Boobs!"
Because many people never read the BOOK. It's a commentary on Communism.
I saw it when I was about six, and fell in love with it. :) (I also saw it when it first came out, so that's a huge impression there too.) I loved all those fantasy-like shows of the '80s!
Granted, compared to what we have now they aren't that great by a long shot, but still...they fired up my imagination, and I still love 'em to death. :)
The book is actualy very similar to the movie. It just doesn't take place in America. Or the 80's
ReplyNot really. They left the best parts out. But anyhow, in my mind, the movie and the book are two separate entities.
Not really. The book is just...gah, no words for it! So very much BETTER than the movie. :D
I loved this movie. And I loved this article. Hilarious. Come on people lighten up. He's critiquing the movie, not the book, and in terms of the movie, it does offer a fairly accurate portrayal of the adventures of an incredibly irresponsible and self-centered child.
ReplyHeh. Same here! Love the movie, love the book...love and agree with the article. :D I think Michael Ende was actually pretty angry about how they treated the story; rumor is he HATED it! Said it was way too Hollywood, basically.